US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[harmy.kook]

Wow. This is really deranged. How does a person become like this?

Simple, identity politics.

Especially since it's a slowly failing project from the Progressives/Liberals they're losing their minds

Admittedly, it's a good thing because it's causing all the hidden LibCucks to expose themselves(think Destiny, most of the people in Trump's thread, etc)

 

[mandatorylurk]

Crying faggot's wife trying to deflect but not denying her husband is a crying faggot:



JD Vance pointing out how gay Walz is:

Vance also saying Kamabla's a gay chameleon:

 

[namelesstacotruck]

@xXthrowawayaccountXx

No. Gay marriage was always a terrible idea. All the special privileges of marriage are to encourage and incentivize the most proven family unit model.

Marriage has been so twisted that the best practice is to not get married at all. The woman can live with the man and doesnt get the financial benefits of divorce to encourage her to leave. The family also gets to double dip and the woman gets all the benefits and advantages of being on paper a single mother.

Inheritance is the worst part. Gays accumulate wealth and power at an accelarated rate because they dont have to spend time on family and child rearing they are the perfect entity to climb corporate structures. Giving them outsized financial and social power due to having more money and social position.

Then use that power to increase their social contagion so they can have more potential sexual partners and push policy towards their own form of "reproduction" and resources to benefit them. How much time and money was invested into prep vs just not sticking your dick everywhere?

Gay marriage breaks a very ancient social contract by default. That is by sacrificing your most productive years for child rearing, you will have children who will support you in twilight years. Instead thet demand your children take care of them, and they also try to recruit your children to become one of them. At bare minimum their goods can go to their relatives who are propogating society.

Society can tolerate a small percentage of this, but its fatal to a society past a certain point.

 

[ShitLurker]

That's being democratic or "populist" as detractors like to say and bizarrely use as a slur

When I was hearing about populism, it was used to criticize unrealistic proposals that would be popular. Eternal gibs, minimum salary of a billion dollars, full debt pardons. That's what I always understood as populism. It stops being populism when people want it and it isn't an absolute pipe dream or horribly cripling. It's just weasel words again since everything democrats offer is textbook populism.

 

[mlanguishi]

@xXthrowawayaccountXx

No. Gay marriage was always a terrible idea. All the special privileges of marriage are to encourage and incentivize the most proven family unit model.

And there's also this. And everytime you see someone saying 'slippery slope is a fallacy' that's because they're lying to you.



2008 era cartoon and the term MAP and polystuff was going hardcore in less than 10 years.

 

[Chop Top]

Okay, I'm not a lawyer, but wouldn't that have already been tried? "create an entirely new legal status do handle everything a marriage contract already handles" just sounds like a massive fucking bureaucratic nightmare saying it out loud, compared to just letting them use the already existing framework.

In earnest? Of course not (unless you count civil unions). It was totally unacceptable and political poison for years until it was forced on us by judicial activists.

"It's just easier to use the pre-existing framework!" Sure it is, if you completely ignore the first thing I said. Laws exist to create incentives and order. The incentive is to create stable, healthy families, not enable tRuE lOvE to be expressed like some Disney movie.

Why not punish all murder the same? It sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare to do otherwise!

And again, it's not that trivial. It can be an issue of "Oh fuck, my husband is in the hospital and I can't even see them", or " Oh shit, how do I get my other half on the will in the event I die and the house we spent all this money on it up in the air."

You create a legal exception in the form of a title. It's really not hard.

How young are you? You can literally add anyone to your will that you want. What the fuck is this point?

I am not taking a pro-degeneracy stance here. I just don't think every gay, dyke and troon is automatically one. And I think if you do, I don't see your views getting any traction.

These views were the norm less than a decade ago, and your faggy "but not ALL" argument is the same one that every fucking retard uses to dismiss concerns about illegal immigrants and especially Muslims. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ALL YOU STUPID NIGGER. It's a pattern of behavior and a large enough portion to justify DE-INCENTIVIZING the undesired behavior.

And I am also saying you should learn from it. Focus in on the fucked up shit that happens at pride, and the underage troon shit going on. You will probably find yourself winning a lot more battles than trying to get gay marriage repealed.

Learn from fucking what? Allowing judges to be activists? It's extremely questionable that we can even express the will of the people to vote for a fucking President!

Did you know California had a referendum on gay marriage in 2008 and it failed? CALIFORNIA.

This used to be a state's rights issue, as it should be.

Just by how you talk about this problem, I can tell that you:

• Are clearly young and retarded because you have no idea how things were not very long ago and are way too comfortable accepting this level of degeneracy as normal
• Actually believe that fucking arguing on policy of all things is how you contest the uniparty
• Not only believe that arguing on policy is effective, but can't even do it yourself and are clearly not persuaded by it
• Don't understand that laws create incentives for desirable behavior and outcomes
• Think that only family members can be part of a will
• Are such a lazy cunt you'll cede an entire social institution to people who are completely unfit to partake in it because it's easier to do so (behold, the zoomer boomer)
• Are such a propaganda victim you still actually believe that "not all" is a reason to dismiss degenerate and anti-social behavior

In summation, shut the fuck up zoomie zoom, you're a retarded faggot who has barely experienced the world and all that you have experienced is colored by intense propaganda and built upon the foundation of an education that purposely made you this retarded.

 

[mandatorylurk]

A longer version of Vance destroying CNN's Dana Bash, it is simple and destructive and becomes more the interviewer than the gay host, this dude really has been showing he's the heir to MAGA:

He's also going on ABC and slapping them around, total blackpiller death:

 

[invisibult plus+]

View attachment 6295899

This is exactly what the average person needs to hear. Compare that to Harris' campaign ad.

Vance focuses on problems. He doesn't offer vague platitudes that he himself doesn't believe, nor promises he demonstrably doesn't keep. He sensibly acknowledges that people can't even afford housing and food anymore and states that he and Trump do have plans to actually lower costs. You want to talk about chaos and fear? Imagine what would happen if people like Harris stay in power. If they're allowed to do whatever they want even more than they already have been. Imagine if the growing portion of disenfranchised citizens reaches a critical mass because the establishment decided illegals, degens, and abortion were more important.

 

[jje100010001]

https://x.com/Indian_Bronson/status/1822473608230322580

 

[spiritofamermaid]

I know its probably some intern writing these, but Trump refering to himself in third person always tickles me.

Nah Trump's been very consistent in being the one to write his own tweets

 

[Rimanah]

Regardless of one’s actual views on gay marriage, the case that legalized it nationwide, Obergefell v. Hodges, was a terrible decision. It’s rife with awful reasoning, including asserting the constitution guarantees the right to “liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity.”

It’s much like Roe and Casey, in that it stretches the already rather ludicrous concept of Substantive Due Process to absurdity. I would not be surprised if it ends up getting reversed in the future.

 

[CaddestSlown]

Good morning, Kiwis! I see we have another pages long slapfight about gay marriage, and I couldn't be happier to support your right to do so. Godspeed, even if don't exactly agree with a fair share of the points made. It's the passion that inspires me, really. A true American pastime.

A longer version of Vance destroying CNN's Dana Bash, it is simple and destructive and becomes more the interviewer than the gay host, this dude really has been showing he's the heir to MAGA:

View attachment 6295894
View attachment 6295893


He's also going on ABC and slapping them around, total blackpiller death:

View attachment 6295896

View attachment 6295899

KICK. THEIR. SHIT. IN.

This is what I like to be seeing. Fight back, don't be nice, get downright nasty.

Nah Trump's been very consistent in being the one to write his own tweets

NOBODY can replicate or come up with genius Trumpisms like covfefe better than orange man.

Let's all have a productive day of shitflinging this fine Sunday. I have good vibes so far.

Oh. And Chernovich intern / data analyst guy who might be lurking the thread? Just tell your boss to come out of the closet, little is more embarrassing than a cowardly, CAUGHT, homosexual who won't own up to it. A Republican OnlyFans whore (who Chernovish is probably giving money to) has more balls about his values than him.

Being an unfaithful and dishonest homosexual is a way worse look than just being a homosexual. Even though chances are the wife is a 100% willing beard, it still makes him look like a complete loser. Grow a spine, asshole.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

Irregardless still isn't a word, btw.

If irregardless isn't a word, than it ought to be, and irregardless of your personal views on the matter, I for one, welcome new words that isn't all nigger speak.

 

[Overly Serious]

JD Vance pointing out how gay Walz is:
View attachment 6295822

May explain how both men's wives regard them.

This is how Tim Walz's wife looks at him vs. how Vance's wife looks at Vance:

Vance also saying Kamabla's a gay chameleon:

Kama-Kama-Kama-Kamaleon...

 

[CansOfCant]

View attachment 6295946
View attachment 6295941
View attachment 6295942
View attachment 6295943

https://x.com/Indian_Bronson/status/1822473608230322580

Please, please please learn to thumbnail.

 

[Brenda Holiday]

I always say gay marriage is cultural appropriation of Christians lol.
I'm trying really hard to like Vance like the rest of yall. I think I will warm up to him, must be my instinctual hatred of politicians.

 

[Overly Serious]

If irregardless isn't a word, than it ought to be, and irregardless of your personal views on the matter, I for one, welcome new words that isn't all nigger speak.

If "irregardless" were a word, then I'd demand "rerespective" be as well.

 

[(‿ˠ‿) ԅ(≖‿≖ԅ)]

If irregardless isn't a word, than it ought to be, and irregardless of your personal views on the matter, I for one, welcome new words that isn't all nigger speak.

I'm pretty sure irregardless is a double negative, it's basically "unhowever"

also I've only heard two groups of people say it irl, the first are methed-out trailer goblins and the second are hoodrats

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

This is more suited for here than the random images thread:

 

[John Badman]

Biden is searching for the mashed potatoes.