The walkable city breaks down the moment alcohol is introduced and you expect people to be fine with living across the street from bars and waking up to step in vomit and shit the moment they open the door. As much as we want to believe everyone can be responsible they just can't and the quality of life takes a serious downturn when you have to always hear yelling and music that comes with bars (no Jason, it's not just cars that are loud).
The other thing that Jason forgets is the difference between nightclub districts and neighborhood bars. The former is usually clustered in certain areas and attract distinct crowds (ages, wealth level, race), but those typically aren't where people live. This is the type of things /r/fuckcars wants to participate in.
A neighborhood bar (often attached to a restaurant) usually has less issues, but that's not the sort of thing these people want, and despite fantasizing about some sort of
Cheers-style neighborhood bar the reality is something closer to the equivalent of a suburban hotel bar. They'll serve you a drink but don't expect to have an enjoyable time. This, of course, is because drinking isn't the point--it's to have fun with friends, maybe hook up with some floozie, etc.
It's another combination of half-baked fantasy and deceptive bullshit.
two things I'm working my way through Paris: City of Dreams, about the reconstruction of Paris during Haussmann and will be posting my review by this weekend and two here's a fun think piece on why the survivorship bias argument is bullshit with modern buildings being uglier than new ones:
https://worksinprogress.co/issue/against-the-survival-of-the-prettiest/
Edit: Really read all of that guys works they are very well argued.
I've actually never thought of it that way. Having mostly lived in areas where pre-1930 buildings are extremely rare, it's less "beautiful buildings" and more just what survives and what doesn't because demolition or otherwise happens for a bunch of reasons:
- In the way of a highway (contrary to the /r/fuckcars belief, what usually gets chopped for highway widenings are almost exclusively commercial, usually restaurants, gas stations, and the occasional small office building)
- Burns down and nothing replaces it
- Gets torn down for a better use of the land
- Abandoned too long and gets demolished, either by force (enacted through "dangerous building" ordinances) or just because it's another liability to pay taxes on
- Build quality and climate affects (for housing)
- Structural integrity reasons
- Bad reputation (major crime, notorious nuisance business, etc.)