State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[East_Clintwood]

Even worse if he actually left the safe open. Why even bother having one?

Why bother buying multi-thousand dollar paintings if you're just gonna leave them on the floor?
Why bother buying a shitty mustang if you live in a place that's a frozen shithole you can't safely drive it in half the time?
Why bother having kids if you're just gonna constantly whine about having to spend time doing stuff for them?
Why bother having a sidepiece and a wife if you have terminal whiskey dick and need to stick your balls in a silicone torture device to simulate sex?

Trying to explain why that wet brained retard does anything is an exercise in futility.

 

[Kosher Dill]

I knew he was stupid for talking to the cops but even worse if he gave them safe combination or told them where keys were.

Realistically, would there have been any point to Nick refusing to open the safe, given that the cops had a warrant and would be getting into that safe one way or another? I can't imagine a "not my safe" argument would help him any, given that his coke-dusted fingerprints are probably all over the dial or keypad or whatever.

 

[AnOminous]

Realistically, would there have been any point to Nick refusing to open the safe, given that the cops had a warrant and would be getting into that safe one way or another?

Possibly. It would establish the cops would have to be lying if they said he gave consent. In this case it's pointless, though, because they not only had a valid warrant, they presumably have it on video too. But generally if you have the only way to access something without breaking into it, it's reasonable to refuse. If they do it with a legit warrant, you'll lose the safe, but if there's anything wrong with their probable cause and they get in without giving you an actual court order ordering you to turn over the code, they might just lose their case.

So Barnes and his Mini-Me who is representing Nick probably thinks this will happen.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Realistically, would there have been any point to Nick refusing to open the safe, given that the cops had a warrant and would be getting into that safe one way or another? I can't imagine a "not my safe" argument would help him any, given that his coke-dusted fingerprints are probably all over the dial or keypad or whatever.

Oh, the state's case is rock solid. In the moment, though, Nick doesn't know it. Giving them the combo while they search establishes that he has control of it rather than the state having to prove it. And like providing the door code, it could be construed as consent and establishes control. As a lawyer, Nick shouldn't have said or done anything except identify himself. He's an idiot if he volunteered that he stays in the MB and gave them the safe combo. Nick thinks he's smarter than everyone else so he thinks saying "the white powdery substance is mine" doesn't incriminate him unless he says it's cocaine.

 

[AnOminous]

And like providing the door code, it could be construed as consent and establishes control.

I don't think it really does, because you're legally obligated to comply with a search warrant. But if you absolutely are going to act like the cops (despite having bodycams out the wazoo) are going to lie and claim they had consent in light of you utterly chimping out, then go ahead and have them batter down your door and smash open your safe.

I think Nick was lying about only Kayla and he sleeping in the master bedroom not because he was even thinking about the cocaine, but because even he on some level is ashamed to be a disgusting, swinging, degenerate cuck and doesn't want to admit it in front of local cops. So he basically just admitted to owning felony levels of cocaine instead.

Sort of like he's weirdly squeamish about admitting to Hedonism II even though he threw repulsive coked-up cuckstreams in the hot tub and licked another dude's ear on stream, as if that kind of behavior isn't more shameful than a discreet visit to a cuck resort. Oh except that wasn't even discreet. He posted naked pictures of himself and his wife there including one with a bottle up his ass as if nobody would figure it out.

He thinks he's smart but he's dumb as dogshit.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Even worse if he actually left the safe open. Why even bother having one? Either way, the cops don't mention having to break it open so one or the other happened (or Kayla gave them the combination).

We're talking about the guy who bought a professional grade drawing tablet and permanently installed it in his stream setup so that he could draw Mohammad one time multiple years ago. He buys things he doesn't understand to compensate for his lack of value as a man.

I could totally see him going out and buying the most expensive safe possible and then leaving it open all the time once he realizes he has to remember a code to open it.

Why bother buying multi-thousand dollar paintings if you're just gonna leave them on the floor?
Why bother buying a shitty mustang if you live in a place that's a frozen shithole you can't safely drive it in half the time?
Why bother having kids if you're just gonna constantly whine about having to spend time doing stuff for them?
Why bother having a sidepiece and a wife if you have terminal whiskey dick and need to stick your balls in a silicone torture device to simulate sex?

Trying to explain why that wet brained retard does anything is an exercise in futility.

Silly answer: Because you have to get to your stash FAST when that high starts wearing off.

Serious answer: Because he has poor impulse control and went NIGGER RICH as soon as he had more disposable income.

 

[Maude Snew]

Silly answer: Because you have to get to your stash FAST when that high starts wearing off.

He could store half of Colombia up that nose of his. Like some fucked up druggy cuck Chipmunk.

 

[Maraschino]

Supposedly when you are co-defendants, spousal privilege is somewhat weaker. Normally it's pretty strong like you suggested, but when your spouse and you are charged for the same crime, I believe you can throw each other under the bus.

It's precisely why you can't represent your codefendants even if you happen to be an attorney, aka the non-waivable conflict of interest. An attorney might suggest you throw your spouse or codefendant under the bus, but you're less likely to do that in zealous defense of your client if you're the person who needs to possibly be thrown under the bus (or in Nick's case, viciously soccer kicked in the head).

As Kurt/Uncivil Law put it as he called Barnes a retard for trying to pull the 6th amendment argument, you have the right to an attorney, you do not have the right to a specific attorney.

 

[AnOminous]

It's precisely why you can't represent your codefendants even if you happen to be an attorney, aka the non-waivable conflict of interest.

And this is DEFINITELY a non-waivable CoI. To the point the judge pointed it out even at the arraignment stage, because it was so obvious it can't be ignored. There are two kinds of conflict of interest, and this is the non-waivable kind, because it is a situation where the codefendant who happens to be an attorney can't possibly act impartially, considering his own direct interest in the outcome of the proceedings.

In other conflicts (it is really hard to avoid any conflict of interest at all), the attorney should make the client aware of the potential of the conflict ripening into a non-waivable conflict, and even suggest seeking independent counsel on the issue, and in the best practices sense, even seek alternate counsel so the representation can be swapped out smoothly if it occurs, although usually only very wealthy people have this option of retaining multiple lawyers just to be able to switch them out if necessary.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

He was clearly high in the Bible talk segment. I’m wondering can cops test you for cocaine if they pull you over for erratic driving? If so I hope someone catches him speeding again and forces a field test.

I am assuming they can punch your name in their computer and see that you are out on bond for drug possession.

 

[AnOminous]

He was clearly high in the Bible talk segment.

We need to have a Church Police you can call when some faggot is talking shit about Jesus while whacked out of his gourd on drugs.

They should be able to put you in Church Jail while they figure out if you dared to insult Christ while on drugs.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

We need to have a Church Police you can call when some faggot is talking shit about Jesus while whacked out of his gourd on drugs.

They should be able to put you in Church Jail while they figure out if you dared to insult Christ while on drugs.

It’s more he really, really gives shit takes about Religion while high and he looked off his gourd. I know you enjoy Nickjaks, so here’s some gifs from that.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

We need to have a Church Police you can call when some faggot is talking shit about Jesus while whacked out of his gourd on drugs.

They should be able to put you in Church Jail while they figure out if you dared to insult Christ while on drugs.

They used to have gaols for heretics. Then that bloody "redemption" crap started popping up.

 

[Maraschino]

Even worse if he actually left the safe open. Why even bother having one? Either way, the cops don't mention having to break it open so one or the other happened (or Kayla gave them the combination).

I'm of the opinion that he absolutely left the fucking safe open, because he's so negligent in every aspect of his life except for disrespecting his marriage and snorting cocaine that he forgets to do basic things, like paying his fines for speed violations.

A closed door would keep him from snorting fat lines, and we can't have that!

 

[Doctor Professor Timon]

We need to have a Church Police you can call when some faggot is talking shit about Jesus while whacked out of his gourd on drugs.

I thought those were Mormons.

They show up at your house at the worst moments, knock on the door, can't enter without permission.

But, in all seriousness, do you think there'll be any jail time in this? I can see the court being nicer to Kayla and just throwing Nick in jail or something.

 

[Long-time Lurker]

But, in all seriousness, do you think there'll be any jail time in this? I can see the court being nicer to Kayla and just throwing Nick in jail or something.

SEARCH "sentencing guidelines" IN This Thread

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

The state of MN has decided to charge April after dropping her charges after the initial arrest.

Interesting new matter of public record attached. The timing sure is curious - anyone else wonder if perhaps showing off that culty three-wolves tattoo with the shirt-swapping throuple on WCCO didn't inspire much confidence at the county about whether the "live-in nanny" at the "technically separate address" would be a positive or negative influence on the household, such that forcing her to piss in a cup throughout pretrial release and postconviction probation would be a way to at least lessen the odds of the parents going into relapse after the kids are given back? Or could it simply be that Nick's "prove it's mine" defense naturally would leave the state no choice but to charge all three so that process of elimination would leave at least someone on the hook, with all the potential for backstabbing that this prisoner's dilemma now presents? Or is this charge popping up now because the snitching on April has already begun? I guess we'll find out soon...

Amazing work! This file can apparently also be found in the MRCO system with the case number 34-CR-24-487. Here are the pdfs.
She has her first appearance in court on August 28th by Zoom.

Looks like Fischer will be picking up April's case. Curious if April sends in the judge change request. If she does I imagine it will be a copy paste of Nick's and Kayla's.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The state of MN has decided to charge April after dropping her charges after the initial arrest.


Looks like Fischer will be picking up April's case. Curious if April sends in the judge change request. If she does I imagine it will be a copy paste of Nick's and Kayla's.

Here's the actual docket and documents so one can actually read things:

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

Turns out, having Nick for legal representation can add more charges. Will we get the prophesized death penalty addition? ONLY TIME CAN TELL.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'd like to remind everyone of this:

https://x.com/TheRalphRetort/status/1794068376005873929

https://archive.is/McTF4

I sure hope she got it in writing, 'cause they sure as hell didn't announce it publicly. And they seem more than willing to reneg on their deal