UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
The founding fathers of the US realized that the government's fear of it's population was paramount, and understood that very well, to the point that the very first parts of our constitution were specifically called out to allow the citizens to criticize the government, and to arm themselves against that very same government.
I agree with you in spirit, and I don't want to burst your bubble, but the Bill of Rights isn't the very first part of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights is literally a collection of amendments, literally afterthoughts.

IIRC, those who didn't think to include them assumed that the rights outlined in them didn't need to be explicitly declared. Lawmakers from states who had rights outlined in their constitutions pushed to have them included.

I take your meaning, however. I think those first two rights in the Bill of Rights are critical, even though not long ago (PL) I lost a government position in violation of that first right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smar Mijou
Just take him behind the station and blow his head off with a shotgun, doing anything more than that is a waste of effort.

Yep, bullet to the back of the head and put the little rat out of his misery.

But instead he'll run up the legal aid on some long ass trial and then all the money to keep him in prison for decades.
All in it'll be millions spent on some savage who should never even been allowed to be born in this country.


Hope judge throws max 10 years at him, but expecting him to get off with therapy or some bullshit.

We can only wish , bet he don't even get 12 months that's if he even gets custodial.

Uk justice in action, drugs = 7 years, noncing kids = 7 months!!
 
Been watching the reactions etc on this and the media, even the so called alternative media seem to desperately be trying to either shift pity onto the brown cunts or in the case of the Alts, assure you its got to be solved with talking more (and donating to edaddy of course!)
Idk, I sense fear, Its too early to say but this seems to have started something, nobody is swallowing their shit on this one.
Of course its just as likely that it burns out and everybody goes back to the new normal but im quietly optimistic here.
 
Remember that the police are in the middle of a recruitment crisis too.


Chief constables are to be given discretion to award the extra money to new constables’ starting salaries to help police forces compete with the private sector for new recruits.
The Government has accepted a recommendation by the police remuneration review body, which said police chiefs should be able to start new constables on £1,200 higher salary than normal. It comes on top of the 4.75 per cent increase in the basic salary of £33,324 a year agreed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves.
It is designed to help forces facing difficulties recruiting new officers at the same time as losing older policemen and women. The review body said it aimed to ensure the police service in England and Wales could maintain the uplift of 20,000 officers over the past three years by continuing to “recruit at volume.”

“It will assist those forces that are finding recruitment challenging and continue to boost the income of the lowest paid officers,” said the review body.
“We are conscious that over the last decade there has been a significant increase in the gap between private and public sector pay.
“This risks undermining the ability of the police service to recruit, retain and motivate high-calibre officers with the right attitudes to manage complexity, respond to vulnerability, de-escalate social tension, and build and sustain public trust and confidence.”
All 43 forces will be able to offer the extra pay to new recruits – which is made possible by allowing chief constables to put new constables on pay point 2, rather than pay point 1.
The Government has, however, rejected a recommendation by the review body for the Metropolitan Police to be able to offer a £4,000 “golden hello” by putting new recruits on pay point 3. Instead, the Government is proposing to raise the London allowance by £1,250.

It comes as the review body warned that the Met was short of 1,500 officers on its target of 35,415, which could put the safety of the public at risk, the pay review body has said.
“We are very aware of the operational and public safety risks of it not meeting its workforce,” said the review body. “We are very concerned about the immediate challenges the MPS faces in attracting officers of the right calibre with the right skills and attitudes and in the volume needed to address current shortfalls.
“We are alert to the operational risks and the implications for public safety that the MPS has told us may arise if the situation is not addressed.”
It said the MPS employed around a quarter of all the officers in England and Wales, accounted for a sixth of all crime, was the lead force for strategic threats such as terrorism and a third of county lines gang crime was linked to London.
The force is, however, still in special measures after inspectors uncovered a litany of systemic failings in fighting crime and serving victims.
The review body had recommended that Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, should be allowed to pay “golden hellos” of some £4,000 more than the normal starting salaries for new police constables in order to compete with the private sector.
However, it warned: “This measure could have implications for neighbouring forces and the constable pay scale as a whole. We therefore propose that this additional discretion be limited to two years with an initial review of the discretion after one year.”
The review body also warned that there had been an increase in the number of warranted police officers being placed in desk jobs normally carried out by police staff. This was because of the way funding for the 20,000 uplift had been geared towards recruiting front line officers.
Senior police chiefs have called for greater flexibility to allow them to recruit more police staff so they can switch officers into frontline roles.
 
How far do you think the plods will go to try and stop this one?
They're getting a lot of time to prepare for it. That's well over a month away and the powers that be will try to spin this to quell tensions. It's clear that last night has them rattled and they want to put a stop to whatever's going on. I too have my doubts whether we have reached boiling point and people are beginning to snap but I wish to be mildly optimistic for now. Shitskins need a reminder as to who's country they're living in.
 
View attachment 6256452

Tommy's gearing up for round 3. He's striking while the iron is hot.

How far do you think the plods will go to try and stop this one?
Month and a half makes me think they are going to be more sensible and practice the same tactics used elsewhere. Expect lots of people trying to get recordings and expect a massively excessive response from the police to stop them doing so.

Nuclear option is Labour slap the terrorism label on the EDL and use all of the laws the Tories put in about protests to crush those not affiliated with them.

More likely one is the police use the people they have in those groups to kick off stuff to give their actions a veneer of respectability. We know they have a history of that, indeed there's a case currently going through about some of those who did that with left-wing affiliated groups.
 
Remember that the police are in the middle of a recruitment crisis too.
Import untold thousands of hairtrigger-violent fighting age males from war ravaged shitholes.

Jobs scarce, economy moribund.

Police and military experiencing a recruitment crisis.

Antiwhite propaganda relentless and ubiquitous.

Gee, I wonder where this could be going.
:thinking:
 
I have a family member who is a bit of a prophet. They've been calling it right since the 90s. Their latest prediction, told to me last week which I laughed off; "Get out of the UK by the end of September, It's all going to kick off". Maybe they're right again.

View attachment 6256452

Tommy's gearing up for round 3. He's striking while the iron is hot.

How far do you think the plods will go to try and stop this one?
Fuck. I owe them another beer.
 
I having this ever growing belief that a significant part of the rights online voice, mostly the "alt right" types exist soley to demoralize and make you feel helpless and that there is no point in doing anything about the state of things, I believe thats why Fuentes exists and why /pol/ is able to stay online without issue.
They are what you call "living" red herrings. There is a reason for why they are allowed to stick around even with the backlash.
 
I cannot express my disdain for London. If it were to sink into the sea, at least there would be a ton of dead Arabs. I am really lucky my place is pretty damn white because the place is heavily local they don't cow tail to foreigners at all. Its older people man, they are the last racist bastion.
 
Haven't found the district level one, but here's an older/simpler one.

How deeply buried in a multi-million dollar gated neighborhood of Prince George's County would you have to be for your family to be as safe as in Nowhereville, Appalachia?

View attachment 6256187
2006 stats (its 2024 btw) , for what area? what country? Kind of incomplete.
 
Riot police were out and about in a few places across England today, with civil unrest spreading from the events of Southport this week [thread]. Here's a roundup of happenings.

Whitehall, London. In the day, the lads engage in their national pride: football chants.
'Stick your fucking Islam up your arse'


Later there were scuffles and the riot lads boinked heads.



After dark was an aggressive police sweep to clear the streets.

Whitehall was a pretty big day. If you want more there's a thread unfortunately by an insufferable journalist, but nevertheless with a lot of good media here.

Hartlepool, NE England. Frequently appears to be a swarm of feral street children. A couple of guys got lightly mauled by police dogs.





Later, some guys assaulted a brown dude clearly just walking through. Huge L for the Hartlepool lads.


Manchester, NW England. From an area called Newton Heath, a fairly determined police presence but only some minor chats caught on camera.


 
Last edited:
2006 stats (its 2024 btw) , for what area? what country? Kind of incomplete.
2006 for the US. Before Obama's "Just Us" department and fanning the flames of BLM race riots for Mike Brown, Freddie Gray, and Trayvon Martin. And then of course the full blown race communism, de-policing, and Soros DAs of the Floyd era.

So after all that, which direction do you think the black violence differential has moved? Steve Sailer has some meticulously researched graphs...
 
Crowder had Tommy Robinson on his show yesterday, where he interviews him, and Tommy goes more in-depth and explains things to us naive small-brained Amerimutts. He also shows some relevant clips from the documentary. His interview starts at about the 44:00 mark or so...

Rumble link because Jewtube is censorious faggots.

You're just LARPing on the internet though. In the real world trying to organise anything with poor optics isn't going to pan out well.
I'm not LARPing whatsoever. As I said before, I'm just an Amerimutt sperging in a UK related thread... 🤷‍♂️
The organisers would face a high chance of being beheaded on the streets of Paris for pulling that stunt. I don't think smashing mosque windows quite has the same effect and I don't want Christians beheading innocent people either?
Considering the usual outcomes of these events where nothing meaningful ever happens, and the Charlie Hebdo attacks are still relatively recent, I would say that low-IQ types that only understand violence probably need to be taught a lesson using violence as the means of teaching. Because "solidarity" and "peaceful coexistence" is fundamentally incompatible with these dumb sand niggers. It hasn't ever worked a single time in the past, and it won't in the future.
Exactly this!
Theirs a time and a place for violence but it's never going to achieve fuck all until enough people are behind your cause.
I wouldn't be so hasty to come to that conclusion. The Arab Spring Protests that eventually led to the downfall of Moammar Ghadaffi and Hosni Mubarak started with minor relatively peaceful Protests. All it takes is the right mix of disgruntled public sentiment, ineffective government, and a spark to light the powder keg to set things off.
I agree with you in spirit, and I don't want to burst your bubble, but the Bill of Rights isn't the very first part of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights is literally a collection of amendments, literally afterthoughts.
Well, my phrase might have been spelled out wrong, but I wouldn't call the Bill of Rights "afterthoughts" especially considering that the first 10 were all ratified at the same time, less than 2 years after the constitution itself was ratified , and the fact that people like James Madison, who were fundamental architects of the Constitution itself were main contributors to the Bill of Rights. And that they were specifically called out as fundamental rights guaranteed by the US constitution. I see it more as the founding fathers who wrote the constitution just simply "added to it" for lack of a better term, rather than amending the constitution in dramatic fashion.
 
Been watching the reactions etc on this and the media, even the so called alternative media seem to desperately be trying to either shift pity onto the brown cunts or in the case of the Alts, assure you its got to be solved with talking more (and donating to edaddy of course!)
Idk, I sense fear, Its too early to say but this seems to have started something, nobody is swallowing their shit on this one.
Of course its just as likely that it burns out and everybody goes back to the new normal but im quietly optimistic here.
One benefit of a Labour government is the populace knows they're actively hated by them so there's no need for voters to bow down in hope that Labour may do something about immigration. The Tories at least pretended they might do something. The election has probably saved them from dealing with the tipping point.
 
Last edited:
Back