The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

[ForTheHoard]

How many kids do whites need to have to counter the number being stabbed each week now? It's like 10 a week that make the papers right?

Muslims are the new smallpox. You have to have 12 kids if you want 3 to survive.

 

[Jimmy Dean Bowl]

Muslims are the new smallpox. You have to have 12 kids if you want 3 to survive.

They're popping out football teams and the average white is busy worrying about whether they can afford to have one.
Must be nice to be a dole bludging muzzie.

Edit: words

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

Retards on X are falling for it. A ton of replies are socks and bots saying “MEN need to quit doing violence!!!” Instead of deep dive on what kind of man it was.

I love that argument. Yes, men commit more violence and rape than women (except for trans"women" of course). Now let's apply that to race and immigration status.

The type of woman who says "Its men doing the violence" are the same type who vote for more immigration and leftist authoritarianism. They don't give a shit about the rapes or murders of white children. They just wanna watch other people suffer.

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

That specific story and No Irish Need Apply, yes. (Edit: Yes, it is apocryphal.)

Irish having been actual slaves (in the Thirteen Colonies) and being non-White, complete bullshit.

The storu that NINA was bullshit is itself bullshit. All the evidence is there if you go look as opposed to listening to trusting the (((experts))) who have every reason to lie and downplay the mistreatment of whites then as now in order to prop up their narrative about blacks having the monopoly on being shit on, and thus the monopoly on demands for muh reparayshuns. Like "there were no Irish slaves in the Thirteen Colonies," its a deflection to preserve (((the narrative)) the fact that they weren't in the Thirteen Colonies isn't meaningful because the Colonies were still part of British Empire which itself took, held, and sold Irish slaves in the wake of the Cromwellian Conquest.

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

Wake me up when King Arthur returns to take the throne from that faker Charlie.

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

“not of English origin”

When I was living in Turkey, it wasn’t uncommon to see people with light skin and eyes. Not saying he’s Turkish, but not all Islamic peoples possess dark skin/hair/eyes. The narrative now is he’s “eastern European”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DH5JkN6Y9rA

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

The storu that NINA was bullshit is itself bullshit. All the evidence is there if you go look as opposed to listening to trusting the (((experts))) who have every reason to lie and downplay the mistreatment of whites then as now in order to prop up their narrative about blacks having the monopoly on being shit on, and thus the monopoly on demands for muh reparayshuns. Like "there were no Irish slaves in the Thirteen Colonies," its a deflection to preserve (((the narrative)) the fact that they weren't in the Thirteen Colonies isn't meaningful because the Colonies were still part of British Empire which itself took, held, and sold Irish slaves in the wake of the Cromwellian Conquest.

Okay, I may be wrong on the signs specifically.

So someone, it might have even been you, brought up these Irish slaves before, but their story focused almost entirely on the British Caribbean and some African-Irish mixture that formed instead of on Virginia.

As far as I am aware indentured servants (men, really, I mean) were, for at least most of the 1600s/1700s, fatherless sons who were unable to afford the buy-in for apprenticeship into a trade. They would, as a debt instrument, receive free passage across the Atlantic, which was extremely expensive at the time (like, several years wages; mass European migration started later when improvements in maritime technology made it safe, cheap and reliable for every low quality Eurotrash to flood in) and in exchange have to perform labor until it was paid off. Some of them fell into debt peonage, but it was fairly easy to abscond to the frontier and they did frequently successful sue and win in civil courts showed they had a great deal of power, something they actually had in common with Medieval serfs but not in common with chattel slaves.

That they could flee so easily (also something they had in common with Indians, but not with Africans) and that the supply of very desperate people was drying up meant that eventually the colonies, specifically Virginia, had to substitute away from their preferred labor supply and towards an alternative, African chattel slavery. The early Virginians wanted to build a copy of England in the New World (ironic, it was more of a New England than New England was), and Africans were something they adopted more reluctantly.

The Caribbean also tended to get shittier workers than Virginia (people that were even more desperate and destitute to the point that they had no bargaining power to go to a better place).

In all of this I have never heard of the Irish being subjected to mass forced labor in what became the US. As far as I'm aware they weren't even a particularly big minority here until the Potato Famine, and one of the reasons people feared/hated them was that they were the first economic refugees and Catholics to mass migrate into a country that had, up until that point, been settled primarily by the British establishment or by Protestant utopia-builders.

Like, I won't deny the use of Irish slaves elsewhere in the Empire, I don't know. I've gotten lost in this conversation, I thought the original part was specifically about America. Obviously the British brutalized the Irish, the Potato Famine itself was, as I understood, deliberately worsened by government "neglect" (something they'd do again against Bangladesh).

 

[Fred Herbert]

Arabs, Turks, Kurds and other Middle Easteners can be very light skinned. One notable example is Saddam Hussein's deputy, a fellow by the name Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, could easily pass as European. For the record he wasn't a runaway Scotsman in exile. He hailed from the same Arab tribe as Saddam himself.

 

[St.Davis]

The storu that NINA was bullshit is itself bullshit. All the evidence is there if you go look as opposed to listening to trusting the (((experts))) who have every reason to lie and downplay the mistreatment of whites then as now in order to prop up their narrative about blacks having the monopoly on being shit on, and thus the monopoly on demands for muh reparayshuns. Like "there were no Irish slaves in the Thirteen Colonies," its a deflection to preserve (((the narrative)) the fact that they weren't in the Thirteen Colonies isn't meaningful because the Colonies were still part of British Empire which itself took, held, and sold Irish slaves in the wake of the Cromwellian Conquest.

Interesting. I stand corrected.

 

[3deadniggers]

Arabs, Turks, Kurds and other Middle Easteners can be very light skinned. One notable example is Saddam Hussein's deputy, a fellow by the name Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, could easily pass as European. For the record he wasn't a runaway Scotsman in exile. He hailed from the same Arab tribe as Saddam himself.

View attachment 6299498

This is what has always bugged me about the term "white". There are arabs who are pale skinned and make Europeans look like niggers. The hue of your skin doesn't define your ethnicity.

 

[Cassius Crayfish]

Arabs, Turks, Kurds and other Middle Easteners can be very light skinned. One notable example is Saddam Hussein's deputy, a fellow by the name Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, could easily pass as European. For the record he wasn't a runaway Scotsman in exile. He hailed from the same Arab tribe as Saddam himself.

View attachment 6299498

Muhammad is frequently quoted in the Islamic sources as being white. So white that he stood out from those around him.

 

[isalaide]

If this is indeed footage of the arrest, it is one of the slavs who have so culturally enriched the UK who has been out stabbing weans today. Short video clip.

https://x.com/PakistaniIndex/status/1823001276310769774

 

[Freya]

As much as I loathe to admit it, I think most Europeans would struggle to take action.

Feasibly, what can they do?

Send them back? Challenging, many of them may not be citizens of the country they came from if they're descended from migrants. Similarly, it's highly improbable the states in question would accept the return of these people. Thanks to a long habit of destroying documents on entry, you'd also have the task of trying to prove which country some of them are even from.

Then there's the ECHR. Labour and the Tories have promised to both flout various articles of it if they're willing to accept it or not. It's highly likely signatories would object or prevent the UK, or another state, attempting to deport people en mass. Not purely out of alutrism, but also because they don't want to become potential asylum destinations either.

The Idi Amin approach? Be serious. You'll be hard pushed to get the most racist of Brits to endorse that.

Closing the gates is very late coming, but it's going to take a concerted effort to dismantle communities as they are and force people to integrate. And even that is going to be a hard, if not impossible, sell to many people because of the backlash some religious/ethnic communities will have against it. Not purely in Europe, but worldwide (try to break up a Muslim Enclave and I'm sure the Middle East will retaliate).

Europeans are already taking action. These are sovereign states after all. There is nothing stopping mass remigration besides liberals.

 

[Dr. Ricearoni]

>be British
>get stabbed

 

[Jaimas]

Muhammad is frequently quoted in the Islamic sources as being white. So white that he stood out from those around him.

Plot twist, Mohammad was a CIA Operative

 

[Broadside]

It appears a white man just stabbed a little girl in Leicester and was stopped by a bystander named Abdullah- so that means you're not allowed to be angry anymore and any criticisms of islamic immigration or attacks will be met with a smug "yeah but didn't you hear about Leicester, chud?"

 

[Autischic]

the sun never sets on the british resentment

 

[The Ugly One]

Send them back? Challenging, many of them may not be citizens of the country they came from if they're descended from migrants. Similarly, it's highly improbable the states in question would accept the return of these people. Thanks to a long habit of destroying documents on entry, you'd also have the task of trying to prove which country some of them are even from.

Put them on a boat, point it toward the North African coastline, and declare it's not your problem what happens when it reaches shore.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Now that is quite interesting. Seems that the BBC has changed the wording on their article as have a few other places from the "Hero Muslim" stopping the attack to just him being part of a crowd who did it.

People posted a supposed video of the HUWITE stabber, but no proof is given nor is any blood visible anywhere.

A eyewitness directly contradicted the narrative of Abdullah stopping the stabbing and instead said it was two blokes who did it.

Seems like the media jumped the gun to get the W over chuds and is only making things worse.

If this was a right wing attack it would be on a politician or on non-white victims. And we would be getting hammered with it already.

I just had a idea: what if this is a white schizo attacking white people because he wants to stop the racist brits?

 

[3deadniggers]

It appears a white man just stabbed a little girl in Leicester and was stopped by a bystander named Abdullah- so that means you're not allowed to be angry anymore and any criticisms of islamic immigration or attacks will be met with a smug "yeah but didn't you hear about Leicester, chud?"

Leicester square in London. His ethnicity is unknown, he's not brown but he does look foreign. There's discussions in the bong news thread because the papers are censoring their own articles.