Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Strix454]

Nick, April, and Kayla can potentially claim that Aaron supplied coke to kids. (This issue applies to the CPS case. Nick won't be able to get out of the possession for the criminal charges - Aaron was long gone by 5/23.)

No. They can't. If Nick or Kayla make that claim, the only way to make it is with firsthand knowledge that Aaron did it and firsthand knowledge makes them guilty of neglect and they lose the CPS case. If April accuses Aaron of it based on firsthand knowledge of Aaron doing it, she opens herself up to criminal charges.

Even if Aaron made a public confession that he did it, Nick and Kayla would still lose the CPS case. They opened their house and gave access to their children to a person who gave one of their children cocaine. Nick can't turn his house into a drug den and then say he isn't responsible for the actions of others toward his children in his drug den. That is losing argument in the CPS process.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick's gaslighting performance on the Ralph stream about people just assuming he was a trad dad was so strong, Charles Boyer nearly rose from his grave in jealousy. This is a guy who had Doug TenNapel and friends on for "Chad Dad" streams, took superchats to pray for grandma who stubbed her toe, and started out never swearing on his show. Yes, that's all our fault for "just assuming" he was a Christian who adhered to traditional values.

It's ridiculous this piece of shit was able to pull off this act so long. He obviously hates his own children. He hates his wife. He even hates Jesus, he has openly rejected Christ and just thinks he was just some guy. He even hates his dog. Look at this.

 

[Synechdoche]

Can anyone who is knowledgeable about the law say what all this might look like to a prosecutor?

By the looks of it, Balldo himself wants a jury trial. How does it look like for the prosecutor? Would they prefer a settlement and be done with it? Would they also like a trial and nail his ass?

Would his bullshit on youtube affect them in any way (I mean, on a human level. Could they get mad at him and could that influence their decision making) ?

 

[AnOminous]

By the looks of it, Balldo himself wants a jury trial. How does it look like for the prosecutor? Would they prefer a settlement and be done with it? Would they also like a trial and nail his ass?

Balldo wanting a jury trial is hilarious.

What would the jury look like? They'd all actually know what Balldo looks like in the commnity.

And that's like an absolute piece of shit, which is what he actually is.

 

[Lemondale]

Will Baldo Escape To Jamaica if he losses his trial?

 

[Strix454]

Can anyone who is knowledgeable about the law say what all this might look like to a prosecutor?

They have a very solid case. They got him with a significant amount of drugs and the probable cause the warrant would look from a prosecutors point of view difficult to attack. Having one of the kids test positive for cocaine also means the child neglect charges would look really solid as well. The gun related charge is about the only uncertainity and its only uncertain because not all the evidence and testing has been disclosed IMO.

To a prosecutor, doing a jury trial on this case is going to look like a waste of time and money. The likelihood of him being found guilty is very high and the sentence he is likely to get is equally predictable. A case with a Barnes-like Attorney making a constitutional law defense would be especially annoying and time consuming.

Some prosecutors might increase the charges or try to figure out a worse outcome in sentencing for Nick if he fights it to a jury trial. With the positive test for cocaine in the kid, they could certainly up the child neglect charge.

 

[Whiskey]

It's ridiculous this piece of shit was able to pull off this act so long. He obviously hates his own children. He hates his wife. He even hates Jesus, he has openly rejected Christ and just thinks he was just some guy. He even hates his dog. Look at this.
View attachment 6163484

Call me naive but I disagree. I think until he got a lot of attention he was a decent guy. The story here isn't really that of a master manipulator but rather how incedious corruption is.

It was one vice after another and another chasing a bigger and bigger high.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Can anyone who is knowledgeable about the law say what all this might look like to a prosecutor?

By the looks of it, Balldo himself wants a jury trial. How does it look like for the prosecutor? Would they prefer a settlement and be done with it? Would they also like a trial and nail his ass?

Would his bullshit on youtube affect them in any way (I mean, on a human level. Could they get mad at him and could that influence their decision making) ?

Ultimately he's a first time offender and non-violent. He seems like he is being careful about not accusing the court, prosecutor and police of wrongdoing. They'll likely offer him a plea deal of deferred adjudication with conditions including testing, rehab, etc. The plea deal will likely downgrade the weight to reduce the sentence so take the plea with 20 mos presumptive and deferred or trial facing 48 mos presumptive with guilty verdict.

Unless he keeps saying people lie about guilt to get plea deals.

 

[StannisTheMannis]

he is 100% going to try and blame everything on Aaron. lol

I bet he's gonna pin the blame on Aaron AND April. Let's face it, April is damaged goods and not long-term partner material. Nick will throw her ass under the bus when he has to in an instant. Blondie chose to stick around at the Rackets hovel after the arrests (where she avoided charges) and naively thinks that she's scot-free while living there.

Aaron also admitted that April's been siphoning thousands of $$$ out of their joint bank account after she left him while they were legally married (unless Blondie can prove this cash was to pay a downpayment on the house next door, this may lead to probable cause that Imholte funds were used to buy coke).

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

Probably the kids just want to go home and will lie if that might get them back there. All they know is they've been removed, forcefully, by the government authorities their insane, drug-addled dad probably warned them about, from the home they've always known.

They probably just want to go back to something familiar. But thanks to their shit-eating, cocksucking, faggot of a so-called "dad," that just isn't going to happen.

What was Nick supposed to do? Just live up to his obligations as a dad?
View attachment 6163220

My guess is that the kids has been so unwatched that they just play with their internet devices all day long at nick's house and at the foster house they're more restricted. Depending on how far gone they are mentally (emphasis: due to nick's and kayla's neglect), they might prefer the 24/7 internet access as opposed to clean clothes and fresh food. They might even think "well, now that the gubment got to dad and mom, maybe they'll do the bare minimum and we still get to play all day again"

 

[ddlloo]

He's said it himself, fighting this case is preventing him from getting the kids back. The question is... Why the fuck is he fighting it??? About the only thing I think he has a hope of changing is getting drug charge lowered by one degree when accounting for the weight of the baggies. He's a first time offender though, does he really think he's going to get a jail term and is scared of that or something? Everything else seems pretty fucking cut and dry from the outside.

I just don't fucking get it. There's a super cynical part of me that occasionally thinks it's because he doesn't really want the kids back, he thinks he can make content out of this saga, and that there's a hail merry chance he gets off scott free and then can do a victory tour and clear his name with the public or something. But even at my most cynical I find it hard to believe that.

 

[SusanHassle]

No. They can't. If Nick or Kayla make that claim, the only way to make it is with firsthand knowledge that Aaron did it and firsthand knowledge makes them guilty of neglect and they lose the CPS case. If April accuses Aaron of it based on firsthand knowledge of Aaron doing it, she opens herself up to criminal charges.

Even if Aaron made a public confession that he did it, Nick and Kayla would still lose the CPS case. They opened their house and gave access to their children to a person who gave one of their children cocaine. Nick can't turn his house into a drug den and then say he isn't responsible for the actions of others toward his children in his drug den. That is losing argument in the CPS process.

They can.

I'm merely trying to predict Nick's strategy here. I'm not saying it will be successful.

Family court is far more casual. The point would be to accuse the one person who Nick does not have on his side—the person with TWO restraining orders against him who discussed coke being near his kid.

Three against one. Do you honestly think Nick isn't trying to leverage that advantage?

(Also, Aaron's not going to face criminal charges, though he wedged a door open. What is in play? Ashley has leverage for full custody.)

 

[thebigdream]

This isn't the win that he thinks this is. He was the kid's guardian. You are responsible for your kid. Being fucked up on booze and cocaine, then someone that you invite to your house, who drugs your children while you are passed out is the guardian's failure.

And it's not like this was the 16-year-old acting out, I think most parents would at least sympathise with older teens being risk-taking and hard to control, this was an 8-year-who who by all means should never have even seen coke let along ingested it under his guardianship. No normal parent has this issue, it doesn't even come close to happening because it's so absurd for a young child to be around this stuff if you're a half-functional person. And no matter what cRazY weIrD situation he can pin the blame on, he should've been there as a parent to stop her, or should've stopped the situation from developing entirely (LIKE BY NOT HAVING COKE IN THE HOUSE). Even if he takes the approach of blaming Aaron, he let someone be around his kids with drugs. That's not a win that's fucking disgusting.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

They have a very solid case. They got him with a significant amount of drugs and the probable cause the warrant would look from a prosecutors point of view difficult to attack. Having one of the kids test positive for cocaine also means the child neglect charges would look really solid as well. The gun related charge is about the only uncertainity and its only uncertain because not all the evidence and testing has been disclosed IMO.

To a prosecutor, doing a jury trial on this case is going to look like a waste of time and money. The likelihood of him being found guilty is very high and the sentence he is likely to get is equally predictable. A case with a Barnes-like Attorney making a constitutional law defense would be especially annoying and time consuming.

Some prosecutors might increase the charges or try to figure out a worse outcome in sentencing for Nick if he fights it to a jury trial. With the positive test for cocaine in the kid, they could certainly up the child neglect charge.

Nick is known to make terrible choices with Lawyers, recommending a business and estate lawyer for Vic's defamation trial, hiring the flashy and expensive "tv/radio Lawyer" Marc Randazza instead of a more sensible local lawyer who is better versed in Minnesota Defamation law, now he's hiring yet another constitutional lawyer for a case that has nothing to do with the constitution.

If Nick is planning to pull out the constitution at a district court then he's incredibly desperate and at this point should probably just take a plea deal, we've already seen Nick's "Barnes Recommended" constitutional lawyer stumble at the local law level with his attempts to keep information supressed showing he has no clue what he's doing.

If Nick takes this to trial then the Prosecution are going to nail him to the wall with everything they have, but in truth a win through a plea deal is a win through less effort and Nick could probably get something decent if he took a moment to get his head out of his own arse and take responsibility.

Maybe having this shitty Barnes Recommended lawyer is Karma for fucking over Vic.

 

[Neodanthril]

why in the world would people who were this unrepentant not be excommunicated from their local church? who in their right mind would let a balldo reviewer continue to come into their church? theres no way the people there dont know about the balldo.

 

[Fapcop]

April is damaged goods and not long-term partner material.

So… What I hear you saying, is that she needs to make an OF?

Wholeheartedly agree!

Never underestimate the kinds of shitty choices a coke head can make. Especially a cokehead who used to arguing with his wife 24-7, and suddenly has a woman who constantly strokes his narc ego.

Nick is known to make terrible choices with Lawyers, recommending a business and estate lawyer for Vic's defamation trial, hiring the flashy and expensive "tv/radio Lawyer" Marc Randazza

Here’s to hoping that Nick will fly in Randazza to make the argument to the jury that sniffing coke is in fact a constitutional act of free speech.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

He seems like he is being careful about not accusing the court, prosecutor and police of wrongdoing.

We must be watching different shows.

 

[The Wokest]

Why hasn't he settled with Monty yet?
Monty needs a juicer .

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Why hasn't he settled with Monty yet?

Because Nick is a retarded egomaniac.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

He's said it himself, fighting this case is preventing him from getting the kids back. The question is... Why the fuck is he fighting it??? About the only thing I think he has a hope of changing is getting drug charge lowered by one degree when accounting for the weight of the baggies. He's a first time offender though, does he really think he's going to get a jail term and is scared of that or something? Everything else seems pretty fucking cut and dry from the outside.

The presumptive sentence for 1st time offender with that amount is 48mos.

He's "fighting" it only because there is nothing else to do. It's more accurate to say he is "waiting." The state is waiting for lab results. In August the state will present probable cause for the charges to the court. Nick can challenge the warrant and evidence at that hearing. Before that hearing but after all the lab tests are back, Nick will likely get a plea offer. Probably after that hearing too as he will not get evidence thrown out. The plea will likely be too good to decline (20mos of deferred adjudication w/ rehab, probation, drug tests, etc).