Another question from someone that is minimally educated in lawfare:
What is even going on here anymore? The court seems to be doing its best Tomlinson impression to Hardin by saying 'Hush, child'. Why are the judges and magistrates literally bending, and sometimes breaking, reality to ensure that the case remains open and Greer has infinite time to file another screed that essentially says 'My feelings were hurt and I don't know what to do about it'. Many of the law experts here have been completely baffled by the moves the court is making. Clearly this lawsuit is a fucking cancerous, realm shattering illness in the system and while there are no merits in Greer's case, the court (outside of the initial dismissal) has all but said 'It's ok little buddy, you keep on trying till you get it right.'
Are they trying to use Greer as a harbinger? Are they trying to make an example of Null that no-no words aren't allowed in America?
Greer is his own worst enemy to his own attempts at litigation and they seem to punish Null for every mistake Greer makes, or am I misreading the scenario?