The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

in all fairness this is nothing even remotely new
It's not, but the response was.

And instead of watching a thread derail into British people struggling to say "a bottle of water", I would love to see takes on why THAT stabbing was the event that brought down the white man's fury for an evening or two.
 
It's not, but the response was.

And instead of watching a thread derail into British people struggling to say "a bottle of water", I would love to see takes on why THAT stabbing was the event that brought down the white man's fury for an evening or two.
A similar event occurred in Ireland. Small children being targeted specifically is going to earn a lot more ire than, say, children dying incidentally in a general attack. On top of the children being killed, you also had people bringing weapons to a vigil and then the government coming down harder on the protestors in London than they did in Leeds a few weeks prior - it was a blatant difference in treatment between natives being pissed at actual murder vs Gypsies being mad some of their own were arrested.
 
It's not, but the response was.

And instead of watching a thread derail into British people struggling to say "a bottle of water", I would love to see takes on why THAT stabbing was the event that brought down the white man's fury for an evening or two.
It's been explained already. The victims were children and a muslim turned up at the vigil with a knife.
 
This is just retarded wordplay. Statutory rape doesn't exist in most countries, if you fuck a ("consenting") 12 year old you are not raping them in the legal sense. But that doesn't mean the legal system doesn't consider it a crime.
Now if it comes with lesser punishment, that's a different issue, but if something is rape or not technically is perfectly irrelevant.
That's the key thing, it does.

Not all crimes are sentenced the same, but there are guidance categories.

A rape generally hovers around 4 years, though there are various issues with that too. Scotland is "pioneering" jury-less trials, ponder that one...

Sexual assaults on the other hand don't necessarily carry jail time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
The victims were children and a muslim turned up at the vigil with a knife.
Have we got that confirmed yet? I've seen the photos, that he had priors and was on probation, that he was involved before the riot kicked off but I've not seen a name yet. Which I really want so I can try to find what his prior convictions were for since I suspect someone who rocks up to that sort of vigil to threaten people with a knife is pretty damn rancid.

Edit

And instead of watching a thread derail into British people struggling to say "a bottle of water", I would love to see takes on why THAT stabbing was the event that brought down the white man's fury for an evening or two.

Honest answer? Everyone who bought into "muh fair right" being behind these riots might as well believe everything the BBC writes from here onwards because it was a complete fiction.

It was a warm week. Southport was rammed and even post stabbing all sorts of people continued to head there to enjoy the nice weather by the sea. The vigil went as expected and seems to have been fairly calm. The rioters were involved with what happened after and many were the sort of people who turn up to a vigil with booze in hand and will only get more drunk from there. If they had not found a mosque they likely would have targeted something else.

Kier shrieking like an offended toddler after the soft touch used on Leeds or Rochdale when the same happened there inspired some people to organise actual protests over the weekend but those were actual protests and mostly ended long before the people that remained kicked off with the police. Again, same sort of people as kicked of on the Southport one or, if you want to draw a comparison on the other side of things, the many BLM protests that were entirely peaceful and others were largely the sort of people Rittenhouse ran into. They came to the place with booze in hand and would have ended up fighting with one another without other targets. The pissed up gay couple from Liverpool are a prime example. They wandered out of bingo drunk and looking for more booze, bumped into people agitating the police and thought "this looks like fun." The far-right made up maybe 5% if that of these groups and were not really organisers save for likely leading many chants.

Monday things wound down heavily because people had jobs. Tuesday almost nothing happened but suddenly all the news was talking about hundreds of far-right demos on Wednesday. Which basically failed to manifest as various NGOs, charities, government groups and the police claimed victory over protests that were largely invented by them.

This was not the white man's fury. This was a small number of people upgrading their usual batch of weekend violence to do it in a more organised fashion, a larger number of well-intentioned people trying to do actual protesting around them for a brief period over the weekend and then very little else.
 
Last edited:
Labour are speed running fucking up the country because they know they didn't win. They know they're very unpopular and no one wants them and it's only going to take 1 charismatic Torie to wipe them off the map for another 15 years. They also know the Tories won't walk back a single thing they do. So they can completely ravage the country, make it impossible to recover and as soon as they lose power they can keep the goal posts moving so "Stop cutting kids dicks off and defend the border" is never discussed again.
 
How many more people have been killed and raped since the riots?

Seems like every day I'm seeing a new mass stabbing/diversification event.
And yet the riots are never coming back.
The people in charge are still comfy (with the notable exception of starmer having dirt sprinkled on him during a speech).

What made those 3 kids being stabbed so much more notable than any other stabbing?
Or rather, why have the whites of the UK decided that none of these other victims are worth getting uppity over?
They didn't decide none of the other victims were worth it. Quite the contrary, in fact, they were fucking pissed.

Every one of these has been adding up. Every truck of peace, every Rotherham, all increasing the boil by a degree here, two degrees there.

This happening was inevitable. If it wasn't this incident that did it, it'd be another, or still another. Unfortunately for the powers that be, now that it's started, it will never fully stop.

And it won't because the same shitheads responsible for this situation reaching a boil in the first place won't.
 
This did not make it into the highlight reel but it nabbed an archive of the "news" site that claimed it was an asylum seeker who arrived by boat last year who was on an MI-6 watchlist . That article seems the primary source for a lot of the misinformation spread about him being a Muslim initially as well as a few others.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/major-...-casualties-in-southport.196915/post-18962319
The guy running that clickbait site got one click too many:
1724272794151.png
archive


Someone can go dig up the video in question, I find the article funny no matter what.


Good one to watch for the two-tier stuff again
...and the only thing that happened to Prophet Zebediah Al-Obidiah was getting flamed and having to unlist a music vid:
 
This is just retarded wordplay. Statutory rape doesn't exist in most countries, if you fuck a ("consenting") 12 year old you are not raping them in the legal sense. But that doesn't mean the legal system doesn't consider it a crime.
Now if it comes with lesser punishment, that's a different issue, but if something is rape or not technically is perfectly irrelevant.
English law defines rape as penetration with a penis without consent. It’s not wordplay, a woman (unless you believe in clown world gender garbage) literally cannot commit rape in the UK.
 
English law defines rape as penetration with a penis without consent. It’s not wordplay, a woman (unless you believe in clown world gender garbage) literally cannot commit rape in the UK.
Forced penetration is charged under 'Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent' according to section 4 of the 2003 Sexual Offences Act, which is the exact same legislative act that rape is charged under. The potential penalties are the same, if forced penetration is getting lesser sentences it's because judges are choosing to apply lesser sentencing. The judges / social perception is the issue, not what word is used.
 
And lo a wise Protestant from the eastern star:

The ten commandments of Keith:

1. You're not to think you are anything special.

2. You're not to think you are as good as we are.

3. You're not to think you are smarter than we are.

4. You're not to imagine yourself better than we are.

5. You're not to think you know more than we do.

6. You're not to think you are more important than we are.

7. You're not to think you are good at anything.

8. You're not to laugh at us.

9. You're not to think anyone cares about you.

10. You're not to think you can teach us anything.
 
I'm really disappointed in the UK - I was hoping that this Starmer would have folded by now and beaten Liz Truss' record, but it appears it's not to bed. A shame. Socialists should be put to the sword or noose.
 
Lets not kid ourselves, Sargon's UKIP stint was an absolute disaster and probably a gigantic reality check. Internet edgelord turns out gives a lot of clips to get out of context and hammer in the media. What I will give Sargon is that he learned from that and noticed that though he will never have any sort of presence or power in political meatspace, he can definitely go back to his online niche and keep it growing. That he also doesn't interact with any sort of sektur, skeptics or other gay ops specialists also means he isn't constantly getting dragged into drama anymore. I file Sargon as tepid with his classical liberal stint, but he is useful as a gateway to get people thinking "something ain't right" and for some he will be enough, and for others it won't and they'll keep looking for somebody more willing to call a spade a spade.
Sargon thought he could replicate Trump's success but he failed to realize that the establishment and media is the UK are WAY more powerful and corrupt than the USA. At least most Americans know not to trust their journos and that every politician is full of shit. Bri*ish live under the illusion that the state sponsored media cares for their well being, and establishments like the NHS must be protected at all costs.

In some way they pretty much earn what they deserve.
 
I'm really disappointed in the UK - I was hoping that this Starmer would have folded by now and beaten Liz Truss' record, but it appears it's not to bed. A shame. Socialists should be put to the sword or noose.

It's actually relatively difficult to get a standing Prime Minister to resign -- the recent trait of the Conservative Party is actually a super weird period of British Politics.

Who would realistically replace him? That's another main issue. That entire party is one big virtue signalling cucked mess.

Sargon thought he could replicate Trump's success but he failed to realize that the establishment and media is the UK are WAY more powerful and corrupt than the USA. At least most Americans know not to trust their journos and that every politician is full of shit. Bri*ish live under the illusion that the state sponsored media cares for their well being, and establishments like the NHS must be protected at all costs.

In some way they pretty much earn what they deserve.

Most people here don't trust the media either.

Sargon's issue wasn't the media, it was his own actions. Trying to be the Trump or any form of American politician in the UK was never going to result in a good outcome; especially with his Internet history at the time. I was in UKIP at the time and it wasn't the media trying to burn him down - it was the rest of us in the party because he was a pain in the ass at the time and was shitting things up with his annoying as fuck followers.

I remember being in a branch meeting and some of his followers were there. They were obnoxious as fuck; had no real anchor to the reality of politics; and all had fucking weird personalities. The sort of people you wouldn't want anywhere near polling stations or the counting stations because they'd bring nothing but embarrassment. The pseudo-intellectual right wing who spend more time debating the merits of why the left has appeal rather than trying to stop it.

I'm all for free speech without legal consequences, but Sargon at the time was an absolute retard and so far up his own ass that no one in the UK was ever going to take him seriously.

He's much, much better these days, however back then he had zero chances media or not.
 
The riots may be over, but I think we are now past the event horizon of noticing. The regime embargo on perpetrator information over the last few weeks ("Man arrested" etc) is forcing even the comfiest normie/boomers to confront the suppression or seek out alternate news sources. And there has been significant amount of incidents over the last few weeks.

There's a video going around of a foreign chap punching a waitress in the face. Apparently the police visited and declined to pursue it.

tweet re nandos.JPG

I believe a large amount of this noticing is due to womens safety being at risk in such an obvious and constant way. It's kryptonite for the regime.
 
The riots may be over, but I think we are now past the event horizon of noticing. The regime embargo on perpetrator information over the last few weeks ("Man arrested" etc) is forcing even the comfiest normie/boomers to confront the suppression or seek out alternate news sources. And there has been significant amount of incidents over the last few weeks.

There's a video going around of a foreign chap punching a waitress in the face. Apparently the police visited and declined to pursue it.
View attachment 6334479
View attachment 6334482
I believe a large amount of this noticing is due to womens safety being at risk in such an obvious and constant way. It's kryptonite for the regime.

The amount of open anti-government sentiment and pushback against the lefties has never been so high on social media. People are now just actively shitting on immigration and the police now with zero fear. It backfired on Labour. They didn't scare people, they simply made them rethink their methods and gave them a reason to openly talk about previously hushed topics.

The concept of two tier policing was always there in the public lexicon, but now the 4th wall has been broken with it and people can openly see the game of bullshit being played by the state.

The riots were a flashpoint, but they aren't the end.
 
So the UK is sending "wrongthinkers" "far right" people to prisons for years for just "wrongthink" "racism" and "misogyny", where they could be attacked by "Asian gangs" and are unlikely to be given bail? Locking people up like animals in a pound just for words? Was Australia that tyrannical during the coof, or has the UK surpassed that?
 
Sargon thought he could replicate Trump's success but he failed to realize that the establishment and media is the UK are WAY more powerful and corrupt than the USA. At least most Americans know not to trust their journos and that every politician is full of shit. Bri*ish live under the illusion that the state sponsored media cares for their well being, and establishments like the NHS must be protected at all costs.

In some way they pretty much earn what they deserve.
Not just that. Trump was a known figure decades before he went into the presidency. You can smear him all you want, but people knew him so there was dissonance. Nobody that wasn't terminally online knew who Sargon was. Now imagine if instead of Sargon, it was Jeremy Clarke, that would be much closer to Trump. A known media figure in the British sphere known for decades. Hell, it's the same thing that happened with Milei in Argentina. The propaganda machine is always going on all fumes everywhere, but it's much easier to destroy somebody if it's an unknown figure and you can set the narrative day one instead of fighting against decades of history and impressions for the person in question.

It's why I harp on Trump being so important to set the future stage of politics. He can prop up people and it's suddenly not randos, it's somebody that Trump is paying attention to. Or do you think JD Vance would have gotten a fraction of success that he seems to be having today without a nudge and a wink from ol Teflon Don?

Sargon was basically fucked the moment he went into the big leagues and extra fucked because his sphere of influence was a gold mine of soundbites. Some random would have had less trouble than Sargon.
 
Back