- Joined
- Jun 14, 2024
It’s looks like you’re right, it’s not sovereign immunity, but pretty broad statutorily created immunity. I’m too lazy at the moment to go review the filings and look at case law to make an informed guess, but I’d still be shocked if the claim against the city gets passed the 12(b)(6) stage.I'm not sure municipalities in Wisconsin are covered by sovereign immunity, but I'm pretty sure they're covered by some form of immunity. It's generally extremely difficult to prove municipal liability.
It definitely won’t pass qualified immunity, and I can’t imagine the city has less protections. Unless the jurisdiction or judge is a real stickler about what the “clearly established” violation element requires.
I like to pride myself on being able to decipher even the most esoteric retardese, but I can’t figure out what he’s trying to say here.
I get that he’s trying to say “Roe happened, then people (read:pepperonis) stopped having as many babies, and so the unwanted babies couldn’t grow up to commit crime.”
But I don’t get how he defends that conclusion with it taking two decades to have any effect.
God it’s like the Necronomicon. But instead of becoming insane from reading it, I just become dumb, fat, and piglike.
Last edited: