Opinion If we learned one thing from the RNC, it's that the GOP is no longer conservative - America now lacks a truly conservative political party. Voters like me have nowhere to go unless we follow suit, sacrificing our principles as the GOP has.

Article Archive

If we learned one thing from the RNC, it's that the GOP is no longer conservative​

America now lacks a truly conservative political party. Voters like me have nowhere to go unless we follow suit, sacrificing our principles as the GOP has.​

Political party conventions are truly the best forecast for a party's direction, or at least its vision, at that moment. The speakers chosen, the content they cover and the nominees elevated in each convention paint the clearest picture of that direction.

This is especially true for the 2024 Republican National Convention, as we watched the party fully embrace former President Donald Trump’s vision. But what I watched unfold over that week wasn’t conservative. It was the embrace of populism in the interest of winning elections, even at the cost of our principles. It was sad to see.

I watched conservatives sacrifice meaningful stances, such as being anti-abortion, opposing sexual promiscuity and opposing union strangleholds on our economy in the name of winning the election.

The GOP is willing to abandon stances that matter if it means votes

The Republican Party has been toying with abandoning Reagan conservatism for some time now. The embrace of Trump in the 2016 presidential election was the beginning, but the party at the time struck a balance, highlighting Trump as a vessel through which conservative ideas could resonate with Americans whom he appeals to.

From President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s until 2016, the GOP was the party of limited government, free markets and hawkish foreign policy. Now, that's all in the past. The latest platform abandons all of that in exchange for an outlook where breaches of conservative principles are justified if they favor the "common good" of winning control.

The party is building an entirely new coalition behind Trump. This coalition doesn’t care if you're a conservative. All they care about is what will get you to vote for Trump.

Trump's RNC acceptance speech:Trump's triumphant night comes amid calls for Biden to get the boot

In his vice presidential nomination acceptance speech Wednesday, JD Vance said, "We have a big tent in this party on everything from national security to economic policy."

While that may have been true in the 2010s, the Republican Party has made it clear that it wishes to move away from that era and into a new one shaped by a populist vision.

Just look at who Republicans invited to speak at the RNC

The GOP’s new strategy, trading firm stances on abortion and other issues for votes, can be seen through the people they chose to speak at their convention.

First up, and most egregiously, we have Amber Rose, an OnlyFans model and pro-abortion activist. Rose presented herself as a misguided woman who was led by the media to believe lies about Trump. Regardless, she lives a life that is antithetical to that of conservative values. She hasn't exactly hidden it.

"I’m not a Satanist. … Satanists are just atheists as well, but they're just more political,” Rose said in an interview this year in which she defends Satanists. “They help a lot of people, a lot of women, to get abortions in Southern states that, you know, where they're illegal."

Call me closed-minded, but I have no interest in rebranding America’s supposedly conservative party to include people like this. There is no form of conservative ideals compatible with someone who defends Satanists for helping women get abortions. Full stop.

Next up, we have Teamsters President Sean O’Brien. Having a union boss speak at the RNC is a complete reversal for the GOP that, as recently as 2021, introduced the National Right To Work Act into Congress. This act would outlaw forcing workers to join unions and pay dues against their will.

Embracing such an anti-worker and historically corrupt organization as the Teamsters, a group that has actively fought against right-to-work laws, is a complete reversal from the GOP. Allowing unions to keep a stranglehold on the economy and extort workers goes against principles the Republican Party has held for decades.

This particular change is an outright embrace of populism, looking to appeal to the one-fifth of voters nationwide who belong to union households. Joe Biden won this demographic nationally in 2020 and by slightly more in Midwest swing states.

JD Vance was a bad pick:Trump's VP pick makes it clear unity isn't the goal of the Republican Party

Trump's own speech shows GOP's changing message includes making him God's chosen leader

Trump's speech Thursday night at the RNC was shockingly free of divisiveness (relative to his status quo). However, he did take the time to highlight his position as the Republican Party's figurehead.

"I'm not supposed to be here tonight," Trump said, reflecting on the assassination attempt. "I stand before you in this arena only by the grace of almighty God."

A common theme throughout the convention was speakers suggesting that divine intervention was responsible for Trump surviving the attempt on his life.

“God spared President Trump from that assassin,” said Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in her Tuesday speech, “because God is not finished with him yet.”

Portraying Trump as God's chosen leader for the future of the party and the country is a dangerous line to walk, and deifying politicians is a dangerous game.

Trump loyalists would rather embrace nonconservatives than work with Reagan Republicans

Trump also took time during his speech to speak directly to Vance, his pick for vice presidential nominee.

"You're going to be doing this a long time. Enjoy the ride," Trump said.


Trump's words to Vance highlight exactly his vision in selecting him: a successor who will take over the future of the MAGA movement.

After the events at the RNC, it is clear that the GOP is actively pursuing a new coalition without real conservatives in it. This shift is particularly disheartening to me, a Gen Z voter. I missed out on candidates like Mitt Romney, John McCain and George W. Bush and instead got Trump again.

I had hoped this phase for the GOP would work itself out, and we might return to some semblance of conservative candidates in the future. But it is now clear to me that this will not happen anytime soon.

America now lacks a truly conservative political party. Voters like me have nowhere to go unless we follow suit, sacrificing our principles as the GOP has.

Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
 
From President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s until 2016, the GOP was the party of limited government, free markets and hawkish foreign policy. Now, that's all in the past.
This shift is particularly disheartening to me, a Gen Z voter. I missed out on candidates like Mitt Romney, John McCain and George W. Bush and instead got Trump again.
I can't imagine being a zoomer neocon and longing for the good ol' days of overseas infinity wars and losing with dignity. These idiots never advanced the principles of limited government or free markets in any way. Of course neocons tend to define 'limited government' as letting Democrats do whatever they want while pouting and whining about principles you never advanced one inch. And they define 'free markets' as regulatory capture by defense contractors, banks, silicon valley mega corporations, and other rich lobbyist groups.

Disgusting.
 
The GOP is willing to abandon stances that matter if it means votes
We need to lose with principles!

how did this guy with a fancy PS degree not see the american masses were fed up with being taxed to death and sent to die for bullshit wars? everyone saw the politcal compass changing from liberal vs conservative to populism vs globalism.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Socially, conservative doesn't mean "we've decided 1950 was perfect and we should only ever emulate that, except also we want a Muslim theocracy but without the pesky sandniggers browning up the place". You want that, go be Amish.

That's a hard truth that a lot of "conservatives" are going to have to learn or accept. Conservatism is moderate and studied social development, with an eye on keeping a society from too much harm, not complete stagnation. A society that stagnates, dies. It dies slower, maybe, but it still dies.
 

Attachments

  • retard.png
    retard.png
    483.2 KB · Views: 2
I have. Well, 600 pages of it. It is basically just about getting rid of bloat. The abortion autism shows up in the middle of the document. Haven't had time to go past the borty tism section, so not sure what else is in there.
Never mind the document itself is bloated in practice. No wonder Trump publicly denounced it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
>psypo
>written by several Trump officials

Okay.

I can't be scared of something I haven't even read.
Yeah, it's impossible for insiders to self-sabotage a campaign. I guess they could just be idiots, but that's more boring.

Why are you bitching about or even commenting on something you haven't read any of then?

Socially, conservative doesn't mean "we've decided 1950 was perfect and we should only ever emulate that, except also we want a Muslim theocracy but without the pesky sandniggers browning up the place". You want that, go be Amish.

That's a hard truth that a lot of "conservatives" are going to have to learn or accept. Conservatism is moderate and studied social development, with an eye on keeping a society from too much harm, not complete stagnation. A society that stagnates, dies. It dies slower, maybe, but it still dies.
It's not stagnation, it's keeping what's best and not fixing what ain't broken. I'm not accepting intrinsically bad shit just because it's current year, and neither will the few actual conservatives with principles.

Unfortunately there's a lot of retards who think like you, that we need to be 2000's Democrats, hence why we have neocon RINOs running the party.
 
Last edited:
Why are you bitching about or even commenting on something you haven't read any of then?
Since I'm hearing nothing about Project 2025, I want to take some initiative to understand what all the ruckus is about.
 
JD Vance was a bad pick:Trump's VP pick makes it clear unity isn't the goal of the Republican Party
WTF is this nigger on; Vance was a Never-Trumper to the point I argue he still is and WILL Pence him at one point.

If we learned one thing from the RNC, it's that the GOP is no longer conservative
Good. Conservatism got the GOP nowhere. Death to neo-conservatism.
 
God, I'm so sick of the bellyaching about how Trump isn't pursuing abortion bans. He got the SC majority that was needed to reverse RvW, which has long been the best-case win scenario for the pro-life side. Anybody who actually lives in reality knows this. I think these fuckers are just mad that something was solved, rather than regurgitated as one of these permanent "issues" that can be used for fundraising election after election. Reagan has been out for nearly 40 years - he presided over one of the greatest economies, but following in his footsteps hasn't gotten us close to returning to something like that.
Reagan's other policies can easily be linked to the greatest ills this country today - no more asylums? Genuinely mentally ill fuckers in the street, shooting up the schools, cutting their dicks off and demanding people treat them as the real women they are, and even getting involved in NGOs and politics. Isn't that great?
Let's not forget about all those "natural conservatives" - 3 generations in and they are still voting reliably blue, but even if they weren't it wouldn't matter, because new first generation immigrants keep pouring in over the porous border. Thanks Ronnie! I really appreciate living in a 61% white (and rapidly declining) country!
Fuckers like this need to realize that the new right has had enough - the people who actually stood to benefit from the Reagan economy are now getting very old, if not already dead. Fuck you, you got yours back then, now I want mine. I don't care if neocons feel politically orphaned, just fuck off forever already. The only legacy these fuckers deserve is as a reminder to not repeat the mistakes of riding a wave that died off decades ago. This article makes me feel good, this neocon is losing the last thing they had to their name - the ol' graceful loss. I relish in their disgraceful ousting.
 
We need to lose with principles!
The conservative mission statement is pretty much "lose with dignity," they just exist as a sort of false opposition to the globalist left, acting as an alternative and then immediately turning around and handing the globalists whatever they want on the off chance they actually win an election. Who cares about fixing the economy and giving young people hope, we have to ban the porn with internet ID and send our money to Israel/Ukraine!
 
Nobody cared about abortion before the dumb evangelical influx
A truly conservative party would be taking the vote away from women, getting rid of the NFA and income tax, and reinstating slavery but I don't see you calling for that
 
First time a think tank lays out a plan to actually run the government? The y freak out.
Honestly, this idea alone is one that Trump should fully adopt. It'll help ensure his ideas live on.
There needs to be some kind of balance, between workers rights and safety, and the corporate side.
You can't have that in a world composed of endless economic zones.
 
Define "stagnation".

Define "social development".

And try to do so without referencing the strawman of the retard who wants the 1950's back because that's the vocal minority of the right. Preferably also within a paragraph each.

It's not a strawman when that minority was explicitly who I was addressing, but whatever.

Stagnation and social development are both explained by recognizing that society is going to develop different patterns and stressors as the world changes around it. We learn new things, develop new things, society organically develops in certain ways. Stagnation is trying to clamp down on these things, putting our fingers in our ears and humming loudly and insisting that exactly the way things were is how they will always work, while social development looks at the way the world and society have changed and seeks to, essentially, install overpressure valves. Allow society to change enough to let off the pressure, to keep it from fracturing under the stress of artificial constraint.

Nobody cared about abortion before the dumb evangelical influx
A truly conservative party would be taking the vote away from women, getting rid of the NFA and income tax, and reinstating slavery but I don't see you calling for that

Why not insist on the return of the monarchy, while we're at it?

Conservatism is not picking an arbitrary point in history, and saying "This, this right here is how it always should be, so sayeth we".
 
Back