Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Procrastinhater]

I've thought about this, and if I were falsely accused of having coke in the house and neglecting my kids I'd want the hair follicle tests released to the whole damn world, along with the body cam footage to show my house looked perfectly normal (and to hopefully show the police planted the drugs)
I'd be screaming from the rooftops that I've never done coke in my life, not saying shit like "well the state hasn't proven anything yet" and "all my recent drugs tests have been clean" while refusing to give the first one to the CPS.

Balldo is acting exactly like an angry seething cuck thats guilty as sin would do.
Which is what he is.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

So he finally realizes he is inevitably going to lose on probable cause and the search warrant. Now he is moving to an incredible longshot argument of trying to convince a jury that he has no idea where nearly an ounce of cocaine, scales and various accessories in his bedroom in his house where he has admitted to the police that he sleeps came from.

A more subtle change was his noting that 1st time drug offenders rarely get jail with plea deals.

He then changed the argument that his goal is to "maintain his liberty" from the original "they can't prove it." He talked about multi-year probation being an obstacle to moving. He'll get deferred adjudication on a felony, with 60 months probation. And with his idiotic statement on posting bond to avoid drug test fees, I hope they order 5 years of random drug testing at his expense. 5 years of home inspections. And a GAL.

He's setting up a plea. He'll never say he's "Not guilty" again but he'll say he had to do it to move on with his kids. He'll still argue the state never proved their case and couldn't prove it (they didn't have to because he'll admit it in the plea).

It's a subtle but noticeable shift in language in that interview. He's going to take a plea and agree to do everything that keeps him out of jail and gets his kids back. He'll spin it as a win for him over the evil state. And of course, the only thing the state ever wanted was him safely taking care of his kids.

Is it going to be one of those things where Nick goes in and says 'not guilty' and Kayla says 'guilty, it was all me'? Would that get him off the hook?

Could Kayla take the rap if Nick's been buttering her up all this time?

They are separate cases. Theoretically she could plead guilty and say it was hers. The state can still charge Nick and the defense would have to call her as a witness. Whether that would be enough reasonable doubt that Nick didn't control or possess any of the coke in his house and safe would be up to the jury. Ownership and use of the drugs are not the crimes alleged, it's possession and control. Kayla claiming possession doesn't exclude Nick from possessing also. It's why they are both charged for the full amount.

 

[AnOminous]

He's setting up a plea. He'll never say he's "Not guilty" again but he'll say he had to do it to move on with his kids. He'll still argue the state never proved their case and couldn't prove it (they didn't have to because he'll admit it in the plea).

He's exactly the kind of shit-for-brains who tries to insist on an Alford. I hope the prosecution refuses any deal that doesn't involve admission of guilt.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Nick just claimed he's not being charged with child neglect and she just let that slide.

So basically he managed to spend an entire stream without saying a single true thing, even denying Patrick S. Tomlinson style that he is charged with child neglect, despite anyone being able to look it up. (He may be playing technikieta again since he's MERELY charged with the gross misdemeanor of child ENDANGERMENT because of the drugs and firearms). He's fucking delusional if he thinks he's doing his case any good. I guess he's realized he's not going to testify because prior dishonesty is always a hearsay exception in impeaching a witness's testimony.

This will be memory-holed as 'they claimed I ABUSED/BEAT the kids!' as if it were totally different. 'Endangerment is something TOTALLY different with a different legal standard that they did NOT prove!

Nick claims they went for unconditional release because random drug testing costs $75 a pop, so "you just have to do the math" to figure out that paying $10,000 bail is cheaper.

Holy fucking cope, Batman. Yeah, I’ll do the math. Even if they tested him once a week after the arrest up until the trial, that’s 13 weeks which adds up to less than $1,000. Last time I checked that’s substantially less than 5K.

No one believes this shit. Not a judge nor jury in this world is going for this. He paid the bail so he could still do drugs. No, not every recreational drug user (say someone who smokes weed or does X at a party) is a problem. Nik/Kayla/April are NOT recreational drug users.

They had coke and Ketamine in their own bedroom, located in the same house occupied by 5 children. This is unsafe not only because the kids could potentially access it, but most importantly because the adults being under the influence poses a danger to them and their safety. If you’re drunk/high and one of your kids gets hurt playing outside, are you able to take care of the situation? NO. Are you even able to wake up and cook 3 meals a day, plus snacks, do housekeeping such as laundry, and help with schoolwork or hobbies? NO.

Please fuck off with this nonsense, Nik. It’s gross, it’s ignorant, and it’s insulting to our intelligence.

All his drug tests are clean.

Chrissie asks Nick,what are the two biggest rumors he would like to dispel. He says I) that he’s charged with neglect, (claiming that’s a rumor, when anyone can read his charges, & II) that he’s refusing drug tests, which he goes into typical Nickger detail over:
View attachment 6241513
TLDW: He actually claims he’s not charged with neglect. Look at his charges, one of them is neglect. He also says he’s paying $750 per person on drug tests monthly. Good. Coke clears the blood stream in approximately 48 hours, btw. He says they get tested every 2-4 days.

I've thought about this, and if I were falsely accused of having coke in the house and neglecting my kids I'd want the hair follicle tests released to the whole damn world, along with the body cam footage to show my house looked perfectly normal (and to hopefully show the police planted the drugs)
I'd be screaming from the rooftops that I've never done coke in my life, not saying shit like "well the state hasn't proven anything yet" and "all my recent drugs tests have been clean" while refusing to give the first one to the CPS.

The piss tests that clear in 24-48, and that he chooses when to take... He paid so that he can choose to go sober and crank out a clean test when he things he can.

Nick is acting like the low IQ criminals who want the I's dotted and T's crossed to put them away when it is obvious that they are guilty as sin. I support making the State do their job, but when you are a low-life (like Nick) it is just a burden on the rest of society to make them handle your shite. He is trying to hold on to a respectable image, but he is well-confirmed to be a scumbag junkie.

Also 750 USD per month is more than once per week for him and Kayla, so his own Maths defeat him on the state-tests being more expensive.

Kids will be back really soon. Everything about child endangerment/maltreatment is internet fiction. Nobody in the community saw anything wrong with the kids. They see them five times a week.

No one saw anything, so the only reason that the teacher, nanny, or pastor said anything was a CONSPIRACY!

Having the kids taken away is the most painful thing that ever happened to him, especially because he knows they where never in danger from anything or anybody in his household

The State is actually the villain here!

No one's asked him to go to rehab at all

Maybe they did, bit not in those words--or in a 'faggy way'--so that does not count!

"Possession crimes require the intent to possess the drug"

I did not MEAN to possess the drugs! I just bought them on accident!

Monty confirmed raping Randazza and sending playing the video on an LED truck to Nick’s town with the caption “Coming for your Ass, Cuckieta!!!”

Uh... What?

 

[Neodanthril]

Archive of this morning’s catastrophe can be found here:

https://gofile.io/d/5kcWsN

this archive, which is linked in the op, no longer exists

 

[Permanent Resident Cope]

What's the inverse of impostor syndrome?

Delusions of grandeur?

skull and bones means don't ingest.

Such an effective graphic it even works on ODD maniacs.

Nick just implied he didn't know the coke was in his house.

They told me they did it, they told me it was gone, those hoes were holding out on me!

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

He's exactly the kind of shit-for-brains who tries to insist on an Alford. I hope the prosecution refuses any deal that doesn't involve admission of guilt.

Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.

 

[Strix454]

"Possession crimes require the intent to possess the drug"

Not correct Nick. Constructive possession generally requires they prove you had knowledge of the drugs on your property and had the ability to exercise control over the drugs on your property. Your "intent" with regard to the possession of the drugs doesn't really have anything to do with it.

The drugs were in your house in your bedroom which you freely admitted to the police is the place where you sleep. They were out in the open. There was drug paraphernalia out in the open.

 

[200MB]

Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.

I remember LEGUL MINDSET talking about how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea. I'll try and find it.

EDIT:
He talks about it here at 6:37.

 

[Mr.Bucket]

I remember LEGUL MINDSET talking about how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea. I'll try and find it.

He's only a slightly more practicing lawyer than Rekieta so I would take his legal opinions with only a mildly smaller boulder of salt than Rekieta's.

 

[Strix454]

Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.

It is allowed in MN as far as I can tell. But its rarely used because the Judge and prosecutor don't usually have much incentive to agree to it. To get one accepted, there would have to be unusual circumstances and the defendant would have to have a certain degree of leverage in negotiations with the prosecutors. It would only I think happen in a case where neither side was very certain of what the verdict would be in a trial.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

This stream was something else: all the seethe, cope, and passive aggression from all the missed 3am post-stream Locals streams from his kitchen, distilled and concentrated into one interview.

Rekieta is really the LeBron (or would he say Tiger Woods?) of seethestreaming.

"My lawyer lost the appeal." Magnificent.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Nick says that @Null is being lied to about the bodycam footage. Let's see how this ages:

 

[Null]

He's flat out lying. Lying to you face.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Nick says that @Null is being lied to about the bodycam footage. Let's see how this ages:


View attachment 6241869

Pretty easy to demonstrate if he'd just consent to it's release.

 

[Mr.Bucket]

He's flat out lying. Lying to you face.

It's one thing him and Boogie have in common... neither of them can tell the truth about anything, ever.

 

[LiquidKid]

I would like to put in a request with management of this forum to add Mrs. Chrissie Mayr to the list of Noseguards and Balldo(tm) washers list. I personally feel she has finally earned it.

Got you covered

NOTABLE PEOPLE

Note: even if someone backtracks, it’s impotant to leave them accountable for ever defending Nick. As such no one will be removed from this list solely because they changed their mind.

• Kurt UncivilLaw- “I care about Nick, not the kids. fuck the pastor, he turned in my friend.”
• Robert Barnes- “This was unconstitutional and a conspiracy”[link]
• Viva Frei- “They are planning a conspiracy against Nick and we should all be afraid.”[link]
• Megan Fox(not that one)- “He was so full of life and the evil Kiwifarms did this to him. Laughing at him now is just as disgusting as what he’s accused of.”
• Juju the Cow/Dax Herrera- “I talked to Nick. He's fine, he misses his kids. This is all unconstitutional, fuck the pastor.” The kids can bath themselves!
• Vito the Pedo- Everything Juju says.
• Ethan Van Sciver EVS- “I talked to Nick and I stand by him.”[link] the 16 years old should have stepped up!
• Good Lawgic - “Nick is my friend and I'm going to be there through the good times and bad, and Nick is going to come out of this because he loves his kids and his family”[link] 5 years olds clean themselves guys!
• Legal Mindset - “Barnes actually had a lot of good points and nobody is listening, PPP is all strawman arguments, and you Kiwifarmers better prove to me why this didn’t violate the constitutions!“[link]
• Anna That Star Wars Girl - “Aaron is a clout chasing rat who was just as much into the swinging and drugs as Nick was. Nick will have a redemption arch, for sure!”[link]
• Dani Ahn Direct - “We all need to give Nick love not hate”
• Ethan Ralph - Has done many defense streams, allegedly paid $20k to sweep it up
• BTM Reviews - 5 hour cope stream
• Karlyn Borysenko - “Kiwi Farms did this, I want to block all Kiwifarmers”
• That Umbrella Guy -"No child, your warrant doesn't count here!" [link]
• The Quartering - “I trust Barnes fully”
• Godwinson - I would have done the same
• Andy Signore -“so many people are applauding Nick’s downfall and it’s disgusting”
• Melonie Mac -“I’ll pray for you to get through this, Jesus can redeem anyone”
• Leon’s Law - if you have an issue with Nick, you also need to have issues with legalmindset for calling out Barnes, Barnes is a genius, y’all should check which lawyers are team Kiwi.(don’t worry, we can keep track of that ourselves)
• Dan Mullen - allegedly taking the same “kids can take care of themselves” stance. will need to verify
• Nina Infinity - haven’t seen what she’s said yet, but she’s brought up enough
• Doug TenNaple - “I will stand by my friend regardless of what is said about him” “there were times when my kids were so skinny you could see their ribs”
• Ty Beard - “I support my friends, I don’t take shots at them”
• Chrissie Mayr - did an entire baldo sweeping stream with Nick

 

[Sharpeteer]

Yesterday I was wondering how this was going to work with her being a regular on FNT and all. I want to clarify that I do not wish for Gary to kick her from the show for doing this interview (for this reason at least. Just kick her because she's a horrible guest there).

I think Gary seriously needs to be careful though. Him being a former addict himself, no one should know better than him the manipulation tactics they can pull on people that are weak minded or pacifist type. So if Chrissie is willing to let Balldoman on, let him completely take control of the narrative there, and she's willing to silence people saying truthful things about his addiction and abusive behavior, GARY NEEDS TO BE CAREFUL. As she's a regular on his show, what's to say she won't bring that stuff Nick spread onto his show as well? Perhaps act as a negative influence on Gary? He himself has said many times that he always has to work every day to lot fall into the addiction once more, so this may make it more difficult if she's even stupider than I think she is, and tries to bring said influence with her.

I just cannot think of any good reason to do this. If you're just going to sit there and let this guy, while knowing everything out there (I refuse to believe she doesn't know anything at all), spew all this crap on your show, and let it be known to everyone paying attention to Nick that you will sweep for him, what good does one think could possibly come from it? What are you going to get for this? Seems to me all you got a quite the blow to your reputation, not that you had a great one to begin with.

Balldo is acting exactly like an angry seething cuck thats guilty as sin would do.

For a so-called lawyer, he sure seems to lack all the brains of one. Every single thing he says and does, are quite the opposite of what a real lawyer would do.

He's closer to Jared Leto's Joker than he is a lawyer. Also specifically, the "Suicide Squad" version of Jared Leto's Joker, not the post-credit Zack Snyder Justice League version, just to make it even that much worse, if possible.

I remember LEGUL MINDSET talking about how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea. I'll try and find it.

Hey Andrew, I challenge you to go over how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea.

Good to see you did it because *I* TOLD YOU TO. Glad I was able to challenge you into doing that, and that you decided to do this because of me.

See how stupid that sounds?

Got you covered

I appreciate you and your services.

 

[TexOffender]

Not really of note but Youtuber Colonel Kurtz (pop culture streamer like TUG, friend of Andrea Burkheart) did a couple of livestreams. He stance was "he's innocent until proven guilty" and caught a bunch of shit from it. She also had said of Aaron, "How did he find two attractive women that want to fuck him?"

Spoiler: Timestamp to comment about Aaron

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

Nick just implied he didn't know the coke was in his house. He's really going to try and pin this all on someone else.


EDIT:
View attachment 6241126

"I didn't say that."

Motherfucker needs a whipping. Just such a scummy little fuck.