Incecticyder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 22, 2024
I think that this was done for the Youtube algorithm (my theory).Remember when Mr. Never Apologize To People Who Want You Dead deleted all of his good content because he said he thought some mentally ill deviant might off themself? And then he started taking it easy on the pros who spent years hounding him and trying to ruin his life. That didn't stop him getting called a Nazi. Yet he persisted in it and in lieu of responding in kind, he took his anger out on his audience. I initially thought he was doing it because he did have those misguided mainstream ambitions. But now I think it really was an attempt to appease the Iconic guys so they'd publish and ship his books. That's been my personal conspiracy theory since the shoe store porno reveal, anyway.
While I am fairly certain he would do something stupid that would get him sacked, an editor is like a superior officer so his instict to obey might kick in. Then again, considering how much he praises very flawed artists that cannot function unless there is an editor breathing down their neck to keep them in line, he might fuck that up too when his contrarianism kicks in.But l won't muddy the issue. This is Zack we're talking about. Even if all the necessary cultural changes happened and all the gay autistic tranny leftists got booted out of the industry, he'd absolutely self-sabotage before too long. Do you think he'd function well under an editor's supervision? A guy who is paid to make sure your stories work and your deadlines are met sounds like Zack's greatest natural enemy. Or he'd do an interview and say something too retarded to ignore and get shitcanned.
He might need to lower his sales expectations after this "Culling" of his. When you fight the audience, you always lose. This goes double for crowdfunding. His comments might have people who agree with him (or at least pretend to) but that also means less money.This is from one of Zack's recent community posts "Comments are SO much more thoughtful and intelligent after The Culling." It's incredibly arrogant and not much different than some of the nasty, arrogant statements about comics fandom that the comic pros who actually have mainstream jobs working for DC or Marvel have said. Well, except that you actually do have some clout if you are writing Spider-man or drawing Batman.
Zack's big thing is selling "Impossible Stars II" for $35 to people. Based on his recent behavior, I assume he believes that the people giving him $35 for a comic book like that are grade A suckers and he's laughing all the way to the bank. Which, fair enough, that is a sucker's game when you can buy a volume of 86 for $13 on Amazon. I'm just not sure if having a temper tantrum over Furiosa underperforming at the box office is worth destroying the parasocial relationships that make it possible to sell something like "Impossible Stars II" for $35 per comic is such a great business plan, though.