- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
Let's go ahead and debunk a Nick lie that he is arguing right now.

Nick says that the Cop claimed to have watched his video ON his account, but since it was private, that would be impossible (even though he didn't private the video until well after 10 the next day since he was passed out).
Let's look at exactly what the warrant said.

What the cop ACTUALLY said was that he was able to review the video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. Cog's reupload was Nick's video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. If Nick wants to claim that Cog altered it then all he has to do is simply un-private the video and show exactly what Cog changed.
"They said they watched my video" but the ACTUAL statement was "(I) was able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites"
These are two completely different statements. Is he just a lying liar that lies, or is his brain so scrambled that he can't read correctly?
It doesn't matter where the video was viewed, that's irrelevant, but Nick is trying to argue that the cop intentionally lied about where he viewed it when he very clearly did not.

Nick says that the Cop claimed to have watched his video ON his account, but since it was private, that would be impossible (even though he didn't private the video until well after 10 the next day since he was passed out).
Let's look at exactly what the warrant said.

What the cop ACTUALLY said was that he was able to review the video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. Cog's reupload was Nick's video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. If Nick wants to claim that Cog altered it then all he has to do is simply un-private the video and show exactly what Cog changed.
"They said they watched my video" but the ACTUAL statement was "(I) was able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites"
These are two completely different statements. Is he just a lying liar that lies, or is his brain so scrambled that he can't read correctly?
It doesn't matter where the video was viewed, that's irrelevant, but Nick is trying to argue that the cop intentionally lied about where he viewed it when he very clearly did not.