Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
Let's review.

Defenses:
Someone else gave the child drugs.
- It doesn't matter. If you turn your house into a drug den and one of your cohorts does drugs with your kid, you're responsible. Part of the legal duty of parents is to protect their children from druggies.

People around Nick hated him.
Maybe they did, but the things they objected to were obvious to absolutely everyone. Nick was doing drugs. Kayla was doing drugs. Nick and Kayla had people in their house doing drugs with them. The house was in disarray. The children were in disarray.

The government lies.
If I assume only what I know to be true because I saw it on stream and/or Nick admitted to it, I know that he was using drugs and neglecting the kids. I have seen him high as a kite day after day. I have seen him moving degenerates into his house. I have heard from multiple sources that the house was a mess. I have seen video of the children looking thin and poorly cared for. And it just follows. No one who does as much blow as Nick was doing, also runs a tight ship of a household with regular nutritious meals and clean clothes.

Nick was under a lot of stress.
Nick is obviously very divorced from the real world. "My nanny quit and I and my SAHM wife had to drive our own kids around" is not a sympathy-getting move. No, not even if you have five. No, not even if four are home schooled. Rural or semi-rural people are often in situations that require a lot of driving., and even the reason (dance lessons, music lessons, Bible classes, amateur drama productions) are not nearly as sympathetic as, say, a child needs medical treatment. Plus, even if you had a real reason for sympathy -- one of the children was seriously ill, or Kayla was -- it wouldn't cause people to excuse the crack den part.
 
Faces of cope (yes, there's an insect that just landed on his forehead)

View attachment 6172125

This is the YouTube thumbnail for one of the clips.

6160339-7ff9b668656b5902579289140188fd3b.gif
[
WTF is this choice of streaming look/venue? He looks like a sleazy, '80s porn producer or a gay Twitch thot.
 
*Warning: Butts in chat*
Some clips from the locals stream (w/chat):

On lawtubing. "I'll stream with good lawyers"

Due to his current circumstances he will have to leave trial streams for 1-3 hours in the middle. Says he let that stop him up to now because of his "perfectionism flaw". Says he hated quitting Murdough in the middle. Further bitching about how boring trials are.

Talking about Biden getting a poll bump post debate. "He took a two point bump right before the stream... right before the debate started"

Full context:

They'll 'hook up biden with electrodes and automatic cocaine injectors into his eyeballs'

"The things you can't say are things that the government has a burden to prove and hasn't"

Context before that clip: Talking about criticisms and about why he isn't sad 100% of the time. Spends most of the day going through documentation. Cooperates with the government where and how he can. He can't wait to tell you guys the whole story.

The murder hypothetical:

Has stuff that he wants to talk about that the state doesn't know yet "because we're not there". This story is "fascinating." Will be able to talk about things and "the internal processes of it with you guys." Talks about 'when a government worker goes on stand and lies about you' and how you have to just take it. "I haven't lied at all." People assumed he lied because they don't know the story.
 
On lawtubing. "I'll stream with good lawyers"
I'm fairly sure Nick has this wrong, and does not understand what Streamyard is now allowing with simulcasting.

Back in the day, LegalBytes suggested a schedule and rotating host for trial streams. The host would get all the Superchat dollars on a given day. (It was silly but she probably organized sorority socials too. Turns out, she/her husband read Nick properly.)

Since then, Stremyard has enabled one host - for Baldwin it appears to be Eric Hunley - in which anyone can watch Dani, Joe, Nate the Lawyer, etc on their own channels and see the group discussion while the creator can collect their own Superchats from those watching them.

This was one of the most awkward/amusing discussions I've ever seen in LawTube but it's explained here timestamped at 1:03:00. Joe's cope was hilarious.

Edit: Words
Edit II: Not timestamped. Not good at this, but it's at 1:03:00
 
Last edited:
See, e.g., Fitzpatrick v. United States, 178 U.S. 304, (1900).
Thank you for the citation.
Once you opt to testify in a criminal case, you can't plead the Fifth.
I believe that.

I am at fault here, though; I did not provide enough context. Below is the section to which I replied. The context, then, is civil court (the CHIPS case).
Something about Crackety Rackets line here is really bothering me though. He’s implying that there’s some testimony he could give in the CPS case to win it, but that it would hinder his criminal case. That just doesn’t make sense to me. In what world would something that proves your not a complete failure as a parent also show you’re guilty of the criminal charges? The only thing I can think of is that he would have to be honest and admit to the drug possession, but that he would be able to explain away his daughter’s drug test with that admission.
Idk, I’ll need to think more about this, but something about this whole line just stinks.
Instead of the statement being good for one case but bad for the other, I was trying to suggest making the statement was good but getting cross-examined was bad.

So @Captain Manning and/or @AnOminous , are there differences in Fifth Amendment protections for civil cases? Broad stroke differences, of course.
 
People assumed he lied because they don't know the story.
People assume he lied because he does nothing with his mouth but lie. And suck dicks. And drink.
So @Captain Manning and/or @AnOminous , are there differences in Fifth Amendment protections for civil cases? Broad stroke differences, of course.
If you take the Fifth in a civil case, it can be used against you in that civil case.
 
"Ladies and gentlemen of the court, there are many things I have been accused of. The State has made many claims as to my guilt based on so-called evidence. But this is not the whole story. I have been eagerly waiting to reveal the whole story to you which will undoubtedly exonerate me of all charges. The time has now come for that revelation."

"Ladies and gentlemen, are you aware of Star Trek? Are you aware of the existence of the Mirror Universe filled with sinister doppelgangers? Ladies and gentlemen, what if I were to tell you that a rift in the space-time continuum has occurred in Spicer, Minnesota, and it is not I who am guilty of any crimes but rather my evil twin from the Mirror Universe?"
"Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, let me tell you about the Dimensional Merge. You see this amulet?..."
:story:
 
I wonder if Nick's lawyer is going to pull out the one true defense for the Baldoman. Aaron obviously sprinkled the coke in the spaghettios in some kind of 4D chess move to set up Nick by having his kid test positive when CPS got involved. Apparently the other kids were to weak from hunger to make it to the table to enjoy this sumptuous feast.
 
My nanny quit
Next obvious question: and why didn't you replace them (with someone not coked up and whom you weren't banging)? Could it be that it is hard to entice a decent nanny to a slovenly drug den of alcoholic wife-swapping? Could it be you couldn't risk someone not in the ménage seeing the absolute state of your home and life? Outstate Minnesota is chock full of nice farm girls with valid drivers' licenses... though they probably won't crawl under your desk, so maybe that was the reason.
 
Nick takes the podium to give his testimony. His lawyer is missing. The last thing anyone saw of him before Nick called him an Incel Prude was a sick yellow glow followed by a zap of lighting.

Nick: "For you see, the INCEL PRUDES at the KAREN FARMS snuck into my house at the behest of..." *pause for dramatic effect* "ERIC JULY..." *snort* and planted the cocaine in her herbal teas."

Honorable Judge Christian Weston Chandler takes a moment from doodling to look up and gasp.

Nick: "So you see Judge, it is not my fault. I know I was given 6 hours to provide my testimony, but I request a brief 40 minute recess so I may whip my coke whore and insult my monogamous wife's body. When I return I will explain, again, how the balldo functions since there are still hold outs in the audience who have refused to put one on."

Weaker members of the jury, those not currently imprisoned for asking what happened to the judge the first day, are crying having long given up hope of being released from this hell. 6 weeks have passed since the merge and all efforts to escape the courthouse have failed. Despite initial hopes that suicide might be feasible after the "mutiny" in week 4, death is no longer permitted and no one wishes to be made an example of again.

Those in the audience that agreed to put on the Balldo funnel the jurors back to the jury room where they will be forced to watch Nick's depravity for another 6 hours. A floating clay totem, mostly unnoticed given the other horrors they've been forced to witness, watches the jury leave before fading out of existence to attend to other matters.
 
Nick wouldn't want to talk to Kayla of 20 years ago because he values himself

Minus Kayla, Nick would likely have been on the path to being a porn-obsessed incel or the sort of loser guy whose "relationships" are with sex workers. He would certainly have valued himself highly, but I don't think that much of anyone else would have. While I assume the parents were interested in supporting him as a family man with lots of kids, I think minus Kayla and kids that the family would have far less interested in supporting him at all. They would certainly I think not have funded him being a single degenerate.
 
Back