- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
That One Kid just was unfortunate enough to wander into the smokehouse where Nick was dry-aging steaks in an atmosphere of 100% pure crack smoke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no winning when the prize is an unemployed crackwhore.
The way Nick tried downplaying the harmfulness of cocaine really makes me think the theory that he doses himself with cocaine "medicinally" and did the same to "help" his daughter is trueThat One Kid just was unfortunate enough to wander into the smokehouse where Nick was dry-aging steaks in an atmosphere of 100% pure crack smoke.
He believes it reduces stress and supposedly mixes it into his liquor hence why he licks the bottle since he doesn't want to waste any coke.The way Nick tried downplaying the harmfulness of cocaine really makes me think the theory that he doses himself with cocaine "medicinally" and did the same to "help" his daughter is true
From what I’ve seen, I agree with this. Looks like most of the criticism towards Mayr is based on personal dislike. I’ve watched her stuff maybe 3X, once long ago when da Gunt hollered at her, once when I tried watching one of her all female shows (& I couldn’t take the grating voices of half of her cohosts,) & yesterdays interview w/ Rackets. I’m not well versed in her work but it was clearly a basic interview where the goal is to get the guest to talk. She was unobtrusive, some might say to a fault.Chrissie talks to pretty much anyone and interviews people she doesn't agree with but she generally doesn't blast them; the point of the interview is to get the interviewee to answer questions not debate about them.
She never does. She's Nick but in the female form when it comes to prepping for shows. Her GD show Simpcast is a bunch of pornstars who sit and scroll thru Twitter. Not much of a show. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that's zero prep. I was hopeful for this interview, then remembered how fucking lazy she is.Then maybe she should have done her fucking homework? Seems like a good idea before any interview, really. This isn't some esoteric and obscure thing anymore.
Right now, there is a clip war happening between TV's Wil Herren VS. Keanu/Chrissie. I put a link to the crosspost I did on Aaron Imholte's thread if anyone cares. Also have a TLDR, but it's gotten nasty and Chrissie's a part of it.But my guess is that this comes down to her personal friendships with Keanu and April. What pressure does Chrissie feel to defend Nick because her friends are on his side and now the expectation is that she has to prove her loyalty to them by coming to Nick's defense?
Lafayette has a tradition of wild media personalities. John Larroquette has talked about how insane he was when he did radio out of Lafayette.Wil Herren weirdly enough is a news anchor in Lafayette, LA,
She gave him a softball interview as a reward because April texted Keanu and told her about what a horrible person Aaron is. Before April contacted Keanu, according to the Keanu/Chrissie clique Nick was a horrible person who was controlling April, a cult leader like figure who was probably limiting April's contact with the outside world and possibly even writing messages in her name. Now he is getting a softball interview.I do like Chrissie, but if you're going to have an interview post with an over-the-top thumbnail and over-the-top title acting like you're going to get to the bottom of Rekieta's arrest, then fucking do it. Don't over sensationalize it, then go easy on him. There was hardly any pushback and she knows all of Nick's antics. Just another grifter at this point.
Nicky is soo ready to take Lolcow of the Year from Bossman that he is smoking crack just to prove he can.Rekieta's new claim: being around drugs being smoked may cause a hair follicle test to be positive
Super late on this but it's crazy to me that April even went back to Nick. After all that shit went down. They're all very despicableShe gave him a softball interview as a reward because April texted Keanu and told her about what a horrible person Aaron is. Before April contacted Keanu, according to the Keanu/Chrissie clique Nick was a horrible person who was controlling April, a cult leader like figure who was probably limiting April's contact with the outside world and possibly even writing messages in her name. Now he is getting a softball interview.
It's explains so much because he sounds, looks, and acts like a total balldo.................... WITH the extra rings.Lafayette has a tradition of wild media personalities. John Larroquette has talked about how insane he was when he did radio out of Lafayette.
This just goes to show all of these assholes are such trash. The way they flip and turn on each other faster than politicians change their minds only proves these people (in the voice of Ashton/Kino) ALL DESERVE TO SUFFAH BISH!!!She gave him a softball interview as a reward because April texted Keanu and told her about what a horrible person Aaron is. Before April contacted Keanu, according to the Keanu/Chrissie clique Nick was a horrible person who was controlling April, a cult leader like figure who was probably limiting April's contact with the outside world and possibly even writing messages in her name. Now he is getting a softball interview.
BUT I'M A LAWYER.......... AND MUH FREEDUMS AND MUH RIGHTS!the competing statements "intent to posses is part of the crime! they have to prove intent" and "the cops don't know ANYTHING about the drugs including who owns them or where they came from or even what they are" mixed with the statement "I kept the coke in a safe place" is INCREDIBLY retarded.
Miranda warning is specifically about in-custody statements."Anything you say can and will be used against you in court." - Excerpt from the Miranda Warning
If they think he says something they can use, they'll use it.
Rule 401.Definition of "Relevant Evidence"
"Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
Committee Comment - 1977
The threshold test for the admissibility of evidence is the test of relevancy. Essentially, it is a test of logic, and assessment of probative value. Evidence must have some probative value or it should not be admitted. The rule adopts a liberal as opposed to restrictive approach to the question of relevancy. If the offer has any tendency to make the existence of a fact of consequence more or less probable than it would be without the evidence it is relevant. A slight probative tendency is sufficient under Rule 401. Even where probative value is established and the evidence is relevant it still might be excluded under various other provisions in these rules, state and federal constitutions and other court rules. Rule 402.
The evidentiary offer must tend to prove or disprove a fact that is of consequence to the litigation. What is of consequence to the litigation depends upon the scope of the pleadings, the theory of recovery and the substantive law. The rule avoids reference to materiality, an overused term meaning different things in different situations. The fact to be established need not be an ultimate fact or a vital fact. It need only be a fact that is of some consequence to the disposition of the litigation.
The liberal approach to relevancy is consistent with Minnesota practice. In Boland v. Morrill, 270 Minn. 86, 98, 99, 132 N.W.2d 711, 719 (1965) the Court defined relevancy as a function of the effect the offered evidence might have upon the proof of a material fact in issue:
If the offered evidence permits an inference to be drawn that will justify a desired finding of fact, it is relevant. Reduced to simple terms, any evidence is relevant which logically tends to prove or disprove a material fact in issue.
Rule 402.Relevant Evidence Generally Admissible; Irrelevant Evidence Inadmissible
All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided by the United States Constitution, the State Constitution, statute, by these rules, or by other rules applicable in the courts of this state. Evidence which is not relevant is not admissible. [Commentary not copied here]
404 explains that character evidence, including evidence of other crimes not at issue, is only relevant for certain purposes.Rule 403.Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time
Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. [Commentary not copied here.]
It "reduces stress" so much he was a raging, seething cocaine cuck in every stream for months before he finally got busted for all the cocaine he had.He believes it reduces stress and supposedly mixes it into his liquor hence why he licks the bottle since he doesn't want to waste any coke.
Almost every single thing this drug-addled moron has said since his arrest is either an admission against interest or a blatantly idiotic lie that can be used to impeach his other testimony because he's a lying liar who lies, even about things that are basically already in evidence in the case.But any freely given statement can come in if it's relevant, lawfully obtained/properly authenticated, and isn't hearsay (or fits in an exception).
Ha! In the 70's some guy did found Outer Baldonia. Maybe Nick could be the Balldonian Isle.Maybe Nick should found his own country, Balldovia, declare himself King, and make drug possession legal. Checkmate local government, the little guy wins again!