Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Nick's Snort Tube]

Read the thread fool. Nobody is asking for the children to be filmed during the court proceedings. Even if they testified for something, that wouldn’t be televised.

Unfortunately, nick would stoop to this level. He would definitely put his kids on the defense witness list if it meant the court would deny airing the trial. 100%.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Of course not. They're going to pin everything on Kayla.

I'm also leaning toward Nick making her claim everything was hers and she kept it secret from him.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Unfortunately, nick would stoop to this level. He would definitely put his kids on the defense witness list if it meant the court would deny airing the trial. 100%.

Null just showed a document from the court where they confirmed that they don't predict the kids being involved at all

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but just because Nick's home environment was a danger to his own children, that doesn't mean that Nick is wrong to prevent his children from being televised in the court proceedings. They aren't mutually exclusive propositions.

Well, one of the kids tested positive, right? If Nick tries to claim they tampered with evidence or something, I can think of reasons they would put one of the children on the stand.

Fuck all the way off!

1. No one here wants to see his children. This is an old lie from the start of the bodycam request saga, and it has been clarified many times in the thread, court filings, e-mails, DMs by Josh and others that the children will be censored. YouTube streamers and people ITT when making transcripts have redacted their names scrupulously.

2. No child is EVER televised in court. It was handled in no less than 3 cases that Nick covered in full by keeping them off camera. He has no excuse other than willful deceit in this.

3. The fucking prosecutor has filed a notice (post is on the same fucking page as your inane ramblings) that they will not call any of thr children.

Stop falling for Balldoguards' concern troll tactics.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Null just showed a document from the court where they confirmed that they don't predict the kids being involved at all

This is the document, for those who would like to read it.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

If one of the parents was dosing one of the children, the child's testimony could shed light on how they were doing it.

Nigger the literal prosecutor said they’re not calling kids to the stand. Take the L.

 

[Captain Manning]

Does anybody know if Null/Hardin is entitled to a surreply?

A lot of people didn't want to watch it either as it turns out. People are more interested in Sean and Null

Sean pulled pretty good numbers the last two times he had Null as well. Null is kinda like a lesser version of Metokur in terms of audience interest. A lot of people will tune in if he's announced as a guest.

Dick Masterson as a guest? Not so much.

Speaking of Wikipedia, in June an IP editor scrubbed mention of Nick from Vic's Wiki article without as much as an edit summary (very sus).

Well, Vic did say he hired a PR firm after the report leaked about the 9 yo testing positive. That could be them at work.

Would be funny if so. The idea of PR firm taking one look at Nick and determining their client should absolutely not have his name connected to Rekieta.

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but just because Nick's home environment was a danger to his own children, that doesn't mean that Nick is wrong to prevent his children from being televised in the court proceedings. They aren't mutually exclusive propositions.

Well, one of the kids tested positive, right? If Nick tries to claim they tampered with evidence or something, I can think of reasons they would put one of the children on the stand.

If one of the parents was dosing one of the children, the child's testimony could shed light on how they were doing it.

Nigger, read this. Then stop.

The county just said they don't intend to call the kids as witnesses.

Nick is not fighting this because of the kids. He fighting this because he wants to control all the information that comes out about him.

 

[Fapcop]

I've watched the original Pillstream & the MATI. Null who is usually so calm and reserved bursting into laughter over AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed is comedy gold.

Edit: I just watched this clip from Elissa and Nick's excuse about Laundry situation doesn't make ANY sense. Timestamp @5:21

So Nick explains there's lots of clothes because he has a lot of kids in the house so they do hand me downs, which makes sense. But the clothes should be CLEANED, FOLDED, and PUT AWAY. Not even Devil Dax is laughing or backing up this explanation he's just quiet during all of this.

Wait… So Nick don’t have problems buying 200 or 300$ bottles of whisky, but his kids are running around in hand me downs?

Priorities!

Daily bottle of overpriced hooch is more important than new clothes for the kids.

 

[Poop Shoot]

No one wants to see Nick’s kids, we all just want to see the fucking hovel Nick and Kayla let their home become.

 

[TEA 3HF]

What kind of inbred, shit-sniffing coward do you have to be to try and use your traumatized kids as a shield? Especially against the public humiliation you both deserve and have dished out to others previously? I'd say man the fuck up, but apparently a balldo is explicitly used to remedy the incapability to.

 

[Meat Target]

Maybe an unpopular opinion, but just because Nick's home environment was a danger to his own children, that doesn't mean that Nick is wrong to prevent his children from being televised in the court proceedings. They aren't mutually exclusive propositions.

You're assuming this whole "KF has pedos, protect muh keeedz" schtick isn't just a Chewbacca Defense.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

If one of the parents was dosing one of the children, the child's testimony could shed light on how they were doing it.

The only person who is likely to call the kids to the stand is Nick because he's using them as a shield to hide his literal dirty laundry from the public.

 

[AnOminous]

The way I see this going is that Nick is blaming it all on the cocksleeves, they will happily take the felony conviction to help out Master Balldo and ruin their lives because he is controlling them and their lives in every aspect.

That might work for a woman, and as womanly as Nick is, entirely in the negative sense of the word, a man doing this will just disgust a judge or a jury, especially when he does it so smugly and obviously falsely. If it was April it was still constructive presence because he knew it was there in his bedroom and didn't get rid of it immediately. Even if it was Aaron it's completely unbelievable he didn't notice his master bedroom was strewn with multiple stashes of drugs and paraphernalia.

That will be made exponentially harder by remaining on the internet, especially if he continues to throw bizarre tantrums like what we've observed today. We all know that there are deranged assholes out there who will actively take a personal hand in life ruination. They'll break the law, they'll lie to police, they'll try to steal shit and lord knows what else.

He's well on the way to getting the kind of "fans" people like Daniel Larson and Cyrax and Wings have, the kind of lunatics who make @TwitterIsCancer look sane and normal. And even TiC turned out more right than not on the facts about Balldo, but was cowtipping.

He was only going to take a brief break from streaming and would have continued his epicurean lifestyle. This guy seriously has no sense of shame.

What Balldo is doing is not epicurean in the least. Epicureanism may have been about pleasure but was more about avoiding pain, and massive drug abuse, gluttony, drunkenness and the like is opposite to the philosophy because it leads to misery. It is about simplicity and moderation in most things, because that is what leads to a good life (according to Epicurus anyway).

What Nick is doing is malignant hedonism.

I might be having another episode but maybe someone else remembers this. I have a memory of Nick doing a stream talking about some pedo who was actually entrapped by the Government. Pedo was convinced to cross state lines to have sex with a child that didn't exist. I remember Nick talking about the issues with the feds tricking a person into going to commit a crime that they could not possibly do because that child didn't even exist and then arresting and convicting that person because of a made up scenario.

That's not legally entrapment. To prove entrapment, you have to prove not only that you were tricked into attempting a crime, but that it's a crime you never would have committed without the entrapment. In this case, soliciting sex with a minor and crossing state lines to attempt it is a crime whether or not the child exists.

The classic case of entrapment is John DeLorean, who was badgered and cajoled into getting involved with a coke transaction, by agents who knew he was in serious financial trouble and were hell-bent on destroying him. He had never done anything similiar in the past and shown no inclination to do so.

The pedo case is more like when an idiot takes out an ad (these days probably on a darkweb honeypot) or otherwise seeks out a hit man and (invariably) a fed takes him up on the offer and arrests him for solicitation.

And for it NOT to have happened in their home, the cocaine exposure would have had to have happened in a place or with a person they left their child with. It doesn't help.

It doesn't even really matter if he somehow frames Aaron for the actual exposure. Just the drugs openly lying around in a house with children is presumptively endangerment anyway.

His defenses are weak. He's just desperately throwing everything imaginable at the wall to confuse the issue. It's not that this can't work. Johnny Cochran more or less made a career of the kitchen sink strategy.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Do we have anyone on here who is versed in US based wealth management and what type of clauses are typical for trustfunds?

I was wondering if this entire thing might have a much more severe impact on Nick than anyone is expecting. If the trust he has been living off for his entire life contains a morality clause that would be triggered by a felony conviction and/or drug conviction, this might be much more dire times for the House of Balldo than we expect.

 

[TEA 3HF]

Do we have anyone on here who is versed in US based wealth management and what type of clauses are typical for trustfunds?

I was wondering if this entire thing might have a much more severe impact on Nick than anyone is expecting. If the trust he has been living off for his entire life contains a morality clause that would be triggered by a felony conviction and/or drug conviction, this might be much more dire times for the House of Balldo than we expect.

Not totally literate but the application of these clauses also depends on the current executor of the estate. His dad has already shown to be just as if not more of a fuck up than Rekieta so glhf.

 

[zimzam88]

I've never been charged with a felony.

I've never used or possessed cocaine.

I've never had my child poisoned with cocaine.

I've never entered into a cuckolding relationship with my wife.

Balldoman doesn't think any of those things are something to be ashamed of though, the only thing that he's pissed about is getting caught. Honestly at this point he should just come out of the closet and be a total open faggot degenerate and take pride in all of it, I don't think the remaining balldowashers would even care.

 

[RodgerDodger]

They literally wrote a response saying they see no reason why they would call the kids.

And the case of child neglect is the CHIPS case and has nothing to do with these criminal proceedings.

There is a Child Neglect charge in the criminal case as well. That comes from having large amounts of drugs around children.

Those charges will almost certainly escalate if the DA starts digging into the Coke being inside the kid. But that finding comes from CPS. They may not have concluded their investigation and officially passed those matters over to the DA yet. That also may be being looked at as an entirely separately matter, that may lead to charges and trial unrelated to the current drug charges.

So it may not be officially on the DA's radar yet. Or it may not be something either CPS or DA feel confident in pursuing. But if they did it almost certainly would involve questions asked of the kids. Remember we've long suspected that mysterious family medical emergency was related to this. The other kids would be witnesses to that. But that event if that's what it was, has enough time separation from the drug raid ao as to be investigated, and where applicable charged separately.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

There is a Child Neglect charge in the criminal case as well. That comes from having large amounts of drugs around children.

Those charges will almost certainly escalate if the DA starts digging into the Coke being inside the kid. But that finding comes from CPS. They may not have concluded their investigation and officially passed those matters over to the DA yet. That also may be being looked at as an entirely separately matter, that may lead to charges and trial unrelated to the current drug charges.

So it may not be officially on the DA's radar yet. Or it may not be something either CPS or DA feel confident in pursuing. But if they did it almost certainly would involve questions asked of the kids. Remember we've long suspected that mysterious family medical emergency was related to this. The other kids would be witnesses to that. But that event if that's what it was, has enough time separation from the drug raid ao as to be investigated, and where applicable charged separately.

True, but the fact that drugs were in the house does not require the children to testify since bodycam footage can be used to demonstrate this beyond a doubt.
I believe the state can prove their case without calling the children, as they will always try to do since traumatizing kids by forcing them to testify against their own parents is very bad.

 

[Meat Target]

I've watched the original Pillstream & the MATI. Null who is usually so calm and reserved bursting into laughter over AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed is comedy gold.

I don't think I've ever heard Dear Feeder that joyous.

 

[DHugo]

People care more about being first on page 6000 than Nick cares about his kids.