US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[High-Fructose Corn Syrup]

View attachment 6152257

View attachment 6152258

As always he only spoke the truth.

View attachment 6152279

I've always assumed it's a reference to this, like something beneath a basement dweller, but I might be showing my own age going to an 80's horror movie.

It was but we chuds took it back.

 

[Forest Portal Triumph 747]

quite possible Trump is performing reverse psychology with that golf cart vid to piss chomo joe off to the point where chomo joe stays in the race to spite blomf

 

[HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS]

View attachment 6152257

View attachment 6152258

Lmao Trump baiting DNC to put kamela up there lol

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

Lmao Trump baiting DNC to put kamela up there lol

I want to see them debate so bad, it would be so funny.

 

[Polyboros2]

The masterstroke: Since Kamala is unlikely to ever be elected to any office ever again, running her in a losing effort in 2024 wastes her as "the rightful heir" candidate in 2028, clearing the detritus from the path for Gavin Bateman, who absolutely won't want to wait until 2032 to lay claim to the throne to which he feels Hillary-levels of entitlement to.

She doesn't even have "rightful heir" status if Biden drops out now. Everyone is skipping her for Gretchen, Newsom or Michael Obama if Biden drops out, completely skipping over her. Even Buttchug is getting AB tested internally, a literal fag who has an abysmal record in the administration. They'll never say it, but they agree with Trump about Harris.

 

[Random Internet Person]

I'll take your clocks if I'm late with this observation but  if the Dems have to ditch Joe from Scranton, plugging in Kamala will be a masterstroke (apart from being most obvious).

1) The obvious: By not doing so, you anger all the loyal wine aunts and sheboons and soybois you need.

2) The masterstroke: Since Kamala is unlikely to ever be elected to any office ever again, running her in a losing effort in 2024 wastes her as "the rightful heir" candidate in 2028, clearing the detritus from the path for Gavin Bateman, who absolutely won't want to wait until 2032 to lay claim to the throne to which he feels Hillary-levels of entitlement to.

Another thing I’ve heard: if you don’t have Kamala or Biden, your campaign donations have to start from 0 dollars for your new candidate.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Either way, Flynn would be a good pick. Just so long as he doesn't pick Tim Scott, Jewbio or Doug Burgum

I don’t think Kari Lake is a wise choice but it would be amazing to see her debate Kamala Harris. Like an unloosed Tulsi Gabbard.

 

[Betonhaus]

Learn what I have had to. Start looking for context clues, figure out if its good or bad. Then never, ever attempt to use it yourself. Just nod along like you understand.

and try not to guess the meaning of something based on older slang. If something is cringe it is NOT sick or phat. Try not to cringemaxx your mussy.

Lol Biden is definitely not going to want to drop out now, I wish I could be a fly on the wall in the white house when they see this.

I'll take your clocks if I'm late with this observation but  if the Dems have to ditch Joe from Scranton, plugging in Kamala will be a masterstroke (apart from being most obvious).

1) The obvious: By not doing so, you anger all the loyal wine aunts and sheboons and soybois you need.

2) The masterstroke: Since Kamala is unlikely to ever be elected to any office ever again, running her in a losing effort in 2024 wastes her as "the rightful heir" candidate in 2028, clearing the detritus from the path for Gavin Bateman, who absolutely won't want to wait until 2032 to lay claim to the throne to which he feels Hillary-levels of entitlement to.

Another thing I’ve heard: if you don’t have Kamala or Biden, your campaign donations have to start from 0 dollars for your new candidate.

yeah, it sounds like if they drop Biden and dont choose Harris then they will have to return three years of spent donation money, which is just impossible. It'd be like trying to move when you are severely underwater on your mortgage.

Generally the options are:

• try to salvage the presidency with a more viable candidate, taking out massive debt to resolve obligations to previous donors
• keep joe biden while he increasingly becomes a laughingstock and try every trick in the book to make him viable
• switch to Harris for minimal gains, and possibly legal repercussions if the donations problem isn't resolved
• give up on the presidency, which would lead to massive knock-on effects in losing seats in the house and senate and donors wanting their money back
• arrest or kill Trump and use the military to stage a coup

 

[Vic Viper T301]

View attachment 6152279

I've always assumed it's a reference to this, like something beneath a basement dweller, but I might be showing my own age going to an 80's horror movie.

This is correct. IIRC some lefty podcast started calling people on the right chuds as a reference to this movie and it caught on at Reddit and Twitter.

 

[GettrGriftr]

She doesn't even have "rightful heir" status if Biden drops out now. Everyone is skipping her for Gretchen, Newsom or Michael Obama if Biden drops out, completely skipping over her. Even Buttchug is getting AB tested internally, a literal fag who has an abysmal record in the administration. They'll never say it, but they agree with Trump about Harris.

I honestly don't think Gavin Bateman (or is it Patrick Newsom?) will want it right now with the Dems in such disarray. He wouldn't want to risk losing simply because his Party is in such a maelstrom at present.

Could he right the unmoored ship and catch a favourable wind in only 3 months? Possibly. But if I'm him, I'm saying "Too much risk. Let's take the L this year, have a reprise of 2017-20 where Trump is cockblocked at every turn, then when he's done for once and for all, I come riding in on a white stallion."

 

[Kane Lives]

View attachment 6152279

I've always assumed it's a reference to this, like something beneath a basement dweller, but I might be showing my own age going to an 80's horror movie.

Chud as an insult never made sense. It's the most limpwristed thing possible. Hardly anyone knew the original, or what it referred to. (No offense to horror movie fans, of course).

And if you gotta explain an insult... well, it's hardly one, isn't it? Compare and contrast to niggers.

 

[Dr J]

Another thing I’ve heard: if you don’t have Kamala or Biden, your campaign donations have to start from 0 dollars for your new candidate.

I think the campaign donations start from $0 anyway. Basically because Kamala for President is not the same campaign as Joe Biden for President

 

[Your Girlfriend's Dad]

Biden was forced to drop out of the 1988 Pres election for lying and plagiarism. He's been a bad pathological liar his entire career and has a ton of baggage.

Biden as VP was Obama's Kamala Harris.

I meant more in the scheme of things in the last 35 years. I don't think that was in the minds of most voters in 2020.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Lmao Trump baiting DNC to put kamela up there lol

He's baiting Biden to stay in.

 

[GettrGriftr]

This is correct. IIRC some lefty podcast started calling people on the right chuds as a reference to this movie and it caught on at Reddit and Twitter.

Yep. And if you'll recall (if you follow this stuff), Jim Metokur's 2022 monthly streams were called the "Year of the Chud (YOTC)".

It was worn with pride

 

[Dr J]

I meant more in the scheme of things in the last 35 years. I don't think that was in the minds of most voters in 2020.

Biden had tons of baggage, and a terrible record. Plus he's an asshole. Problem was, you didn't hear about any of these things because Biden also had friendly media, trying to tell you that he was just an amiable grandfather figure to contrast with big meanie Orange Man.

Same media telling you that Biden isn't demented and it's just a stutter

 

[XYZpdq Jr.]

it's just a stutter

that reminds me, they never even bothered to fake up something for Speech Impediment Awareness Week 1998 where they mentioned "long-serving Senator Joe Biden overcame his stuttering to become a Washington DC fixture!", right?

 

[Random Internet Person]

I think the campaign donations start from $0 anyway. Basically because Kamala for President is not the same campaign as Joe Biden for President

Eh, maybe they don’t have to since Kamala is the running mate. All that has to be done is have Kamala step up to the plate and pick a new VP.

 

[Dr J]

Eh, maybe they don’t have to since Kamala is the running mate

Robert Barnes says no. For the reason I stated. If you can find any sources other than Barnes that say differently I could be persuaded to change my opinion.

But the Democrats are fucked either way here. Running Biden's corpse will at least allow them to keep the money

 

[Your Girlfriend's Dad]

Biden had tons of baggage, and a terrible record. Plus he's an asshole. Problem was, you didn't hear about any of these things because Biden also had friendly media, trying to tell you that he was just an amiable grandfather figure to contrast with big meanie Orange Man.

Same media telling you that Biden isn't demented and it's just a stutter

Biden absolutely has baggage, I'm just referencing the general zeitgeist in the latter half of 2022.