Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

Nick and Kayla's defense being 'well it wasn't my coke, it was actually April's she bought it!' is unbelievably stupid. Even just based on what we know:

• Nick admitted to the cops during the arrest that he and Kayla slept in the master bedroom, and that that was their bedroom. Why would April keep her coke in the room where she didn't sleep, and wasn't hers?
• The various drug paraphernalia found in the master bathroom and bedroom. The defense somehow has to claim that none of this was the Rekieta's and was actually April's.
• Drugs were found in the safes, which are located in the bedroom and bathroom. Are they going to claim that the safes aren't theirs, and the safes themselves belong to April? If not, are they really going to claim that while they own the safes that the coke was found in, they don't own the contents of the safes?
• This is also ignoring any DNA or fingerprint evidence for the drugs. All they have to show is that any of the containers of cocaine have the Rekieta's fingerprints on them, and I don't know how you can't show possession.

This defense sounds like something I saw on an old episode of cops, where some corner drug dealer was getting busted by the cops, and he had a baggie of drugs in the jeans. The criminal's defense to the cop on video camera was 'well I stole these jeans they aren't mine, so the drugs aren't mine, I don't know how they got in my pocket.' Rekieta's defense is somehow even more stupid, because his defense is 'well it's my house, my mater bath and bedroom, my safes, I sleep here every night, there is drug paraphernalia everywhere, but the coke in my safe isn't actually my coke.'

 

[FuhrerMustang]

If Nick is claiming that nobody asked him to consent to the footage, he's either speaking about the county officials, or he's just lying. It absolutely would make things easier if he would sign an affidavit consenting to the release of footage. It's written in the statute that any party involved may do this, including April, Kayla, or any of the Police Officers. I aggressively tried to reach April thinking she would be done with them and willing to consent, but she's still in the balldo bunker. I was dissuaded from trying to contact the LEO.

Send him a message on signal. Post it here and have him put his money where his mouth is.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

If Nick is claiming that nobody asked him to consent to the footage, he's either speaking about the county officials, or he's just lying.

Didn’t you publicly tweet at him, asking him to sign a waiver or something?

 

[Angry Crustacean]

Send him a message on signal. Post it here and have him put his money where his mouth is.

He would point at the motion to suppress that got shot down before smugly eating a Dorito.

 

[TurdThrower]

They can.

I'm merely trying to predict Nick's strategy here. I'm not saying it will be successful.

Family court is far more casual. The point would be to accuse the one person who Nick does not have on his side—the person with TWO restraining orders against him who discussed coke being near his kid.

Three against one. Do you honestly think Nick isn't trying to leverage that advantage?

(Also, Aaron's not going to face criminal charges, though he wedged a door open. What is in play? Ashley has leverage for full custody.)

I thought Aaron just had the one with the other belonging to April (not sure if still active)? Also Ashley probably could get full custody if she wanted but Aaron appears to have done a course correction so why go about that from her perspective. Aaron basically serves as a free baby sitter and most parents want the divorced spouse to be in their children’s lives.

 

[Burn It All Down]

Nick and Kayla's defense being 'well it wasn't my coke, it was actually April's she bought it!' is unbelievably stupid. Even just based on what we know:

• Nick admitted to the cops during the arrest that he and Kayla slept in the master bedroom, and that that was their bedroom. Why would April keep her coke in the room where she didn't sleep, and wasn't hers?
• The various drug paraphernalia found in the master bathroom and bedroom. The defense somehow has to claim that none of this was the Rekieta's and was actually April's.
• Drugs were found in the safes, which are located in the bedroom and bathroom. Are they going to claim that the safes aren't theirs, and the safes themselves belong to April? If not, are they really going to claim that while they own the safes that the coke was found in, they don't own the contents of the safes?
• This is also ignoring any DNA or fingerprint evidence for the drugs. All they have to show is that any of the containers of cocaine have the Rekieta's fingerprints on them, and I don't know how you can't show possession.

This defense sounds like something I saw on an old episode of cops, where some corner drug dealer was getting busted by the cops, and he had a baggie of drugs in the jeans. The criminal's defense to the cop on video camera was 'well I stole these jeans they aren't mine, so the drugs aren't mine, I don't know how they got in my pocket.' Rekieta's defense is somehow even more stupid, because his defense is 'well it's my house, my mater bath and bedroom, my safes, I sleep here every night, there is drug paraphernalia everywhere, but the coke in my safe isn't actually my coke.'

They could try to argue that April had the code or key to the safe. I'm not sure that argument would hold up in court.

 

[Sharpeteer]

Send him a message on signal. Post it here and have him put his money where his mouth is.

No please no.

What makes Nick missing Null so funny is Nick continuing to message him, and never getting a response.

Permanently left on read. Sad life.

Do we have a clip about this? I am working on a more long-form summary for the OP supplements, and this would be a HUGE undermining of his established image.

I don't recall ever seeing a clip, as I think it was merely a post or text message from Aaron (part of why I'm not willing to say that's the 100% truth, although it sounds like our guy). I'll dig back through the thread when I have time (unless someone finds it before me).

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

For what purpose? Consuming cocaine isn't one of his criminal charges. The state may require he provide it as a condition of returning his kids but that's going to be on Nick if he wants his kids back. Also, he has the results of that test. If it didn't make him look like a coke fiend, he'd have released it. What he doesn't want is KCCHS requiring him to attend rehab as a condition of getting his kids back which is what the hair test would trigger.

He also said he's given the state the clean urine tests. Contrary to his statements, he doesn't have an issue giving the state test results. He only objects to dirty test results.

Potentially circumstantially supports an additional, related neglect charge against either or both of them under 609.378a1.

Also adds doubt to any "the coke wasn't mine" defense to his possession.

OMG this Camelot appearance is enraging.

Nick was a drunk with SO MUCH STRESS. What was his stress? His kids had the end of the school year!

No one has ever had five kids in June before! This is brand new! Of course Nick has been degrading for two years and it hasn't been June for two years. And 99.9% of people with five children manage June without cocaine. And without tons of money. And without a trust fund. And local family. But you just don't understand.

He's such a dumb fuck. He has kids. He has 5 kids. Whoop-de-doo. Yes, it's stressful. It's not stressful enough to somehow excuse shacking up with another couple, buying an ounce of blow, repeatedly appearing in an incoherent state with a bloody nose in public, and letting your kids go hungry to the point of them asking for food or be observably dirty at school/church.

And it sure as fuck is not that "stressful" when you have 2 adults and FT hired help (plus didn't they have 2 last summer, at least for a time?). If your wife is xannied out or terrified of driving, get her better help. If you stay up all night for no reason, stop. If your nanny quit, consider that you might be the problem.

Nick's only real stress about having to deal with kids was that it cut into time for the things he wanted to do: coke, booze, and April.

If you want to see a good simulation of what it was mentally like to be Nick and company on the day he was arrested, there is a sequence in Goodfellas that can give some insight.

I'd give you a clock bc I was the first to Goodfellas that day (though I might have only hit post on the scene where he's freaking out at Kaaaaren for flushing their retirement bc I didn't want to get jannied), but there's never too much Goodfellas, and it's dead on, so I gave you a like instead.

His public claims about the drugs are the same as his "not guilty" plea. They would not be admissible without his direct testimony. They might be admissible if he stated they were his. The videos that show "white poweder on his nose" are admissible because of the cops training and experience as PC for warrant.

Probable cause standard and admissibility as evidence in a trial standard are different. The powder stream may never need to be formally admitted, at least for the current charges.

"The frustrating part of [testing for alcohol] is that alcohol isn't part of any of the concerns that anyone has in our case."

It sure as heck is part of the CPS concern. And if there's ever a 609.378a1 charge, excessive, incapacitating drunkenness could certainly be circumstantially relevant.

Drugs were found in the safes, which are located in the bedroom and bathroom. Are they going to claim that the safes aren't theirs, and the safes themselves belong to April? If not, are they really going to claim that while they own the safes that the coke was found in, they don't own the contents of the safes?

And were the safes open? There's no detail in the statement of probable cause affidavit available online from the court about cracking them, so either open or someone gave them the combination (the statement of probable cause affidavit does not mention anything either way).*

* I swear there was another, more detailed affidavit/narrative posted here that described Kayla and April emerging from the back room, and I thought also said Nick gave the combo (or maybe I imagined that) but I couldn't find it so defaulted to the public record.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Didn’t you publicly tweet at him, asking him to sign a waiver or something?

But he is so BUSY he cannot possible see it! He has a 100k subscriber 24 hour stream.... Actually, it is a 5k gift... er... I mean, big plans for the show and daytime content He will definitely be streaming a tiral... that is to say, he has his kids to.... What I REALLY meant was that he has to do thing for the state...

HE IS JUST SO BUSY! YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND!!!!

I don't recall ever seeing a clip, as I think it was merely a post or text message from Aaron (part of why I'm not willing to say that's the 100% truth, although it sounds like our guy). I'll dig back through the thread when I have time (unless someone finds it before me).

I recall him saying he mocked Vic and his 'sexuality' and that he 'should have come out as gay'. I was referring to the 'I did not think he was innocent part'.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

If Nick is claiming that nobody asked him to consent to the footage, he's either speaking about the county officials, or he's just lying. It absolutely would make things easier if he would sign an affidavit consenting to the release of footage. It's written in the statute that any party involved may do this, including April, Kayla, or any of the Police Officers. I aggressively tried to reach April thinking she would be done with them and willing to consent, but she's still in the balldo bunker. I was dissuaded from trying to contact the LEO.

He will clarify that there is no footage for him to review for release. Then after the state provides it to him, he will say he can't consent to release any footage that depicts his children or the inside of their home. To save face, I bet he releases everything outside his home w/o children on his own.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

He will clarify that there is no footage for him to review for release. Then after the state provides it to him, he will say he can't consent to release any footage that depicts his children or the inside of their home. To save face, I bet he releases everything outside his home w/o children on his own.

He is too lazy for that... He also would not know how to redact it himself, and will cry that, 'He has more important things to do than fulfil requests from haters'. He will then wish Josh and the Farms a million Balldos and hoe that our gay little speculations that are NOWHERE NEAR FACT is fun to do.

 

[TurdThrower]

Considering Nick seems to be the only one with a lawyer, I suspect he's going to take the hit.

I keep seeing this but I thought that he and Kayla were doing a joint defense? If so then by virtue of having a lawyer would Kayla not be covered by them too?

 

[Watching Rekieta]

I keep seeing this but I thought that he and Kayla were doing a joint defense? If so then by virtue of having a lawyer would Kayla not be covered by them too?

They have different case numbers and the attorney only made an appearance for Nick. On the other hand, their omnibus hearing is at the same time and place? IDK

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

While they are not charging him with use.

Use would still be charged as possession.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Funny how Nick claims his stress was because he has kids but no mention of the absolutely avoidable lawsuit he asked for and over which he has burned six figures and counting while suffering setback after setback. I know which one of those would cause more stress for the average person.

 

[Chode]

Clips of Camelot's stream with my notes.

Spoiler

Explanation of the 2009 case. Says they were fostering two boys until Our Wife started bleeding mid 2nd pregnancy. Had to go on bedrest. Didn't keep up with them.

Again says he was sick for 20 days. He couldn't even eat liquids the 2nd time.

On child abuse accusations. Says CPS ignored the previous two cps calls.

'Allegedly' illegal substance. Government doesn't have admissible test of substance yet. If children are present with an illegal substance the kids are put on emergency placement (with family).

"Minnesota has a presumptive reunification plan where they 'want to put your kids back with the family' and I put that in airquotes because, well you know, child protective workers don't always want to do that, even when they say they do, and they sometimes act contrary to that" Says he has a month of clean tests ever since he started asking for them

Having to straddle between cps and criminal case. Makes it very difficult if you're trying to actually defend yourself.

It's the same attorney prosecuting the cps and criminal case. The government wants you to tell their story. You can show them "piles and piles of evidence" saying otherwise. Most don't have the means to fight, when they have someone that has the means to fight it really complicates things for them.

Best case scenario for the case: beat the charges. 'Not an outlandish possibility', government has a tough case to make, it's not an open and shut case. Can't talk about why. Can read about them when the docs hit.

People get a distorted view from watching the show. Says he is only drinking on the show not the rest of the day

Alcohol is not part of any of the concerns they have with our case. The list of concerns is exceedingly small.

Says if the kid was doing rails of coke there would of been a funeral. Says they were dumbstruck when they heard the result. Made demands to the state in response and people should be angry at the state's response (when the documents come out). Nobody reported the kids looking erratic in line with them being on drugs despite going to church, music, etc. Kids are above average height and weight, says state is struggling to reconcile facts with the test results. Story from "documents that really shouldn't be leaked due to laws in Minnesota get leaked" only part of the story got out. Possible that someone else came in to contact with his child with drugs. Can happen in nefarious and non nefarious ways. Knows his child was not doing drugs, literally impossible result.

Note: 'Leaked' when CHIPS cases are available in person:
View attachment 6101983

Camelot saying his mind immediately went to the drugs coming from outside contact.
For the clip that made him look like a bad friend. Does he mean the clip where he said Nick sees medicinal value in cocaine?
View attachment 6094002

Took the first drug test voluntarily. Didn't know what the hair follicle test was going to show, goes to a lot of clubs, crazy fucking parties. Revoked their consent to that test. Says government lied saying he revoked access to future tests.

Most people's cases aren't broadcasted. get documents in "little pieces of very convenient" leaks.

People should watch Barnes about the problems with the test results

Why is Aaron allowed to talk? If there is an agreement with the state it is not concealable by the state. Hopes he makes a million bucks.

Complaints about stress. "I drank way too much on shows". "Other things going on" causing issues. Lots of mental problems. Not depression, but similar symptoms. "Not faulting people for coming up with their own theories." Was compensating by drinking to excess way too often. "I might not of been drinking much off stream". Nice not using it as a crutch to get through things.

One of the big stressors was the end of the school year. Had activities all of the time. 'Cute to assume there was neglect, we made it to each of their activities'.

Nick has had a therapist for a long time

The classic. If you watched his streams 2 or 3 years and thinks he lived the straight and narrow lifestyle what is wrong with you? Doesn't know if he has ever claimed so.

Christians do "bad stuff" all the time. If Christians just catered to people on the straight and narrow church would be fucking pointless.

How old shows apply to the case. 'What does this clip from 2019 have to do with 2024?'

Superchatter remembers when he didn't swear on stream. Says people only see a portion. Camelot reminds him of John C Riley in Talladega Nights except for the betrayal part.

People were concerned (with the alcoholism), did this event save your life? Mostly issues outside of that. Had some days where he wished he wouldn't wake up.

Talks about the nanny leaving. Had to scramble to fill the schedule. Kids are in any activity they wanted to do if they can fit it in. Had to replace her with help from 'friends'.

Any reason why the nanny left. It's 'fuzzy'. Got one story from her, doesn't think it was honest.

*MANGOSTEEN*

Is the corner demon "sitting here with me"? no

Was that not your coke? governments job to prove it. Our Wife was also charged. Not my burden to say anything at all.

Would you go on Kino Casino? no. Was on one of their first shows(?). What felted means

Had to cut Killstream short for video call with kids. Will resume later.

Camelot got clipped. Was waiting for shower call.

@Null Bodycam footage. 'No one's even asked me for a release form'. Release law 'will be complied with or not complied with' by the state. He is curious about the bodycam footage.

Montegraph. Waiting for Montegraph's damages.

You don't have any reason to trust me. "I'm not going to be mad at people for having negative opinions"

A sign out. 'Captain(?) have fun you're still gay'

Side note: even ffmpeg has bowed to the comic nigga:

 

[Burd Turglar]

I was curious who the random whore was because I don't live and breath these retards and would ya look at that, she's litteraly some dumb whore.

Spoiler: NSFW

and for fun, here's pre boob job whore

Edit* her name is xialand and all you have to do is Google image search to find ev-er-y thing. The internet was a mistake.

 

[Nod Flenders]

Nick again saying obvious lies. Must be a day ending in Y.

 

[East_Clintwood]

Says he is only drinking on the show not the rest of the day

This isn't the defense you think it is given you were drinking enough on stream to meet the NIAAA guideline definition of both binge drinker and heavy drinker.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

They could try to argue that April had the code or key to the safe. I'm not sure that argument would hold up in court.

The biggest problem for Nick is that he streamed hundreds of hours worth of evidence for the prosecution to pick through, of him talking about doing drugs, of him getting wasted on stream, of him doing cocaine off stream and coming back hyped up, even having white powder on his nose on one occasion, of him losing insane amounts of weight, every relevant moment will be played for a jury.

If Nick is really planning to use the "blame each other and they'll never know the real culprit" strategy, even if it hadn't been used a million times before and wasn't accounted for in the law, then he's going to be the one that the jury inevitably land on, purely based on media exposure to his apparent substance abuse, it won't be April and certainly not Aaron.

Not to mention everything that happened to his kids while under his care, not recognizing or caring about his children going hungry and not having fresh clothes, of them living in a pigsty, all of it is heavily indicative of Junkie behaviour, that's exactly how the prosecution will paint the situation and it's exactly how the jury will see it.

Nick can argue semantics and technicalities all he wants, trying to be clever and cute, but at the end of the day he was caught with his dick in his hand.