Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 133 38.6%

  • Total voters
    345
While I've been ill for the last 24, I've managed to transcribe all of Rekietas delusions about Ms. Sweep and put them into a musical form with the help of AI. Lyrics are mine, the rest is AI.

Please enjoy. (Best enjoyed with headphones)

View attachment 6313648
This is art. Thanks @sneedem&feedem for the link.
Please tell me you are planning to show up and blast that song after the hearing is over and Lord Balldo leaves the courthouse.
If I can make it through the next couple of month without getting vanned for contempt of court I'll count that as a win.

I've put it up on YouTube. Lyrics in the description.


Will see about getting it on spotify and other places. People enjoyed it more than I expected so currently trying to make it accessible as possible. Attached it here as well for ease of access for you.

I will state that anyone is welcome to use it in any of their own content.

View attachment 6317663
It's catchy as fuck.
 
Most likely:
1. Null's future interactions with the court in this case being impeded.
2. Said awful person being doxed, shamed, mocked and ratted out to the legal system.
To anyone who does this, what the legal system does to you will be nothing compared to what we'll do to you.
 
My whole work schedule was cleared thanks to potential riots street congestion the DNC is going to cause. So now it’s a toss up between being on riot watch all week or driving 8 hours to watch a bunch of retards try to act like normal human beings before sperging out and catching charges as Rekieta parades around his Qover. Maybe he’ll be bold and take inspiration from his Depp trial days and pull an Amber Heard doing a bump in front of everyone.
 
Meanwhile behind a dumpster in Wilmar a lanky swaying figure hands a bundle of extra cash to Riley. “Yes, I think that should cover me yelling KIWIFARMS and JOSHUA MOON in the courtroom until I get dragged out. Now I just got some cool new synthetic drugs for you, or maybe you just want to piss on Mint?”. The figure turns away, his profile revealing only a nose sticking out. “Just don’t forget to say you are a volunteer reporter”
 
1723920229704.png


Still trying to do victory laps because the judge followed standard court rules.
He does not even realize that he ate a big fat L by fighting this request, that was unlikely to be granted in the first place.

Now everyone knows what a giant hypocrite he is.
 
My whole work schedule was cleared thanks to potential riots street congestion the DNC is going to cause. So now it’s a toss up between being on riot watch all week or driving 8 hours to watch a bunch of retards try to act like normal human beings before sperging out and catching charges as Rekieta parades around his Qover.
I think one of the funniest things about this whole arc is that Nick is such an arrogant, retarded faggot he actually thinks it's a good idea to have his side whore he's cucking his wife with show up to his court hearings, as if this will fly in a small town. Everyone must be utterly repulsed by this weird freak. His kids must get constantly taunted and bullied, thanks to his evil hedonistic bullshit.
 
My whole work schedule was cleared thanks to potential riots street congestion the DNC is going to cause. So now it’s a toss up between being on riot watch all week or driving 8 hours to watch a bunch of retards try to act like normal human beings before sperging out and catching charges as Rekieta parades around his Qover. Maybe he’ll be bold and take inspiration from his Depp trial days and pull an Amber Heard doing a bump in front of everyone.
Take a vacation from Riot Watch, fren. You've earned it. Save up a couple episodes of MATI to make the drive up and back.
 
I understand I'm retarded, but can Kayla even take a plea deal in a way that prevents Nick from also either needing to plea or go to trial?

Like if Kayla goes 'your honor I'm guilty that's my crack' surely the judge will then turn to Nick and go 'if you were aware your wife had crack you are also guilty still?'

It's not like only one of them possessed it or endangered kids, if Nick was aware coke was IN HIS BEDROOM SAFE then he's still guilty of possessing cocaine.

And if Kayla was neglecting the kids but Nick didn't do shit to fix it, HE still neglected the fucking kids.

Am I missing something where there's a way to throw Kayla under the bus and get Nick off besides 'well the court won't want to put both parents on probation at the same time?'
If someone has drugs in your car while you’re driving you can be held responsible, if someone brings drugs in to your home and gets caught the homeowner can be charged with constructive possession if the drugs are found in an area of the home where the homeowner has dominion; e.g. your safe or bedroom.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
At this point with all of the retards on here talking about bringing in pen recorders, hidden cameras and other such stupid bullshit, you can be assured that Nick's lawyer will notify the court building staff.

Court security staff will be on high alert for retards like you. This won't be like any normal day where staff is bored and mistakes get made. Standard courts have xray machines. They will find your voice recorder pen. They will catch your "hidden" camera when you pass through the metal detector. They already know all about camera glasses, camera purses and camera buttons.

Expect to get your ass handed to you and arrested if you try to bring in any recording equipment that is something other than pen and paper.

Also, don't be that moron that wears any T-shirt or hat with ANY writing on it. Especially Rekieta memes. What you think is funny in real life, will be far less amusing to both sets of lawyers and a judge that want a clean, uneventful trial that you don't interfere with.

unknown1.jpg01227c6c342a027a5c4039f80f6db2fe.jpg

Don't touch the cow. And above all, don't fuck with the courts.
 
Last edited:
If someone has drugs in your car while you’re driving you are responsible, if someone brings drugs in to your home and gets caught the homeowner can be charged with constructive possession if the drugs are found in an area of the home where the homeowner has dominion; e.g. your safe or bedroom.
This is not always true, and is what is called a "rebuttable presumption" when a presumption applies. That means you have the opportunity to prove you didn't know, or couldn't have known.

Almost all crimes since time immemorial require both a mens rea, state of mind, and an actus rei, the actual illegal act. To be guilty of a crime, one must have intentionally committed the act. Someone bringing drugs into your home, if you had no idea they were doing it, doesn't make you guilty, but because of deranged "War on Drugs" policies, may shift the burden to you as the defendant to prove your innocence.

Another major policy Nick would be found guilty on, even if somehow he didn't know an ounce of cocaine scattered in various stashes in his own bedroom along with drug paraphernalia everywhere, is "willful blindness." For instance, if a sketchy dude in Tijuana offers you $5,000 to carry a duffel bag across the border, and you don't look in it, and you don't know what's in it, if it turns out it's a few kilos of dope, you don't get to plead innocence, because anyone who's not a complete idiot knows what they're being paid to do.
 
His kids must get constantly taunted and bullied, thanks to his evil hedonistic bullshit.
This is what offends me the most. This stupid crackhead got outed as a degenerate in every part of his family life and his response is this. His children are a burden to him in his own mind since he thinks this is all their fault. It can't possibly be from Nick being a full time crack fiend. Nick certainty wasn't thinking of his kids when he was firing a pipe and banging whores around them constantly. I can't even get started on the eight year old.
 
This is not always true, and is what is called a "rebuttable presumption" when a presumption applies. That means you have the opportunity to prove you didn't know, or couldn't have known.

Almost all crimes since time immemorial require both a mens rea, state of mind, and an actus rei, the actual illegal act. To be guilty of a crime, one must have intentionally committed the act. Someone bringing drugs into your home, if you had no idea they were doing it, doesn't make you guilty, but because of deranged "War on Drugs" policies, may shift the burden to you as the defendant to prove your innocence.

Another major policy Nick would be found guilty on, even if somehow he didn't know an ounce of cocaine scattered in various stashes in his own bedroom along with drug paraphernalia everywhere, is "willful blindness." For instance, if a sketchy dude in Tijuana offers you $5,000 to carry a duffel bag across the border, and you don't look in it, and you don't know what's in it, if it turns out it's a few kilos of dope, you don't get to plead innocence, because anyone who's not a complete idiot knows what they're being paid to do.
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently narrowed the definition of constructive possession. Storing cocaine in his personal safe in his bedroom is indefensible in my opinion, there is no way he can argue it wasn’t his.

State v. Florine Supreme Court of Minnesota Feb 7, 1975

State v. Hunter Court of Appeals of Minnesota. Dec 22, 2014

IMG_9681.jpeg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
This is what offends me the most. This stupid crackhead got outed as a degenerate in every part of his family life and his response is this. His children are a burden to him in his own mind since he thinks this is all their fault. It can't possibly be from Nick being a full time crack fiend. Nick certainty wasn't thinking of his kids when he was firing a pipe and banging whores around them constantly. I can't even get started on the eight year old.
Even single mother homes are much worse for kids than a traditional home where the parents stay together until the kids are adults. Chuck in drugs and open polygamy and it's pretty obvious why those 'Scandinavian prudes' has concerns.
 
"Dominion" being his bedroom and "control" being in a safe he had access to, I assume.


I'm just baffled how he could fight 'literally found with coke' so he might as well just plea out and say he had to to protect his kids. The government railroaded him because it's a conspiracy and there's nothing he could do.
 
His kids must get constantly taunted and bullied, thanks to his evil hedonistic bullshit.

If they haven’t been they definitely will be now. That’s an important thing about being a parent, people need to keep in mind that your behavior gets reflected upon your kids. Can’t imagine the hell the kids experience with “Wow my dad is a cool internet celebrity” to “My dad is is this weird Balldo sex pervert that’s a laughing stock at the internet. All I want is clean clothes and some food”. What did Balldo think when his pastor talked about sins of the father? I know it was probably about cocaine.

Take a vacation from Riot Watch, fren. You've earned it. Save up a couple episodes of MATI to make the drive up and back.

Now that you mention it, I do camping and fishing around Mille Lac Lake. It would be an hour or two away from the court house (I will neither confirm nor deny if I go)
 
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently narrowed the definition of constructive possession.
If it gets to that point he will try to cite it (on appeal after losing) but it is unlikely the judge will somehow ignore this precedent and give faulty jury instructions. I'm pretty sure he had "dominion and control" of stuff lying around in plain sight in his own bedroom.

Also the judge, like most judges, will probably follow the pattern jury instructions that are uniform on specific issues. Thanks to bullshit, Westlaw apparently has the monopoly on these in Minnesota, and I'm not going to pay money to look them up, but I think it's likely they've been amended to address this precedent.
What did Balldo think when his pastor talked about sins of the father? I know it was probably about cocaine.
"Why am I listening to this incel prude pastor talk about that fraud Jesus when I could be smoking crack in Beelzebub's name?"
 
Back