This absolutely happened. If for anything else, as a form of gay autistic revenge against the pastor for the intervention he no doubt tried to hold with Rekieta earlier this year. Something triggered all the raging against the incel prudes at church. Likely the pastor and other men from the church asked Rackets to sit down privately and told him he was acting off. Being scolded by a bunch of other guys, his peers, would've set his narc rage off like crazy.
I've said it a billion times: either
He will never really work as a lawyer. He's been out of school for 9 years and worked for 3, generously interpreted. He's never worked with someone (and never would) who knows what he's doing, and he hasn't done enough of it himself to be competent. No firm is going to hire him, he'd be useless in-house, and no one would risk partnering with a workshy big mouth, much less one who made news for coke and swinging. And he, himself, could not abide any of those options, because God forbid anyone have a legitimate and reasonable opinion about him not pulling his weight.
I was just pointing out that Nick is bullshitting when he says "the government is allowed to say what they want and I can't say anything" no, he can say whatever he likes as well, it's often just a really bad idea, but going back to Nick's murder hypothetical, if you can prove that you were nowhere near the scene around the time of the disappearance or have indisputable facts that you had nothing to do with it then why conceal it and go through the stress of losing your kids and a lengthy trial?
If this is the first thing in his stream, it's the narrative point he's the most mad about. Going through the motions doesn't make you a good father Nick! Sacrifice your ego and go to rehab!
It must kill him that all of his streams for the last 6 months were unwatchable babbling train wrecks.
Lmao, suffer Rackets.
That's something a lawyer should do, not you Nick.
Your "story" would be more of a fabrication than some of the worst fan fiction the farms has taken part in since page 950.
Lies by omission and misdirection are still lies Nick, you lying faggot who lies.
The usual MO for churches is to follow Matthew 18: 15-17 which essentially says to confront a wayward brother one on one, and if they refuse to listen then with many people, and then if they refuse to listen, treat them as they would an unbeliever. 1 Corinthians 6: 1 is often cited too, asking Christians to stay out of government courts as much as possible.
10 hours of body cam footage are currently being copied to a USB 1.1 flash drive, which will be mailed to our errverrlord as soon as it's done.
My guess, if he can't get the warrant tossed and all the evidence suppressed, is he's gonna go with something like the coke being Aaron's. Anyone but his. Though it was in his master bedroom, which he admitted to the police is where he sleeps, and constructive possession is a bitch. Plus they have the cokestream where he acted insane with white powder on his nose.
If he testifies, he opens himself up for cross-examination. He'll have to plead the fifth on something. Once he does that, said question and any further questions are presumed answered in a light negative to Nick.
Recording a CPS worker you don't trust? Man, that sounds suspiciously like work to Nick.
If there's one thing Nick's known for it's being a perfectionist.
Did he directly say that, or "technically they haven't proven beyond a reasonable doubt it was coke with a full offsite lab test"?
Nick's Mind said:
Not just that, but there is a sizable chance that he ends up losing his legal license at the end of this saga. The legal system isn't going to take lightly a lawyer having convictions for drug, firearms and child neglect charges.
At this point he is just trying to convince what few gullible morons exist as his supporter group that he did nothing wrong. That and try to convince himself.
A semi-retired attorney friend of mine does legal documentation work, reviewing contracts and such. It doesn't pay much comparatively speaking, but he likes the extra money and enjoys the work because it keeps his mind active. Lots of people would find it boring, but he doesn't. I imagine Nick Rekieta would.
you’re technically not supposed to read into the invoking the 5th as an admission of guilt as a juror I’m pretty certain at least in a criminal trial
I can’t comment on how this works with CPS/child custody cases, but in criminal trials, once you take the stand you waive your right against self incrimination. And if you opt not to take the stand, the jury is not allowed to consider that against you.
Actually, I don't think he can testify on his own behalf, and then plead the 5th on cross. I think the way it works is that if you chose to take the stand, you have substantially waived your 5th Amendment right to remain silent, provided the questions on cross examination are relevant to what was raised on direct examination. See, e.g., Fitzpatrick v. United States, 178 U.S. 304, (1900).
The latter.
