Could you please point out where I literally said that?
It may be subjective whether it is "worse" or "better" than a 9 y/o intentionally being given cocaine (we still don't know why or how this happened and may not ever), but previous speculation ITT questions whether Nick tried to get April or the real nanny herself to fuck the 16 y/o because Nick has stated he wished his parents were open with him about their having sex at that age (which is fucking weird itself). I think 99% of people with half a brain cell would find that pretty revolting, weird as fuck, and borderline sex predatory. Powerlevel I guess but I'm not yet 30, and I find the idea of fucking a 16 y/o pretty incomprehensible. They're baby faced kids. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an emotionally immature, stunted loser at best. Like the 20 something dude that relies on buying high schoolers beer for "friends."
INB4 you say something even more cringey like, "Actually I was groomed by my babysitter at 16 and I enjoyed it lololol" Many such cases.