Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 23.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 31.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 87 32.5%

  • Total voters
    268
What kind of analogy even is this? The drugs were found in Nick’s house and his own daughter tested positive. It’s more along the lines of a dead body was found in his house and his prints were found on the smoking gun.

They found the coke and the daughter tested positive. I don’t understand how you can try and weasel talk your way out of it other than through severe mental retardation. It seems pretty open and shut.

I’d be inclined to maybe suspect a gubmint conspiracy against Nick if this came out of the blue in 2019. But we could see the visible effects of stimulant abuse for months. This didn’t just come out of nowhere lol.
Nick's current strategy is similar to Ralph's:

Play into the handful of retarded sycophants you have left that are stupid enough to believe your obvious lies. Ignore everyone else (people of average intelligence and above) because there's no hope of convincing them anyways, so why bother?
 
It would be very funny if one of Nick's defenses is "Well your honor, the cocaine I got is actually cut with a lot of other things, like baking soda. So I don't have 25 grams of coke, it's more like 10."
That would be funny, because I think Minnesota (and most states) don't give a shit what the concentration of a drug is: 25 grams of coke with 40% purity (10 grams) is treated the same as 25 grams of coke with 100% purity (25 grams). There are some that do care about the purity but they're the exception.

Him trying to make that claim is a losing argument from the outset, which would be funny and weird.
 
Isn't "white Midwestern" food stuff like
tater tot casserole? Would you like tacos more if they included a can of condensed cream of mushroom soup?
Bite your tongue. Tuna casseroles are divine inspiration from God and cheese curds are delicious. I’m just sick and tired seeing everyone praise third world beans and rice meals as justification for mass immigration. If they didn’t have torta bread they’d be serving the stuff out of troughs like the Ethiopian restaurants
 
If he testifies, he opens himself up for cross-examination. He'll have to plead the fifth on something.
Once you opt to testify in a criminal case, you can't plead the Fifth. As with all things there are exceptions, like if you're in a shoplifting trial and suddenly they start grilling you on a murder. The rule generally applies to things you testified about. And again, there are exceptions, like anything that would implicate your honesty, and anything you previously said that contradicts what you're saying now ("prior inconsistent statements").

Considering Nick has hundreds of hours of lying on record and constantly contradicts himself, he'd be crucified.
Nick is a shit liar, and guilty as sin. I think he'd be stupid for him to take the stand, but it would be funny if he did. He's certainly arrogant enough to think he's the smartest guy in the room and can gaslight a jury.
Which is funny because he didn't seem to think any of his clients deserved a jury trial.
 
Last edited:
- There's stuff the state doesn't even know yet that he wants to talk about but he can't.
"Ladies and gentlemen of the court, there are many things I have been accused of. The State has made many claims as to my guilt based on so-called evidence. But this is not the whole story. I have been eagerly waiting to reveal the whole story to you which will undoubtedly exonerate me of all charges. The time has now come for that revelation."

"Ladies and gentlemen, are you aware of Star Trek? Are you aware of the existence of the Mirror Universe filled with sinister doppelgangers? Ladies and gentlemen, what if I were to tell you that a rift in the space-time continuum has occurred in Spicer, Minnesota, and it is not I who am guilty of any crimes but rather my evil twin from the Mirror Universe?"
 
View attachment 6170537
I think it was about this person. He shows up in chats and if I remember correctly, he's said that he talks with Nick.

About a year ago Captain Havfun was supposed to go on a stream with Steve Gosney to talk about toys. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmAs8pQuXMU

They had been loosely discussing it for a few weeks "Hey, we should stream together and talk about toys." Havfun sent Gosney some Starship Enterprise accessories that go with a figure Gosney had and he was expecting to be on stream with Steve to watch him open, but Gosney only gave him short notice for the stream so he missed it. At 50 minutes into the stream Havefun came into the chat and asked to come on, but Steve had a stop time set and there were only 10 minutes left.

Afterwards, it bled into Legal Vices stream that followed https://www.youtube.com/live/oTOde5G1B58? and Steve addressed it at 14 minutes. View attachment 6170684

3 Months later, on Halloween, Dave from MLS Law (as the name Mac Turner) had a go with it when Steve arrived. https://www.youtube.com/live/PwyPJFL-CNM?si=7n6bBPphxp06UZ7u&
View attachment 6170688
In the weeks leading up to the toy stream Havfun and Gosney had been having a good time together on various panels, but one perceived slight occured and it all fell apart. Havfun tried to explain his dismay by saying he was used to working in Hollywood and everybody is informed of schedules and things are arranged ahead of time. Steve Gosney was pretty annoyed at the whole thing and disavowed all drama.

FYI, to anyone interested, there is a LawTube thread where Gosney is a topic.

The usual MO for churches is to follow Matthew 18: 15-17 which essentially says to confront a wayward brother one on one, and if they refuse to listen then with many people, and then if they refuse to listen, treat them as they would an unbeliever. 1 Corinthians 6: 1 is often cited too, asking Christians to stay out of government courts as much as possible.

If it is a Bible believing church (it probably is because of how much Nick seethed about them) then they likely followed all that. So it's not like this church just immediately slammed 911. They just asked him to pull up in a faggy way, so he literally had to choice but to do the Appealstream.

I agree this probably happened, and I think I made the same 'told me in a faggy way' joke. They even had the GALL to put his family on the prayer list for the church.

Nick would fail himself on redirect examination. I don't think he would be capable of keeping the thought he had previously... But instead would go on entirely different tangent... Thus destroying any credibility...

I think you mean 'cross'? Direct is the side that called the witness, and this is followed by 'Cross-Examination' by the opposing side. Re-direct is optional and is the calling party's chance to respond to the scope of what was presented on cross.

It would be very funny if one of Nick's defenses is "Well your honor, the cocaine I got is actually cut with a lot of other things, like baking soda. So I don't have 25 grams of coke, it's more like 10."
That would be funny, because I think Minnesota (and most states) don't give a shit what the concentration of a drug is: 25 grams of coke with 40% purity (10 grams) is treated the same as 25 grams of coke with 100% purity (25 grams). There are some that do care about the purity but they're the exception.

Him trying to make that claim is a losing argument from the outset, which would be funny and weird.

They don't care. They charge you with the intent of possessing the full mass of powder drugs. Just becuase your dealer sold you 5 grammes of flour, if you intended to buy cocaine, you still get the drug charge.
 
it was jack fucking normal "stress," but only became higher stress because he wanted to be doing other things, namely drugs, booze, and sex; and when you do a lot of those things you are way off your game for everything else and therefore often "stressed."
The life of a drunk addict is often stressful.
Tuna casseroles are divine inspiration from God
I had to look up what that was and I found recipes talking about which condensed cream soup to use as an ingredient? It's just anemic macaroni product with like 3 different canned things poured on top and baked? Like what the fuck, man? What in the semi-homemade hell is this? No wonder Sandra Lee was driven to drink.
 
Last edited:
"Let's say, hypothetically, the government accuses you of murder. They don't have a body, they don't have a murder weapon, they don't have witnesses [....] they just have a missing person. And the government says 'We need you to prove you didn't murder.... we need you to prove you won't murder again'."

But:

The government does have a body - all the positive cocaine drug tests they took from him

The government does have a weapon - all the cocaine they confiscated it

The government does have witnesses - both actual people and hours of live stream footage showing the behavior of drugged out people

The government literally said you don’t have to prove you’re innocence, we just have a fuck Tim of evidence against you.


This is my problem with Nick during all of this, he keeps describing himself as if he’s being framed, or “guilty until proven innocent” when in reality he’s ignoring that he’s the most guilty man possibly ever. Even OJ had a better alibi than he does.
 
I think you mean 'cross'? Direct is the side that called the witness, and this is followed by 'Cross-Examination' by the opposing side. Re-direct is optional and is the calling party's chance to respond to the scope of what was presented on cross.

I think he will spin enough some bs at first and even muddle through cross part. But then in redirect say something entirely contractionary initial statements... Or just come up with something new and fanciful.
 
The cocaine being found with April's credit cards is his best defense. It is hers, not his. It is all about the reasonable doubt.

Unless April wanted to counter that she had no idea he’d taken her cards. It could be that he should have theft tacked onto his charges as well.

I love how one of the cheap whore costumes in that picture is literally priced at $14.88.

Still overpriced.

Elissa Clip

This has been hashed ITT before, but his driving schedule is manageable if he asked for help, used rideshare, hired someone, or just planned the schedules better. A lot of the issue is that the children have overlapping 3-4 hour blocks of activities where they do 2-3 versions of one activity. If Nick truly cannot handle it and it is driving him and his wife batty, they should cut back.

Obviously it’s all cope but Nick is really trying to justify getting a coke habit, letting his marriage fall apart & loosing custody of his kids because of the insane schedule nobody had any control over, except Nick & Kayla, of course. But sure, it’s all the nanny’s fault for leaving them in the lurch.
What is the point of “homeschooling” when none of it seems to take place in the home. He doesn’t even like the Scandinavian prudes anyway.
Dance, ballet, theater, choir, violin, piano…too much unnecessary fluff all at once. Scant academics and not one kid plays a sport.

Except now everyone knows so much more about what is and was really going on to know that Nick is even more delusional than everyone thought. Before it was 20 minutes of word salad along the lines of "Sometimes you rely on people to help you and you set your schedule based on that and then their schedules change and they can't help you out so much and then your schedule changes and you have to adjust and don't get me wrong, I'd like to do trial coverage, I'd really love to, but I can't right now because of my schedule...." and now he's openly accusing his nanny of ruining him by quitting in the middle of a school year and LYING ABOUT IT!

The nanny quit in February. So what’s the excuse as to why he wasn’t able to stream a full trial the year and a half previous to her quitting?
 
Everyone can see the tattoo, still being shitty and unfinished - many prison jokes to be mode about that. What's more puzzling to me, is what the fuck is happening on his arm, right here?
IMG_20240709_185452.jpg
Whole video, for different angles
 
I think you mean 'cross'? Direct is the side that called the witness, and this is followed by 'Cross-Examination' by the opposing side. Re-direct is optional and is the calling party's chance to respond to the scope of what was presented on cross.
I think he meant redirect and it's for cleaning up your testimony that got wrecked on cross. But Nick is such a swiss cheese brain he'd make it even worse by contradicting himself.
Whole video, for different angles
Like this dumb fuck asshole doesn't have enough enemies, now he's insulting Locals too? What a loser. I mean it does suck, but he's the loser who decided to be on it.
 
What's more puzzling to me, is what the fuck is happening on his arm, right here?
I hope Rickety Crackets wasn't shooting up.
It could go either way: shooting up is for gross burnouts in crack dens, not refined hedonists in cocaine houses, so Nick would never.
Or it's exactly the kind of dumb-arse macho risk-taking that would make him feel like he was playing chess with God and winning.
 
Back