Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 14.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 106 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 169 40.0%

  • Total voters
    423

Attachments

  • Kiwi Caliphate.jpg
    Kiwi Caliphate.jpg
    109.1 KB · Views: 38
28th...FUCK I gotta work.

But for laughs, Law & Crime should broadcast it
It's actually set for the 21st. The text of the Happenings link on the main page is wrong. @Null or some other mod might want to correct that.

Screenshot_20240806-182415~2.png

I think the 28th might be a remnant of some date that was set when the case was assigned to Fischer, and then cancelled and reset to the 21st of this month after she was removed. The specific judge's schedule plays a role in how and when these things are set.
 
Out of curiosity, what is the legal reasoning for all these documents ending with this? I've scanned through a handful of legal documents and affidavits in my life and I've never seen that. Is that like a weird minnesota thing?

Screenshot 2024-08-06 at 9.30.47 PM.png


Speaking from experience, this kind of messy writing can save your ass if someone tries to forge your signature.

I should really work on having a better signature. I basically just scribble on the line now.
 
Ah yes, owner and proprietor of the Kiwi Farms, notorious doxxer with over 300 confirmed tranny kills, the final boss of the lower-case-i Internet himself,

View attachment 6280043

Jevlu Mon
Can nobody in this thread read? He clearly is revealing himself once more and wrote JUDAS MOON. First Chris, now Nick, how many more people are going to get betrayed by him?
 
Makes me wonder if Kayla thinks her husband's looking to trade her in for a newer model.
I think Aaron mentioned in a conversation with Kayla that she believed Nick and April were trying to kick her out. Additionally he confirmed in a recent stream (on Elissa Clips) that April would shittalk Kayla saying she (April) would treat Nick better than Kayla does.

If she doesn't get the hint that April is trying to steal Nick and that Nick wants to replace her with a younger woman, she's even more stupid than I anticipated. I don't see Nick's children ever accepting April as a potential new (step)mother, just the shitty blonde that destroyed the marriage of their parents.
 
Out of curiosity, what is the legal reasoning for all these documents ending with this? I've scanned through a handful of legal documents and affidavits in my life and I've never seen that. Is that like a weird minnesota thing?

View attachment 6280736
I forget the exact context in which it was explained, but basically it's like how it's often required to include a page count on a document.
e.g.
page 1/7

That way noone can allege that there was anything else on some further (made up) page, with the further pages having been lost or whatever. It's the written version of saying "out" on a radio.
 
She might, but April hasn't even had her first appearance yet. A plea deal would be out of sequence IIUC.
Correct, although I think she'll get one and they charged her for the expressed purpose of hoping she takes one and turns.

They using your hos against ya, Nick!

Out of curiosity, what is the legal reasoning for all these documents ending with this? I've scanned through a handful of legal documents and affidavits in my life and I've never seen that. Is that like a weird minnesota thing?

Screenshot 2024-08-06 at 9.30.47 PM.png
It indicates that it is a complete affidavit, and no pages are missing. It's not just a Minnesota thing. Note that the various affidavits were notarized in various states. Sean's has an Ohio notary stamp, for example.

You also often see it in police reports ("Nothing Follows").
 
That's why you should use dearrow. Their titles used to be decent, now it's 100% Mr. Beast tier garbage slop clickbait. They're becoming the reallifelore of these crime channels.

For anyone that doesn't know, reallifelore is a sperg that will turn any mundane topic into "CHINA RUSSIA TAIWAN ISRAEL UKRAINE HOUTHITHS PALESTINE". I made my own bingo card and it checks out every single fucking time. He turned a video on orange's assassination into some what the fuck about the secret services' history, though that was one of the very few good videos he made.
I must confess that I am lacking any context which would éclaircir whatever you're talking about here.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Ali Assaf who @Spectre_06 "helped" in his CG whatever lawsuit made an FOIA request.
ali1.jpgasshat.jpg
He has a thread here.

If I'm reading this right, they're paying forensic staff to do those redactions? That's insane, just get a media contractor.
bodycam pricer.jpg
bodycam2.jpg

Kayla's bail. I don't think these were posted but I found them alongside Nick's. Who knows why it wasn't released initially. Maybe an error on their end.
kay bail 2.jpgkay bail.jpg

Uhhhh, okay.
lol1.jpg
 
I think the 28th might be a remnant of some date that was set when the case was assigned to Fischer,
For reasons the 28th might have been mistaken for the criminal omnibus date, see below. Also a partial timeline of upcoming events in the other two cases (Nick+Kayla share the 21st omnibus).

Case record hearing entry (emphasis mine):

Upcoming Hearings
08/20/2024 02:45 PM
Contested Omnibus
Judicial Officer: Fischer, Jennifer
Location: Courtroom 207
Cancelled; Other


However, this was the most recent hearing date we discussed:
april-hearing.jpg


Also, the CHIPS trial:
chips-trial.jpg


Edit: clarify purpose of post
 
Last edited:
I forget the exact context in which it was explained, but basically it's like how it's often required to include a page count on a document.
e.g.
page 1/7

That way noone can allege that there was anything else on some further page, with the further pages having been lost or whatever. It's the written version of saying "out" on a radio.
That makes a lot of sense. The way legal documents are often handled makes them seem like they would be easy to fuck with so I suppose that provides some level of protection.

A somewhat amusing example of how loose some legal documents really are is when I bought a piece of land from a friend....
The document was basically "Person A gives all right of ownership over the property described in Exhibit A to Person B". (with a little extra legalease). All the signatures and notary stamp were all on that page.

Exhibit A is just a regular piece of paper with a legal description of the property. As far as I can tell, there was nothing preventing me from just swapping Exhibit A which described the empty plot of land with the legal description of his house instead before I filed it at the recorder's office, technically stealing his house.

I'm sure some states / areas do it a little better, but man it seems like dumb system.
 
Back