Exulansic / TT Exulansic / Sierra Weir / Sierra Dullea Weir - TERF detransitioner/desister who has a crusade against the "I Am Jazz" phenomenon and also a massive collection of Party City wigs.

View attachment 6213750
Uhhh didn’t you try and get her kids taken away from her? 🥴
Yep. You straight up just don't play around with that kind of thing-grassing to the Nash, is simply not done. You better suspect the kid has an empty belly and a cock up the arse befor you start fucking around with peoples lives like that.

Class is hard to determine in americas from overseas, but I get the picture that as well as being upper middle class and no having much community solidarity like that TT is basically just 'tismly hugely socially sheltered.

Also, I can se her going down some autistic road of projecting and self testing and confirming her (ir-to a proud autist)-rational feelings of social rejection, and embarrassment at faux pas, into me right>dog dangerous>home dangerous >children>CPS, 'it's not sly behaviour on my part, it is merely unfortunate objective reality that I need to report this.'

Sorry to beg for the spoonyfeed, but what is the AGP gate business that they fell out over in the first place?
I haven't sene TT sympathising with agps, but also I haven't been much tuned into her -also in that video, I don't know if ASTF misspeaks but there's a bit that implies that TT is calling for the destruction of WPATH-is that not good? Or have I maybe got it the wrong way round and TT was against and she was pro?
This is the problem with these dramatic fucks sprinkling atoms of lore in amongst three hour bitch screeds.
Also i don't see how you cna really be "against" cross dressing, any more than you can be against spanking. You can't meaningfully police that. Yeah cross dressers shouldn't be in women's spaces but the very point of being a cross dresser is that you generally don't ask to be, which then comes down to the eternal problem of trans that we face now.
Autistically, fascistically categorising clothing items - it's nto going to work. The only way to deal with the problem is the root causes of proj addiction, social media, and social ills Whcih are much more vast and will basically always continue to exist in this particular economic model, and can't be undone without an insanely involved dictatorship.

Also lol, poor show, I thought TT accepted and owned being ugly. Come on now lady, you have a mirror. You could even, with a fe small changes, greatly improve your looks if you are going to be saty about it.
Comparison to Margaret what's-her-name, the lady who played the Wicked Witch of the West, should be a compliment. She was a genuinely good and nice lady. And the mere fact of having goodness in your heart always bleeds out visually, a la the good old Roald Dahl meme so often seen on these fine farms.
 
Sorry to beg for the spoonyfeed, but what is the AGP gate business that they fell out over in the first place?
I haven't sene TT sympathising with agps, but also I haven't been much tuned into her -also in that video, I don't know if ASTF misspeaks but there's a bit that implies that TT is calling for the destruction of WPATH-is that not good? Or have I maybe got it the wrong way round and TT was against and she was pro?
This is the problem with these dramatic fucks sprinkling atoms of lore in amongst three hour bitch screeds.
Also i don't see how you cna really be "against" cross dressing, any more than you can be against spanking. You can't meaningfully police that. Yeah cross dressers shouldn't be in women's spaces but the very point of being a cross dresser is that you generally don't ask to be, which then comes down to the eternal problem of trans that we face now.
Autistically, fascistically categorising clothing items - it's nto going to work. The only way to deal with the problem is the root causes of proj addiction, social media, and social ills Whcih are much more vast and will basically always continue to exist in this particular economic model, and can't be undone without an insanely involved dictatorship.
TT defended the blue dress guy at the Genspect conference, and all of TT's current enemies are against him wearing that. It makes sense from TT's point of view because in one video where she was responding to a Daily Wire guy saying transgenderism must be eradicated from daily life, she said that since transgenderism is a spiritual belief/religion, you must tolerate it but nobody else has to participate in it -- so let trannies wear whatever they want just like believers in other religions wear their garb publicly, but you don't have to play with the pronouns and the government/big pharma/public establishments don't have to treat trannies as anything other than their birth sex or give them unnecessary medical intervention. The other GCs disagree they believe that letting trannies wear whatever they want is participation in the religion since trannies get off to publicly presenting their fetish, and that's rapey because they're forcing you to participate in something sexual without your consent.
 
GCs disagree they believe that letting trannies wear whatever they want is participation in the religion since trannies get off to publicly presenting their fetish, and that's rapey because they're forcing you to participate in something sexual without your consent.
Ahhhh yeah. That guy. PhilLily on YouTube or something. Or maybe lilyphil. I chanced upon one of his videos the other day where he mentioned that.
Yeah.
I mean it does come down to civil liberties doesn't it.
I'd say TT is right but I see the others point, but honestly you cant really do much about it.
Any more than you can effect foot fetish people loving summer cos they get to perve at sandals or high heel people enjoy surepticious glances... Some people are perverts for puffer jackets ffs.
How can you tell what someone gets off on, do we henceforth then flat out ban men from this or that item, at what point does a kilt become a skirt, is the pleat size regulation?

After flowing the argument into its immediately obscure and absurd destinations, it also makes clear that - trying to assert or attach more importance to what should be treated as sartorial matters, is exactly what gives the TRAs to breathing room to try to say that a dress is an identity, or any significance, and means they are something like female.

Also, going insane about the mere. Fact of someone wearing this,
1721559683072.png

gives them that glorious frission of taboo that is what gets them off in the first place.

I don't know shit about ASTF but this whole argument is exemplifying of the worst type of feminism (imo, anyway).
 
While it's true that you can't always tell what innocuous thing might get someone off, AGPs aren't really innocuous, nor is a mystery what they're getting off to. They make it pretty fucking obvious. That's why the vast majority of people have a naturally disgust response to them that their useful idiots have spent lots of money and mental energy forcing people to stamp down and ignore. lol, lmao even
 
While it's true that you can't always tell what innocuous thing might get someone off, AGPs aren't really innocuous, nor is a mystery what they're getting off to. They make it pretty fucking obvious. That's why the vast majority of people have a naturally disgust response to them that their useful idiots have spent lots of money and mental energy forcing people to stamp down and ignore. lol, lmao even
For sure, of course.
There's just no meaningful way of policing it, outside of things like don't use the women's loos. Which is, I assume what TTs position.
If this is "not enough" I can't really picture the idea of some sort of total clothing ban to go further, that woudlnt be dystopic as fuck.
Long story short: TT retarded dog bite munchie social services snitch
AsTF : dramatic bitch with unworkable hill to die on.
 
it's not sly behaviour on my part, it is merely unfortunate objective reality that I need to report this
100% this is her exact mindset.

Why do I get the overwhelming, unshakeable sense that she deliberately provoked the dog in order to provoke conflict?

There's just no meaningful way of policing [male transvestic fetishism]
Of course there is. That's like saying that there's no meaningful way to police women going topless as public indecency.

Everyone knows a man in a dress when they see one - start handing out $800 fines for 'public lewdness' to any dude with the balls to go full dick-in-a-dress, with subsequent offenses earning a multiplier ($1600, $2400...).

You'll see the behavior curb itself quite quickly.
 
100% this is her exact mindset.

Why do I get the overwhelming, unshakeable sense that she deliberately provoked the dog in order to provoke conflict?


Of course there is. That's like saying that there's no meaningful way to police women going topless as public indecency.

Everyone knows a man in a dress when they see one - start handing out $800 fines for 'public lewdness' to any dude with the balls to go full dick-in-a-dress, with subsequent offenses earning a multiplier ($1600, $2400...).

You'll see the behavior curb itself quite quickly.
But then you'd have to find a specific definition of a dress, one that didn't include Kilts, Lavalava, middle Eastern men's outfits, and all manner of other traditional male clothing. Too difficult. Just humiliate and mock mercilessly any obvious AGP and we won't need a law.
 
But then you'd have to find a specific definition of a dress, one that didn't include Kilts, Lavalava, middle Eastern men's outfits, and all manner of other traditional male clothing. Too difficult. Just humiliate and mock mercilessly any obvious AGP and we won't need a law.

No, no, no. You just pass a local ordinance that leaves the definition vague ("gender" is nowhere defined in the US Code) and use the ordinance as a pretext to target undesirables for citations and leave it for the courts to sort out long after.

The vagueness in the letter of the law or its precise application is immaterial. The key tactic here is to establish the implied threat of state policing to make it de facto taboo.
 


Sorry about how large this appears to be, weird format. Archiving it cus I bet you she deletes it. Hope it's okay to post this here, if it ain't topical I'll be glad to put it into the gender crit thread. She does talk about Sierra.

Anyway, Brits here to tell us she's been getting blamed for Hakims death and Daryls death??? She feels like she is actually guilty of this somehow. I guess she likes the farms unless they're critical of her? Ma'am we just think you're stupid.

"Marcus is innocent in all this. He didnt get along with Hakim, but nobody wanted Hakim to die. HE WAS SO BEAUTIFUL."
"Fucking Kiwi farms, I don't care." ( I bet you'll read this post! )
"I love Marcus...You can love people..."(implying you can love more than one fella)
"A lot of these rumors are coming from-" Deletes where she says the drama source is from, ooo, intrigue!
"Sierra's a weirdo etc blah blah dog blah, I hate infighting"
"HE WAS SO BEAUTIFUL"
"Jennifer Thomas, my real friend. She's been coming to see me."
"It was a mistake to let these weirdos into my life from the movement. You get people like Sierra, and Yvette" (V555, whom she willingly had a threesome with.)
"Against my better judgement I tried to team up with Yvette one more time."
They met up in Atlanta. V555 met with a friend of Hakim, and came onto Brit AGAIN. Came onto Brit again, got drunk, and told Brit everyone knows she's a liar and the Hakim shit. "Yvette, you don't know me!" I bet the Atlanta money went toward the partying she mentions here, heehee.
"I'll probably regret making this video." Thats why I downloaded it, silly.
She says she'll come back, but she wants to forget everyone she has drama with and restart.
 
View attachment 6240010

Sorry about how large this appears to be, weird format. Archiving it cus I bet you she deletes it. Hope it's okay to post this here, if it ain't topical I'll be glad to put it into the gender crit thread. She does talk about Sierra.

Anyway, Brits here to tell us she's been getting blamed for Hakims death and Daryls death??? She feels like she is actually guilty of this somehow. I guess she likes the farms unless they're critical of her? Ma'am we just think you're stupid.

"Marcus is innocent in all this. He didnt get along with Hakim, but nobody wanted Hakim to die. HE WAS SO BEAUTIFUL."
"Fucking Kiwi farms, I don't care." ( I bet you'll read this post! )
"I love Marcus...You can love people..."(implying you can love more than one fella)
"A lot of these rumors are coming from-" Deletes where she says the drama source is from, ooo, intrigue!
"Sierra's a weirdo etc blah blah dog blah, I hate infighting"
"HE WAS SO BEAUTIFUL"
"Jennifer Thomas, my real friend. She's been coming to see me."
"It was a mistake to let these weirdos into my life from the movement. You get people like Sierra, and Yvette" (V555, whom she willingly had a threesome with.)
"Against my better judgement I tried to team up with Yvette one more time."
They met up in Atlanta. V555 met with a friend of Hakim, and came onto Brit AGAIN. Came onto Brit again, got drunk, and told Brit everyone knows she's a liar and the Hakim shit. "Yvette, you don't know me!" I bet the Atlanta money went toward the partying she mentions here, heehee.
"I'll probably regret making this video." Thats why I downloaded it, silly.
She says she'll come back, but she wants to forget everyone she has drama with and restart.
I don't understand anything.... I'm apparently out of the loop here... what is Hakim to her? Why she is so distraught by his death? Who is Daryl and when and how he died? Why do people think she has anything to do with Hakim's death and in what way? Who even said that? What's Hakim story's, anyway?

I don't know. I don't enjoy seeing her cry, she really seems in a bad place... I'm just really curious...
 
She's been getting called out on twitter.

1000014980.jpg


1000014982.jpg


Check the main terf thread for the relevant information and receipts on Brit's prison boyfriend. Long story short, Brit admits that Hakim was sent back to prison "because of my loser ex." She admits to using Hakim specifically to intimidate her ex husband to stay away. And shortly after Hakim was sent back to the pen, Brit got back with her baby daddy #2, Marcus. The last time she mentions him, Brit doesn't even refer to Hakim as her ex-boyfriend, but "the dude who has all the tattoos, the Hakim guy." She doesn't want her audience to know any of this, so she just cries and plays victim instead of addressing her actions and what she actually said.

She even deleted all traces of Hakim on her twitter in an attempt to memory hole the guy. Rather interesting behavior from someone who claims she loved him so so much. It's all in the main terf thread.

To avoid further confusion at this point, it would be ideal for ASTF to have her own thread. Karen's boring old ass has her own thread, and she don't even show her tits like my girl Brittany.
 

Attachments

  • 1718209505573.png
    1718209505573.png
    155.7 KB · Views: 48
  • Screenshot_20240727_085543_YouTube.jpg
    Screenshot_20240727_085543_YouTube.jpg
    606.6 KB · Views: 46
Last edited:
How hard is it for people to abide by simple rules like: don't make your personal life public if it isn't relevant to your e-whatever and don't shit where you eat. Further, don't talk about your shitting habits even if you do abide by not shitting where you eat. Everything everyone knows and gossips about is because it's volunteered information! Why are you like this Brit...

The threesome thing with V555 still gets me. V555 looks a few feathers away from being a haggard harpy. People that get up to weird sex stuff ending up being all dysgenic weirdos is such a funny phenomenon to me. It turns out you can judge books by their covers a good chunk of the time and be accurate and it was just propaganda to ever think otherwise.
 
She's been getting called out on twitter.

View attachment 6241615

View attachment 6241616

Check the main terf thread for the relevant information and receipts on Brit's prison boyfriend. Long story short, Brit admits that Hakim was sent back to prison "because of my loser ex." She admits to using Hakim specifically to intimidate her ex husband to stay away. And shortly after Hakim was sent back to the pen, Brit got back with her baby daddy #2, Marcus. The last time she mentions him, Brit doesn't even refer to Hakim as her ex-boyfriend, but "the dude who has all the tattoos, the Hakim guy." She doesn't want her audience to know any of this, so she just cries and plays victim instead of addressing her actions and what she actually said.

She even deleted all traces of Hakim on her twitter in an attempt to memory hole the guy. Rather interesting behavior from someone who claims she loved him so so much. It's all in the main terf thread.

To avoid further confusion at this point, it would be ideal for ASTF to have her own thread. Karen's boring old ass has her own thread, and she don't even show her tits like my girl Brittany.
I also agree she needs her own thread, it's been mentioned a little here and there if she stays on the internet. It's just that writing an OP isn't my forte.

She's not crying cus she feels guilty, she's crying because people are holding her accountable. She in her own words, wants it "all to go away", then she'll come back she said.
 
sierra.png
Has this been discussed in the thread? Apologies if it has been and I missed it. Sierra was cited for an ethical violation by the national licensing board for speech-language pathologists, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), for misrepresenting herself as a pathologist and implying she was a medical doctor, rather than an SLP, which is a master's-level degree. This happened in May of this year. When I first watched some of Sierra's content I noticed she often misrepresented herself this way, seemingly to bolster her own credentials when discussing trans surgeries and hypothesizing about potential psychiatric diagnoses. It really bothered me when I found out she was, in fact, not an MD and not a pathologist. I got this screenshot from Karen Davis's Twitter, but I believe the first person to point this out (to my recollection) was ASTF; I remember Brit talking about it on her livestreams after she and Sierra had their falling out. May 2024 is about when all of that went down - is it possible Brittany reported her to the board as payback for calling CPS on her? Regardless of who did it, Sierra deserved to be cited and I'm glad ASHA was made aware.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6249650
Has this been discussed in the thread? Apologies if it has been and I missed it. Sierra was cited for an ethical violation by the national licensing board for speech-language pathologists, the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), for misrepresenting herself as a pathologist and implying she was a medical doctor, rather than an SLP, which is a master's-level degree. This happened in May of this year. When I first watched some of Sierra's content I noticed she often misrepresented herself this way, seemingly to bolster her own credentials when discussing trans surgeries and hypothesizing about potential psychiatric diagnoses. It really bothered me when I found out she was, in fact, not an MD and not a pathologist. I got this screenshot from Karen Davis's Twitter, but I believe the first person to point this out (to my recollection) was ASTF; I remember Brit talking about it on her livestreams after she and Sierra had their falling out. May 2024 is about when all of that went down - is it possible Brittany reported her to the board as payback for calling CPS on her? Regardless of who did it, Sierra deserved to be cited and I'm glad ASHA was made aware.
lol

Her "I'm totally a pathologist, a speech pathologist :redditsmirk:" nonsense was so fucking dumb.

I'm confused as to why she didn't cut it out when people started noticing it.

Sierra isn't entirely stupid. She managed to stumble her way through college and get some professional credentials.

We've been talking about her making medical expertise in here for awhile, I'm pretty sure.

Even if she herself believes her credentials count for something in the troon debate (they don't, but, y'know, lolcows and their egos), she should've realized that it's totally likely that some buttmad troon would try and report her. Let alone friendly fire, which is a distinct possibility.

Is she that proud of being a glorified speech therapist?

Or am I overestimating her intelligence?
 
I know we’ve pointed it out before, but Sierra still has not outright denied that she called CPS and has even suggested that Brittany deserved it.
image.png
Sierra’s new position: Brittany deserved to have CPS called on her because she smokes weed & eats magic mushrooms.
This is the same woman who has gone on hours and hours worth of diatribes about the medicinal woo woo healing magic properties of weed & how it’s the literal wonder drug with no down sides.

Sierra, just fucking admit you did it. Everyone already knows.

(also I highly recommend searching “CPS” on her twitter for fun toilet time reading.)
 

Attachments

  • image.png
    image.png
    97.9 KB · Views: 62
  • image.png
    image.png
    89.8 KB · Views: 61
  • image.png
    image.png
    58.9 KB · Views: 59
  • image.png
    image.png
    54.9 KB · Views: 60
  • image.png
    image.png
    40.8 KB · Views: 58
Back