Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

sidv.jpg
 
the worst part is she probably won't even fuck him

dude could get a much hotter escort for like $1000

When it gets to that stage I don't think it's about the sex, it's about being pulled into a world of parasocialism. She chats with him, probably live, listens to his problems, he sees her naked. It's like being a paid therapist and gf in one.

Like an online version of the Japanese host clubs.
 
In all of those situations telling someone to Man up is more about them accepting the status quo, not actually standing up for themselves.
Frittering years of your life away and still saying "uhhhh idk not sure" is trying to make an unsustainable status quo last forever. Break up with her or marry her, stop wasting your time and her fertility.
 
I fucking despise the "man up" argument. It's always just used as an excuse to demand that you tolerate shitty situations and accept them without complaining, and those same situations are ones that the person demanding you accept would never tolerate themselves. But retarded men still buy into it because they're desperate to be seen as an 'alpha male'.
“Man up” as it is most frequently used is just a one way street that where men have to accept the shit sandwich he’s given but women are free to do whatever they feel like. I of course think of the numerous instances of “man up and marry that slut” where the guy marries sometimes literal whores and a few years later she divorces him because he didn’t give her enough tingles.
 
Frittering years of your life away and still saying "uhhhh idk not sure" is trying to make an unsustainable status quo last forever.
Even if you tell her every single day "I don't want to get married or have kids", she'll still wake up one day and blame you that she's unmarried and childless. Being totally honest and straightforward with a woman means nothing if she secretly infers something else.
 
Even if you tell her every single day "I don't want to get married or have kids", she'll still wake up one day and blame you that she's unmarried and childless.

Actions register on a more primal level than words. The fact you keep depositing gametes in baby-maker tells her body that you do want kids, and pair-bonding is a biochemical reaction that is strengthened by orgasm, not an intellectual abstraction that can be turned on and off by generating the right sounds in her eardrum. So yes, it is unironically at least partially your fault for using her body as an ambulatory fleshlight and hoping she won't bond to you, but will somehow be able to dispassionately disconnect from you once you find someone younger and tighter to cum inside, as though she'll emotionlessly live the rest of her life alone, among her cats, without any hard feelings at all.

Being totally honest and straightforward with a woman means nothing if she secretly infers something else.

You should be celibate or get a RealDoll if you don't want kids. I mean this unironically. A woman's body is for producing children, not providing you a with a toy.
 
You should be celibate or get a RealDoll if you don't want kids. A woman's body is for producing children, not providing you a masturbation toy.
Should infertile people abstain completely from sex? Should women who might be pregnant abstain from sex because of the possibility of solely recreational semen touching them?

I mean, that's so fucking stupid. Even the most prudish, uptight Christian denominations don't think sex should be exclusively for procreation.
 
-Your gf disrespected you and your ego is hurt?
-Man up , your ego is fragile let it go
I'll agree with this one.
You shouldn't let a woman hurt your ego, that's weakness
Should infertile people abstain completely from sex?
In a perfect world they'd be so busy from working themselves to death so they rest of us can spend more time raising young that they'd have no time for sex.
Passing on your genetic material is the only reason life exists at all.

If you don't want kids then you're a degenerate manchild coomer, equivalent
to the homosexual, and your opinion is worthless.
 
Should infertile people abstain completely from sex? Should women who might be pregnant abstain from sex because of the possibility of solely recreational semen touching them?

You're like a 500-lb man who lives in front of the TV, and when someone tells you to get up, feet are for walking, you say, "But what about a guy born with no legs? What about somebody with a broken foot? What about when somebody who is dying of bone cancer?"

What do these situations have to do with you romancing a woman, spending years of her life getting her to bond to you closely enough to nest in your den and let you plant your seeds in her, and then being mad when, when you dump her once you're tired of fucking her, your use of a magic formula, "I don't want marriage or kids," failed to stop her from becoming sad and angry?

I mean, that's so fucking stupid.

What's fucking stupid is you thinking either of those cases have any bearing on the argument you're trying to make, which is that you should be able to initiate and consummate a mating process with a woman that has evolved over millions of years, and somehow forestall it merely by saying a few words. The entire process of bonding and love evolved to produce children. A woman being sad and angry when the man who's fucking her dumps her? That's an evolved instinct that contributes to reproduction. Women becoming frantic and unhappy when they're childless at thirty-three? There's a reason this emotion kicks in 10-15 years before menopause - it's evolution telling her to get her ass in gear and propagate her genes.

You think evolution cares about words?

You can be mad at this. You can whine about infertile people, or newly-pregnant women, or, I don't know, armless legless cancer patients with two dicks, as though any of that matters. It's just reality. Getting mad that a woman was upset after you initiated our advanced primate mating process, then cut it off once she got too old to have kids, because you said words, is like getting mad when you throw a pound of ground beef at a dog and say, "Don't eat that!"

Man is an animal. The sooner you accept this, the sooner women make sense to you.
 
-You're not sure if the child is yours and you want a DNA test?
-Man up take the responsibility for the child and stop being insecure.

-Your gf disrespected you and your ego is hurt?
-Man up , your ego is fragile let it go

-You're with a girl after a few years and you're not sure if you want to marry her?
-Man up just give her a ring stop being afraid of commitment.

-You're getting fucked in a custody battle?
-Man up, the child needs his mom.

-Hr is doing a seminar about gay black trans women with aids?
-Man up accept it.

In all of those situations telling someone to Man up is more about them accepting the status quo, not actually standing up for themselves.
I don't know if it is a testament to tenacity or insanity that there's still a significant amount of dudes out there that think "maning up" will actually fix things.
The problem is humans are social creatures so they are vulnerable to this kind of manipulation. Going your own way (as in actually your own not what some bearded dude on steroids is telling you) is hard.
the worst part is she probably won't even fuck him

dude could get a much hotter escort for like $1000
Could also be that she lied about it. That would be a genius marketing move to motivate the other simps to step up the dono Game. I am always suspicious with those posts, because getting gifted your dream car reeks of a trip to Dubai coming up shortly.
 
Could also be that she lied about it. That would be a genius marketing move to motivate the other simps to step up the dono Game. I am always suspicious with those posts, because getting gifted your dream car reeks of a trip to Dubai coming up shortly.

There's been rumours of even Twitch streamers getting a $10k dono and then sleeping with her number #1 fan. So I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility 🤔🤔
 
I can't remember the last time I read an article about a black woman being raped by a white man.
I did a search once and I found one example other than the Duke Lacrosse case, which turned out to be a false accusation. But it was national news for weeks, while the daily examples of black-on-white rape are swept under the rug.

What’s really crazy is that we really only hear about black-on-white rape when the woman is also murdered. Otherwise, we get a photo of the perp and the victim remains anonymous. It’s only when they’re dead that we get a victim pic. And we get examples of those all the time. So logically, rapes without murder must be even more common.

Tl;dr: white-on-black rape is national news so you hear about almost every example… but it hardly ever happens. Black-on-white rape is common but not reported, but we do hear about the fraction of cases where murder follows
 
You're like a 500-lb man who lives in front of the TV, and when someone tells you to get up, feet are for walking, you say, "But what about a guy born with no legs? What about somebody with a broken foot? What about when somebody who is dying of bone cancer?"
"REEEEEE stop bringing up very common situations that make my insane rule look stupid!"
 
Tl;dr: white-on-black rape is national news so you hear about almost every example… but it hardly ever happens. Black-on-white rape is common but not reported, but we do hear about the fraction of cases where murder follows
The primary reason why rape kit analyses have such long backlogs are because of who the perpetrators are. In feminist Mecca Sweden, women have complained about being pressured to consider how oppressed her rapists are. The ideal scenario for the powers that be is to only go after white rapists and everyone else gets a pass.
 
the worst part is she probably won't even fuck him
Depends on the guy's street smarts. Anyone with enough malice would have negotiated an encounter (probably a full night) for the car. Then again someone who wanted that would be able to get it without spending what may well be the yearly salary of half of America. People talk about Dubai potties all the time but many would be surprised at how simple it is to get some of these kinds of women in bed for money—or not even those girls, but regular girls you'd see in college/university.

Well, at least that is how it works where I live. I assume the only thing that'd stop American girls is that it is illegal, but people break the law all the time.
 
Frittering years of your life away and still saying "uhhhh idk not sure" is trying to make an unsustainable status quo last forever. Break up with her or marry her, stop wasting your time and her fertility.
I would argue the best option is to break up in most cases.

My brother was for 10+ years with the same chick, made a child with her,bought a house together and ended up separating.

I always saw his refusal to actually marry her as a subconscious idea that they would not be happy together he had in his head.

He was then too tied up to actually cut the knot.

I would argue that a woman should leave/pressure a man to marry past a certain time because not marrying is disrespectful to her. She should know her worth and leave because he does not truly desire her forever in most cases.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: bile demon
I did a search once and I found one example other than the Duke Lacrosse case, which turned out to be a false accusation. But it was national news for weeks, while the daily examples of black-on-white rape are swept under the rug.

What’s really crazy is that we really only hear about black-on-white rape when the woman is also murdered. Otherwise, we get a photo of the perp and the victim remains anonymous. It’s only when they’re dead that we get a victim pic. And we get examples of those all the time. So logically, rapes without murder must be even more common.

Tl;dr: white-on-black rape is national news so you hear about almost every example… but it hardly ever happens. Black-on-white rape is common but not reported, but we do hear about the fraction of cases where murder follows
everyone knows white dudes don't want to fuck black chicks

oh sure, there are exceptions (Halle Berry, Zoe Saldana, etc.), but most black women look like literal baboons
 
>fem"""cel"""
Is there a single more paradoxical, more oxymoronic word? I have only EVER seen this word been used in the context of retarded coomer wish fulfillment pining for an archetype that DOES NOT EXIST (and will NEVER exist) and for f*ids to parade themselves around the label to garner sympathy from doubledigit-IQ orbiters on Groomcord. Anyone who uses this word in a completely unironic manner deserves to be flayed alive and tossed into a brazen filled with boiling liquid shit.

Also I remember seeing some absolute NIGGERFAGGOT here with a signature that said "femcel breeding volunteer" and a tr*nime pfp. Whoever that is just know you will not be spared on the day of the rope. Kys you fucking scourge on society.
 
There's been rumours of even Twitch streamers getting a $10k dono and then sleeping with her number #1 fan. So I don't think it's out of the realm of possibility 🤔🤔
That wouldn't make a ton of sense though. If you're a ho, and some dude has already given you money, then:
A) He's already gotten what he wants and you've ruined the perspective of being unobtainable. There's a good chance that from there he'll be less likely to keep spending money.
B) If it gets out that it happened, the other simps will be massively turned off. You can't exactly advertise sex for donations as a feature.
C) Obviously these guys are really very pathetic and are going to make a woman drier than a hot plate in the sahara, so it's not like it'll be pleasant.

I'm sure this particular breed of harlot just cynically extracts money then goes on to bang other men, which also adds a humiliation aspect they probably enjoy since they secretly find their simps contemptible.

>fem"""cel"""
Is there a single more paradoxical, more oxymoronic word? I have only EVER seen this word been used in the context of retarded coomer wish fulfillment pining for an archetype that DOES NOT EXIST (and will NEVER exist) and for f*ids to parade themselves around the label to garner sympathy from doubledigit-IQ orbiters on Groomcord. Anyone who uses this word in a completely unironic manner deserves to be flayed alive and tossed into a brazen filled with boiling liquid shit.
Why are you so upset that femcels exist and are valid? Like this girl. Nobody will have sex with her and it's very sad.
1723678121048.png
What a hideous creature. No wonder no man wants her.
 
Back