Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.7%

  • Total voters
    349
Let's go ahead and debunk a Nick lie that he is arguing right now.

Screenshot 2024-08-20 204408.png

Nick says that the Cop claimed to have watched his video ON his account, but since it was private, that would be impossible (even though he didn't private the video until well after 10 the next day since he was passed out).

Let's look at exactly what the warrant said.

1724081981558.png

What the cop ACTUALLY said was that he was able to review the video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. Cog's reupload was Nick's video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. If Nick wants to claim that Cog altered it then all he has to do is simply un-private the video and show exactly what Cog changed.

"They said they watched my video" but the ACTUAL statement was "(I) was able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites"

These are two completely different statements. Is he just a lying liar that lies, or is his brain so scrambled that he can't read correctly?

It doesn't matter where the video was viewed, that's irrelevant, but Nick is trying to argue that the cop intentionally lied about where he viewed it when he very clearly did not.
 
"They said they watched my video" but the ACTUAL statement was "(I) was able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites"

These are two completely different statements. Is he just a lying liar that lies, or is his brain so scrambled that he can't read correctly?
I’m starting to believe that Nick doesn’t even understand what was written in his own motion.
 
post-trial kiwifarms meetup and note organization at spurs in wilmar whenever session ends. had a few people ask so I figured I'd post
I'd just be mindful, anyone who attends any meetup even for comparing notes, that Rage Pigs and non practicing lawyers are reading this thread. If anyone tries to start drama with you:

Record it
Do not implicate KF in anything
De-escalate and leave or call the cops if needed.

Be the bigger man / woman. Desperate people will try and leverage your mistakes for their benefit. Don't take the bait.
 
lawyer grandma
They’re the worst. For the ones on KF, I highly recommend the ignore button.

It doesn't matter where the video was viewed, that's irrelevant, but Nick is trying to argue that the cop intentionally lied about where he viewed it when he very clearly did not.
Nick lies like he breathes, and interestingly enough accuses everyone else of lying, constantly. I can’t put into words how hellish his life must be.
 
Is Nick trying to argue that viewing a copy of a livestream is not the same as viewing a livestream?
Yeah, even tho the warrant says they watched the stream on his Youtube account he has mistakenly invented that the reupload by COG is what the police watched and has hinged the entire first part of his case on this false fact
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I think Nick became a lawyer purely so he had some arena where he'd be able to swing his dick around and act like a badass. It's the rich weakling's passive aggressive version of learning martial arts so you can threaten to beat people up.

But like most guys who do the latter, every time he's actually been tested Nick has been folded up like a card table.
 
"They said they watched my video" but the ACTUAL statement was "(I) was able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites"

These are two completely different statements. Is he just a lying liar that lies, or is his brain so scrambled that he can't read correctly?
I’m starting to believe that Nick doesn’t even understand what was written in his own motion.
No, no, no.

This is where it gets good.

Creative writing major Nick and his Barneswalker do not appear to understand sentences constructed with a passive voice.

As far as I can tell, Nick does not intend to argue that Cog edited the video to make Nick look bad.

He's just going to argue that the passively constructed sentence he doesn't understand implies something that it doesn't, namely that the statement that someone "able to review the video that was taken off of Nick's social media sites" means that the person making the statement had to directly view the video on Nick's channel.... which is not at all what it says.

This is facepalm-worthy shit.

But the fact that Nick's on Twitter pre-gloating the day before the hearing makes me think he actually is fully confident it will work.

He's trying to claim that a YouTube GUI-added clickable icon on videos which you can remove with plugins means the video was altered.
It's a ridiculous and retarded point to make.
Upon re-reading the motion, I believe the argument is that he must have seen the logo added as part of the YouTube user interface, which means he had to know it was on Cog's channel and not Rekieta's channel, AND couldn't have known if it was edited further, AND therefore the probable cause is GONE.

But according to the motion itself, Nick hid the evidence. It's not even in dispute!

The next best option is to use a copy which claims to be an accurate copy of the original.
 
Late, but
View attachment 6329606
That is one tacky-ass Michael Kors purse. Which is saying something, because Michael Kors purses are cheap and tacky as a general rule. Guess that's the best you can expect for a Minnesota side bitch.
And it’s sitting right next to the plastic faux-snakeskin boots she picked up at Burlington on the same trip. Anyone could look at this shelf and guess that the balding slut who assembled it has a pussy that stinks like fish.
 
Look at the rust stains in the shower. That would be all through your washing machine and dishwasher too. You'd need to gut the pipes, and probably replace or get some sort of water softening system.
Thats hard water, its not uncommon in certain areas, especially rural areas that use wellwater. It comes about because of minerals in the water. Your clothes would be fine, as would any other use of water, so long as you get it tested for any heavy metals and the like every few years. It also takes a LONG time to build up. Like, years and years, its a very slow process, especially when it gets that bad. Its more a symptom of desperation (not properly cleaning or replacing the tub) than a symptom of serious issues with the plumbing.
 
Semi Off-Topic: Is this the beginning of Kurt’s redemption arc?

I have honestly felt kind of bad for him after Kino Casino uncovered that video of him that he sent in for that dating service or whatever. He seems like a guy who just never really got into a good relationship.
Kurt is actually a smart lawyer, but it's obvious his personal life is a mess and deeply unfulfilling for him.

What he needs to understand (and hopefully is beginning to) is Rekieta has no appreciation for the former anymore ("never a law channel"), and can offer Kurt no help with the latter. Nick is not Kurt's friend. Nick is not anybody's friend. Nick is all about Nick. Kurt's salvation, whatever that is for him, does not lie with Nick.

I didn't blame him too much for getting upset with lawyer grandma talking over him about how he needs to start cold-approaching women on subways, gyms, etc. and cornering them at work instead of continuing the demoralizing but effective dating app grind.
Lawyer grandma?

You mean Megan Fox?

Megan Fox isn't a lawyer. Megan Fox is a dumb blonde bimbo "journalist" in a push up bra and with a suboptimal IQ. Remember, her immediate reaction to Nick's arrest was to tear up and talk about how awful the Kiwi Farms is. This despite the fact her profession entails her earning a paycheck from speculation and muckraking herself. Whereas we do that for free for our own amusement.

I understand how Kurt blowing up at her is cringe (and have said so in the past), but I also equally see how Megan is an annoying cunt and can have that effect on people. I would actually give Kurt a mulligan when it comes to her.

What the cop ACTUALLY said was that he was able to review the video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel. Cog's reupload was Nick's video that was TAKEN OFF OF Nick's channel.
To be perfectly honest with you, I initially interpreted that portion of the warrant application the same way Nick seems to be. Apparently @Himedall All-seeing Waifu read in the same way too. I always assumed they got their copy from Nick's YouTube or Rumble channel before he privated both.

That said, I also see how "taken off" could mean "a copy somewhere else that was taken off Nick's channel."

If the judge could see how both interpretations could apply, I don't see the problem. I don't think the cop lied. None of the lawtubers that have reviewed this thus far seem to think Nick will win on this point.
 
Last edited:
Nicks twitter banner is one of the most ironic things I've ever seen. In the original God and Adam, God is reaching out towards Adam offering his hand. Adam has his arm extended, but his hand is drooped down. It symbolizes the inherent flaws of man, and how Enlightenment is only the flex of a finger away. At least Adam has his arm out-stretched, can you blame a man for doing everything he thinks is necessary?

Adam and God

Baldo on the other hand, is looking at God with a mixture of confusion and contempt. "How dare he disturb me." He has the same expression that a teenager makes when their parents ask them to get off of their phone and come to dinner. God is reaching out to him. Straining to get to him. God is carried by angels down to Baldo's couch and Nick won't so much as raise his hand to meet him.

Nick isn't doing this because he can't help it, he's not doing it because he's unaware of the fruits of higher aims. Nick just thinks he's better then that. He believes that there will be no consequences for his actions and that he really does know better then God himself. This unintentionally explains every flaw in Nick's character. And the funniest part to me is that he thought this picture was so funny that anyone who visits his 150K+ follower twitter would have a chuckle from it.

Baldo on his pony throne
 
Back