Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
So is it the start of the messages in reference of the guns? Not quite planting evidence but saying that the cops purposely and deliberately lied in the report about the placement of the guns?
Or am I missing something?
I think the "neglect report" means the report by the pastor that was the basis for the search warrant being issued
 
this is what i was thinking when you were going over it yesterday, um sure i remember it being said in the leaked DM's around when legal mindset was talking about it when it all started, it was something like nick replied to one of them about "WELL WHAT IF THE COPS PLACED IT HMMMMM?" something to that effect
He knows he said that, probably to several people in DM's. That's why he spent time ranting about cops planting evidence and how his CYA is he was speaking in general terms because cops often plant evidence.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: RandyMiskatonic
Okay, so I've got three big things so far. Keep in mind I am specifically exploring rumors regarding activity of the police officers which could be clarified by bodycam footage.
  • Yellow Flashs's messages where he denies owning a .22 firearm,.
  • Barnes and Frei outright accusing Officer Pomplun specifically of conspiring against Rekieta to protect their corrupt small town.
  • Chrissy Mayr's clip where Rekieta says "you don't know what a cop brings into your house either", then backtracks it on confrontation.
Are there any other major points related to the day the search was executed? Was Aliesha Sweep the HHS rep present that day or was it someone else?
 
Okay, so I've got three big things so far. Keep in mind I am specifically exploring rumors regarding activity of the police officers which could be clarified by bodycam footage.
  • Yellow Flashs's messages where he denies owning a .22 firearm,.
  • Barnes and Frei outright accusing Officer Pomplun specifically of conspiring against Rekieta to protect their corrupt small town.
  • Chrissy Mayr's clip where Rekieta says "you don't know what a cop brings into your house either", then backtracks it on confrontation.
Are there any other major points related to the day the search was executed? Was Aliesha Sweep the HHS rep present that day or was it someone else?
We don't know how some yahoos got ahold of the arrest report, but it's documented here:

No it's different...here's more Screenshots...this appears to be AFTER the arrest report and there was some info that had details about the complaints from other people

Ms. Sweep was brought out to ensure the kids were placed with their grandparents.
 
I still don't understand how Barnes became so trusted and respected.

He became trusted and respected by foolish people through his association with famous people and their cases which often had a political character. He used the Wesley Snipes case to make himself "famous". He also often tells people what they want to hear rather than anything useful. He tends in my opinion to leverage clients for self-promotion.
 
He became trusted and respected by foolish people through his association with famous people and their cases which often had a political character. He used the Wesley Snipes case to make himself "famous". He also often tells people what they want to hear rather than anything useful. He tends in my opinion to leverage clients for self-promotion.
Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).
 
Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).
I think it was because he is a gigantic faggot, but I do think they also rejected his team of clown witnesses as well.

If they'd allowed his parade of clowns, they'd have lost the case and Rittenhouse would now be not enjoying prison.
 
I think it was because he is a gigantic faggot, but I do think they also rejected his team of clown witnesses as well.

If they'd allowed his parade of clowns, they'd have lost the case and Rittenhouse would now be not enjoying prison.
I thought he was shown the door after going into the fundraising business for himself.
 
Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).
I think it was mentioned by Rittenhouse and one of his lawyers that Barnes wanted to grandstand and possibly make a legal martyr out of Rittenhouse by bringing in a bunch of nonsense constitutional arguments, while the lawyers Kyle eventually chose just wanted to win the case for their client in the cleanest way possible. Barnes only ever saw Kyle as a cause and not as a person.
 
Look, ma, I'm embedding YT!
This family law libertarian guy has the best video thumbnail for Rekieta, even handed review of Nick's crap. He's based in reality of handling loads of cases likes Crackieta
thumb1.jpg
last edit: his video adds nothing and curves away half-way through, but that thumbnail~
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6292810

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?
It's the texts you covered on 5/31 MATI. I don't see where he said evidence was planted. He carefully words his lies. His rule is that nothing can be inferred about what he says while he infers everything and it's fine. e.g. He spergs about the .22 shell casing and how he never shot his guns. Well, no one accused him of shooting guns. He inferred it. So inference is okay with but only when he does it.
 
It's the texts you covered on 5/31 MATI. I don't see where he said evidence was planted. He carefully words his lies. His rule is that nothing can be inferred about what he says while he infers everything and it's fine. e.g. He spergs about the .22 shell casing and how he never shot his guns. Well, no one accused him of shooting guns. He inferred it. So inference is okay with but only when he does it.
It doesn't have to be a direct statement, it just has to be a rumor that exists. Chrissy obviously seems under the impression that the evidence may be planted.

Someone else sent another clip from the Chrissy video I've added.

If there's also any social media posts that seem genuinely concerned about corruption in the county, I'll accept those. I've already archived about a dozen.
 
[/QUOTE]
Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).

Part of Barnes pretrial media blitz was having Kyle go to a kenosha bar (while Kyle was underage) and take some selfies with the local MAGA Patriots.

No being underage in the daytime in WI is a gigantic nothing, as you are allowed in bars with a parent before 8 or 10 pm (been about 10 years since I lived in kenosha) but the idea of immediately having him cosy up to the MAGA crowd was bad optics since the media narrative was "maga retard kills blacks" even though the reality was "Retard kills non black retards".

Behind the scenes the rumor was Barnes was creating offshoot arguements about 2-A that would have derailed the proceedings into a 2-A tangent for president setting and appeals as opposed to just winning the 1st degree murder charge.

His professional attorneys were able to drop the long rifle charge as it didn't actually meat the criteria for the statute; Kyle was under 18 but the rifle was not the proper length. So that one just got dismissed outright, which set the table for the 1st degree to be called in question.

Wisconsin has 1st degree murder laws that can circumvent intent if you are doing something needlessly reckless. So you can get a 1st degree murder charge for drunk driving as WI considers the act of driving drunk as so careless that you can derive intent from just the action. Without illegally being there with the weapon the 1st degree murder charges were overreaching. Barnes would have made a bigger spectacle out of a simple dismissed charge, and it was obvious Barnes was clout lawyering as opposed to focusing on the case.

TLDR When the MAGA sing along at the bar came out Barnes was shuffled aside for his retarded optics and aspirations beyond the case.
 
I know you've been diplomatic in how you've spoken about your contact with Nick, but if he's resorted to disseminating private DM's to use against you then he's well and truly opened the door to have any and all of the texts released, if you're in the mind to do that.
I would never consider a DM to be private. They’re always fair game as are text messages and any other written communications.
 
I think it was mentioned by Rittenhouse and one of his lawyers that Barnes wanted to grandstand and possibly make a legal martyr out of Rittenhouse by bringing in a bunch of nonsense constitutional arguments, while the lawyers Kyle eventually chose just wanted to win the case for their client in the cleanest way possible. Barnes only ever saw Kyle as a cause and not as a person.
The plodding, boring course was simply to present it as what it was, a clearcut case of self-defense, not to turn it into some giddy crusade over bullshit. And that worked.
People who display their intimate conversations to win arguments over the Internet have very strange priorities, and shouldn't be trusted.
A lawyer is someone who can be trusted with a confidence.

This cunt has done the "Dear John" stream where he betrayed a confidence for literally no reason other than he was assblasted, and now he's done the same with Jersh, but in an extremely bizarre way where he himself was the one doing the "shower call" and somehow thinks disclosing the DMs that completely confirm Jersh's summary of them is an own. I'm completely baffled at what logic made this coke-addled faggot think that was somehow a win.

Who would consider such a completely unreliable douchebag worthy of a confidence?
 
Sounds like the perfect Libertarian party candidate.
Possibly but, fortunately, we have a safeguard called the general election.

"I never insinuated or called anyone a pedophile, It is youuu, Josh, who called somebody pedophiles"
:really:
BTW, in addition to him being a drunken idiot in general, I immediately thought of Vito when he said that.

Null is very careful about accusing people of being pedos. He does in Vito's case, because Vito openly admitted to being one. Null being truthful about Vito gets under Dick's skin, and Nick does whatever Dick wants.

Just for 100% clarity, are you saying because he afterwards tried to snake his way out if it saying that'a not what he meant when he called out avatars loli avatars?

Cause mines a man in his 30s.
Mine is his ass with the bottle sticking out of it.

I can understand why he might not appreciate that, but calling it loli would be a weird cope.
 
Back