Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
That wording is going to make most people think child abuse and PPP knows it.

My guess is that if (and that's a huge if) they have a bomb to drop, it'll either be something done to the Nanny or April messing with the oldest boy -- which would be child abuse obviously. Maybe animal abuse/neglect. I'm not holding my breath for a huge nuke to be dropped by them though.
See, that was someone else's thought that I happen to agree to be the likelier thing (april messing with the boys) but you just made me realize what Nick's defense will be.

Nick wasn't at the house...but the dog is. That damn pug is the drug dealer!
 
I've been trying to think what could be worse that doesn't involve CSA.
What if CPS saw something on a later visit (so not on the first report)?

Like a bullet hole in one of the kid's walls?
What if one of the kids was doing something shitty to another one? Even if just like physical abuse. And the "adults" were so fucked they didn't stop it. The way PPP was talking about it.. "If it's true everyone in that household.." almost seems to indicate some sort of shared guilt amongst the adults as if they didn't put a stop to something they should have. I dunno.. I hate this whole situation at this point. It's gone so far into completely fucked territory I hope the big reveal just turns out to be nothing.
 
Unless one of the kids strapped another to the St Andrew's cross and whipped them, that scenario just sounds like a "boys will be boys" or sisters catfighting type thing, and is not worse than a 9 year old testing positive for coke.

I remember when Nick said the 16 year old wanted Kayla, not Nick, to teach him how to drive. Probably because Daddy is a rage machine when dealing with the family he resents. My guess is that when given the chance to spill the beans to CPS, the oldest son had a lot to say, mostly as payback for the years of abuse from his father and the thought it was the Christian thing to do (tell the truth). And to protect his mother.

He's probably her favorite, also as the oldest he most likely feels he should protect the weaker members of his family. The wild card is how much sway does Daddy Warbucks (Bob) have over the kids?
 
the book "Pawverbs"
There are multiple Pawverbs books, but since Aaron says it was about dogs, it's probably this one:


Pawverbs for a Dog Lover’s Heart is a collection of dog stories, each based on a real dog and highlighting a principle or lesson found in the book of Proverbs.
[...]
At the end of each story, you will find a “Paws & Ponder” and a “Paws & Pray” feature to prompt you to go deeper into the story and see a spiritual truth that might impact your own heart.

An epub copy is available on Libgen.

pawverbs1.jpg
pawverbs2.jpg
pawverbs3-1.jpg
pawverbs3-2.jpg
pawverbs4.jpg
pawverbs4-2.jpg
pawverbs5.jpg
pawverbs6.jpg
foolish.jpg

Poor Aaron.
 
Last edited:
It would have to be really bad and probably consistent.
Now, detective caps, gentlemen:

  • How come only one child has the signs of consistent cocaine intake?
  • Why is she Nick's Favorite
  • and would he really just give her coke as a medicine for hyperactivity?

My theory, harrowing as it is is that cocaine was given to her as a vasoconstrictor and a painkiller Basically something that reduces bleeding to affected areas... Now gentlemen, why would a swinger who's friends with sexually dubious people need to give a 9 year old frequent doses of something that slows bleeding instead of taking her to a hospital?

Where might that bleeding have been?

I'm probably wrong. I pray to God I'm wrong. I have never in my life wanted to be more wrong - but seriously to the wall motherfucker If I'm not.
When you don't know the facts, it's better to just admit your lack of knowledge than come up with this crap. Even if what you're saying is true, I'd much rather it come out through careful investigation than autistic conjecture; you're accusing someone of a very heinous thing without solid evidence.
 
View attachment 6118750
6/23/2024 - Casino teases supposed upcoming Rekieta bombshell to be released in next few days according to alleged source close to the situation.
If this is true (which, to be honest, the casino likes to blow things out of proportion fairly often), the day of the torsion cannot come soon enough.

Until and unless it drops and is backed up by proof, it's just clickbait. Why isn't it being dropped now?
Probably because they're scared that saying it directly without confirmation would put them on the hook for a defamation lawsuit or something.
 
Allegedly, Balldo Jannies are hiding in the Kasino chats relaying information to Nick for him, this is why they're waiting for "the thing" to drop before they comment.
I mean it won't help him, considering he just flies off the handle and babbles about random shit.
 
This grift makes no fucking sense. It's clear that there's more of a finical benefit to shitting on Nick yet they're choosing to ruin their reputation by siding with the shit excuse of a father. So I rather skeptical about the idea that it's just for the grift. I feel like there's another reason.
Barnes and Dax both LOVE conspiracy theories, being a contrarian, railing against the state no matter what and have a strong disposition to trusting and sticking by their “friends” to the bitter end. I don’t know enough about EVS to say whether he falls into that camp, too, but it would make sense if he did.

I don’t think there is any serious financial incentive. I think they genuinely believe their rhetoric because that’s their general mindset and it’s shored up by their social relationship with Nick.

Grand conspiracies certainly do exist and occur, but often, especially with more mundane events like this, Occam’s Razor wins out. Guy who has always been fascinated with degeneracy gets mega rich very fast, starts doing lots of drugs and getting his dick wet whenever and wherever he can, begins neglecting his personal and home life to pursue more drugs and sex? It’s a tale old as time. Think about nearly every single major rock star and famous actor. It’s almost always there, even if it’s not common knowledge in the zeitgeist. Lori Mattix was infamous for being Jimmy Page’s underage fucktoy and claims she had a threesome with David Bowie at the age of 14. And even if Lori Mattix is making up he tryst with Bowie, it’s pretty much established that he liked young girls during his Ziggy Stardust phase.

It is worth considering that the fans sticking by Nick the hardest are his most devout and loyal paypigs, so there is a potential financial incentive, albeit a rather small and petty one. However, I don’t consider that to be as heavy of a contributing factor as that Dax and Barnes have a mindset that lends itself to being balldowashers. Remember, Barnes was covering hard for Jack Murphy until it all came out that Murphy was trying to blacklist critics, which I guess crossed a line for Barnes’ ethics and also caused major strife with others in his social circle.
 
I've been trying to think what could be worse that doesn't involve CSA.
It probably involves physical abuse between the kids or something bad happening to the dog. Remember that the pug was supposedly locked in a bathroom which would have terrible effects on its health. Imagine the poor thing just slowly wasting away as there's no proper dog food at home or any veterinary care while the adults are on a coke bender.
 
PPP and Warski claim to have a source that "would know" and that it'll come out in the next few days, supposedly will make the cocaine "look like a cigarette". PPP hinting that it's something so bad that all the adults involved at the Rekieta house should be executed if true.

Child sexual abuse.
To be totally fair PPP has been saying they should all be executed since the first day pretty much. I wonder what it is though.
 
I don't think it will be child abuse or anything like that

1) Info is from a source who would be in a position to know.
2) Worse than the cocaine on the girl, so it has to be about the children.
3) The children has not been in Rekieta's custody since initial arrest, so the act happened before arrest, and the evidence would have been gathered before too.
4) If it was anything as bad as rape or beatings, it would have been cited in the arrent and known just as much as, if not more than the cocaine and the guns already. There's no point of hiding the worst crime in the list.
5) If it isn't from a government source who can prove this with documents, then it can never actually be confirmed.
#2 Cocaine ON the girl? FFS, how clueless/deluded are you?
 
>The tests were clean
How am I supposed to interpret this statement? So Balldo didn't reach the 500pg threshold while one of his children blew it out (literally) by 1000%?
Or was he suggesting the test itself was hygienically done, nothing stated about the results?

Balldo would score at least high 5 digits, if not over 100,000pg/mg.
I’m sure someone else said this already, but unless Nick is just straight up lying, this means he’s playing around with detection windows and purposefully only getting tested after those detection windows have passed, which is why he wouldn’t consent to hair testing (longest detection window for stimulant use). Ironically the drug with the longest detection window in urine is MJ, where heavy users have to stay off it for weeks (like 21-28 days) to get a negative urinalysis. The stimulants are on the order of a few days IIRC so it would be very easy to do this and then use that result to claim you were always “clean”.
We NEVER hear the success stories because we will NEVER know how it may have gone otherwise. (There's a stats/economics word for that but I cannot be bothered to google.)
You can occasionally extrapolate from the really bad outcomes… NYC’s version of CFS had some scandals within the last couple of years of kids dying due to parental abuse and neglect after CFS had identified the issue, but let the kids stay with those parents anyway, because the agency over prioritized keeping kids with their families (and often as not were not monitoring those families closely enough.)
They have been eye level with each other's navels numerous times.
In wet swimsuits, if they were even wearing those…
I think I am late on this, so clocks may be warranted. But Nick has discussed how they cannot prove USE. Has anyone considered that, in piss tests, cocaine is like GONE in 24 hours~ish? So.... as we saw.... on the Weekends, when government is off the clock, he is free to cut loose. So this most recent weekend stream... why wouldn't he use?
I expect him to MAYBE cut back on the booze, but to continue coke weekends. Because they would never know. And, he is only charged with posession.
That’s why the court/parole officer demanding random drug testing is way more serious than your employer demanding the same. When the parole office tells you you need to submit a sample it’s same-day-or-go-to-jail, and I don’t think they take weekends off as a matter of course. If your employer tells you to submit a random drug test today and you won’t, the worst they can do is let you go.
As a side note, I have been greatly dismayed to find out that drug use is basically not a crime, or not one the cops try to prove. Apparently it really is the posession, because use is too tough to prove.

Same thing to me mostly. And others have pointed out Nick is talking himself into dealer charges by denying use, because if you have 26g of coke you're obviously doing SOMETHING with it... If you're not using it, what are ya doing with it?

Opinions welcome
I’m surprised he wasn’t charged with intent to distribute given the scale with Coke residue on it.
PPP i think even said on Kino Kasino that Nick led to his own demise deciding to raise the kids in a homeschooling set up that was so heavily religious and that if they were public school kids he'd never have gotten the cops called on him in the first place.
I disagree. Public school teachers (good ones, anyway) would notice if their students showed up to school in the same clothes for a week or more, complained of being hungry, and dad was driving them around in a cocaine whirlwind like the Tasmanian Devil on drugs. There are some parochial teachers who ignore abuse if it’s within the limits of what their faith accepts as normal, and public school has the effect of a lot MORE mandated reporters interacting with students on the daily. And the relationship between a PS teacher, the parents of students, and their public-school-unionized job security is much less direct than private school teachers who work for a church pod school with maybe a dozen students who are all the kids of parishioners… I could see that having a cooling effect on teachers in that kind of a system making reports (ie “I suspect abuse, but if I do make that report, what if the parent affected by it figures out it was me and tries to retaliate?” Kind of reasoning.)
 
I've been trying to think what could be worse that doesn't involve CSA.
What if CPS saw something on a later visit (so not on the first report)?

Like a bullet hole in one of the kid's walls?
Yeah, I am hoping it’s something gun related, a near miss, or a kid took one to school or something.
As opposed to the alternative.
 
Back