Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
View attachment 6110017
Barnes claims that Josh and Kiwi Farms wants to dox the kids because the dude who leaked the documents didn't censor their names properly. Also, he still continues to claim that we are a sick group of people.
It's kinda rich of someone actively defending child abuse to so often insinuate other people have harmful motives towards children, like it's some kind of projection. A 9 year old tested positive for use of cocaine and Barnes is actively trying to minimize that while claiming everyone else like Josh and LegalMindset are the ones harming kids. It's all very suspect.
 
Untitled-3.png

Sloppy PS, original attached if you can make it nicer
 

Attachments

  • 1718974671608.png
    1718974671608.png
    899 KB · Views: 10
View attachment 6110017
Barnes claims that Josh and Kiwi Farms wants to dox the kids because the dude who leaked the documents didn't censor their names properly. Also, he still continues to claim that we are a sick group of people.
the kids have been "doxxed" for a long time we just don't talk about them out of respect for children. I'm a sick puppy I've never formed a qover and neglected my children

It says CPS must do a "relative search" within 30 days and report to the court the results within 90 days.

This seems like a long time (30 - 90 days) to keep the kids in foster care if extended family is ready and able to take them in.
this has been discussed in the other thread but there are reasons they don't automatically place them with family like the risk that the family will just let them have contact with the neglectful abusive parents etc
 
this has been discussed in the other thread but there are reasons they don't automatically place them with family like the risk that the family will just let them have contact with the neglectful abusive parents etc
I guess what I'm asking is why is there a built in time delay? What's the difference between giving the same extended family relative custody after 14 days, 30 days, or 90 days?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I guess what I'm asking is why is there a built in time delay? What's the difference between giving the same extended family relative custody after 14 days, 30 days, or 90 days?
Suppose it gives them time to check the mood of the family and also to make sure that extended family are suitable in the first place. Most fucked up parents are two people from fucked up backgrounds themselves, Rackets is an oddity in that regard
 
I guess what I'm asking is why is there a built in time delay? What's the difference between giving the same extended family relative custody after 14 days, 30 days, or 90 days?
I imagine it's a process they probably have to do interviews, home inspections, make sure the paperwork is all in order for them being registered fosters, the fosters probably have to be drug tested also. I have no experience with CPS so I could be totally wrong. It does say that 30-90 days is the longest possible amount of time that CPS has to make their recommendations though so I assume that it can be done faster than that
 
Barnes claims that Josh and Kiwi Farms wants to dox the kids because the dude who leaked the documents didn't censor their names properly. Also, he still continues to claim that we are a sick group of people.
Barnes has the look of a PDF file. Barnes is projecting.
Is it possible to learn this faggotry?
Not from a kiwi.
 
CHIPS case information is publicly available at a public access terminal at a court. Anyone could have looked it up and, if the actual document was there, snapped photos of the screen
The fact those are publicly accessible is a fucking travesty. What's the logic behind allow it?
 
Barnes is projecting.
Near the end of his segment he started dabbling in walking back some of his observations; real subtle though.

I would not be surprised if Nick continues his speed run and the government claims are further substantiated he's going to either stop commenting on the matter entirely or shortly after issuing a, "well folks, cocaine is a helluva drug"-esque statement.
 
Less youtube cut and taxes how much is that? $700? Which will be going to TWO of his THREE sets of lawyers to come up with a strategy to deal with the damage he did to his criminal and CPS cases to mitigate the damage he did on stream because he can't keep his mouth shut. That's not a net win friend.
He doesn't need to pay taxes, he's got Barnes on his side. It worked for Wesley Snipes, r-right Balldobros?
"HA HA! Wouldn't it be funny if I put the tip of my dick in your ass bra?"
"Only the tip I swear."
"HA HA! Oops I came in your ass bra! Isn't that funny?"
"Now let's kiss"
"Bitches leave!"
If you think about it, Aaron was the perfect guy to keep secrets about Nick's homosexuality. Aaron's so caught up in his own masculinity that he's not going to say how he and Nick touched balldos or whatever sick filth they got up to. The only thing more embarassing then being cucked by Nick Rekieta is having sex with Nick Rekieta.
View attachment 6110017
Barnes claims that Josh and Kiwi Farms wants to dox the kids because the dude who leaked the documents didn't censor their names properly. Also, he still continues to claim that we are a sick group of people.
>defends Jack Murphy
>defends Nick Rekieta
>doubles down on defending Nick Rekieta
>failed skeevy Hollywood celebrity lawyer

I can only imagine the sort of disgusting interests Barnes has.
 
Back