Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 96 25.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 63 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 146 39.2%

  • Total voters
    372
outside of public figures
1723744555584.png
1723744574735.png

or morally outrageous cases
1723744621736.png

?
 
Public figures meaning politicians or celebrities, not cokehead streamers. And crimes of moral turpitude meaning something along the lines of the Ohio State University sex abuse scandal or kidnapping a child and torturing them to death. Not being a cokehead hoarder.

Obviously much of those guidelines are based entirely on opinion, but I believe a false rape accusation can easily ruin somebodies entire life and therefore the option for a private trial should be available to the majority of parties who ask.
 
Last edited:
No matter how you slice it, Nick is an extreme hypocrite.
And that's the whole fucking point people are trying to make.

He doesn't deserve it because he has made his life public and advocated for accountability and openness but suddenly reverses when he is asked to be open and held accountable.
 
Why, that would imply that Rackets either misread/misinterpreted those rules or is misrepresenting them to the court! Our rickety-Rackets is a gud boi! He'd NEVER do anything so disingenuous! And as for the misreading of them? He's got a 580 IQ!!! Hell, Wakanda's got NOTHIN' on him!

Nick's barneswalker attorney already has a track record of misreading/misinterpreting rules. He made a fool of himself in his first motion in the case involving the children.
 
And that's the whole fucking point people are trying to make.

He doesn't deserve it because he has made his life public and advocated for accountability and openness but suddenly reverses when he is asked to be open and held accountable.
Him not deserving it doesn't mean I don't believe the option should be there for others.
 
You would think Nick Rekieta's attorney would be familiar with the practice of not broadcasting minors who are testifying during a trial that's being televised and garbling their voices, given that I'm familiar with this practice--from watching Nick Rekieta's trial livestreams!

Even if this wasn't commonly done, though, it's almost too retarded to rebut (leaving aside the allegation that, what, we only want to see a coke fiend's trial because... we're waiting for the child to testify? huh). How often does the State call in children to testify against their parents in drug cases? I imagine it happens sometimes, in some situations, but I cannot believe that it is a winning strategy except when dealing with extraordinary neglect and abuse. There's currently no indication whatsoever that any of his children would need to be witnesses.
 
Back