- Joined
- Feb 14, 2024
Liar. Even if he wasn't in view, the horrified crowd running from his leprous gunted visage would be seen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Liar. Even if he wasn't in view, the horrified crowd running from his leprous gunted visage would be seen.
Like EOR could afford a real Elvis?!"The person they pledged their life to, actually."
Ralph, you were "married" by an Elvis impersonator in Vegas.
Don't need him they already had a fat pill addict hillbillyLike EOR could afford a real Elvis?!
There is no charge of domestic violence. Only a one-year temporary restraining order. There has been no finding of fact, and IN FACT, there is no proof that any domestic violence took place. The recording made doesn't show any, although it isn't the best look. However, it would be inadmissible in court in the first place. It's against Mexican constitutional law and against most state laws as well. It also doesn't show any violence. It's a work for idiots like yourself. It was meant to smear Ralph in the public eye, and in that regard, it worked.This is untrue, with their domestic violence laws they can absolutely change Rozy's name without Ralph's consent. They're only required to serve Ralph notice and it's up to a judge if it's in the best interest of the child. Which Amanda would absolutely be granted.
The hat, sir. Please comment.There is no charge of domestic violence. Only a one-year temporary restraining order. There has been no finding of fact, and IN FACT, there is no proof that any domestic violence took place. The recording made doesn't show any, although it isn't the best look. However, it would be inadmissible in court in the first place. It's against Mexican constitutional law and against most state laws as well. It also doesn't show any violence. It's a work for idiots like yourself. It was meant to smear Ralph in the public eye, and in that regard, it worked.
Any lawyers can weigh in if they like, but they know as well as I do that it's almost impossible to lose your parental rights, even with Ralph's record. That, and given the fact that the AUDIO recording is inadmissible (any shyster could get that thrown out), and she has kept Ralph out of the child's life by choice for over a year do not weigh in her favor; They actually weigh in Ralph's favor. She's actually quite stupid for behaving in this manner.
You see, if Ralph was cut of out Rozy's life for good, that would mean no child support. That's what the state really cares about. None of you seem to understand that.
I'm sure if Ralph were offered a hefty financial settlement he might agree to step aside, because it's going to cost him a shit ton to fight this in NY and then pay ANOTHER child support. Absent that, I think his pride takes precedence.
There is no charge of domestic violence. Only a one-year temporary restraining order. There has been no finding of fact, and IN FACT, there is no proof that any domestic violence took place. The recording made doesn't show any, although it isn't the best look. However, it would be inadmissible in court in the first place. It's against Mexican constitutional law and against most state laws as well. It also doesn't show any violence. It's a work for idiots like yourself. It was meant to smear Ralph in the public eye, and in that regard, it worked.
Any lawyers can weigh in if they like, but they know as well as I do that it's almost impossible to lose your parental rights, even with Ralph's record. That, and given the fact that the AUDIO recording is inadmissible (any shyster could get that thrown out), and she has kept Ralph out of the child's life by choice for over a year do not weigh in her favor; They actually weigh in Ralph's favor. She's actually quite stupid for behaving in this manner.
You see, if Ralph was cut of out Rozy's life for good, that would mean no child support. That's what the state really cares about. None of you seem to understand that.
I'm sure if Ralph were offered a hefty financial settlement he might agree to step aside, because it's going to cost him a shit ton to fight this in NY and then pay ANOTHER child support. Absent that, I think his pride takes precedence.
I don't know what you're selling but I'm buying. Whatever puts piggie deeper in the hole, both metaphorically and physically, I'm all for it.pay ANOTHER child support.
He just wants to jump on the Ralphamale dick to suck tranny dickMATTAH OF FACT THERE AINT NO PROOF OF VIOLENCE BISH
Imagine, being a Ralph fan. Holy shit, fella
There is literally no proof. Does that blow you mind?I don't know what you're selling but I'm buying. Whatever puts piggie deeper in the hole, both metaphorically and physically, I'm all for it.
Same nigger 6 months ago. "Harry Morris is a lolcow for having his granddaughter wear a shirt. You'll all see! !!"When Ralph visits Rozy, and he lets you all know about it....I wonder how many will be stunned or were just larping in the first place?
So your response is.....There is literally no proof. Does that blow you mind?
Where are the photos? Where is the physical evidence? They can't even prove revenge porn, much less domestic violence.
When Ralph visits Rozy, and he lets you all know about it....I wonder how many will be stunned or were just larping in the first place?
Oh yes they do. It may take two years, but you fuck around with family court long enough or flagrantly enough, they will. How do you think the foster system finds fresh meat?Watch and see. They don't take your parental rights away from you, no matter how many KFFags wish it was true.
Almost none of you understand the actus legal process works,,,,I do.
DERS NO PICTORAL EBIDANCE BISH
Shut the fuck up Esoshaggy and niggahs tongue your anusThere is no charge of domestic violence. Only a one-year temporary restraining order. There has been no finding of fact, and IN FACT, there is no proof that any domestic violence took place. The recording made doesn't show any, although it isn't the best look. However, it would be inadmissible in court in the first place. It's against Mexican constitutional law and against most state laws as well. It also doesn't show any violence. It's a work for idiots like yourself. It was meant to smear Ralph in the public eye, and in that regard, it worked.
Any lawyers can weigh in if they like, but they know as well as I do that it's almost impossible to lose your parental rights, even with Ralph's record. That, and given the fact that the AUDIO recording is inadmissible (any shyster could get that thrown out), and she has kept Ralph out of the child's life by choice for over a year do not weigh in her favor; They actually weigh in Ralph's favor. She's actually quite stupid for behaving in this manner.
You see, if Ralph was cut of out Rozy's life for good, that would mean no child support. That's what the state really cares about. None of you seem to understand that.
I'm sure if Ralph were offered a hefty financial settlement he might agree to step aside, because it's going to cost him a shit ton to fight this in NY and then pay ANOTHER child support. Absent that, I think his pride takes precedence.
The financial settlement should be:I'm sure if Ralph were offered a hefty financial settlement he might agree to step aside, because it's going to cost him a shit ton to fight this in NY and then pay ANOTHER child support. Absent that, I think his pride takes precedence.
I don't understand the actus legal process works but then again I wouldn't expect to considering I'm not a Mexican plumber.Almost none of you understand the actus legal process works,,,,I do.
Ralph has been recorded being a domestic abuser multiple times, he's exhibited such behaviours across multiple relationships and this includes during and after they broke up.there is no proof that any domestic violence
Post your "poly sci" degree then.
Just because you're simping for a fat faggot with quadruple piggytits in Meheecoh doesn't mean everything should rhyme with cactus.actus legal process
I know the legal praw-cess. I know it because I spent more time in the courtroom than Nick Rekeita.Almost none of you understand the actus legal process works,,,,I do.