- Joined
- Dec 15, 2021
Christ I got about half way through before I had to discuss something I personally had happen and keep seeing from retards, even people close to me.
Literally I've run into people bring up this last point and use it like a "Gotcha!" moment in this whole affair. That this is just another symptom of Transphobia and "If Kris was a cis male this wouldn't happen". It's the most asanine retarded point imaginable and feels like a need to cope over how many alt-righties are on the bandwagon throwing anti-trans shit about the place.
Let's boil this down for a second,
Kris gets called out with a little proof, because they're trans the left all jumps on the "YOU CANT BELIEVE THIS IT'S A SMEAR!" wagon, Kris immediately leaves as the tip of the iceburg comes into view with left/trans allies/trans people all trying to dismiss or excuse the claims as hard as they can because people on the right (a subsection of the right let's be real) are using bad words to defame Kris over the whole thing. As more and more comes out those left-voices start getting quieter and quieter as yknow, you can only defend paedophilic shit like this for so long by leaning on "This isn't enough evidence and is fake!". Neither side really seems to have taken into account that Kris left the very moment these accusations came to light and they didn't even attempt, for a nanosecond, to defend themselves, which to anyone with half a brain knows is a clear sign way worse and fucked up shit went on.
You got people going "WELL LAVAGS SAYS THEY'RE NOT A VICTIM!" but you point out that in any abuse case, you cannot take a victim's lack of understanding if they're a victim or not to heart (Cite; I asked someone using this like "If I was to slap my wife and she looks at you telling you she deserves the slap and it's her who's in the wrong, does that mean now she's no longer a victim of spousal abuse?", a claim which stumped the person solid for a good 20minutes until they farted out "ITS NOT THE SAME!"), you point out that Dr Disrespect got shit canned over a single incident (Not excusable) and somehow people go "W-W-W-WELL HE HAD SOMEONE SAY IT HAPPENED AND PEOPLE LOOKED INTO IT SO NO, THEY HAD REASON TO SUSPECT SHIT UNLIKE KRIS!" which is beyond asanine when these are the same people now desperately trying to link Shadman to every personality online to try and protect Kris.
Look, we can all admit at one point in time we saw Shadman's edgy shit in 2016 and thought it was funny and followed him for a bit. I readily admit that, but the moment I realised he had artwork depicting lolis, as well as lolis being raped by dogs, I, like many people, stopped discussing him and giving him attention in any capacity because he had gone too far into his "Edginess" and liking him beyond that point wasn't "Supporting an edgelord", you were supporting someone who fetishized real underage girls in sexual situations.
This whole thing really does show the hypocrisy of the internet, namely the left in their wild rampage to defend anyone "in their camp" of really fucked up crimes whilst demanding anyone on the right be cancelled, ostricized and practically beheaded for daring to say funny internet words. Your personal politics absolutely shouldn't effect how bad a crime is, it should be about what the crime is and how fucked up that person is and making a point of dropping all associations. Why does the left think it's a smart idea to die on a hill to defend pedos and shit anyway?
Literally I've run into people bring up this last point and use it like a "Gotcha!" moment in this whole affair. That this is just another symptom of Transphobia and "If Kris was a cis male this wouldn't happen". It's the most asanine retarded point imaginable and feels like a need to cope over how many alt-righties are on the bandwagon throwing anti-trans shit about the place.
Let's boil this down for a second,
Kris gets called out with a little proof, because they're trans the left all jumps on the "YOU CANT BELIEVE THIS IT'S A SMEAR!" wagon, Kris immediately leaves as the tip of the iceburg comes into view with left/trans allies/trans people all trying to dismiss or excuse the claims as hard as they can because people on the right (a subsection of the right let's be real) are using bad words to defame Kris over the whole thing. As more and more comes out those left-voices start getting quieter and quieter as yknow, you can only defend paedophilic shit like this for so long by leaning on "This isn't enough evidence and is fake!". Neither side really seems to have taken into account that Kris left the very moment these accusations came to light and they didn't even attempt, for a nanosecond, to defend themselves, which to anyone with half a brain knows is a clear sign way worse and fucked up shit went on.
You got people going "WELL LAVAGS SAYS THEY'RE NOT A VICTIM!" but you point out that in any abuse case, you cannot take a victim's lack of understanding if they're a victim or not to heart (Cite; I asked someone using this like "If I was to slap my wife and she looks at you telling you she deserves the slap and it's her who's in the wrong, does that mean now she's no longer a victim of spousal abuse?", a claim which stumped the person solid for a good 20minutes until they farted out "ITS NOT THE SAME!"), you point out that Dr Disrespect got shit canned over a single incident (Not excusable) and somehow people go "W-W-W-WELL HE HAD SOMEONE SAY IT HAPPENED AND PEOPLE LOOKED INTO IT SO NO, THEY HAD REASON TO SUSPECT SHIT UNLIKE KRIS!" which is beyond asanine when these are the same people now desperately trying to link Shadman to every personality online to try and protect Kris.
Look, we can all admit at one point in time we saw Shadman's edgy shit in 2016 and thought it was funny and followed him for a bit. I readily admit that, but the moment I realised he had artwork depicting lolis, as well as lolis being raped by dogs, I, like many people, stopped discussing him and giving him attention in any capacity because he had gone too far into his "Edginess" and liking him beyond that point wasn't "Supporting an edgelord", you were supporting someone who fetishized real underage girls in sexual situations.
This whole thing really does show the hypocrisy of the internet, namely the left in their wild rampage to defend anyone "in their camp" of really fucked up crimes whilst demanding anyone on the right be cancelled, ostricized and practically beheaded for daring to say funny internet words. Your personal politics absolutely shouldn't effect how bad a crime is, it should be about what the crime is and how fucked up that person is and making a point of dropping all associations. Why does the left think it's a smart idea to die on a hill to defend pedos and shit anyway?
