Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 105 25.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 76 18.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 165 39.8%

  • Total voters
    415
You can like someone who is one. You could even be their friend.
The very act of cuckoldry disgusts me to the point that I could never be friends with someone so pathetic and spineless.
Look at Destiny that is the face of the cuck movement and Nick is right behind him in a chair watching their wife / exs get fucked by black men together.
Its not that they're being cheated on, its that they're actively encouraging and engaging in it. Destroying the very moral fabric of marriage, relationships, and family for sick hedonistic pleasure.
He has two lines of defence. Search warrant getting invalidated. And coke in some magic way not being his. Either it was all April's(Why in their bedroom?), or planted by cops(goberment conspiracy) or magically teleported all over the place...
That dang Drug addict April! All her fault! TERRIBLE things she did to the children. We had no idea about the drugs. Absolute disavow!
Which is why we got tattoos with her and had her hang and stay with us weeks and months after the arrest.
 
Sounds like a good reason to release the bodycam footage to me. Then we can all watch these evil agents of the state planting the cocaine. Sadly this won't provide us with the footage of them forcing Nick to snort it all those previous times, but we can't have everything now can we.
While previously he stated the bodycam footage would exonerate him, he now claims that it would be irresponsible to make it public and is also scrambling to avoid it being entered in as evidence entirely.
That's funny, and weird!
 
Is there a clip where Barnes states Rekieta fucked Officer Pomplun's wife or am I hallucinating that
Neither. You probably just misheard. Barnes said in the initial stream, that Pomplun should have noted in the warrant that Nick was boning Aaron's wife (April), since Aaron's videos were used as evidence in the warrant.
 
Neither. You probably just misheard. Barnes said in the initial stream, that Pomplun should have noted in the warrant that Nick was boning Aaron's wife (April), since Aaron's videos were used as evidence in the warrant.
Not surprisingly, Barnes completely neglected to mention that Aaron was also fucking Kayla.

I actually wonder if Nick didn't appreciate what Barnes said there. Given that he seems to want to keep the narative going that he's faithful to Kayla. I can see how what Barnes said would assist the narrative that Nick is experiencing retaliation, but Nick is also simultaneously hoping to hold onto his trad Christian image.

"We're just friends."

Yeah, "friends with benefits" maybe.
 
Last edited:
If I was defense counsel, i would argue the stream has all sorts of relevance and prejudicial issues if shown in full

But its gonna be hard to argue against a picture with white powder on his nose, the night he was arrested.
I´d imagine the stream only has relevance on the warrant issue, no? What are the odds for it getting revoked? It just seems like Nick is stalling apropos of nothing, wasting his money, instead of pleading guilty and getting this personal issue dealt quickly because the county probably is no trying to demolish this random person´s life. I´d imagine a fundraiser would just embolden A-logs and we all know he is not "resisting" because of principle - he has none and is a lying sack of shit - so he is just throwing money away, exposing all his private life, because he is a massive retard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
The very act of cuckoldry disgusts me to the point that I could never be friends with someone so pathetic and spineless.
Look at Destiny that is the face of the cuck movement and Nick is right behind him in a chair watching their wife / exs get fucked by black men together.
Its not that they're being cheated on, its that they're actively encouraging and engaging in it. Destroying the very moral fabric of marriage, relationships, and family for sick hedonistic pleasure.
100% agree. It's not like having a gay friend or the like. It's having a complete hedonist for a friend.

Just think about it. You're shooting the shit with your friend. You look at them, and you get reminded that this nigger jacks off to watching the bull ravage his wife. It's not like your friend is fapping to cuck porn in private as a fetish fantasy, no. They're actively participating in it, and you know. You know that their wife is either a complete whore, looking for validation, or being manipulated into going along with your friend's voyeuristic fetish. He does indeed destroy the institution of marriage just so he can WATCH his own humiliation and the degradation of his wife as he jacks off to it.

I would be so uncomfortable. It's two consenting adults, but I just can't do it. I can't look at a true blue cuck, a fornicator and a sodomite, and think that they have much of anything good to offer to the world. Sex pest and gooner vibes all around, I would just get a constant feeling that they're about to slide into deeper and deeper degeneracy like Rackets did with the Qouple.
 
100% agree. It's not like having a gay friend or the like. It's having a complete hedonist for a friend.

Just think about it. You're shooting the shit with your friend. You look at them, and you get reminded that this nigger jacks off to watching the bull ravage his wife. It's not like your friend is fapping to cuck porn in private as a fetish fantasy, no. They're actively participating in it, and you know. You know that their wife is either a complete whore, looking for validation, or being manipulated into going along with your friend's voyeuristic fetish. He does indeed destroy the institution of marriage just so he can WATCH his own humiliation and the degradation of his wife as he jacks off to it.

I would be so uncomfortable. It's two consenting adults, but I just can't do it. I can't look at a true blue cuck, a fornicator and a sodomite, and think that they have much of anything good to offer to the world. Sex pest and gooner vibes all around, I would just get a constant feeling that they're about to slide into deeper and deeper degeneracy like Rackets did with the Qouple.
yeah there's a marked difference between associating with people who, maybe they have problems like porn addiction or being a stoner but they are at least aware enough to be ashamed about it and keep it to the goon pod. and then there's people who openly flaunt it and act like its normal. I'm someone who is judicious about my associations IRL but I also recognize my own failings and I don't hold things against people generally speaking, we're all on the same boat in life.

but there are some things so basically wrong I can't countenance associating with it. I can be friends with someone who has the occasional joint or weed edible to relax at the end of the night but not with someone who insists on smoking 24/7 or someone permanently messed up like ReviewTech.

Plus the negative effects of it can impact your life. Look at how Rekieta's association and "friendship" with open degenerates sucked him into the scene and destroyed his life. Smartest thing Drex ever did was bailing once it became apparent that rekieta was doing drugs and swinging.
 
I don't recall if that's the exact bit, but the correct stream. Which was not the initial arrest stream but the follow-up. I wouldn't be shocked if my brain put 2+2 together in my memory, while these guys skirt over or omit stuff.

Barnes does use similar language of Aaron (noted in this clip quoted) to describe the Officer Pomplun later, "...looking like uh a vengeful vindictive cop looking to get Nick Rekieta and he's willing to break the law and violate the constitution to do it."
 

The error in Barnes' argument is that he tries to make the warrant exclusively about the hunt for drugs and issues around drug use. But at its heart, the warrant was about the state of the children and their care in the house. And its a very strong warrant on those particular points.
 
I have come to the conclusion that if Nick really wants to have a shot at beating these charges, there's only one man for the job. From the depths of his Mexican tool shed, comes a man with enough courtroom experience to make Perry Mason blush. I'm talking about the one and only Ethan Oliver Ralph. His legal expertise and fine craftsmanship of the English language will undoubtably be a valuable asset to Crackets' defense. Why, I can just picture it now. Nick's 9 y/o daughter on the stand, Ralph points at her and hollars as a matter of fact, I'll bet it was YOU that brought the cocaine in the house! The jury will be so impressed, they'll have no other choice but to acquit.
 
I apologise profusely as it has undoubtedly already been asked and answered but as the thread approaches 6,000 pages I have no hope of keeping up: in all of his screeching since the original raid/arrest, has Nick ever offered a plausible explanation for why there was 26g of cocaine in his house?
Nick is VERY sorry that he can’t give you his side of the story, because he’s in the process of getting raped by daddy government.

He’s really looking forward to giving you his side though! Likely right after he sends you that 5K locals present!
 
I have nothing to base this on, but I think the Fox article was instigated by Law and Crime, CourtTV, or one of the other big court (re)broadcasters. I don't know what the law is in MN around airing a court hearing, but say they wanted to make sure the judges want the hearings aired (and live), what better way to cite "local news affiliate" rather than "affidavits from random Youtubers and lawyers".

Granted, the youtubers probably get more views than the local fox affiliate, but boomer judges still get impressed by the local tv station.

It's been noted in thread before, but Law and Crime getting the court designation for the Rekieta trial would be hilarious.
 
IMG_6010.png
I saw this and thought it would be relevant if we can stream the courtroom.
 
I have nothing to base this on, but I think the Fox article was instigated by Law and Crime, CourtTV, or one of the other big court (re)broadcasters. I don't know what the law is in MN around airing a court hearing, but say they wanted to make sure the judges want the hearings aired (and live), what better way to cite "local news affiliate" rather than "affidavits from random Youtubers and lawyers".

Granted, the youtubers probably get more views than the local fox affiliate, but boomer judges still get impressed by the local tv station.

It's been noted in thread before, but Law and Crime getting the court designation for the Rekieta trial would be hilarious.
A somewhat similar thought occurred to me, and I was typing it out when you posted your reply:

Why the fuck would Fox have an issue with what Null is doing here? They're the media. They should want a camera in that courtroom too. Null isn't looking to have exclusive control over the footage.

@Null, if they contact you, or you contact them, you might consider politely asking for an affidavit from their general counsel as well. Also maybe consider asking for one from the local NBC, ABC, and CBS affiliates.

Hell, maybe even ask Law & Crime for one. That would REALLY piss Nick off.

:story:

Barnes does use similar language of Aaron (noted in this clip quoted) to describe the Officer Pomplun later, "...looking like uh a vengeful vindictive cop looking to get Nick Rekieta and he's willing to break the law and violate the constitution to do it."
The bottom line here is that Barnes didn't accuse Pomplun of violating Nick's rights because Nick fucked Pomplun's wife, but he did accuse Pomplun of violating Nick's rights for unspecified reasons.

A fucking his wife accusation would make his claim more salacious and ridiculous I suppose, but what Barnes actually said is ridiculous enough on its own. Or, more to the point, it is further demonstrative of the fact that Barnes is pushing a conspiracy theory.

We need that body cam! We gotta help prove Barnes right! Remember, always bet on Barnes!

That callout of Nate the lawyer at the end is so rich. I’ll take Nate’s word for it because he WAS a prosecutor you overinflated cabbage patch doll
"Do some research!" - Barnes

People do research. Research reveals Barnes is full of shit.

That's one thing I'll give Andrew/Legal Mindset some credit for. He pointed out that many of the cases Barnes cited don't say what Barnes claims they say.
 
Back