Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Dumbledore's Onlyfans]

The craziest part of current events is that Nick could be at the RNC right now. He could legitimately have become bigger than he was at Rittenhouse and Depp. If he had a smidge more work ethic, like enough to boil his own eggs, and listened to people saying set a schedule for streaming when there’s nothing big going on.

I’m not talking about some reality where he never defames Monty, doesn’t do drugs, or whatever. I mean he probably could’ve kept going as he was if he wasn’t so lazy. If he was just a little bit smarter and a little bit more motivated. Nick could’ve continued neglecting his kids and streamed at the RNC. He could’ve done cocaine with some Senator and sucked his cock in a bathroom stall.

Dude got invited to Mar-a-Lago for a screening of Dinesh D’Souza’s movie. He didn’t try to network with people or maybe get a few five minute interviews that might lead to a guest appearance. Instead, he wore a leather jacket and belt from hot topic with his crack whore looking wife.

You really are a fuck-up Nick.

Quarter Pounder and Alex Stein are both at the RNC (Stein already got kicked out for photo-bombing Cenk Ogre). Nick is not there, although he could have been. Sad.

 

[RodgerDodger]

It makes no sense. Nick clearly isn’t focused on getting his kids home. Attacking the lab is not going to expedite the children returning to their normal environment & routines.

Any actual competent attorney would be advising Nick to A. Check himself and Kayla into rehab, and behave. And B. Do everything CPS says. Because doing this not just gets his kids back. But has the greatest chance of getting the DA and Judge to agree to some sort of suspended sentence program on the criminal.

Trying to prove he didn't do cocaine. There was no cocaine in the kid. When there is 26 grams of coke spread between 2 safes and every flat surface in his bedroom will accomplish nothing. Well nothing except piss off the Judge Jury and CPS Judge. His Trial isn't going to be weeks long, calling forensic experts and shit. The Judge isn't gonna go for that. The testing of and for drugs is settled science, long accepted by the courts. The Court will not long tolerate this angle of bullshit.

And he fucking knows this. He was a small town storefront lawyer. He knows what it takes to get the best outcome for a client facing drug charges. And it's not by trying to go all Mattlock

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I can’t help but wonder what Nick hopes to accomplish in regards to obtaining the Curriculum Vitae of some Minnesotan scientists. He must have some really killer cocaine making him feel extremely invincible, to go with such a retarded argument in his children’s welfare case. Both lawyers signed off on these requests.

It's worth noting the company names since that's not the company Nick and Kayla got their drug tests from. I guess they accept that theirs are positive and not a false positive (obviously it's positive for something; if it was clean there would be no reason to not provide that).

That must mean Barneswalker Frank wants to dig into the procedures and qualifications of the people who performed the hair follicle tests on the kids.

This is a major signal in itself.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

He was a small town storefront lawyer. He knows what it takes to get the best outcome for a client facing drug charges.

OBJECTION! Nick is, was, and will always be a non-practicing lawyer.

His experience is minimal and he has no fucking clue how a courtroom works in his home town as evidenced by the fact he thought cornering a female judge in an elevator to complain to her was a fantastic idea worth sharing with the audience.

 

[AnOminous]

I don't know if we know for sure how this request went, but considering his snide social media comments around this time and lack of smugness announcing some sort of win, I'm going to guess he didn't get his way.

My guess is they'll respond with the records in question and nothing will be amiss. But maybe he gets lucky and someone fucked up.

Because doing this not just gets his kids back.

Nick couldn't give a flying fuck less about his kids. He hates them. He's glad they're gone. He's a sociopathic piece of shit and the only reason he cares about them being taken at all is it's ruined his reputation and now everyone knows what absolute garbage he is and it's a giant narcissistic injury. He probably blames the kids just for existing.

His experience is minimal and he has no fucking clue how a courtroom works in his home town as evidenced by the fact he thought cornering a female judge in an elevator to complain to her was a fantastic idea worth sharing with the audience.

What's particularly stupid and incompetent about that is he also utterly failed to preserve the issue for appeal, while trying to pull a retarded gotcha alone in an elevator with a female judge. Great job, come across as a repulsive pig chauvinist while simultaneously getting his client the worst possible outcome. What a complete dipshit, but I guess to be expected of someone who is too much of a loser even to handle a traffic ticket.

That must mean Barneswalker Frank wants to dig into the procedures and qualifications of the people who performed the hair follicle tests on the kids.

It's up to the prosecution to prove they did everything by the book, hence you always ask for all this stuff since failure to turn anything potentially exculpatory over triggers a Brady violation and then it's game over for the case. Also if even a single link in the chain of custody is broken you can easily raise a reasonable doubt that they tested the wrong sample.

As for whether this is strategically a good idea? Probably not if he cares about getting the kids back but he doesn't. It's what you do if your client insists on challenging this kind of thing. This is what anyone in a case based on cut and dry scientific evidence does, makes the prosecution produce their full evidence.

It's not like the results are getting MORE positive.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

My jaw dropped listening to the clip from his last stream where Nick says that he’s on a much faster timeline to get his kids back than anyone realizes and they’ll all be home soon.

This is straight up delusional thinking. Is this just Balldo Barnes and Frank leading him down the primrose path to keep the money flowing, or is Nick detaching further from reality in a more psychotic way?

 

[Balldo's Gate]

My guess is they'll respond with the records in question and nothing will be amiss. But maybe he gets lucky and someone fucked up.

I was talking about the request to prevent public access to the case. I'm sure they'll comply with the request for the records for the testing company, that seems boilerplate to me except for the implication that there is still a test result that Nick wants to cast doubt on.

 

[3MMA]

This just looks like lawyers trying to dig up everything they can with hope they can poke enough holes to discredit the testers.

the only reason he cares about them being taken at all is it's ruined his reputation

Nicks trial strategy isn’t what interests me, nor is it astounding, surprising or even unexpected. It’s that he’s risking his parental rights in order to play a cool guy to the Internet. That’s what I can’t help but wonder about.

My interest is that Nick cares more about his reputation online than his children continuing to be wards of the state. Look at these possible consequences of not showing up:

My question for the lawyers ITT is, can any of the above consequences be applied if the Rekieta’s do show up, but botch the trial up with Nicks bullshit, rather than working with the agencies involved in making sure the kids aren’t exposed to traphouse faggotry? Namely the severing of parental rights, permanent transfer of custody to a relative, or other permanent transfer of the children’s custody, including foster care?

 

[Whistlin' Crustacean]

Robert Barnes was on Timcast last night, looking rather unhealthy, ugly, fat, baggy-eyed and muddying attempting to muddy the waters with regard to "second and third potential shooters" in Trump's assassination attempt. Some dude in chat went:

It warms the cockles of my heart to know that his balldoguarding will follow him forever.

 

[The Internet Dick]

Nick couldn't give a flying fuck less about his kids. He hates them. He's glad they're gone. He's a sociopathic piece of shit...

The biggest part of my problem when it comes to looking at Rekieta's situation from his perspective is that my sense of identity comes from being a husband and father. I have empathy enough to imagine what I would think, feel, and do if my kids were little again and torn from my life and my wife was sinking into the depths of despondency and addiction. What I can't imagine is not giving a shit.

 

[AnOminous]

My question for the lawyers ITT is, can any of the above consequences be applied if the Rekieta’s do show up, but botch the trial up with Nicks bullshit, rather than working with the agencies involved in making sure the kids aren’t exposed to traphouse faggotry? Namely the severing of parental rights, permanent transfer of custody to a relative, or other permanent transfer of the children’s custody, including foster care?

Short answer? Yes. They can't actually unilaterally impose conditions on his criminal defense, but they are not a criminal court, and are not necessarily bound by the same due process considerations as a criminal court. They can draw an adverse inference from his refusal to take drug tests and other such refusals to comply with their conditions on return of custody. There may be (and probably are) limitations Minnesota in specific has on exactly what they can do, but that would be a question for someone who actually practices in the field and specifically in Minnesota.

But they're not constitutionally prohibited from doing things a criminal court couldn't do.

That said I'm not sure what Nick is basing his belief in his children returning soon on, so it may be the case, although he appears to be making it difficult. The situation is actually reasonably good for reuniting the family at least under supervision especially if both sides of the family are willing to pitch in and supervise the situation. CPS type agencies have broad latitude to make arbitrary decisions.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

Spoiler: The person lecturing you about masculinity

View attachment 6205683

What is it with cuckolds lecturing others about masculinity

 

[Captain Manning]

My jaw dropped listening to the clip from his last stream where Nick says that he’s on a much faster timeline to get his kids back than anyone realizes and they’ll all be home soon.

This is straight up delusional thinking. Is this just Balldo Barnes and Frank leading him down the primrose path to keep the money flowing, or is Nick detaching further from reality in a more psychotic way?

It's naturally Nick, but it's being enabled and accentuated by Barnes and co.

I figure if Nick didn't have Barnes in his corner, there is an outside chance he might admit some culpability and try to work with the state. But with Barnes triggering his natural tendency to deny all his failings, there's virtually zero chance of that.

Which is fine by me. It means he's firmly on the road to hell now. Which is the road he deserves to be on.

Remember, this nigger still will not even admit that he went to Hedonism II.

He can never be wrong. Everything everybody says about him is all fanfiction.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Interesting aside in Nick's stream last night on the subject of murder as a crime, bail and appropriate punishments.

Nick generally seems to believe that most murderers are not bad people and are not likely to repeat their crime. Based on them not being a threat to the community and the likelihood of a repeat crime being low, they deserve low to no bail and (probably) short sentences in prison.

But on the other hand, black people who live in the wrong places deserve high bail and long sentences based on Nick's extensive knowledge of them from the TV show like "the wire".

Its an interesting unlikely mix of some very liberal ideas (crime should dealt with based on the threat the person poses to the community in future rather than what they did) and good old fashioned racism which says you punish "those people" differently.

I see part of what Nick is saying, but there is a lot more nuance here. Often the reasons for repeat murders are tied to some other factor, but those factors are not always allowed considerations in 'proper and good' social circles.

What is likely going on in his mind is that he wants absolution from the consequence of his actions affecting the rest of his life.

'I never did drugs IN FRONT of the children, so you can't call me a bad parent!'

Or

'Just because I talk about sex online doesn't mean I can't teach children in a coop. I don't talk about it HERE!'

This is the type of thinking he wants applied. Until he punches YOU in the face, you have NO REASON to not allow him into your home. Forget the fact that he has done it to 5 others.

Now that we know that the 9 year old is on Ritalin for her ADHD, what are the chances that Rekieta either:

a.) Had snorted up all the kid's Ritalin and so had to find her a substitute, or
b.) Just got the notion that if Ritalin is good for ADHD, how much better would cocaine be?

He might have got the idea that because it 'works well' for him (and by 'works well', I mean it has deluded him into thinking he derives some superior benefit from cocaine when compared to his prescribed stimulant) then surely it would also 'work well' for his nine year old daughter?

I am not sure he is that high-functioning to make that connection.

I’m really annoyed by how Nick framed the CPS doc drop.

“Stalker Kiwis, don’t you know this is just if I mess again? These aren’t the real plans!”

I’m pretty sure everyone here was like, “lol, he’s gonna have to go through drug inspections and drug testing to get his kids back”.

I don’t know how he gets his kids back without that being a part of any plan.

The government is lying! They do all this for NO REASON at all. Trust me to interpret the secret law words and ways!

Nick is trying to find a way ehrre he can get what he wants, look good while doing it, and not have to do anything he doesn't not want to do. It will not happen. The government has him by the Balldo, and we are supposedly to feel bad for him becuase Gubment Bahd!

Only a Scandinavian prude incel would think a guy who started his shows saying he was “lawsplaining the interwebs” was ever a law channel.


We are a channel about relationships and masculinity. We have always been a channel about relationships and masculinity.

I'm working on the more complete backstory of Nick and his channel. It will put things like this to rest. I am starting back in 2017 and working forward.

These will be in the post following the OP once complete.

It makes no sense. Nick clearly isn’t focused on getting his kids home. Attacking the lab is not going to expedite the children returning to their normal environment & routines.

As said above, Nick will not take a victory of getting his kids back (if he event wants that) he has to look 'cool' and make it easy to do in order for them to do it.

I had friends who put so much paradoxical effort into cheating at school that it would have been better to simply study. Nick seems to have no bounds too far in search of laziness or avoidance of responsibility.

The craziest part of current events is that Nick could be at the RNC right now. He could legitimately have become bigger than he was at Rittenhouse and Depp. If he had a smidge more work ethic, like enough to boil his own eggs, and listened to people saying set a schedule for streaming when there’s nothing big going on.

I’m not talking about some reality where he never defames Monty, doesn’t do drugs, or whatever. I mean he probably could’ve kept going as he was if he wasn’t so lazy. If he was just a little bit smarter and a little bit more motivated. Nick could’ve continued neglecting his kids and streamed at the RNC. He could’ve done cocaine with some Senator and sucked his cock in a bathroom stall.

Dude got invited to Mar-a-Lago for a screening of Dinesh D’Souza’s movie. He didn’t try to network with people or maybe get a few five minute interviews that might lead to a guest appearance. Instead, he wore a leather jacket and belt from hot topic with his crack whore looking wife.

You really are a fuck-up Nick.

He really did take everything for granted and lose it all in the worst way.

 

[Nova902]

nick is still making the American Beauty rounds. And kevin Spacey love fest. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKk2w0l3phs&ab_channel=Meffistoe'sMovieReviews

 

[LiquidKid]

I can’t help but wonder what Nick hopes to accomplish in regards to obtaining the Curriculum Vitae of some Minnesotan scientists. He must have some really killer cocaine making him feel extremely invincible, to go with such a retarded argument in his children’s welfare case. Both lawyers signed off on these requests.

Part of me wonders if his legal strategy is to waste the state’s time and money as if it were a civil case, no realizing they don’t care about wasting everyone’s tax dollars

 

[Long-time Lurker]

I am starting back in 2017 and working forward.

Godspeed. o7

 

[zyclonPD]

What is it with cuckolds lecturing others about masculinity

 

[Watching Rekieta]

The hair testing will have no bearing on his possession charges. My guess is that they just used those to get a baseline to inform the Child Protection issues.

I suspect he's looking past crim as he's likely getting a plea (but pros attorney is lead for both). I'd bet that certain levels and long-term abuse triggers mandatory rehab as well as longer times for testing. Nick obviously doesn't think he needs rehab or he'd already be there. He's fighting the psych eval too.

In opposite Law Pope world, going to rehab is incriminating but a positive hair test is not.

 

[Swole McPole]

Any actual competent attorney would be advising Nick to A. Check himself and Kayla into rehab, and behave. And B. Do everything CPS says. Because doing this not just gets his kids back. But has the greatest chance of getting the DA and Judge to agree to some sort of suspended sentence program on the criminal.

This whole business is just a rerun of Montegraph, but using less expensive lawyers. Instead of doing what you need to do to get the best possible outcome, the stupid cunt is just grandstanding, deploying some half-baked legal theory that will make absolutely fuck all difference but will just cost him a shed load of money. And six months down the line, he's in exactly the same position and his kids are still in the care of the local authority.

I'm all for it though. It keeps the milk flowing and preserves the safety of his kids. Win/win!

I suspect he's looking past crim as he's likely getting a plea (but pros attorney is lead for both). I'd bet that certain levels and long-term abuse triggers mandatory rehab as well as longer times for testing. Nick obviously doesn't think he needs rehab or he'd already be there. He's fighting the psych eval too.

Here in the UK, the courts can't mandate rehab. People generally agree to enter as part of a plea deal. I bet the US is the same. First couple of possession charges for personal use quantities, nobody's giving much of a fuck. You'll get a fine or probation. People tend to take the rehab deal when the alternative is likely to be a custodial sentence. Even though Nick's been collared for an ounce, I don't think anyone is making the argument that he's supplying, so it's still personal use. Not much chance he'd be getting a custodial sentence.

I think it's all about the child protection case and the public relations.