Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Beavis]

The question is... Why the fuck is he fighting it???

If Nick takes a plea deal he admits wrongdoing and the haters win.

 

[SaltyFanta]

If Nick takes a plea deal he admits wrongdoing and the haters win.

I can see Nick going down the Fat Pat path and O.D.Ding out and declaring that it's all false until the very end.

 

[AnOminous]

He talked smack about the CPS people. The worst he said about police is "confirmation bias." He's not even denying it's cocaine, only that they haven't proved it's cocaine.

I guess you missed the whole vagina liquor thing.

 

[huckbeine]

i know in the back of his brilliant coke-fried brain, Rekieta is thinking that since he is just a first time non violent offender, he will get a suspended/lenient sentence. I would love to see Rekieta's face when he is really sentenced to prison time because he pissed of the judge, jury (if it becomes a jury trial) prosecutor during his trial because of his arrogant answers to questioning.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

He's not even denying it's cocaine, only that they haven't proved it's cocaine.

And when the crime lab proves that it is cocaine, Nick will shift the goalposts, and his next cope will be "OK, but the state still needs to prove that it's my cocaine."

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

And when the crime lab proves that it is cocaine, Nick will shift the goalposts, and his next cope will be "OK, but the state still needs to prove that it's my cocaine."

He would continue to move the goalposts even when they prove that it's his.

 

[smarty_snoops]

when rekieta ODs robert barnes will claim the government did it

 

[Captain Manning]

And when the crime lab proves that it is cocaine, Nick will shift the goalposts, and his next cope will be "OK, but the state still needs to prove that it's my cocaine."

Constructive possession.

That cope will work for the dumb people that still worship him, but not anybody that's been paying attention. And not the courts. Or a jury.

 

[Swole McPole]

Even if Aaron made a public confession that he did it, Nick and Kayla would still lose the CPS case. They opened their house and gave access to their children to a person who gave one of their children cocaine.

That's some next level swinging right there.

"Why don't you come on over, bang my wife and share your cocaine with my kids. I'll slip yours the bullet and you can give mine the spaghetti-os."

 

[FedPostalService]

If Nick takes a plea deal he admits wrongdoing and the haters win.

He’s setting up the story that innocent people take plea deals to avoid trouble from the GUBBERMENT.

Which is sometimes true. But I’ve never seen someone claim this who had 26g of what hasn’t been officially tested as cocaine yet found by the police and one nine year old who has officially tested positive for cocaine.

 

[Pure Soap]

Will Baldo Escape To Jamaica if he losses his trial?

Venezuela.
No extradition and easy access to pure coke.

 

[Gorbus]

Lawyers are more-or-less preconditioned for becoming lolcows, because the entire structure of how a legal defense works is basically tiered cope and goalpost moving. They start with Defense Plan A, if that gets rendered non-viable by evidence or testimony they move to Defense Plan B, and so on and so on. It's carefully constructed so they're never arguing about what is right or what is true, just whether a given situation is legal or can be proven to have happened to a legal standard. It doesn't matter if Defense Plan A is outright contradicted by Defense Plan D, because D is only coming out if A is already ruined. It's not about being consistent, it's about flim-flamming a box of rubes.

Unfortunately juror selection (especially in the US) is now so corrupt and ludicrous that you get sent home for having any knowledge of the law, a brain, or opinions, and so lawyers are used to making arguments on easy mode. The strategy that works on twelve handpicked retards who've been fed on select evidence unfortunately does not work against the entire internet when they have access to literal years of evidence on your character.

They have to do this doublethink because frankly otherwise you'd kill your client then yourself the first time you had to defend a clearly-guilty pedophile, so they see everything in terms of legalities and provability, which is not how 99.999% of the population see the world. They don't understand that we don't care and that we can draw conclusions and make judgements completely divorced from the little game of keepaway they play with the truth. There's no wording of the law they can find that undoes our case, because we're arguing no case.

The anger of a lawyer faced with the wrath of the internet is just the anger of a magician who is upset someone moved away from the intended viewing angle and saw that they were just standing on one foot instead of levitating.

 

[Vibralldo]

Lawyers are more-or-less preconditioned for becoming lolcows, because the entire structure of how a legal defense works is basically tiered cope and goalpost moving. They start with Defense Plan A, if that gets rendered non-viable by evidence or testimony they move to Defense Plan B, and so on and so on. It's carefully constructed so they're never arguing about what is right or what is true, just whether a given situation is legal or can be proven to have happened to a legal standard. It doesn't matter if Defense Plan A is outright contradicted by Defense Plan D, because D is only coming out if A is already ruined. It's not about being consistent, it's about flim-flamming a box of rubes.

Unfortunately juror selection (especially in the US) is now so corrupt and ludicrous that you get sent home for having any knowledge of the law, a brain, or opinions, and so lawyers are used to making arguments on easy mode. The strategy that works on twelve handpicked retards who've been fed on select evidence unfortunately does not work against the entire internet when they have access to literal years of evidence on your character.

They have to do this doublethink because frankly otherwise you'd kill your client then yourself the first time you had to defend a clearly-guilty pedophile, so they see everything in terms of legalities and provability, which is not how 99.999% of the population see the world. They don't understand that we don't care and that we can draw conclusions and make judgements completely divorced from the little game of keepaway they play with the truth. There's no wording of the law they can find that undoes our case, because we're arguing no case.

The anger of a lawyer faced with the wrath of the internet is just the anger of a magician who is upset someone moved away from the intended viewing angle and saw that they were just standing on one foot instead of levitating.

It does make sense someone whose job is to deny reality and come up with bullshit loopholes in order to outsmart people would turn into someone like Nick.

"No, I said I'd give up DRINKING on stream, this is cocaine!"

Basically just a sovereign citizen.

 

[Gorbus]

It does make sense someone whose job is to deny reality and come up with bullshit loopholes in order to outsmart people would turn into someone like Nick.

"No, I said I'd give up DRINKING on stream, this is cocaine!"

Basically just a sovereign citizen.

It's born of the same delusion; that there's a set of magic words that will force [The State/The Judge/The Haters] to fly back into their lantern like a fucking genie and leave you alone.

Nick should've already learned this lesson too, because he was taught it by Judge Fischer. Who did what she wanted, even though Rackets was apparently right according to the law.

And people aren't even judging him just for the charges, they're just a manifestation of the stuff people were already upset with Nick about. If Nick recalls, people have been a-logging him for a couple years now for his downward spiral. Using nothing but evidence he himself showed them: his livestreams. The image of himself he showed the world, when judged by the standards he himself espoused, was all that was needed for his audience to turn against him. Beating the charges wouldn't change anyone's mind, because all the charges did was make it untenable for everyone but the most desperate to make money off him. That might seem like when the tide turned, but it was really just when the grifter tide turned. The most visible but least numerous segment of his audience. The normal people, judging him on a moral, rather than brand integrity, basis had already gone.

Also like dude you talk about the balldo and American Beauty all the time, and without any exacerbating context around that it is still just information nobody wants and pretty creepy and vicariously embarrassing to your kids.

 

[MunsterCheeseJr]

Nick won't be able to get out of the possession for the criminal charges - Aaron was long gone by 5/23.

"Aaron left his drug safe at my house. I didn't even know it was there." Or the much more obvious "It was found with April's credit cards. It is obvious the stash is hers. I had no idea our nanny was brining drugs into our house." Or more likely Nick's lawyer will point out these types of scenarios to make the case fall below "a reasonable doubt."

April's drugs, "The Rekietas had no idea" since it is her credit cards is Nick's lawyer's best reasonable doubt argument." Oh, also couple with "Aaron is an angry bitter ex-husband who is lying about them to target his soon-to-be ex-wife because he was hoping to get his ex-wife jailed and the Rekiettas too since they were protecting her in their 2nd house. Aaron blames them from breaking up his marriage."

she was microdosed because her parents are retards that believe quack medicine, or it was accidental ingestion of sorts.

A nine year old who watched mommy, daddy, friends thinking they are sly cocaine users doing bumps. Maybe she found a cocaine bullet in the couch. Maybe some in her mommy or nanny's purse. Or Daddy's stash in his live streaming den after he has passed out for the day.

Rails? No way. But maybe imitating the adults doing bumps. Maybe she found some left over powder remnants around a table the adults were obsessing over. Or she tasted a bit. Felt EXTREMELY good. Now she is highly motivated because of how good it feels to find the cocaine lying around the house when mom and dad are not looking. As I said. Couch cocaine bullets. Purses. Streaming den stash. Cocaine bullets found in dirty clothes lying around. Laying out on the night stand in mommy and daddy's room.

And the adults are so high, strung out or drunk and/or asleep they just are not providing good attention to their children.

The initial discovery could have been accidental. But once she got a taste for it, there is no reason she would not be as highly motivated to find some more just like the adult junkies were highly motivated to keep up with their drug use.

 

[keke]

he said "the nanny wasn't being honest" no shit. she was probably scared of these freaks.

So weird that whenever anything happens the only one who knows the truth is Nick. All others are either lying, misinformed, or missing essential context. At this point narcissist should be added to the already paragraph-long title.

 

[Angry Crustacean]

Aaron left his drug safe at my house. I didn't even know it was there." Or the much more obvious "It was found with April's credit cards. It is obvious the stash is hers. I had no idea our nanny was brining drugs into our house." Or more likely Nick's lawyer will point out these types of scenarios to make the case fall below "a reasonable doubt."

April's drugs, "The Rekietas had no idea" since it is her credit cards is Nick's lawyer's best reasonable doubt argument." Oh, also couple with "Aaron is an angry bitter ex-husband who is lying about them to target his soon-to-be ex-wife because he was hoping to get his ex-wife jailed and the Rekiettas too since they were protecting her in their 2nd house. Aaron blames them from breaking up his marriage."

How do these alternative theories of events work with Nick's cokestream to a jury? "It wasn't my cocaine, I just did a lot of it." These explanations really seem like pissing into the wind for all the good they will do.

 

[Accidental Protege]

How do these alternative theories of events work with Nick's cokestream to a jury? "It wasn't my cocaine, I just did a lot of it." These explanations really seem like pissing into the wind for all the good they will do.

They won't work just from the simple fact that the cocaine was in the master bedroom, where Nick told the cops he slept. No one is going to buy it.

 

[MunsterCheeseJr]

@Angry Crustacean Odds are good that Nick will end up accepting some sort of plea deal prior to a trial. Right now Nick is trying to make it as difficult for the prosecutors and trying to show how difficult it will be to nail him on a 25 grams of cocaine charge, and how they can't prove that it is his. This is his and his lawyer's way of getting an easier plea deal. I expect that just about any plea deal will involve rehab and a period of drug testing.

The question is how long he will be on probation and drug testing. I don't see the prosecutors really wanting to send Nick to jail for a first time offense unless he continues to really piss them off hard.

Of course the additional question after that is if he can actually follow through on probationary drug and alcohol testing for a year or longer.

@Accidental Protege The cocaine being found with April's credit cards is his best defense. It is hers, not his. It is all about the reasonable doubt.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

I guess you missed the whole vagina liquor thing.

I was noting the difference post arrest. He went from edge lord to boot licker.