Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was never for using the homeless. But the migrants Soros paid to fly in evidential on paper trail would make a strong case he couldn’t deny.I’m not sure what bad publicity he’s going to get from “crazy homeless person sues rich jew.”
The only way you’d get dirt on soros would be if you survive a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and get to the discovery phase. That won’t happen, because a crazy person won’t have the legal knowledge, nor the general mental capacity, to write a complaint that overcomes that hurdle.
It’s some that Soros’s lawyers could deal with in like 2 billable hours. That’s going to cost less than 10k even if they don’t farm it out to a new associate who could do it for like 2k tops. Soros is worth almost 6 billion, you’d need an unrealistic amount of pro-se complaints being filed to even begin to put a dent in that.
The economics of it just don’t work out. You’d probably run out of funds trying to amass homeless before Soros even realized something was going on.
Correct. That’s why Bush changed the entire structure when he was given a shit hand. He put those deemed a risk on the chopping block to satiate political bloodlust. If you’re stuck in the river without a paddle you either make or break by doing what you can, otherwise you end up in shits creak.The CIA was in shambles when Bush Sr. was appointed Director after Watergate. There wasn't much to rule with an iron fist then. You give them all far too much credit. CIA was a joke in the 70's, not that it's much better now.
I know I'm late, but all it would take is one sympathetic judge who wants their name in history books for the next thousand yearsLaches. Moot. NO STANDING! Lala la la can't hear you I won't be the judge that caused the civil war la la la
Plus, do you really think the GOP in the house would refuse Michigan's electors? They'd sue in Hawaii to force them to take them. And wouldn't it come down to Kamala, like it should have came down to Pence?
Oops, my bad, I got posters mixed up. How embarrassing.I was never for using the homeless. But the migrants Soros paid to fly in evidential on paper trail would make a strong case he couldn’t deny.
The problem is that it would go to SCOTUS, and John Roberts is a squishy cuck who cares more about “preserving the dignity of the court and the institution” than actually doing his job. And he’d bully one of the three Trump appointees (probably ACB sadly) into siding with him and the three libs.I know I'm late, but all it would take is one sympathetic judge who wants their name in history books for the next thousand years
These people don't have to be qualified.So he's extremely embarrassing, unqualified, and evil, got it. Only serving the interests of the ones paying him and making his life more comfortable while caring nothing for the people whose lives he's actively ruining and throwing away just for money. Thank you, that's all I need to know. As per last time with Newsom, fuck this guy.
The '01 dotcom crash didn't hurt America as a whole so much as mainly hurting Silicon Valley and the laptop class. And even then, the Venture Capitalists sect cauterized the wound rather quickly and had what tech companies that survived quickly by the balls afterwards.Anyone remember the crash in 01 that's never talked about? It was the dotcom bubble bursting from massive companies buying up every inch of useless E-space.
You probably won't remember because just as it was about to threaten the US economy, wouldn't you gosh-darn guessed that some ragheads flew planes into a building and whoopsie daisy, printer went brrrr to fund the MIC to steal oil and poof, no more recession.
What's that? The tech industry is collapsing and the US is going to steal Venezuelan oil? Let's hope there isn't some large scale international issue that requires western intervention to solve. Ukraine and Israel aint it, chief.
And during Bush's tenure as Director and arguably until the 1990's CIA was marked by failure after failure after failure and plans backfiring one after another. Another revolution in Iran, the hostage crisis, two-bit tinpot dictators foiling them left and right... What's you're leaving out is the Soviets had CIA chasing their tails for decades. The USSR were the real masters of human intelligence and made games of tricking the CIA into shooting themselves in the foot every day. What the US was very good at was signals intelligence and later geospatial (satellites). That wasn't CIA.Correct. That’s why Bush changed the entire structure when he was given a shit hand. He put those deemed a risk on the chopping block to satiate political bloodlust. If you’re stuck in the river without a paddle you either make or break by doing what you can, otherwise you end up in shits creak.
If the USSR were the masters of intelligence why do you think capitalism evidentially won over communism?And during Bush's tenure as Director and arguably until the 1990's CIA was marked by failure after failure after failure and plans backfiring one after another. Another revolution in Iran, the hostage crisis, two-bit tinpot dictators foiling them left and right... What's you're leaving out is the Soviets had CIA chasing their tails for decades. The USSR were the real masters of human intelligence and made games of tricking the CIA into shooting themselves in the foot every day. What the US was very good at was signals intelligence and later geospatial (satellites). That wasn't CIA.
To be fair, they got this one from of their own (Kamala).
I said the USSR were masters of human intelligence. People spies. What does that have to do with communist vs. free-market economic systems? Our technological superiority gave us the advantage in signals intelligence and geospatial and the communists went bankrupt trying to catch up. The CIA didn't think the USSR would collapse when it did either by the way.If the USSR were the masters of intelligence why do you think capitalism evidentially won over communism?
For a better point. Why do you think the Taliban Red Unit exists? Because Bush Jr. brainwashed all the boys in gitmo into feeding back useless information for state building. No serious nation has a military unit that uses fucking roller skates for patrol. The closest thing since then was what, the Swiss mountain brigade? At they very least they got to shoot Germans and not their own people due to faulty bomb detectors, which (hint hint) the CIA also made and sold to them.
If the USSR were the masters of intelligence why do you think capitalism evidentially won over communism?
Stop making me agree with you. Free market philosophy was supplanted in eroding Soviet institutional investment. Russians didn’t one day wake up and go “Let’s run state mandated vodka factories to make the people stupider”, that idea was entirely seeded much like the rest of the soviet industrial complex.I said the USSR were masters of human intelligence. People spies. What does that have to do with communist vs. free-market economic systems? Our technological superiority gave us the advantage in signals intelligence and geospatial and the communists went bankrupt trying to catch up. The CIA didn't think the USSR would collapse when it did either by the way.
The '01 dotcom crash didn't hurt America as a whole so much as mainly hurting Silicon Valley and the laptop class. And even then, the Venture Capitalists sect cauterized the wound rather quickly and had what tech companies that survived quickly by the balls afterwards.
You’re not wrong. Benedict Arnold was the greatest British spy. Yet somehow he didn’t win the war, probably because he was caught and hung from horse carriage. He was a good guy though I respect his empathy for the Americans and their fight, he seemed highly conflicted.The country with the best spies has always been the British. MI6 trained CIA and Mossad. I know this upsets those who are Eternal Anglopilled, but it's the truth.