- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
Yeah I was on the fence about this but after reading your post and re-reading the settlement a few times I don't see how this is an issue worth pursuing.am i reading this wrong? the settlement states that jones is a limited agent for the sole pupose of submitting a dmca notice for the video at issue. that's it; just the one video that he (jones) voluntarily posted himself. i see no indication that jones is in any way legally obligated, or even permitted, to submit anything else on stebbins' behalf unless the same video is re-posted elsewhere.
It's specifically "a takedown" and as you pointed out, "the video at issue" which greatly limits the scope. Also I think declaring it to be literally slavery is hyperbole which is probably not a good idea to throw out there given this dude is a vexatious litigant.
I think out of all the cases where the forum has an interest, the only person threatened with indentured servitude is Null's friend in Australia given the ridiculous judgement hanging over his head. Spending money and effort on freeing that dude from that default judgement will do more good for the world than saving a retard from having to send an e-mail. (which he has already sent anyway)