US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure what bad publicity he’s going to get from “crazy homeless person sues rich jew.”
The only way you’d get dirt on soros would be if you survive a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and get to the discovery phase. That won’t happen, because a crazy person won’t have the legal knowledge, nor the general mental capacity, to write a complaint that overcomes that hurdle.

It’s some that Soros’s lawyers could deal with in like 2 billable hours. That’s going to cost less than 10k even if they don’t farm it out to a new associate who could do it for like 2k tops. Soros is worth almost 6 billion, you’d need an unrealistic amount of pro-se complaints being filed to even begin to put a dent in that.
The economics of it just don’t work out. You’d probably run out of funds trying to amass homeless before Soros even realized something was going on.
I was never for using the homeless. But the migrants Soros paid to fly in evidential on paper trail would make a strong case he couldn’t deny.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rimanah
The CIA was in shambles when Bush Sr. was appointed Director after Watergate. There wasn't much to rule with an iron fist then. You give them all far too much credit. CIA was a joke in the 70's, not that it's much better now.
Correct. That’s why Bush changed the entire structure when he was given a shit hand. He put those deemed a risk on the chopping block to satiate political bloodlust. If you’re stuck in the river without a paddle you either make or break by doing what you can, otherwise you end up in shits creak.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Rimanah
Laches. Moot. NO STANDING! Lala la la can't hear you I won't be the judge that caused the civil war la la la

Plus, do you really think the GOP in the house would refuse Michigan's electors? They'd sue in Hawaii to force them to take them. And wouldn't it come down to Kamala, like it should have came down to Pence?
I know I'm late, but all it would take is one sympathetic judge who wants their name in history books for the next thousand years
 
"Mr. President, North Korea has launched their nukes against the Californian coast! You need to use this key to unlock the mobile command center and press the red button to launch the counter-nukes right away!"
1722650322328.png
"Oy vey Goy, It's Shabbat! Don't you have a Kosher nuclear launch method that doesn't use keys, buttons, or switches?!?"
1722649787653.png
 
I was never for using the homeless. But the migrants Soros paid to fly in evidential on paper trail would make a strong case he couldn’t deny.
Oops, my bad, I got posters mixed up. How embarrassing.

That’s actually a different question entirely. They may have a cause of action against Soros tbh, idk enough of the facts to say for certain.
But that’s not something I’d entrust just to a pro-se filing. You’d want it to be done with either a good conservative plaintiff’s attorney, a conservative public interest firm, or by a state solicitor general. Someone who knows the game well enough to know where to properly file, how to get past a 12(b)(6), to navigate discovery, etc.

That’s a viable strategy that we’ve seen rise in recent years to take these fuckers to task, especially here in Texas. Now that you mention it, I’m sort of surprised someone around here hasn’t raised the idea before.

I know I'm late, but all it would take is one sympathetic judge who wants their name in history books for the next thousand years
The problem is that it would go to SCOTUS, and John Roberts is a squishy cuck who cares more about “preserving the dignity of the court and the institution” than actually doing his job. And he’d bully one of the three Trump appointees (probably ACB sadly) into siding with him and the three libs.

There are absolutely district and circuit judges who’d stop the bullshit, but the big man at the top would just tell them “NO!” on appeal.
 
Last edited:
So he's extremely embarrassing, unqualified, and evil, got it. Only serving the interests of the ones paying him and making his life more comfortable while caring nothing for the people whose lives he's actively ruining and throwing away just for money. Thank you, that's all I need to know. As per last time with Newsom, fuck this guy.
These people don't have to be qualified.

You might think that its just a couple of politicians in a room. But behind it all is many many institutes, think tanks and world organizations that do the grunt work.

cfr-media-network-hdv-spr.pngthink-tank-map.jpg
5cd6869235a04157b6a9efde21252577.pngAtlantic-Council-Web.jpg


Then whenever the Government does something horrible you can go "Look at those politicians, no wonder that happened, they are idiots!". When the horrible thing, was the plan the whole time. 😉😉
 
Anyone remember the crash in 01 that's never talked about? It was the dotcom bubble bursting from massive companies buying up every inch of useless E-space.

You probably won't remember because just as it was about to threaten the US economy, wouldn't you gosh-darn guessed that some ragheads flew planes into a building and whoopsie daisy, printer went brrrr to fund the MIC to steal oil and poof, no more recession.

What's that? The tech industry is collapsing and the US is going to steal Venezuelan oil? Let's hope there isn't some large scale international issue that requires western intervention to solve. Ukraine and Israel aint it, chief.
The '01 dotcom crash didn't hurt America as a whole so much as mainly hurting Silicon Valley and the laptop class. And even then, the Venture Capitalists sect cauterized the wound rather quickly and had what tech companies that survived quickly by the balls afterwards.

Enron crashing and burning has a greater impact on the economy than the dotcom crash.
 
If you are looking for some deep Bush lore than you guys should look into how Mao Zedong prophesied that H. W. Bush would be "promoted" in 1980, at the same time he decreed that The Heavens would give Kissinger a long life with a side of calling the NYT and WaPo "jewish controled" and being mad at Watergate getting rid of his pal Nixon.


The deepest lore is Bush granddad which some rumours link to the Business Plot. That is all hearsay, but he did make a very nice profit from dealing with German and later Nazi Iron and Steel in the late 20s and early 30s which allowed him to bypass the entire Great Depression.
 
You don't need a conspiracy theory to explain the polls. Most Americans are niggercattle, and the view of Trump as Super-Hitler the KKK Rape Lord is already burned into the brains of about half the country. They didn't change their opinion just because Trump got shot, all that happened was they were completely demoralized by having to accept their guy is a decrepit, pants-shitting retard. Now they have a candidate who isn't a decrepit pants-shitter (although she is retarded), which is enough to rekindle their Vote Blue No Matter Who enthusiasm to stop Hitlermort from ending American Democracy with his insurrectionist racism.
 
Correct. That’s why Bush changed the entire structure when he was given a shit hand. He put those deemed a risk on the chopping block to satiate political bloodlust. If you’re stuck in the river without a paddle you either make or break by doing what you can, otherwise you end up in shits creak.
And during Bush's tenure as Director and arguably until the 1990's CIA was marked by failure after failure after failure and plans backfiring one after another. Another revolution in Iran, the hostage crisis, two-bit tinpot dictators foiling them left and right... What's you're leaving out is the Soviets had CIA chasing their tails for decades. The USSR were the real masters of human intelligence and made games of tricking the CIA into shooting themselves in the foot every day. What the US was very good at was signals intelligence and later geospatial (satellites). That wasn't CIA.
 
And during Bush's tenure as Director and arguably until the 1990's CIA was marked by failure after failure after failure and plans backfiring one after another. Another revolution in Iran, the hostage crisis, two-bit tinpot dictators foiling them left and right... What's you're leaving out is the Soviets had CIA chasing their tails for decades. The USSR were the real masters of human intelligence and made games of tricking the CIA into shooting themselves in the foot every day. What the US was very good at was signals intelligence and later geospatial (satellites). That wasn't CIA.
If the USSR were the masters of intelligence why do you think capitalism evidentially won over communism?

For a better point. Why do you think the Taliban Red Unit exists? Because Bush Jr. brainwashed all the boys in gitmo into feeding back useless information for state building. No serious nation has a military unit that uses fucking roller skates for patrol. The closest thing since then was what, the Swiss mountain brigade? At they very least they got to shoot Germans and not their own people due to faulty bomb detectors, which (hint hint) the CIA also made and sold to them.

You seem on the uptake so I’ll drop this little nugget for you. Edward Hunter was 100% truthful in his work.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Autistic
Reactions: Phenax and Drael
If the USSR were the masters of intelligence why do you think capitalism evidentially won over communism?

For a better point. Why do you think the Taliban Red Unit exists? Because Bush Jr. brainwashed all the boys in gitmo into feeding back useless information for state building. No serious nation has a military unit that uses fucking roller skates for patrol. The closest thing since then was what, the Swiss mountain brigade? At they very least they got to shoot Germans and not their own people due to faulty bomb detectors, which (hint hint) the CIA also made and sold to them.
I said the USSR were masters of human intelligence. People spies. What does that have to do with communist vs. free-market economic systems? Our technological superiority gave us the advantage in signals intelligence and geospatial and the communists went bankrupt trying to catch up. The CIA didn't think the USSR would collapse when it did either by the way.
 
I believe the return of rigged polls are at least partially because Joe isn't in anymore. Having him have low polling was one of the ways they tried to get him out at least after the debate performance. Since Kamala is now there they're more motivated to put in the work to pull their trickery again, especially while the DNC is at risk of an open convention.
 
I said the USSR were masters of human intelligence. People spies. What does that have to do with communist vs. free-market economic systems? Our technological superiority gave us the advantage in signals intelligence and geospatial and the communists went bankrupt trying to catch up. The CIA didn't think the USSR would collapse when it did either by the way.
Stop making me agree with you. Free market philosophy was supplanted in eroding Soviet institutional investment. Russians didn’t one day wake up and go “Let’s run state mandated vodka factories to make the people stupider”, that idea was entirely seeded much like the rest of the soviet industrial complex.
 
The '01 dotcom crash didn't hurt America as a whole so much as mainly hurting Silicon Valley and the laptop class. And even then, the Venture Capitalists sect cauterized the wound rather quickly and had what tech companies that survived quickly by the balls afterwards.

It recovered quickly afterwards as well. Google starting growing into the giant it is today in the aftermath of the crash. Amazon was starting to branch out from books and becoming the behemoth it is today. Apple released its first iPod in 2001 and started its own ascent. Both Twitter and Facebook were founded in the middle of the decade and started the social media boom. Both YouTube and Twitch (at the time it was Justin.tv) both started around then as well. Hundreds of smaller, but still very successful companies also go their start in that time as well.

I'm not sure the crash burned the VCs all that bad, so much as it did clueless investors who bought into IPOs like crazy thinking that everything would be the next Microsoft. The VCs might have been holding some of the bag, but not all of it. The potential on tech companies is so large that even if ten startups fail, one succeeding more than covers the losses. If any of them turn into the next Facebook or anything on that level it covers a hundred failures.
 
The country with the best spies has always been the British. MI6 trained CIA and Mossad. I know this upsets those who are Eternal Anglopilled, but it's the truth.
You’re not wrong. Benedict Arnold was the greatest British spy. Yet somehow he didn’t win the war, probably because he was caught and hung from horse carriage. He was a good guy though I respect his empathy for the Americans and their fight, he seemed highly conflicted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back