Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 59 16.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.5%

  • Total voters
    356
He’s just trying to instil confusion and delay, he placed emphasis on the omnibus hearing not being broadcast even if the trial is. Language like that signals to me that he’s going to take a plea deal and he’s desperate not to have the video of the omnibus hearing archived on the internet forever. I don’t know the legal details, but he’s trying to throw enough doubt at the wall to clog up a decision being made until the omnibus hearing has already been done, which is only in a couple of weeks.
 
A real show would be if every single one of Nick's guest streamers was flown out to Kandiyoh County to testify against a la Seinfeld Finale. It'd be fantastic to watch all of his former friends and enemies such as Vic, Ron Toye, Monica Rial, Ty Beard, Null, Legal Eagle, Brittany Venti, Mandy, Shane Holson, etc. etc. all have to testify for or against Nick. That'd be the true to finale to end all finales.

Sad we don't live in TV world sometimes.
Technically PPP was one of Nick’s guests, during the infamous “Dick Masterson Simpspiracy” event. Just imagine that gesticulating giant man moving around and flailing his arms and hands in the air wildly as he testifies to the severe lack of morality and the abundance of degeneracy that Nick has displayed to the public, on camera, over the last 18 months.

“Yer honour, ladies and gennelmen of the court, there…do you know what the Balldo is, there? It’s a shaaaameful, diiiiiiirty, greeeeeeeeasy thing, that only a deadbeat dad like Nick Rekieta would not only own, but advertise! On his show!”
 
This is a 10/10 play by Rekieta tbh he’s got Null cooked here. It would be pretty reasonable to any court to deny the bodycam footage be released and seal it based on this assuming it’s true, I’m not backreading 20 pages here.
How did you come to the conclusion that the public can be refused access to material that is routinely disseminated based on a "guy with criminal record requested it"-argument?
 
“Yer honour, ladies and gennelmen of the court, there…do you know what the Balldo is, there? It’s a shaaaameful, diiiiiiirty, greeeeeeeeasy thing, that only a deadbeat dad like Nick Rekieta would not only own, but advertise! On his show!”
Oooo...that'd be great. And Monty too!

Monty: He called me a pedophile.

Judge:....You do kind of look lik-nevermind.

I can't believe Nick is literally using the "No stalker, child" defense.
 
This is a 10/10 play by Rekieta tbh he’s got Null cooked here. It would be pretty reasonable to any court to deny the bodycam footage be released and seal it based on this assuming it’s true, I’m not backreading 20 pages here.
If you can't even be bothered to inform yourself of what is happening here, at least have the courtesy to not shit up the thread, dumb zoomer.
 
Ahem.... A public message to Balldo, from Finger Pistols.
I will make parodies making fun of your court proceedings.
I will make high effort shitposts of your miserable life.
I will make more painted portraits of your balding alcoholic syndrome face.
I will make BALLDO ELYSIUM 2: THE BODYCAM FOOTAGE.

There is nothing you can do to stop me bish! :gunt:

Thank you kindly for wishing me a billion laughs at your expense. From your buddy, Fingers. :dove:
 
Last edited:
Nick must have started hitting the booze early today.

View attachment 6310895
View attachment 6310896

Link
The guy that "joked" about a child victim of sexual abuse being a diaper fetishist typed this.
The guy only stated his house is on public real-estate sites, he took it as "trying to figure out where the kids sleep". Nigger, no one cares about that.

Is calling people pedophiles on twitter how you get stuff thrown out in court?
I guess so. Maybe that's why the Montegraph case got dismissed.
Oh wait.
 
How did you come to the conclusion that the public can be refused access to material that is routinely disseminated based on a "guy with criminal record requested it"-argument?
I’m no fancy city lawyer I just enjoy a good chess move. It isn’t routine in Minnesota since as Null has stated multiple times it either needs to be signed off by a party or it has to meet some criteria of public interest based on misinformation. Well if some convicted pedophile did make that request it would seem like a reasonable motion to seal it if no one in the footage signs off on it.
 
Why does the pedos email have [phish alert] is this just a email protection thing?
Because either KnowBe4 auto-flagged the email, or the recipient used KnowBe4's Report Phishing email add-on.
IMG_0984.jpeg

As an aside, KnowBe4 is the cyber security firm that very recently accidentally HIRED A NORTH KOREAN HACKER. :story:
 
I’m no fancy city lawyer I just enjoy a good chess move. It isn’t routine in Minnesota since as Null has stated multiple times it either needs to be signed off by a party or it has to meet some criteria of public interest based on misinformation. Well if some convicted pedophile did make that request it would seem like a reasonable motion to seal it if no one in the footage signs off on it.
You are clearly not informed at all.
There are dozens of requests for the footage, this convicted sex offender was just one of many.

In no way does this motion address the MANY requests for access to the footage and the hearings in nick's case. They cherry picked the low hanging fruit and are attempting to violate everyone else's rights by building up the "Kiwifarm Pedophiles" strawman.
 
View attachment 6310608
Welp, wrap it up guys. Someone shouted nigger during Nick's first appearance so we don't have the right privilege to transparency in this trial anymore.
There are three big reasons Nick doesn't want his trial to be broadcast:
1) Embarrassment.
2) He can't grift from it.
3) He doesn't want anybody else to grift from it.
 
I’m no fancy city lawyer I just enjoy a good chess move. It isn’t routine in Minnesota since as Null has stated multiple times it either needs to be signed off by a party or it has to meet some criteria of public interest based on misinformation. Well if some convicted pedophile did make that request it would seem like a reasonable motion to seal it if no one in the footage signs off on it.
You sound like you would be amazed by someone using 'Scholar's mate', full offense.
 
Back