Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%

  • Total voters
    305
It was Law and Crime... It was also when he defaces their logo with a Jack Murphy beard....And called them cucks. I hate my brain and the dumb things it latches on to cataloge..Guess that might be why I am here and unashamed.

Little did we know it was Nick who was the Cuck...
 
Why were charges against April reinstated? Who snitched or accused her? Did she voluntarily implicate herself or did Nick's lawyer talk her into it? Is she so mind controlled by Nick that she will run into the sawblades of a felony conviction for drug possession and child abuse with a big coked out smile on her face?

Someone who still likes her needs to hire her a lawyer who isn't also Nick's lawyer.
The real twist is that the lovers werent actually Nick and April. It's Nick and Aaron. Why do you think Nick never goes straight(badumtsh) for Aaron?

It's a literal gay op.
 
This isn't even the worst. He said this about a child (10-year-old) victim of abuse.
"Maybe she was a diaper fetishist".
She's 10, TEN.
I might be having another episode but maybe someone else remembers this. I have a memory of Nick doing a stream talking about some pedo who was actually entrapped by the Government. Pedo was convinced to cross state lines to have sex with a child that didn't exist. I remember Nick talking about the issues with the feds tricking a person into going to commit a crime that they could not possibly do because that child didn't even exist and then arresting and convicting that person because of a made up scenario. There was a point where Nick decidedly turned against the guy, which is not to say he was ever for the pedo. Nick was reading the correspondence between the pedo and the honey pot and the pedo had some demands or wants with the kid/s. He wanted them to wear diapers and shit themselves or something involving them shitting or pissing themselves. Nick took great offense to this because, according to him, children who are raped have a tendency to reflexively defecate due to the trauma they're enduring and the pedo was clearly getting off on that.

I swear this is a real thing that happened in 2021 maybe? It was well before his totally hilarious joke about a child that was abused by the government that had the whole crew rolling on the floor laughing. Does anyone else know what I'm talking about or am I getting streamers confused?
 
I might be having another episode but maybe someone else remembers this. I have a memory of Nick doing a stream talking about some pedo who was actually entrapped by the Government. Pedo was convinced to cross state lines to have sex with a child that didn't exist. I remember Nick talking about the issues with the feds tricking a person into going to commit a crime that they could not possibly do because that child didn't even exist and then arresting and convicting that person because of a made up scenario. There was a point where Nick decidedly turned against the guy, which is not to say he was ever for the pedo. Nick was reading the correspondence between the pedo and the honey pot and the pedo had some demands or wants with the kid/s. He wanted them to wear diapers and shit themselves or something involving them shitting or pissing themselves. Nick took great offense to this because, according to him, children who are raped have a tendency to reflexively defecate due to the trauma they're enduring and the pedo was clearly getting off on that.

I swear this is a real thing that happened in 2021 maybe? It was well before his totally hilarious joke about a child that was abused by the government that had the whole crew rolling on the floor laughing. Does anyone else know what I'm talking about or am I getting streamers confused?
Balldo: not even once.
 
I might be having another episode but maybe someone else remembers this. I have a memory of Nick doing a stream talking about some pedo who was actually entrapped by the Government. Pedo was convinced to cross state lines to have sex with a child that didn't exist. I remember Nick talking about the issues with the feds tricking a person into going to commit a crime that they could not possibly do because that child didn't even exist and then arresting and convicting that person because of a made up scenario. There was a point where Nick decidedly turned against the guy, which is not to say he was ever for the pedo. Nick was reading the correspondence between the pedo and the honey pot and the pedo had some demands or wants with the kid/s. He wanted them to wear diapers and shit themselves or something involving them shitting or pissing themselves. Nick took great offense to this because, according to him, children who are raped have a tendency to reflexively defecate due to the trauma they're enduring and the pedo was clearly getting off on that.

I swear this is a real thing that happened in 2021 maybe? It was well before his totally hilarious joke about a child that was abused by the government that had the whole crew rolling on the floor laughing. Does anyone else know what I'm talking about or am I getting streamers confused?

No, I remember this. It was his 2nd or 3rd 'Predator' stream. He said he did then as a PSA, but now I am wondering if it was something more sinister.

I also remember when he said he would not do the 'Daddy No! meme due to its origins with infanticide. A few weeks later, he 'was over it'.


On a bit of a lighter note, I propose more humourous redactions for his children's names:

Assign them each the name of a Transformer.

It is fitting because they seem to be the two things in life that Nick has taken away from him by more responsible adults.

EDIT: Typos
 
How funny would is be if Ron and Monica show up at his trail?

If the court rejects the requests to live stream the trial, we'll be left with an animated version courtesy of Sharpeteer. Ron, Monica and Vic should get together to do the voice acting for The Six Whores of Balldo the First aka Coomer of Kandoyosha County.

Hmm. That has a ring to it...

Everyone considered him the Coomer of the County
He'd never done a single thing to prove the county wrong
His mama named him Nicky, but folks just called him Balldo,
But something always told me, that Nicky was a mong

He was only ten years old, when his grandpa left the planet
I looked after Nicky, because whatever Celeste says goes,
But it was always clear to me, that Nick was killing animals,
But when I raised it with Celeste, she told me 'Mind your nose'

Promise me Nick, you won't suck another man's dick
And walk away from swinging if you can
Men will think you're weak, if you let them bust your cheeks,
But if you share your wife, they understand,
That you can't be a cuck and be a man.

There's someone for everyone and Nicky's love was Kayla
In her arms he didn't have to prove he was a man,
One summer, they went to Hedonism, Romaine and Ricardo came calling
They took turns at Kayla, while Nicky served them snacks.

 
Assign them each the name of a Transformer.
We want to go Autobot or Decepticon?

If Autobot, use the Protectrons since they are made up of law enforcement and recuse bots.

If Decepticon, use the Stunticons as they are rebellious and uncontrollable.

What Nick hates and Nick views the impact of his kids on his life, respectively.
 
If the court rejects the requests to live stream the trial, we'll be left with an animated version courtesy of Sharpeteer. Ron, Monica and Vic should get together to do the voice acting for The Six Whores of Balldo the First aka Coomer of Kandoyosha County.

Hmm. That has a ring to it...

Everyone considered him the Coomer of the County
He'd never done a single thing to prove the county wrong
His mama named him Nicky, but folks just called him Balldo,
But something always told me, that Nicky was a mong

He was only ten years old, when his grandpa left the planet
I looked after Nicky, because whatever Celeste says goes,
But it was always clear to me, that Nick was killing animals,
But when I raised it with Celeste, she told me 'Mind your nose'

Promise me Nick, you won't suck another man's dick
And walk away from swinging if you can
Men will think you're weak, if you let them bust your cheeks,
But if you share your wife, they understand,
That you can't be a cuck and be a man.

There's someone for everyone and Nicky's love was Kayla
In her arms he didn't have to prove he was a man,
One summer, they went to Hedonism, Romaine and Ricardo came calling
They took turns at Kayla, while Nicky served them snacks.

I request an Rakieta version of The Offspring

"And all the pedos say I'm pretty fly for a law guy"
 
If the court rejects the requests to live stream the trial, we'll be left with an animated version courtesy of Sharpeteer. Ron, Monica and Vic should get together to do the voice acting for The Six Whores of Balldo the First aka Coomer of Kandoyosha County.
I'm assuming that with such limited time remaining between now and the trial the longer we go without an answer the more likely Nick's motion will be granted.

In any event, the transcripts will eventually be made public, and we'll still get to laugh at them. I don't see how Nick could successfully argue that the matter should be sealed as he should be considered a public figure. The only thing missing is his page on Wikipedia. (which probably could be made now, as BLP1E no longer applies to him).

Speaking of Wikipedia, in June an IP editor scrubbed mention of Nick from Vic's Wiki article without as much as an edit summary (very sus).
 
I was watching live, but now that @elb has gotten some clips out, I am back to psychoanalyzing the Rekieta tea leaves.

Nick talking about his lawyer's "incompetence":

A few things stick out. His lawyer got a continuance for him to get together his exhibits and witness list. He sits on his hands for 10 days and doesn't put together any witnesses or exhibits, and when his lawyer asks "who you got?" he is incredulous that the lawyer didn't do his job for him. Why would your lawyer know who you want them to call? Your witnesses aren't going to be listed in the state's case, and your lawyer doesn't know any other context about your case, so why would they be able to put together a witness list? PL: I admit that I haven't been involved in a court case with such low stakes, but in higher-stakes civil litigation my lawyers have always asked us for the possible witnesses and exhibits, but it's up to them to craft the case around that evidence.

His lawyer also says "they don't like that" about asking the state to provide transcripts of interviews. In a context where you intend to make a deal, "they don't like that" actually has a lot of power. Litigation, like war, is just negotiation through other means. But Nick has never learned anything about law in a courtroom, and just has a purely academic understanding of the topic (hence the autistic ideas about the rule of completeness) from a shit-tier law school.

Nick's child coke test:

He is going to pin this on one of the Imholtes. I still think Aaron is the target, not April. The quotes are (emphasis added by me):
  • "They didn't allege that we exposed the child to it"
  • "I know what didn't happen. I know that lady rackets and I [interruption from Daxipad]... I know and can say definitively that in our care, in our home, those children were never exposed to illegal substances"
  • "The children have stated that if they were exposed, they were exposed by someone else"
  • "If any exposure were to have happened, it would have come from someone else"
This absolutely has to mean that Nick's theory of the case is that they were in someone else's care when the kids were exposed to the coke. He then later suggested (with his "cops brought the kids in and out of the home several times" line) that it could be the cops, but I think this is pretty solid evidence that his theory is that Aaron is the one who exposed the kids.

Aaron has told some stories about drugs being around the kids, so it's not far-fetched that Aaron also gave the rosy view of that situation and he may have caught the 9-year-old eating coke. Aaron has also said that he was the one taking care of both sets of kids a lot of the time.

Nick being so definitive and certain about this suggests to me that he absolutely does know how the 9-year-old got exposed to cocaine. He's just trying to run a "technically correct" gayop to try to find a way to pin this on someone who is not a parent of a child.
 
Is anyone else about to have an aneurism trying to imagine what bottom dwelling brain dead retards are still fans of Nick?

It has to be the same ilk as a genuine Ralph fan. They both nose dove so hard in such slimy repulsive way that they're basicly the same person now.

Still it's hard for me to imagine meeting a Nicksucker in real life because they're probably the type of people that you instinctually avoid.

Wait a second.... I DID IT! I FIGURED OUT WHAT THE AVERAGE TRUE AND HONEST NICK FAN IS LIKE IN REAL LIFE!!!

Screenshot_20240816_072130_Brave.jpg
 
Nick being so definitive and certain about this suggests to me that he absolutely does know how the 9-year-old got exposed to cocaine. He's just trying to run a "technically correct" gayop to try to find a way to pin this on someone who is not a parent of a child.
If the kids played baker with his coke stash in the garden it was technically not inside his home.

Checkmate kiwi fags
 
I know and can say definitively that in our care, in our home, those children were never exposed to illegal substances
With the amount of linguistic shenanigans Nick attempts to pull off, I wouldn't be surprised if he's trying to leave an out (of sorts) if the kids were exposed to illegal substances if they were in the care of only ONE of them (i.e. not in "our" care)... That way the little shithead can still claim he was TECHNICALLY being honest...
 
Bob Rekieta, on June 4th:
BobRekietaTestimony.jpg
Aww, such a sweet rich old man. He's willing to lose a bit of money* to help look after his five grandchildren, who we know from Nick are such hard work even when they're not being neglected by their parents or testing positive for cocaine. Such a potent example of his willingness to make sacrifices for his family. R-right...?
*
But only if it's necessary though.

Bob Rekieta, spending July at a luxury hotel in Kinsale, Ireland:
BobRekieta.jpg

July 9 Facebook Post

...oh. The father of Nick Rekieta, a dishonest man? Never would have thought it...

Maybe I shouldn't be too harsh. From his Facebook page it looks like he only goes on vacations every other month. And it was only a four star hotel. They're paupers who grew up dodging bullets in the slums of Houston, after all...

(Can't archive those posts by Bob at the moment, will give any Kiwis who can do it a reaction of their choice)
 
This absolutely has to mean that Nick's theory of the case is that they were in someone else's care when the kids were exposed to the coke. He then later suggested (with his "cops brought the kids in and out of the home several times" line) that it could be the cops, but I think this is pretty solid evidence that his theory is that Aaron is the one who exposed the kids.

Aaron has told some stories about drugs being around the kids, so it's not far-fetched that Aaron also gave the rosy view of that situation and he may have caught the 9-year-old eating coke. Aaron has also said that he was the one taking care of both sets of kids a lot of the time.

Since the stream where Nick refused to comment anything about Aaron I was under the suspicion that he planned pinning something on Aaron.

Although I can't see how he could claim Aaron is responsible for the possession of the drugs inside his own house...
 
"Kids are back now and my parents don't need to supervise them! 😎"

You are truly winning Nick!

Nick is the king of technicality. The kids are 'back' in the house (at the moment or in some capacity at some point) and his parents do not 'need' to supervised (but they are required do so).

I will believe it when I see evidence that doesn't come from a liar.

By "moved in" is he only talking about the primary house or is he including the secondary house as well? Nick has played this Cup and Balldo trick before.

See above. They could be 'just visiting' for a long time...

Are they insinuating that Null and KF have CP? Why is he spending so much time on this?

Yes. He is grasping at any straw he can. He found a thread to pull on, but it will eventually run out.

More than that, Dax has insinuated that KF is a place where pedos congregate to trade CP. I assume he got his understanding of how pedos exchange CP from Vito who is a confirmed pedophile.

It was just a JOKE, guys! He only said it a bunch of times because it was FUNNAY!

We want to go Autobot or Decepticon?

If Autobot, use the Protectrons since they are made up of law enforcement and recuse bots.

If Decepticon, use the Stunticons as they are rebellious and uncontrollable.

What Nick hates and Nick views the impact of his kids on his life, respectively.

I was thinking OG G1-G3 Transformers.

The meme in my head was that when reading docs, the censor for the oldest would be 'Optimus Prime, we are autonomous robotic organisms from the planet Cybertron'.

Speaking of Wikipedia, in June an IP editor scrubbed mention of Nick from Vic's Wiki article without as much as an edit summary (very sus).

Vic hired a PR firm to put distance between himself and Nick. I'd put a tenner on them being behind the edit.

Nick being so definitive and certain about this suggests to me that he absolutely does know how the 9-year-old got exposed to cocaine. He's just trying to run a "technically correct" gayop to try to find a way to pin this on someone who is not a parent of a child.

Nick misunderstand 'reasonable doubt' and is trying to muddy the waters with so much bullshite. Thia is one step short of a Chewbacca Defence.

Unfortunately, it can work on judges who do jot have the time or interest to take in a case.
 
Back