You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
While I've been ill for the last 24, I've managed to transcribe all of Rekietas delusions about Ms. Sweep and put them into a musical form with the help of AI. Lyrics are mine, the rest is AI.
Your Honor, let me quote from abstract of an article published by Cambridge University press in April 15, 2020: Compulsive behavior is a core symptom of both obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and cocaine addiction (CA). Across both pathologies, one can identify a priori goal-directed actions (purportedly anxiolytic checking or washing in OCD and pleasure-seeking drug use in addiction) that turn into rigid, ritualized and repetitive behaviors over which the patient loose control. This is peer-reviewed evidence that cocaine, like all stimulants including methamphetamine, causes uncontrollable urges to clean your surroundings. It was therefore impossible for me, my wife and also April Imholte to both be under influence of cocaine found in my house, and leave that house in such a mess. I rest my case.
He is going to pin this on one of the Imholtes. I still think Aaron is the target, not April. The quotes are (emphasis added by me):
"They didn't allege that we exposed the child to it"
"I know what didn't happen. I know that lady rackets and I [interruption from Daxipad]... I know and can say definitively that in our care, in our home, those children were never exposed to illegal substances"
"The children have stated that if they were exposed, they were exposed by someone else"
"If any exposure were to have happened, it would have come from someone else"
For what its worth, this is very unlikely to work. They are being charged with neglect as parents. Trying to claim that one of their friends at the drug den is responsible for their kid USING cocaine isn't going to help with that charge. Blaming someone else when you are on trial for massive amounts of coke in your home isn't going to work.
And for it NOT to have happened in their home, the cocaine exposure would have had to have happened in a place or with a person they left their child with. It doesn't help.
If Nick wants to take this all the way, he can I guess put his own children on the stand. But that would be an extremely dangerous choice to make.
Nick being a weasel about the hair follicle test is triggering my chemist autismo, so I'm going to explain in very simple, Balldoman proof terms how drugs (and Nick's drug of choice, Cocaine) metabolism works.
As a general rule, when a human ingests a drug, from something as simple as Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) to Nick's second favorite drug (Cocaine), the drug enters the body and it does it's effect at their target (for example an organ or a cell). To stop the drug from perpetually doing its effect, the body modifies the drug transforming it, this happens in most cases at the liver but some drugs also can be modified at other organs like the kidneys and lungs. This transformation renders the drug inactive (some drugs require this modification to become active, but that's beside the point) and it circulates the body in its inactive form to be excreted. This excretion can happen at many levels, from urine to sweat to HAIR.
Very simple. Now let's get into the Balldoman white powder:
Metabolic pathways of cocaine. Cocaine is mainly metabolized through hydrolysis into benzoylecgonine (BE) and ecgonine methyl ester (EME), both of which can be further hydrolysed to ecgonine (EC). Cocaine may also undergo hydroxylation to yield para-/meta-hydroxycocaine (p-/m-OH-COC). Another minor metabolic reaction is the N-demethylation of cocaine to norcocaine (NCOC). In the presence of ethanol (EtOH), cocaine will undergo transesterification and form cocaethylene (CE). AEME, anhydroecgonine methyl ester; CYP450, cytochrome P450; ED, ecgonidine; EDEE, ecgonidine ethyl ester; EEE, ecgonine ethyl ester; FADM, flavin adenine dinucleotide-containing monooxygenase; hCE1, human carboxylesterase type 1; hCE2, human carboxylesterase type 2; NBE, norbenzoylecgonine; NCE, norcocaethylene; NCOC-NO•, norcocaine nitroxide; NCOC-NO+, norcocaine nitrosonium; NEDME, norecgonidine methyl ester; NEME, norecgonine methyl ester; N-OH-NCOC, N-hydroxy-norcocaine; (p-/m-)OH-BE, (para-/meta-)hydroxybenzoylecgonine; PChE, pseudocholinesterase.
Ok so, what's this shit? Basically, when you consume cocaine, the body processes it in multiple ways, and you excrete it via urine and sweat, and some of the sweat gets into the hair follicles. This is particularly useful because it gets INSIDE the hair, meaning you can clean it multiple times and it will still be "lodged" inside the hair, and since hair grows you can make an estimation of when this drug use happened by cutting it at certain lengths.
"But Mister Friendly Dude, what if there was crack cocaine smoke that contaminated the hair like Balldoman implied"
Funny you asked, there was a study that washed a lot of hair of drug users to try and tell if external contamination is something to be spooked of, and they concluded this very easy to understand chart:
Mind you, this is from 2014, and tests have become more precise and exact over the years.
Now, Nick can cope and seethe all he wants, having a 5000 pg/mg in the test is inexcusable, even if the kid never ingested the stuff.
tl;dr Drug enters body, it gets modified your body shits it out, it gets in the hair, hair tests have become very precise and they can wash the hair all they want, if there are metabolites there that the body produced, it can't be from the air.
You just gave me a good idea . If by some reason the trial can't be livestreamed, I will try to make an Ace Attorney parody of his court proceedings with the notes from the brave kiwi reporters that will fly to that prudish scandinavian small town where the Balldo compound resides. I might just do the sprites for Cokeita later just for fun.
For what its worth, this is very unlikely to work. They are being charged with neglect as parents. Trying to claim that one of their friends at the drug den is responsible for their kid USING cocaine isn't going to help with that charge. Blaming someone else when you are on trial for massive amounts of coke in your home isn't going to work.
And for it NOT to have happened in their home, the cocaine exposure would have had to have happened in a place or with a person they left their child with. It doesn't help.
If Nick wants to take this all the way, he can I guess put his own children on the stand. But that would be an extremely dangerous choice to make.
@Mister Friendly Dude
Thank you, I have one question remaining: would bleaching your hair after stopping use affect the concentration of detectable metabolites?
1. So I'm used to Garages having keycodes you can dial in to open them. Is that what they're referring to? Because I've never seen a door that had a keypad you could use to open it.
2. Is there any chance part of Nick's plea deal could involve him ratting out his dealer? Because damn homeboy could sell Nick a whole brick that's gotta be a serious criminal. Of course the cops probably know who this drug dealer is and don't care because someone is getting a kickback.
He could also push the Aaron narrative just on his streams and never bring it up in court at all. It wouldn't be a new thing for Nick to do. When Nick has talked about the Montagraph case in the past, the things he said often had nothing to do with the argument his attorney was pushing in court or what was going on in the case.
This could be what he is always hinting at telling us after the case is over. But he has to be rather careful. Because if he starts dropping actual names, there is a real danger of defamation.
@Mister Friendly Dude
Thank you, I have one question remaining: would bleaching your hair after stopping use affect the concentration of detectable metabolites?
"The results of this study demonstrate that after a single application of a chemical straightening product, the measured illicit drug concentration can be drastically reduced. This may yield concentrations approaching or below the established SoHT cutoff levels, which could likely lead to false-negative results. It is possible that a drug abuser could intentionally apply such a cosmetic treatment to avoid any penalties associated with testing positive during hair analysis. It is important that the analyst conduct an in-depth inquiry about their cosmetic treatment history prior to performing the analysis."
1. So I'm used to Garages having keycodes you can dial in to open them. Is that what they're referring to? Because I've never seen a door that had a keypad you could use to open it.
. If by some reason the trial can't be livestreamed, I will try to make an Ace Attorney parody of his court proceedings with the notes from the brave kiwi reporters that will fly to that prudish scandinavian small town where the Balldo compound resides. I might just do the sprites for Cokeita later just for fun.
