Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
This weird campaign is totally out of nowhere and completely missing the ball. Trump has been Trump for more than 40 years and weird is all you got?
What the fuck.
Edit: weird is cool now. Trump is weird. WEIRD 2024.
What the fuck.
Edit: weird is cool now. Trump is weird. WEIRD 2024.
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
It says a lot about how crazy Laura is that I can't tell if her account got comped or if she really typed this out.
- Joined
- May 21, 2024
Team Trump should start making these too.
(where’s the “a vote for Bart is a vote for anarchy” meme, for the eighty-seventh time?)
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
Yeah they have a marketing team doing their campaigns right now. Holy shit.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
The only thing I will forever be grateful for regarding Mike Pence is how endless frames of the old "Johnny Quest" cartoon were re-purposed for Pence memes.
Right up to election day I continued to tell people Trump would win and got clowned on relentlessly. The one thing no one was taking into account, and I had learned by talking to people, was how mad the Bernie youth were. Most of us, by adulthood, have been fucked enough that you can't really get mad anymore. I've been fucked by the government, healthcare, businesses, etc. But a huge majority of Bernie supporters were college aged kids.
For most of them, Hillary getting handed the nomination was the first time they had ever been fucked and you couldn't measure their rage with conventional devices. Like most of us, the first time you get fucked you want to burn the system down until you learn you can't fight city hall. So most of these kids were experiencing the rage of a first time fucking, and Bernie completely backpedaling over everything he believed in after he was cucked, to support Hillary only made their rage worse. Bernie voters hated Hillary even more than Bill Clinton does. I kept telling people that lefties are delusional enough to think they're getting the Bernie voters but they're not going to get them and Trump's gonna win.
Now I know where the Jewish mothers get it from. "28 hours in labor and this is how you treat your mother? Your father's ulcers nearly killed him worrying about you but you don't have to call if you don't want to... we're not important".
I have a friend, a Jewish chick in her 40s and her mother still talks to her like this.
What you're talking about sounds more like age limits. Like mandatory retirement at 75 or something similar.
Leave it to the left to make a retarded ad like this and then on top of it, to use actors that even lefties would be hard pressed to say looks remotely like a rightie, much less a MAGA person.
Kamala's mouth is known more for what goes in, not what comes out.
Living proof of the Thousand Cock stare.
Also, apparently some semi-successful black rapper has come out in support of Trump. I'm sure chants of calling him "Uncle Tom" and "Nigger" from the left are coming shortly...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2023
I'm reasonably confident that the Democrats won't stoop that low but I'm not willing to stake anything on that. If the 'abortion" was done using a plush puppet or a humanoid medical dummy then i wouldn't question it.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
Screamer_2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2022
Most likely will be they hire some obscure minority performance group who jump around in leotards doing a terrible dance routine that is about abortion. Then blame so low level staffer and say they had no idea when it's badly recieved.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
At this point this wouldn't surprise me in the least if true.
Remember this is "normal", all of us are just wierd.
xXEddie.DurellXx
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Given what happened the last time I would assume it's actually a white woman doctor giving a black tranny an abortion and it'll be pre-recorded.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
Laws don't apply to Democrats.
Ron Jeremy Stan Account
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2021
Twist: she actually was telling the truth, and the Dems were absolutely 100% going to do this – but now that the surprise has been leaked and ruined, the DNC has to scramble and do something else as their entertainment. Instead they'll probably just get John Mellencamp or James Taylor or some shit to perform as a Plan B.
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2024
Wait…that Isn’t a Delta Mu ritual?
scrub
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
The funny this is that the daily stormer is probably supporting Harris.
autistic dog
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2021
People under 50 are making America great again with this one weird trick. Cat ladies hate this! Click below to find out how!
Escaped Abortion
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
I mean, I would have guessed attempt at a joke. Sounds way too over the top to be true. I'm not sure that'd even be sanitary.
There are abortion themed stage shows. I could see them actually doing one at the DNC for a gimmick. You could cast your proud black trans person at the doctor, give them a coat hanger and whinge.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
Yes.
Like how there were multiple meanings of groomer before people starting calling out trannies for sexual grooming
Like how there were multiple meanings of bloodbath. And even the MSM used it. And then they only used the physical violent meaning to slander Trump.
Like how all the leftists were against the Vax because Trump pushed it out. then when Biden took over, the left were in love with it and willing to take it.
If the left didn't have a double standard, they would have no standards.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
You didn't have to bring god into this shit.
The marxist cathedral has been wanting to groom children into queer ideology for a while now. Queer as in without an essence. A foundation. Raise children up with a shaky one so you can mold them into people ready to protest whatever cause you want them too. Also allows big pharma and the therapist industry to make a ton of money. Because they'll be taking SSRI to cope with reality. See a therapist to make sense of the world. For those who think they're trans, a ton of money to be made off of drugs to keep them the sex they think they're supposed to be. And for gay men, PReP because the community can't keep it in their pants and have to have sex with every single gay male they see.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
Welcome to Whitepill not-Wednesday! I'm your host, Diana Moon Glampers, coming to you with this update nearly 36 hours earlier than is alliteratively optimal! Oh well, I guess it's nearly Wednesday in Australia.
I understand from DMs and posts on my wall that maybe some people are feeling down this week about the way that all the Kamala propaganda is playing out.
First of all, you need to understand one key thing:
Donald Trump is currently laying low and not commenting. This should tell you (and the media) something, but instead it seems many are taking the absolutely stupidest possible message from it: Donald Trump is skeered! Sure, he responded so perfectly courageously to an unauthorized ear piercing that the Democrats have been trying to call it a setup or a hoax or just shrapnel to discredit him, but that clearly doesn't matter, he's very scared of Kamala. Because he's a crook and she's a cop, get it?
What are some other reasons, besides a sudden, lurching turn to moral cowardice, that could explain what is happening here? Let's explore the two main options.
Kamala, who came of political age in a state where Democratic policy is largely a matter of mutual agreement statewide, has used one persistent strategy for dealing with the many contentious issues that make the national political scene difficult to navigate:
She just doesn't do anything.
Doesn't matter what the issue is. If it's contentious and might cause her to lose votes from any faction, no matter how small, she will not do it. Because of this, her policy achievements are absolutely de minimis. If you do a search on Google News for terms like "Kamala Harris announces" or "Kamala Harris new policy" you'll find how very scant her actual activities are. She has, just this year, "celebrated new federal policies for nursing home staffing" and talked about some new guidelines for AI that are basic common sense. At no point has she taken any kind of policy stand that was innovative, or the slightest bit controversial.
Seriously, though: she hasn't put up anything about policy on her website, even though she's had over a week to do so since the official announcement (and surely she knew weeks or months beforehand that this was a serious possibility). Before the senior home staffing and AI policies, she's been pretty much absent from White House policy.
The obvious line of attack for DJT to use on Kamala will come after the virtual roll call. Imagine it in the mouth of Trump himself:
Kamala? She's so much of a do-nothing that Joe Biden, demented fool, is out-working her. Old Joe's coming up with active policy proposals like the SCOTUS changes...now, those changes might be stupid, they might be bad for America, but at least he's doing something! What has Kamala done? They named her border czar and she messed it up, she only went one time in 2021 to the border, never went again, Border Police say they've never seen her, never talked to her, it's a real shame. Biden named her to the anti-gun task force in September 2023. What has she done for it? She launched a new task force in 2022 for stopping online disinformation, what did she do with that?
Kamala's strategy is about to start backfiring. She can probably just about make it to the convention on vibes alone, but the Dems obviously are worried or they wouldn't do the virtual roll call to seal it up. At a lot of jobs, you can bullshit your way into decent performance reviews for months or even years, but at a certain point, someone will want to see something you've worked on if you're up for a promotion.
Democrats went wild on a honeymoon period where Kamala literally did nothing but spout platitudes and dance in TikToks. But every single one of them started out by thinking: "Yeah, this is fun, let's have a little joy and fun in the race after Biden's dismal failure, and we'll talk about policy in a week or two."
Now, they're starting to wonder: Where's the beef?
It would be a good time for Kamala to put out a suite of proposals. But Kamala does not know how to walk an electoral tightrope. Her "paralyzed into inaction" style allowed her to evade weighty, controversial questions like "strengthen or weaken tariffs?" or "Israel/Palestine: y/n?" or "How late of a late term abortion are we talking, anyway?" or "More cops or less?" or "Limit immigration/open borders?" When she is asked a question she finds too controversial, she often simply laughs it off and changes the subject to another platitude or childhood story.
I suspect she will make an attempt to suck the lifeblood from whoever she chooses as her own VP, a classic upper management strategy for do-nothings who manage to achieve C-suite. Whatever the VP's most popular policies are will suddenly be hers. So for instance, if it's Walz, expect a whole big thing about feeding every kid a hot school breakfast and lunch for free, because that was one of Walz's big policy innovations.
But she's still going to avoid, to whatever extent possible, taking any positions on tough issues. She will try to laugh at them, and to take weird nonsense positions that satisfy no one. She will not be pinned down to an opinion on any controversial issue.
As for Vance...they literally had to make disgusting shit up to insult him (this from the "no kinkshaming" party). The more rocks they throw, the more obvious it is that he's actually a lot like the median person his age. In contrast to Kamala's total lack of taking any positions (policy positions, hey, get your mind out of the gutter, we'll have none of that here!), Vance did what a lot of people in his generational cohort have done: used the power of internet argument and debate to better understand and articulate his own evolving political positions. Vance's issue is that he's had too many ideas in his life, Kamala hasn't had a unique idea in her head for the duration of her career.
If any normal human being had failed to do work to the extent that Kamala Harris has verifiably failed to do her work in the last several years, they would be filing for unemployment, not a place on the ballot as their party's nominee.
The movie The Hudsucker Proxy (where a dumbass mailroom clerk is suddenly elevated to CEO of the company he works for) gets an element of this right. The main character invents the hula hoop, which becomes a huge fad and he's the toast of the town, he even says a funny by accident (that he didn't know he'd cause all this hoopla) and the reporters roar with laughter. But as time goes by, one good invention just isn't enough. One good pun isn't enough, and when he says hoopla, get it, and you can quote me on that... all the reporters groan.
Media hype cycles require fresh meat. "Coconut" and "#brat" have a lifespan that is rapidly running out. It seems like Kamala hasn't even settled on where she's headed next, and I see no reason to think she won't just follow the advice of whoever is in a room with her that day.
If the election were being held on August 1, like the DNC's virtual roll call, it'd be worth being afraid. But this kind of strategy doesn't fool people for very long. Eventually, people want to know what a politician thinks about contentious issues.
And that's a problem, because I'm not even sure Kamala knows what Kamala thinks.
She's always just awaited orders, and let her party superiors dictate the correct positions on the issues. But now there are different factions, all whispering demands. Do you acquiesce to the LinkedIn founder who is demanding tariffs be removed, or do you take notice that the Teamsters head is speaking at the RNC and keep tariffs lest the unions all defect to the right? This is just one of twenty different problems where a VP could smile and say "I'm taking all this under advisement," but a president has to make a choice.
A president does not get to demur on these issues. A president does not get to avoid angering some part of the voting public. A president cannot evade a fundamental responsibility for decision-making. Yes, this is hard! Very hard. It's why most of us should never be president. You have to be made of steel to deal with the way every choice you make will be quibbled over and you'll be called every name in the book. That's the job.
In Kamala's role as VP, the Rush rule applies (Geddy Lee, not Limbaugh): "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." Fundamental TL;DR: Kamala made a choice every single day she showed up for work and avoided the hard stuff.
I understand from DMs and posts on my wall that maybe some people are feeling down this week about the way that all the Kamala propaganda is playing out.
First of all, you need to understand one key thing:
Donald Trump is currently laying low and not commenting. This should tell you (and the media) something, but instead it seems many are taking the absolutely stupidest possible message from it: Donald Trump is skeered! Sure, he responded so perfectly courageously to an unauthorized ear piercing that the Democrats have been trying to call it a setup or a hoax or just shrapnel to discredit him, but that clearly doesn't matter, he's very scared of Kamala. Because he's a crook and she's a cop, get it?
What are some other reasons, besides a sudden, lurching turn to moral cowardice, that could explain what is happening here? Let's explore the two main options.
- Donald Trump would prefer to face Kamala. No other candidate in the entire election cycle this time around has the level of burdened past that Kamala does. Rumors have swirled about her sexual behaviors and prostitution-like approach to climbing the social ladder. No other Democratic candidate is likely to have as much dirt on him or her as Kamala does. She also has more disgruntled former staffers than most candidates, by a long shot. If Donald Trump wants to pull out these cards, he needs to wait until she's already nominated and ballot deadlines have passed.
- Donald Trump has little he can do against Kamala right now. In order to avoid looking like an insult comic rather than a statesman, Trump has pursued a strategy of generally laying off sexist or racist remarks, based on the idea that these lose more votes than they gain. However, with Kamala's current campaign being 100% substance-free (we'll get to that in a minute), and focused on putting out ads where she does nothing but mouth platitudes and dance, all the "clapbacks" possible are focused on her personality or sex or race, rather than any policy position.
Kamala, who came of political age in a state where Democratic policy is largely a matter of mutual agreement statewide, has used one persistent strategy for dealing with the many contentious issues that make the national political scene difficult to navigate:
She just doesn't do anything.
Doesn't matter what the issue is. If it's contentious and might cause her to lose votes from any faction, no matter how small, she will not do it. Because of this, her policy achievements are absolutely de minimis. If you do a search on Google News for terms like "Kamala Harris announces" or "Kamala Harris new policy" you'll find how very scant her actual activities are. She has, just this year, "celebrated new federal policies for nursing home staffing" and talked about some new guidelines for AI that are basic common sense. At no point has she taken any kind of policy stand that was innovative, or the slightest bit controversial.
Seriously, though: she hasn't put up anything about policy on her website, even though she's had over a week to do so since the official announcement (and surely she knew weeks or months beforehand that this was a serious possibility). Before the senior home staffing and AI policies, she's been pretty much absent from White House policy.
The obvious line of attack for DJT to use on Kamala will come after the virtual roll call. Imagine it in the mouth of Trump himself:
Kamala? She's so much of a do-nothing that Joe Biden, demented fool, is out-working her. Old Joe's coming up with active policy proposals like the SCOTUS changes...now, those changes might be stupid, they might be bad for America, but at least he's doing something! What has Kamala done? They named her border czar and she messed it up, she only went one time in 2021 to the border, never went again, Border Police say they've never seen her, never talked to her, it's a real shame. Biden named her to the anti-gun task force in September 2023. What has she done for it? She launched a new task force in 2022 for stopping online disinformation, what did she do with that?
Kamala's strategy is about to start backfiring. She can probably just about make it to the convention on vibes alone, but the Dems obviously are worried or they wouldn't do the virtual roll call to seal it up. At a lot of jobs, you can bullshit your way into decent performance reviews for months or even years, but at a certain point, someone will want to see something you've worked on if you're up for a promotion.
Democrats went wild on a honeymoon period where Kamala literally did nothing but spout platitudes and dance in TikToks. But every single one of them started out by thinking: "Yeah, this is fun, let's have a little joy and fun in the race after Biden's dismal failure, and we'll talk about policy in a week or two."
Now, they're starting to wonder: Where's the beef?
It would be a good time for Kamala to put out a suite of proposals. But Kamala does not know how to walk an electoral tightrope. Her "paralyzed into inaction" style allowed her to evade weighty, controversial questions like "strengthen or weaken tariffs?" or "Israel/Palestine: y/n?" or "How late of a late term abortion are we talking, anyway?" or "More cops or less?" or "Limit immigration/open borders?" When she is asked a question she finds too controversial, she often simply laughs it off and changes the subject to another platitude or childhood story.
I suspect she will make an attempt to suck the lifeblood from whoever she chooses as her own VP, a classic upper management strategy for do-nothings who manage to achieve C-suite. Whatever the VP's most popular policies are will suddenly be hers. So for instance, if it's Walz, expect a whole big thing about feeding every kid a hot school breakfast and lunch for free, because that was one of Walz's big policy innovations.
But she's still going to avoid, to whatever extent possible, taking any positions on tough issues. She will try to laugh at them, and to take weird nonsense positions that satisfy no one. She will not be pinned down to an opinion on any controversial issue.
As for Vance...they literally had to make disgusting shit up to insult him (this from the "no kinkshaming" party). The more rocks they throw, the more obvious it is that he's actually a lot like the median person his age. In contrast to Kamala's total lack of taking any positions (policy positions, hey, get your mind out of the gutter, we'll have none of that here!), Vance did what a lot of people in his generational cohort have done: used the power of internet argument and debate to better understand and articulate his own evolving political positions. Vance's issue is that he's had too many ideas in his life, Kamala hasn't had a unique idea in her head for the duration of her career.
If any normal human being had failed to do work to the extent that Kamala Harris has verifiably failed to do her work in the last several years, they would be filing for unemployment, not a place on the ballot as their party's nominee.
The movie The Hudsucker Proxy (where a dumbass mailroom clerk is suddenly elevated to CEO of the company he works for) gets an element of this right. The main character invents the hula hoop, which becomes a huge fad and he's the toast of the town, he even says a funny by accident (that he didn't know he'd cause all this hoopla) and the reporters roar with laughter. But as time goes by, one good invention just isn't enough. One good pun isn't enough, and when he says hoopla, get it, and you can quote me on that... all the reporters groan.
Media hype cycles require fresh meat. "Coconut" and "#brat" have a lifespan that is rapidly running out. It seems like Kamala hasn't even settled on where she's headed next, and I see no reason to think she won't just follow the advice of whoever is in a room with her that day.
If the election were being held on August 1, like the DNC's virtual roll call, it'd be worth being afraid. But this kind of strategy doesn't fool people for very long. Eventually, people want to know what a politician thinks about contentious issues.
And that's a problem, because I'm not even sure Kamala knows what Kamala thinks.
She's always just awaited orders, and let her party superiors dictate the correct positions on the issues. But now there are different factions, all whispering demands. Do you acquiesce to the LinkedIn founder who is demanding tariffs be removed, or do you take notice that the Teamsters head is speaking at the RNC and keep tariffs lest the unions all defect to the right? This is just one of twenty different problems where a VP could smile and say "I'm taking all this under advisement," but a president has to make a choice.
A president does not get to demur on these issues. A president does not get to avoid angering some part of the voting public. A president cannot evade a fundamental responsibility for decision-making. Yes, this is hard! Very hard. It's why most of us should never be president. You have to be made of steel to deal with the way every choice you make will be quibbled over and you'll be called every name in the book. That's the job.
In Kamala's role as VP, the Rush rule applies (Geddy Lee, not Limbaugh): "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice." Fundamental TL;DR: Kamala made a choice every single day she showed up for work and avoided the hard stuff.
Last edited:
Jacques1194
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
I know polls are too early at the moment but jesus Gen-Z. I swear they are the worse generation.
- Status