Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 61 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 139 38.6%

  • Total voters
    360
I wonder if family can't or won't take the kids. This seems like an obnoxiously long time to find a family placement
One of the things we don't have a clear read on is where Bob and Celeste are in all this.

You would think a grandparent wouldn't be happy their grandchild was exposed to all this crap, and tested positive for Cocaine, but it wouldn't be the first time rich parents fought like hell to keep their dipshit kid from facing any consequences for their actions.

Without more, I am not sure a family placement would be a good idea. A licensed foster family, otherwise uninvolved in any of this, might be the best thing.
 
The only difference between Balldo and Keffals is fake farts and felonies.
Queen Ke-FFals never LARPed as a conservative man with conservative values who married a woman and had 5 children.

He proudly displays his degeneracy and he loves every minute of it, so much so, that he gets off on "pink pilling" little boys to be just like him.

That's the most disgusting thing about it, the hubris and hypocrisy of Nick Rekieta. Preaching conservative values to others during the day, and then doing the exact opposite during the night, like a snake. He is so dishonest and prideful, he thinks he is God's fucking gift to mankind.

It just sets something off in me, and I firmly believe that the sin of pride and arrogance currupts the most out of man, second only to lust.

Nick Rekieta arrogantly thought "I can handle my coke, I am not like the plebians and the lower class who get addicted to it, it could NEVER happen to ME, I know when to stop! I can stop anytime!"
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know more about this? Would extended family members have to file a motion if they wanted custody? Is it even possible to get the children placed with extended family right now?
Screenshot_20240620-171321.png
Screenshot_20240620-171459.png
Screenshot_20240621-104542.png
The above are excerpts from a Minnesota DHS training manual. I have made a post in the leak thread, but I will relay the information I have found here. I have spent the last couple of days doing extensive research on this topic.

There are two phases of foster placement, there is "initial placement," which constitutes the immediate, emergent removal of the children and their placement in a safe environment. The second is "permanent placement," which does not mean that the children are permanently removed from the home, or custody of the children by the parents is permanently revoked, but that the children are permanently placed with a household until the completion of the case. The period between these two events is called "permanency planning" or "the move to permanency."

What your document is referring to is the legal requirement that KCHHS to do an extensive search, notification, and assessment of all relatives of the children. This is a legal requirement even if the children have been initially placed with family.

Minnesota DHS internal policy is very clear, that even for the purposes of initial placement, family members with preexisting relationships be considered before anyone else. More importantly, the licensing requirements do not apply to initial placement, and DHS will actively assist any family member willing to be a permanent foster for kinship placement purposes in the licensing process, and will also assist in the application process for any local, state, and federal aid programs.

Edit: to be clear, it is an almost certainty that the children have always been in the care of a close relative, and will continue to be in the care of close relatives for the full duration of the case.
 
One of the things we don't have a clear read on is where Bob and Celeste are in all this.

You would think a grandparent wouldn't be happy their grandchild was exposed to all this crap, and tested positive for Cocaine, but it wouldn't be the first time rich parents fought like hell to keep their dipshit kid from facing any consequences for their actions.

Without more, I am not sure a family placement would be a good idea. A licensed foster family, otherwise uninvolved in any of this, might be the best thing.
I'm sure Nick would be showing up at a relative's house all coked up and acting like paranoid faggot to see his kids. Nobody wants that in their lives. Yes, it's chickenshit to not want you grandkids but he's been a dumb faggot for 42 years running and it burnt people out
 
I wonder if family can't or won't take the kids. This seems like an obnoxiously long time to find a family placement
Unfortunately, the indications from the released document are that they may be with Nick's parents.

Nick's dad testified at the hearing, despite the fact that he was not named in the list of people present at the hearing, and the only people listed as present but not named were the foster parents. They also own a home near Spicer which would otherwise be empty.

I am not convinced that they wouldn't be much better off in foster care.

Everything that Nick and Aaron have said suggest that while Kayla's family worked to get Kayla and the kids out of the drug den, Nick's parents have been enablers of him and his degeneracy.

In addition, Nick's manipulation tactics were probably trained on Kayla and his parents, and the reason he tries to pull the shower call shit with everyone is because these tactics work on them.

This piece of shit is already trying to rewrite history. Barnes back then: "Kiwi Farmers want to publish the bodycam footage with the kids in it". Barnes now: "I just wanted to warn the Kiwi Farmers about the publishing of the bodycam footage".
Hair follicle test results revealed that Rekieta's eight-year-old daughter was given coke. Barnes would rather keep the fact that Rekieta's eight-year-old daughter was given coke secret.
 
Last edited:
Without more, I am not sure a family placement would be a good idea. A licensed foster family, otherwise uninvolved in any of this, might be the best thing.
Kayla's family might be a better choice. At least her sister intervened.
I'm sure Nick would be showing up at a relative's house all coked up and acting like paranoid faggot to see his kids.
And then they'd either call the authorities and have him hauled off to jail or they'd lose custody themselves. That's the real issue, is can either side of the family be trusted not to allow Balldo or Kayla access either surreptitiously or by being dishrags.
 
A
I'm sure Nick would be showing up at a relative's house all coked up and acting like paranoid faggot to see his kids.
At this stage, would there not be legal ramifications if he and/or Kayla were to try to see his children in person, or engineer a scenario that would allow them to see their children? Without government supervision, of course.
 
The simplest explanation is that he's become paranoid from his coke habit and a retard from alcoholism on top of already being a lying narcissist from birth. That's the easiest way to understand his irrational gubberment rants.
It's quite possible that Nick sees the writing on the wall for his audience and realizes that the only people he has a chance of keeping on his side are the ultra-conservative anti-government types. Just a thought. He might not be totally delusional, he may be doing it on purpose to try to win those people over since he doesn't have a chance of winning anyone else to his side.
All these reasons seem likely. I also think Nick always needs to feel like he is in a superior position, so he's climbing on his high horse of Oppressed Freedom Fighter battling The Thumb of Government. The only time he seemed remotely comfortable on his last stream was after he assumed that identity and started preaching about how brave he was to not "grovel" before government. That restored his sense of ego and moral superiority.
 
It's quite possible that Nick sees the writing on the wall for his audience and realizes that the only people he has a chance of keeping on his side are the ultra-conservative anti-government types. Just a thought. He might not be totally delusional, he may be doing it on purpose to try to win those people over since he doesn't have a chance of winning anyone else to his side.
Ultra Conservative anti-government types generally don't like people who turn their 8 year old daughters into cocaine users.
 
Everything that Nick and Aaron have said suggest that while Kayla's family worked to get Kayla and the kids out of the drug den, Nick's parents have been enablers of him and his degeneracy.
That is my concern, yes.

Celeste's parents seemed like very decent people, but I haven't seen much evidence to suggest any of their moral values transferred to her and Bob. Indeed, I have my suspicions Nick wasn't raised right, and has never had to experience serious consequences for anything until now. He certainly acts like a man who never has.

Hair follicle test results revealed that Rekieta's eight-year-old daughter was given coke. Barnes would rather keep the fact that Rekieta's eight-year-old daughter was given coke secret.
Let's be honest here: Barnes is doing this because he sees $$$. He wants Nick to be his Vic Mignogna (ironic, no?). As funny as it is to call Barnes crazy, he likely doesn't believe most of the shit he's saying, but he's hoping others do. And sadly, some people do.

Ever wonder why lawyers are often reviled, and the butt of many cruel jokes? Look at Barnes. It's the disingenuous arguments that do it.

@waffle, @TherapyMan, @AnOminous, @Sheryl Nome, @prolapsed_cranium, and others here should all by typing "S" at him. Barnes is why your profession is hated. He's the ambulance chasing fuckwit most average Americans think of when they think of lawyers (rightly or wrongly). He drags the profession into the mud and then pees on it.

 
Celeste's parents seemed like very decent people, but I haven't seen much evidence to suggest any of their moral values transferred to her and Bob. Indeed, I have my suspicions Nick wasn't raised right, and has never had to experience serious consequences for anything until now. He certainly acts like a man who never has.
Bob and Celeste raised an unrepentant narcissist. A likely scenario is that one of them is also a narcissist and the other an enabler. I reiterate my hope that they do not have custody of Nick's children.
 
Fun fact, cocaine is not addictive. Heroine is addictive, alcohol is addictive, but cocaine doesn’t work like that. You could quit cold turkey from one day to the next and be 100% fine. The only “addiction“ quality is entirely mental, it is personal desire and will that makes them keep using. In that instance, when you have five children in a drug den and are doing lines during church service, the question is moral and not medical.

What you mean rather than "addiction" are substances which have a difficult physical withdrawal process associated with them. All "addiction" is entirely mental.
 
@waffle, @TherapyMan, @AnOminous, @Sheryl Nome, @prolapsed_cranium, and others here should all by typing "S" at him. Barnes is why your profession is hated. He's the ambulance chasing fuckwit most average Americans think of when they think of lawyers (rightly or wrongly). He drags the profession into the mud and then pees on it.
I think everyone who's a lawyer has been pretty much universally condemnatory on Barnes. I haven't seen anyone speak well of him since he had an ego-maniac blowout over getting fired by Kenosha Kyle. Most ambulance chasing shysters have the decency to oversell and under deliver on civil cases only, Barnes does is on criminal cases. He literally makes his living off of playing with people's lives by pumping up people's tires with delusional hope on criminal matters and then charging them huge money to basically ensure they get sent to prison. He basally seems like the criminal version of Randaza. That's why he gets fired all the time and can't get along with other lawyers, everyone who works with him figures out he's totally in it for him self and doesn't care what happens to the client.
 
Back