- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
J.J. Abrams' Deal or no Deal version gets boring quickly, the Rian Johnson version is always entertaining.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a good video. I would only add that the fact that J.J. is a leech can't be emphasized enough. One instance that infuriated me was when he baited people into thinking they would be making a Sam Raimi Spider-Man 4 movie. But it turned out to be a publicity stunt to promote his son's Spider-Man comic. Of course, out of pure nepotism, he was given Marvel's flagship character. Non-canon, but still quite relevant. People work their asses off on Marvel for years, and they don't get to write a solo Spider-Man comic run ever. The comic stared his son's thinly veiled self insert Spider-man son, with Peter being an obvious allegory to J.J. But that's a story for another day.
PS. I would still plow his daughter, even though she is Jewish.
Well... yeah, he is a jew.J.J. is literally incapable of doing anything without some form of parasitism
He actually seems charismatic enough that in another world, I'd not mind him as the dark side mentor to a more charismatic person honestly.I don't like the "discount Ezra Miller" stuff because Ezra Miller is already the most discounted Ezra Miller. A broken Ezra Miller knockoff on the clearance shelf at a Dollar General still holds more value than the real Ezra Miller and has a higher resale value.
Honestly he seems like a good actor and I almost feel bad for him. I hope he had a chaperone on set and never had to be alone in a room with Lesleyy "Casting Couch" Headland.
it was also one of the worst spider-man comics of the last decade. a decade, which has exclusively had only bad spider-man comics.It's a good video. I would only add that the fact that J.J. is a leech can't be emphasized enough. One instance that infuriated me was when he baited people into thinking they would be making a Sam Raimi Spider-Man 4 movie. But it turned out to be a publicity stunt to promote his son's Spider-Man comic. Of course, out of pure nepotism, he was given Marvel's flagship character. Non-canon, but still quite relevant. People work their asses off on Marvel for years, and they don't get to write a solo Spider-Man comic run ever. The comic stared his son's thinly veiled self insert Spider-man son, with Peter being an obvious allegory to J.J. But that's a story for another day.
View attachment 6156560
More than the nepotism, I am personally more infurated by the fact that J.J. is literally incapable of doing anything without some form of parasitism, especially via nostalgia. He always has to plagiarize a more succesful story, or piggyback on someone else's success. That 4 he used isn't a coincidence. He knew damn well what he was doing.
What about the literal cuckfic one with the redditor husband of MJ?it was also one of the worst spider-man comics of the last decade. a decade, which has exclusively had only bad spider-man comics.
I said one of, not the worst. the JJ book and that one both belong together in a garbage can though. although in all honesty I am aware of that but haven't actually read that one. I imagine even as horrible as what little I know about it is, being a spider-man fan in comics has been so terrible since 2007 I don't think there is anything I could read and get an actual reaction out of me. they've been shitting on the character for almost 20 years straight with no breaks. every now and then they drag some fossil of a writer out and let them do a story set in the time frame when they were writing the book 30/40 years ago or whatever and with the exception of those one-and-dones they have just been constantly raping 'ol pete for a long time, and I don't think they're letting up anytime soon.What about the literal cuckfic one with the redditor husband of MJ?
At this point I wouldn't put it past them to have Peter anally raped by a gay communist in the gulag.I said one of, not the worst. the JJ book and that one both belong together in a garbage can though. although in all honesty I am aware of that but haven't actually read that one. I imagine even as horrible as what little I know about it is, being a spider-man fan in comics has been so terrible since 2007 I don't think there is anything I could read and get an actual reaction out of me. they've been shitting on the character for almost 20 years straight with no breaks. every now and then they drag some fossil of a writer out and let them do a story set in the time frame when they were writing the book 30/40 years ago or whatever and with the exception of those one-and-dones they have just been constantly raping 'ol pete for a long time, and I don't think they're letting up anytime soon.
the last jedi is terrible but I will always have a little bit of respect for Johnson just taking a huge shit on TFA. I thought that was the single worst franchise movie I had ever had the displeasure of paying for, and at least felt a little better that even the guy hired to make the sequel thought it was terrible and proceeded to basically look at it and be like well, if that's the best you got I can at least put it out of its misery and ran it entirely into the ground and took every stupid mystery box set up and threw it in the garbage. it sucks because it did irreversible damage to Luke Skywalker but it was almost worth it to basically give JJ Abrams the biggest middle finger. the issue with it lies in I don't think Rian Johnson did all of that because he was saying fuck you to the previous movie, but because he's an idiot and thought he was making something great by shitting down the audience's throats.J.J. Abrams' Deal or no Deal version gets boring quickly, the Rian Johnson version is always entertaining.
Counterpoint: All of the themes of the movie are KotOR 2 but done worse and with less thought. It isn't even original.the last jedi is terrible but I will always have a little bit of respect for Johnson
A while ago, in this thread, I tried to write a treatment to see if a sequel to TFA using the premises TFA set up was feasible and it really wasn't. When the B plot is patching up the plot holes of the previous movie, the most I can hope for is Airplane 2, and modern media does not even rise to the level of Airplane 2. Meanwhile, writing a sequel to TLJ was easier and cleaner. So maybe, just maybe, TFA is actually worse than TLJ.the last jedi is terrible but I will always have a little bit of respect for Johnson just taking a huge shit on TFA. I thought that was the single worst franchise movie I had ever had the displeasure of paying for, and at least felt a little better that even the guy hired to make the sequel thought it was terrible and proceeded to basically look at it and be like well, if that's the best you got I can at least put it out of its misery and ran it entirely into the ground and took every stupid mystery box set up and threw it in the garbage. it sucks because it did irreversible damage to Luke Skywalker but it was almost worth it to basically give JJ Abrams the biggest middle finger. the issue with it lies in I don't think Rian Johnson did all of that because he was saying fuck you to the previous movie, but because he's an idiot and thought he was making something great by shitting down the audience's throats.
I can't really disagree with you, but I wasn't even talking about thematic stuff just the fact he threw the plot points in the garbage.Counterpoint: All of the themes of the movie are KotOR 2 but done worse and with less thought. It isn't even original.
I think TFA is much worse. and I have since TLJ came out. both suck, it's like picking between a dog turd or a cat turd. but people always say TFA set stuff up and TLJ ruined it but really I think TFA as a starting point there was almost nothing you could do that wouldn't have been horrible. it was a bad starting point. TLJ still didn't have to be terrible, they could have done something but just as a movie anyone who actually thinks TFA was fine and TLJ was worse is probably an idiot. they were both terrible.A while ago, in this thread, I tried to write a treatment to see if a sequel to TFA using the premises TFA set up was feasible and it really wasn't. When the B plot is patching up the plot holes of the previous movie, the most I can hope for is Airplane 2, and modern media does not even rise to the level of Airplane 2. Meanwhile, writing a sequel to TLJ was easier and cleaner. So maybe, just maybe, TFA is actually worse than TLJ.
I think TFA is lazier than TLJ but not worse. It rehashes most of ANH but doesn't totally break the setting the way stuff like the Criser of Peace does.A while ago, in this thread, I tried to write a treatment to see if a sequel to TFA using the premises TFA set up was feasible and it really wasn't. When the B plot is patching up the plot holes of the previous movie, the most I can hope for is Airplane 2, and modern media does not even rise to the level of Airplane 2. Meanwhile, writing a sequel to TLJ was easier and cleaner. So maybe, just maybe, TFA is actually worse than TLJ.
they are also total retards. I hate JJ Abrams, but I really can't blame him or anyone involved for the Rise of Shitwalker. they were really put in a corner with that movie. Star Wars has been divisive with sequels and prequels from day 1. but during the prequels the internet and social media were not the EVERYONE is on there bitching thing it had become by the late 2010s. the force awakens was a shitty attempt to pander to china and people who hated the prequels, the last jedi was an attempt to.. i don't know pander to people who didn't like star wars in the first place, and rise of skywalker was an attempt to pander to anyone who was still around. now if they had just made george's sequels, they frankly probably would have sucked. but at least there would have been a narrative arc, even if it was terrible. making 3 movies where you don't know what the next one is going to be until you make it might have worked in the 1980s but the fact they didn't script out all 3 from the jump was the worst possible decision and why they ended up the way they did.I find it interesting that, just the same way people complain that TLJ shat on all of the cool expectations and mystery boxes of TFA, there's a lot of people who actually defended TLJ for the same reasons, and think it was TROS fault that the movie now amounts to nothing
Disney keeps insisting he's a terrible teacher
Snoke
New Republic Senate
He force throws Rey easily to the side to fight Luke
Rian Johnson
Well, I was writing under the premise of something that has continuity and would be interesting to watch, not write under DEI mandates.But had J. J. Abrams plan not being executed by total retards, that's how it would have gone:
Every film would have provided with shallow nostalgia, action, a controlled demolition of the George Lucas era and a build-up of the Disney era that would have never amounted to anything. Every mystery box would have three mystery boxes inside. We would learn who Snoke really is... Next movie. We would learn what happened to the New Republic... Next movie. We would learn why did Luke leave... Next movie. The product would have been a big pile of nothing that people would eat up, filling the gaps with more and more fan theories, internet slapfights, fanon and other parasocial stuff that keeps the machine working with the help of enthusiastic journos and, by the time the franchise was properly squeezed and drained for all its worth it would be closed in the most half-assed, despondent way. Like Lost. Like pretty much Abrams has done.