- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
He's reacting to the DogPack hit pieceLegal Mindset grifts talks the legality of the Shad art or whatever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's reacting to the DogPack hit pieceLegal Mindset grifts talks the legality of the Shad art or whatever.
I'm confused looking into this.Daily reminder, kiwis,
Loli is ILLEGAL MATERIAL especially if you have possession of a certain amount on your computer and any indication of "intent to distribute."
Yes in America, yes in most of the Western World.
For some reason, most people have the impression Loli is legal in America, but it's not and hasn't been since the early 2000s.
Well, unless you have either journalistic or educational credentials (like, actual credentials) then most likely you can get in trouble. The feds and police normally don't treat it like actual CP, but it's better safe than sorry (and also to never under any circumstance save it, never).This is a good point. But in the context of awareness sharing meaning exposing a malicious person for interacting and spreading it, would you get in any legal trouble? This example specifically applies if you are just documenting a person like Eret or Kris Tyson or anyone interacting with said material or sharing it themselves and showing they are indeed sharing it.
Some laws are like that, like how in a lot of states weed is still illegal but simply decriminalized. But that doesn't change the fact that the laws are still there and that they can get very nasty when they want to, as well as the fact that late 90s and early 2000s was almost entirely unregulated. Napster and the many anime shows that got reuploded to Youtube without any changes wouldn't have stayed there that long if the law was enforcedI'm confused looking into this.
I looked this up previously not long ago and general consensus was it was legal, but now I get tons of results citing PROTECT act of 2003.
What confuses me, is you would think if this law is 20 years old, things would be different : 4chan was based in america and REGULARLY had unbanned loli content after 2003, and gflashex is a huge loli fan very openly, with a dox, whose been reported to the feds by an ALOG, and still champions it : So what the hell is going on? It seems as if this is on the books, but not ACTUALLY enforced to THAT capacity at least. Because if it was, I doubt the net would look like it does.
This is misleading.Daily reminder, kiwis,
Loli is ILLEGAL MATERIAL especially if you have possession of a certain amount on your computer and any indication of "intent to distribute."
Yes in America, yes in most of the Western World.
For some reason, most people have the impression Loli is legal in America, but it's not and hasn't been since the early 2000s.
Just be really careful with these leaks. Feds are probably watching this shit really closely.
A Hunger Games with only Transgender people video
under the guise of "we have game shows solely on men and women, how about now we make one solely for Transgenders as they compete for $1,000,000"
and it just become a show where trannies humiliate themselves and eachother for $1,000,000
That would be based
and something most people would want to see.
and anyone calling against this show, be they trans themselves would be called transphobic.
It's fun to see how it only took one troon and his antics to tumble down Mr.Beast empire
They most likely won't, but that doesn't mean that they legally can't if they get serious enough about itLoli is not considered child porn, unless it depicts actual existing children, then it might be. But, even regular lolicon that is just cartoon characters or realistic looking children could be considered obscene material (the case law definition of "obscene", not the layman's definition), which is illegal to distribute or possess with intent to distribute, but simple possession is not illegal. No one is going to bust down your door for loli.
Some places will treat it like actual child porn. Couple articles from Canada and one from the US. Go up in front of the wrong/right judge and you'll probably catch charges.Loli is not considered child porn, unless it depicts actual existing children, then it might be. But, even regular lolicon that is just cartoon characters or realistic looking children could be considered obscene material (the case law definition of "obscene", not the layman's definition), which is illegal to distribute or possess with intent to distribute, but simple possession is not illegal. No one is going to bust down your door for loli.
"Ava slash Chris Tyson is a trans male, so I think it wants to be called 'she'..." Then continues to call him 'he' throughout the video.Lol Bruce Rivers is covering Chris, wants his hard drives scrutinized:
mostly children and shills probablyI get Twitter is brain rot central, but seeing defenses like "he cured blindness" or "other companies do it so it's ok" makes me want to rope
oh they learned. they learned how to rape children and then manipulate them with incredibly efficiency and to pay off hacks like the rollingstones and dexerto to be part of their child molestation factory.These retards never learn.
Based reverse psychology gender affirmation."Ava slash Chris Tyson is a trans male, so I think it wants to be called 'she'..." Then continues to call him 'he' throughout the video.
I fucking love Bruce.
I'd assume those are fringe cases though considering this shit is just out in the open on American owned social media websitesSome places will treat it like actual child porn. Couple articles from Canada and one from the US. Go up in front of the wrong/right judge and you'll probably catch charges.
Depends on the state actually, like California doesn't consider loli to be within it's child pornography lawsDaily reminder, kiwis,
Loli is ILLEGAL MATERIAL especially if you have possession of a certain amount on your computer and any indication of "intent to distribute."
Yes in America, yes in most of the Western World.
For some reason, most people have the impression Loli is legal in America, but it's not and hasn't been since the early 2000s.
Just be really careful with these leaks. Feds are probably watching this shit really closely.
Prosecutors can cook up any kind of case that they want to. Depending on how fringe it is and how absent of ethics it was when it was cooked up, even an Attorney General can serve up his own career for disbarment.I'd assume those are fringe cases though considering this shit is just out in the open on American owned social media websites
Are you the schizo who keeps shitting up Smiling Friends threads on 4chan? Just stop watching porn, it's that simple.My man, you're sounding like that those neo-puritans
Spic-stache eats yet another dick, you love to see it. Legal Dicksucker stays buried in Ladyboy Dick, disappointedly.View attachment 6250899(A)
View attachment 6250923(A)
Guy who said on his livestream that the discord messages were fake now takes issue with people making definitive claims without proof. Also, this focus to the question "Was Lava paid by Mr Beast?" is a deflection by this idiot because he is trying to find a way to defend Chris and Jimmy.
EDIT: removed the quote of the post with Legal Dicksucker's stream because he was reacting to Dog Pack's video.