Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Yik]

Okay, so I've got three big things so far. Keep in mind I am specifically exploring rumors regarding activity of the police officers which could be clarified by bodycam footage.

• Yellow Flashs's messages where he denies owning a .22 firearm,.
• Barnes and Frei outright accusing Officer Pomplun specifically of conspiring against Rekieta to protect their corrupt small town.
• Chrissy Mayr's clip where Rekieta says "you don't know what a cop brings into your house either", then backtracks it on confrontation.

Are there any other major points related to the day the search was executed? Was Aliesha Sweep the HHS rep present that day or was it someone else?

After the arrest the position Barnes and Legal Mindset (and others) took and argued for, was that 'the search warrant was unconstitutional.'

This post has the legal mindset stream

ALL OF THESE LAWYERS WHO STREAM OUTSIDE OF A FEW OF THEM WHO ACTUALLY PRACTICE REGULARLY ARE FAILED FUCKING LAWYERS. ANY LAWYER WOULD SAY THIS IS FUCKING BAD!!!


Which is why I said he should actually just kill himself at this point.


LEGAL MINDSET CALLING OUT ALL LAWTUBERS RIGHT NOW SAYING THEY'RE ACTING LIKE BRO'S AND NOT LAWYERS!!!
HAIL MINDSET!!! HE JUST CALLED OUT UNCIVIL INCEL-LAW!!!

This post is a summary of LM's description of the violations. Including a repeating of the rumour of police corruption and retaliation.

Constitutional Defenses:
-Nick's defense should be based on the constitutionality of the search warrant and the arrest.

-1st amendment violation:
---Pastor's report should have only caused a wellness check, not a search warrant.
---Week delay in search is suspicious.
---Mandatory reporting is bad, because it removes pastor/therapist confidentiality.
---Barnes asserts that the raid was retaliation for Nick's criticism of Judge Fischer and the prosecutors.
---He also claims that Nick has previously exposed the local police for corruption.
---This was an opportunity to go after the county's biggest critic.

-2nd amendment violation:
---Why is there a gun charge? He should be allowed to own a gun, and it was in his bedroom not with the kids.
---Bail requirement of confiscating guns should be unconstitutional.
---Guns should only be taken if you use them while on drugs, not simply possessing them.
---The gun charge and the underlying law itself is unconstitutional.

-4th amendment violation:
---Drug testing violates the 4th amendment.
---Shouldn't be able to get a search warrant, remove the kids, remove guns, just because they found "something" in the search.
---A search based on an anonymous report, hearsay (the priest's report) should not be performed. It's the same thing as swatting.
---Search warrants should only be performed against drug dealers.

-5th amendment violation:
---The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
---Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
---Having/using drugs around children is not harm by itself.
---No one witnessed anything bad happen to the kids except that the house was messy.

-6th amendment violation:
---The jail not allowing Nick to see his clients while he was under arrest is a violation of the right to an attorney.
---That Nick wasn't told immediately that April was released is a very bad look for the court.

-8th amendment violation:
---Confiscation of guns should not be a condition of bail, it's excessive and also violates 2nd amendment.
---Bail itself should be unconstitutional.

 

[AnOminous]

After the arrest the position Barnes and Legal Mindset (and others) took and argued for, was that 'the search warrant was unconstitutional.'

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.

That's just hand-wavy defense lawyer bullshit to take your mind off the pile of cocaine they found in his bedroom.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

If there's also any social media posts that seem genuinely concerned about corruption in the county, I'll accept those. I've already archived about a dozen.

Working on a way to archive them, but Nick clicked on a handful of Instagram comments speculating there was some wrongdoing by the police.

Obvious promotion of the grand cop conspiracy theory by Rekieta can be seen in the Instagram comments he likes on his posts. These are clearly indicated by “ by author” above the comment.

He is liking, and implicitly supporting/agreeing with, comments that are basically saying “you were framed by the cops!!!” So funny and weird that he is trying to backtrack on this when it’s so obvious.

View attachment 6292067View attachment 6292068View attachment 6292069

Spoiler: Bonus: “listen to Barnes”

View attachment 6292074View attachment 6292075

(Sorry, I don’t know of a way to archive these because Instagram is awful.)

ETA: One interesting comment from Lord Balldo himself:

View attachment 6292166

“I’m not gonna say I was framed, but uh, you should totally talk to the people who are saying it. wink wink”

 

[Chode]

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.

He likes to say that you should go through the warrant and see how each fact runs into the next. Paired with the talk during the Barnes stream about how investigators/government officials will work to get information without having it go into the discoverable record, Nick might believe the government is withholding pieces of information that were used in the warrant because he doesn't see how they got from step 1 to step 2 without supplemental information.

 

[AnOminous]

He likes to say that you should go through the warrant and see how each fact runs into the next. Paired with the talk during the Barnes stream about how investigators/government officials will work to get information without having it go into the discoverable record, Nick might believe the government is withholding pieces of information that were used in the warrant because he doesn't see how they got from step 1 to step 2 without supplemental information.

It's gibberish though. That isn't how probable cause works. You just need enough that the judge can determine that it is likely that a search will reveal evidence of a crime. While the facial validity is not determined by whether the search actually did reveal evidence of a crime, well, look at it, they found a fuckton of cocaine, shocking absolutely nobody.

They don't have to lay out their entire case in the search warrant, and it would be absolutely stupid to do that anyway.

Barnes is a fucking idiot.

 

[JustTheFaxcts]

This cunt has done the "Dear John" stream where he betrayed a confidence for literally no reason other than he was assblasted, and now he's done the same with Jersh, but in an extremely bizarre way where he himself was the one doing the "shower call" and somehow thinks disclosing the DMs that completely confirm Jersh's summary of them is an own. I'm completely baffled at what logic made this coke-addled faggot think that was somehow a win.

The DMs reminded me of the old "I AM SILLY" meme:


Only with Balldo having unhinged walls of text and Josh having the rational, succinct replies. I hope for his sake he's not sober, since if this is his baseline, he's well and truly fucked his brain permanently.

It was hilarious when he was complaining the Josh was being "myopic" and didn't think about how other people perceive things, while using weasel wording and trying to shift blame in real time. Narcissistic bullshit completely fails when receipts exist.

 

[AnOminous]

Narcissistic bullshit completely fails when receipts exist.

But you're stupid and can't pick up on social cues if you remember what some Balldo-encrusted lunatic said just yesterday, instead of mindlessly believing the new lie he's telling today!

 

[Yik]

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.

You are right they presented a load of nonsense. No use for getting the warrant thrown out or Reiketa's case.

It will be sweet if it is actually useful as evidence that a 'respected' lawyer with an audience was spreading rumours about corruption around the search that were seen by another lawyer and repeated as valid.

 

[Captain Manning]

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face?

Sorta, and weakly. Barnes opined at one point that you can't establish probable cause based on law enforcement monitoring of a livestream. In this case, the cokestream.

Which I am pretty sure is absolute bullshit. He cited absolutely no case law in support of that position. I don't see how "Internet surveillance" would be much different than physical surveillance.

It seems to me if a reasonable trained law enforcement officer saw that stream, including the way Nick was acting, and with white powder on Nick's nose, they would conclude there is likely coke in that house and he is on it. A judge would feel similarly.

And indeed there was fucking coke in that house.

At the end of the day though...

That's just hand-wavy defense lawyer bullshit to take your mind off the pile of cocaine they found in his bedroom.

Correct.

Barnes has bad facts, so he's gonna make up bullshit law.

And people who don't know any better will believe it because "he's a lawyer."

 

[AnOminous]

Which I am pretty sure is absolute bullshit. He cited absolutely no case law in support of that position. I don't see how "Internet surveillance" would be much different than physical surveillance.

There's actually a pretty big difference, in that you generally actually need probable cause even to engage in physical surveillance.

If some stupid motherfucker is publicly broadcasting their own criminal behavior, like Nick was, ANYONE can watch it, with or without cause.

Fun fact: even the police are allowed to watch YouTube.

Also there's the fact they ALREADY had probable cause even before the deranged cokestream. The cokestream was just lagniappe.

 

[The Internet Dick]

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Okay, points for unironically using foppish popinjay in a sentence. I've been looking my whole adult life for just such an opportunity, but it's never worked out.

"What did you call me?"
"Foppish popinjay. I called you a foppish popinjay. It felt right at the time. I mean, look at you. Who wears their hair in a pompadour nowadays? And what's with the purple-blue tuxedo with the frilly cummerbund? I haven't seen one of those since prom night 1979. And those shoes, man. Don't even get me started on the shoes."
"The gauntlet is thrown, sir. You are no gentleman. I shall see in you in the field."
"Whatevs, man. Whatevs..."

 

[Null]

Working on a way to archive them, but Nick clicked on a handful of Instagram comments speculating there was some wrongdoing by the police.

Just screencap shit.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

Just screencap shit.

Screencaps are already in the quoted post.

 

[Captain Manning]

There's actually a pretty big difference, in that you generally actually need probable cause even to engage in physical surveillance.

I'm talking about passive surveillance. A cop can watch you on a public street without a warrant. A cop can watch you on a public livestream without a warrant. Neither is like phone tapping, or otherwise invasive surveillance.

Nick was so brazen in his behavior, they didn't need a warrant to gather together the evidence that established the probable cause the nigger has coke. They only needed the warrant at the very end to go get that coke and arrest his dumb ass.

And they did.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

It doesn't have to be a direct statement, it just has to be a rumor that exists. Chrissy obviously seems under the impression that the evidence may be planted.

Someone else sent another clip from the Chrissy video I've added.

If there's also any social media posts that seem genuinely concerned about corruption in the county, I'll accept those. I've already archived about a dozen.

Camelot. Starts with alleging government only looking for W.

Rekieta then describes in detail the plan to get his kids back (what he claimed he didn't know).

https://youtu.be/2rTsvB6ZxkI?t=2373

Here he admits that he talks shit about police/prosecutors

https://youtu.be/2rTsvB6ZxkI?t=3824

 

[UCantCCPMe]

Look guys, I'm not saying Nick sucked big black cock at Hedonism 2. All I'm saying is he was there and big black cock got sucked.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

View attachment 6291676
Why is his neck so red and purple?

Probably a choking fetish.

 

[Step out of the car sir]

Balldo having unhinged walls of text and Josh having the rational, succinct replies.

Imagine being a fully grown adult and being unable to have an adult conversation that doesn’t make you look like a manipulative sociopath, Nick’s parents likely fell for this charade countless times, mommy and daddy always ready to help their piece of shit kid out of messes he himself got into.
You can hate someone to the core and still talk to them civilly

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

You can hate someone to the core and still talk to them civilly

You can, but it is still something to be avoided.