Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[RotPockets]

"What applicant failed to disclose to the Court is that the video he was watching must have been altered from the original"

Shame detective must have been unaware of defendants Odysee channel

One of the easiest video platforms to download from.

The Results of My Appeal Are In! I Wonder How It Went?!
Source: Cuck Queen Cokieta’s Official Odysneed channel

 

[AnOminous]

Regardless of what happens in court, Nick will still claim a win (thinking he can still control the narrative since it wasn't televised) and do that victory lap. It's in his nature.

He can do whatever he likes. We'll still know he bent over and took Johnny Law's load in his Hank Hill ass, and has several years of more ass poundings to look forward to.

So he can enjoy his smug, gay little Joker dance all he likes.

 

[Cimmerian Kang]

is there a chance that rekieta can plead no contest to avoid trial?

I think anyone in Minnesota can at any time. I'm not sure why he would want to. He might ask for it as part of a plea so that he can claim "Well, technically this is a W for me because even though I was convicted by the unjust state I never cucked (figuratively, I did literally, a lot) and admitted that I was guilty."

 

[Captain Manning]

I feel like 'the video could be faked' is a bad argument because a reasonable viewing party would assume the video isn't faked, and thus reasonably presume that drugs were present based on mandatory reports + Nick's public behavior, and thus the warrant is reasonable.

Yes.

But the argument its not even "the video could be faked." Nick, via White, is straight up claiming the video has been altered from the original. In support of that, he cites Cog's logo, which (as @Balldo's Gate points out) is not a watermark, but something that appears when you mouse over the video on Youtube. That is to say, it's not something in the raw video data, but an overlay.

It's a disingenuous argument meant to sow confusion. I expect nothing less from Nick's corner these days.

Nick deleted the best evidence.

So, in your professional opinion, there is no penalty to the State, in terms getting the warrant, if they they used the second best piece of evidence?

EDIT: Because I'm honestly not sure what fuckery might be going on with the Odyssey copy.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Nick deleted the best evidence.

Correct, and if Nick deleted the best evidence, the remedy is....

 

[Particle Bored]

If Nick really wanted a W he would subpoena Metokur himself for that juicy face reveal. That would totally own us!
(only for Jim to show up in his full biolhazard suit)

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Nick deleted the best evidence.

Pretty sure there's no best evidence requirement for a probable cause affidavit in support of a warrant. That would be a trial issue, if it were an issue at all. Nick's argument is equivalent to saying that an audio recording that is broadcast in its entirety on a television news segment could not be used by the police in support of a warrant. Or a social media post that is screenshotted and then republished by someone else could not be used by the police.

It's just dumb, though it doesn't look like there's a published Minnesota case that is exactly on point.

 

[Kyuruma]

I fail to see the point of this filing, is that just because I'm not attorney-brained? Does Nick seriously think the Judge is going to throw every piece of evidence gathered via the warrant (aka the entire criminal case) off of what he claims?

Does this seriously happen? Do small town judges actually throw out heaps of evidence acquired via warrant in cases like these? It just seems like such a faggoty longshot if he expects it to actually work. If he's truly a 5d chess aficionado and this is his only play, Jesus Christ.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick had an 'expert' on his witness list that was on his 3rd or 4th career after drug testing and is currently some YouTube/Social Media guy. His credentials were laughable.

This kind of shit in the field of "expert witnesses" is ridiculously common. Hire some ridiculous quack to spew a bunch of mumbo jumbo in the hopes of confusing the jury. The chiroquacktor testifying about "muh fibromyalgae." The guy who insists all breathalyzers or drug tests are wrong every single time, etc. Even proscutors constantly bring in absolute bullshit "experts."

I don't think it was Twain but someone said "there are liars, damn liars, and expert witnesses."

 

[Null]

Regarding the evidence being altered.

I have two copies that I created of this stream. This one doesn't have a video ident for it so I either created this off of YouTube or acquired it from someone else the day of. It has the coke nose.


Screenshot from the hard copy I have on a computer.


The Kiwi Farms maintains an archive of the Odysee video which is also directly published by Rekieta.

https://no-cookie.kiwifarms.st/archive/Nick%20Rekieta/

https://no-cookie.kiwifarms.st/archive/Nick%20Rekieta/The%20Results%20of%20My%20Appeal%20Are%20In%21%20I%20Wonder%20How%20It%20Went%21%20%5B507add16-669b-47b6-ad32-a6de63dcf577%5D.mp4

The file was downloaded off of a gofile archive sent to me.

 9643  cd Nick\ Rekieta
 9644  ls -l
 9645  yt-dlp https://gofile.io/d/5kcWsN

That Odysee video is now altered. In fact, it looks like a post-arrest video because the pictures are hanging, so he for sure edited this after his arrest. Because Odysee uses LBRY on the blockchain, @Haru Okumura may be able to precisely pinpoint when he edited his claim on this video. This might just be an Odysee player issue. This video actually does show the coke, too.

https://odysee.com/@RekietaLaw:a/the-results-of-my-appeal-are-in!-i:d

It still links to the Rumble VOD in the desc.

Alright! The Results of my appeal are in! Let's see what the Minnesota Court of Appeals has to say on this conflict of laws decision. I bet it goes my way...

FULL STREAM ON RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/v4wgn2z-the-results-of-my-appeal-are-in-i-wonder-how-it-went.html

Additionally, I have myself and my audience watching this and directly looking at the coke nose and commenting on it in real time one day after it was recorded using a direct copy of the footage I still have in my possession.



As you can see in the video, the nose is coked out and the chat sees it. My video is hardcoded with a datestamp as well.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Nick deleted the best evidence.

...And YouTube added a watermark to Cog's reupload.

Which means that Nick is free to go.

You mad, bro?

 

[Oh Darn]

That Odysee video is now altered. In fact, it looks like a post-arrest video because the pictures are hanging, so he for sure edited this after his arrest. Because Odysee uses LBRY on the blockchain, @Haru Okumura may be able to precisely pinpoint when he edited his claim on this video.

What kind of 200IQ move is it to private the (as far as we know) unaltered streams, leave up the Odysee stream, but then modify it in a way that is immediately obvious via the background in the stream/his attire? I am genuinely baffled, is he just counting on the prosecution team, the police department and the court being idiots?

EDIT: It seems like the Odysee thing may have been a bug. On a cursory scrub through the stream, it appears to be unaltered. Honestly though I'm still wondering why he hasn't taken that down if he privated everything else.

 

[Captain Manning]

Does this seriously happen? Do small town judges actually throw out heaps of evidence acquired via warrant in cases like these?

I doubt it. Unless there's a pretty clear Constitutional violation in collecting the evidence. Fischer is also a colleague of the judge on his case now, and I don't think the the standard for probable cause is really as high as Barnes thinks it is. It's called "probable cause," not "absolute certainty." But, as always, INAL.

Part of me thinks the main immediate outcome (other than the case proceeding) if the motion is denied, and the evidence stays in, is that Barnes can scream more about "small town corruption, Nick is innocent!"

 

[George Lucas]

I thought Nicky was taking a plea deal that was already worked out? Why's he fighting to get evidence overturned smart guy?

Because he can. Seriously, 99% of people on this website are complete retards. Just because you will take a deal doesn’t mean you’re not going to try every trick in the book to get a case thrown out before you get to that point.

The criminal justice system exists to put dumb gorilla niggers in prison. Affluent white people only go to prison when they are (a) inconvenient to the political regime or (b) did something really, really stupid with tons of direct evidence to the point that they can’t get out of it or (c) just have boneheaded representation (like representing themselves) or (d) want their ‘day in court’.

Believe it or not, (d) is probably the most common thing that gets people convicted. People think they are special or what they did was justified or just want to tell their story. They have an intrinsic desire to make the truth known and that’s what gets them in prison. But Nick already has a soapbox and has no need to turn his case into a spectacle. Best case he’s going to remain a free man with maybe some minor probationary restrictions.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

All I’m hearing right now is that Ultra Mega Divorce Rape is not just on the table, but potentially sodomizing Nick on the table (it’s using protection so it doesn’t get his gay cancer).

If this ends with Kayla turning on Nick with her getting the houses while Nick has to live in a van down by the river eating government cheese, I will be very happy.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

(Xeet / Archive)

Learn how to read legal arguments kiwifags!

EDIT - Future Spergout:
• Nick publishes a Signal DM between him and Jersh, thinking he's owning Josh (spoiler: he’s not) - Xeet / Archive

Spoiler: Screenshots

 

[Swole McPole]

Correct, and if Nick deleted the best evidence, the remedy is....

This fool is like the most retarded schoolboy who believes he can pull the wool over the eyes of his schoolteachers.

"Oh, my homework was due today? I'll just tell them that my dog ate it. That'll definitely confound them. They'll have never heard that one before."

I hope all those moronic lawstreamers who bestowed the 'lawpope' handle on this cuckold are feeling duly embarrassed at this point in time.

 

[Canard]

Part of me thinks the main immediate outcome (other than the case proceeding) if the motion is denied, and the evidence stays in, is that Barnes can scream more about "small town corruption, Nick is innocent!"

Now I'm wondering how much is their legal tactics about them being able to cry about it on streams for rest of their miserable lives? Trying to make themselves to martyrs...

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

is there a chance that rekieta can plead no contest to avoid trial? on a side note what's with him claming that "he is of Polish descent?

It is a part of his grand master plan to claim we're antisemitic when he reveals he's actually Jewish (Pale of settlement) and gets the Mossad tracking down posters via a bombing spree by the Duvdevan and Kidon, with Mutt posters get arrested with that new law prohibiting antisemitism. Hence why @Null was asking about eletronic-less vehicles and why St. Davis was screeching about running over CIA niggers (Mossad are one and the same).

 

[Jungle Strike]

Here are the parts of Aaron's show cited in Rekieta's motion to dismiss probable cause: