US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Sincerely hope Vance does a lit during his vp term, unlike harris. i want him primed and ready for 2028.

He looks like a solid sucessor, and we need to make sure the neocon get utterly devastated after trump is gone
Vance needs to state his plans as VP and what he plans to achieve, reminding people that the VP has a role to play that's not just being a useless wino.
 
Vance needs to state his plans as VP and what he plans to achieve, reminding people that the VP has a role to play that's not just being a useless wino.
What if Vance revolutionizes the office of VP into a more active role in federal government? The Democrats would have two people to try and illegally jail for political reasons.
 
There was never any chance there would be actual disruptions of the convention or inconvenience to the attendants. Antifa has no desire to attack the democratic machine, when they sneer about how democrats are just as bad as the right wing that's just moral grandstanding. The Palestinian mob know that if they step out of line the police will come down on them hard. This is all tightly controlled and if you don't think it is then you underestimate and fail to understand your enemies. But then what else is new with the out-of-touch right, these kids will still just grow out of it once they enter the real world and start paying taxes, right guys??
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Rudolf's Friend
What if Vance revolutionizes the office of VP into a more active role in federal government? The Democrats would have two people to try and illegally jail for political reasons.
what did Mike Pence do while in office (besides betray the nation)? i thought VPs normally did a lot more stuff then Harris did
 
what did Mike Pence do while in office (besides betray the nation)? i thought VPs normally did a lot more stuff then Harris did
Mike Pence did nothing wrong. Refusing to certify the election would have been bonkers.

VPs are instrumental as tie-breaker votes in the Senate and are important for international diplomacy. Pence spent most of his VP tenure visiting other countries in a diplomatic capacity. Picking a good diplomat as VP is a solid strategy, but I think Vance will be more important for Trump as a person who will execute his policies.
19th Ammendment was a bit of a whoopsy doodle, wasn't it?
Not really. Most women voted the same as their husbands. The major "whoospy daisy" was the introduction of birth control. That is, I argue, what lead to absurd abortion policies and the widespread proliferation of wealthy childless wine aunts who substitute meaningful life decisions with politics. I don't have an issue with women choosing not to be mothers and/or choosing to pursue a career, but Marxists co-opted and propagandized this lifestyle into nothing more than being a paypiggy for community organizers.

It's sort of like how black people could have turned into an extraordinarily powerful minority group if they followed the philosophy of Booker T. Washington, but instead they turned into drooling Marxist retards following WEB Du Bois.
 
Mike Pence did nothing wrong. Refusing to certify the election would have been bonkers.
He could have at least made a statement to the effect of "these delegates are from states where there is some legal contestation as to how the election was held. The Supreme Court has been derelict in addressing these legal issues, and so it is with some protest that I recognize the electors that have been sent by the state and dismiss the alternate electors. We must commit to addressing these issues, which the courts have so far refused to touch. The law must be clear, so that we can avoid this sort of chaos in the future."

Just something to signal that people are upset and their grievances have been heard.
 
Not really. Most women voted the same as their husbands. The major "whoospy daisy" was the introduction of birth control [...]
That is a thoughtful and solid answer to my low-effort shitpost and I genuinely appreciate it.

Agreed, politics can and often does become a surrogate for family in childless women, but I would argue that it's not unique to them. I imagine unmarried childless men and married men vote similarly but for different reasons.
 
He could have at least made a statement to the effect of "these delegates are from states where there is some legal contestation as to how the election was held. The Supreme Court has been derelict in addressing these legal issues, and so it is with some protest that I recognize the electors that have been sent by the state and dismiss the alternate electors. We must commit to addressing these issues, which the courts have so far refused to touch. The law must be clear, so that we can avoid this sort of chaos in the future."

Just something to signal that people are upset and their grievances have been heard.
I know that this has been normalized due to Democrats doing it constantly, but doing something "with protest" or "in protest" has very serious implications which can destabilize countries. I understand your point, I do not disagree that legal fuckery happened in 2020, and I think the riots on January 6th are overblown compared to some of the crazy shit Democrats have done during other elections; but you really can't dick around with the peaceful transfer of power at that level.
That is a thoughtful and solid answer to my low-effort shitpost and I genuinely appreciate it.

Agreed, politics can and often does become a surrogate for family in childless women, but I would argue that it's not unique to them. I imagine unmarried childless men and married men vote similarly but for different reasons.
I should say that I'm not in favor of banning the pill, but no one has fully addressed its full consequences for society. If someone tried to seriously discuss this in any mainstream way, they would be tarred and feathered.
Did everyone let the drooling mediocrity of Biden-Pence-Harris make them forget that all of 20 years ago it was a widespread meme that Cheney was basically a shadow president and the VP was extremely involved in executive politics?
It's basically a meme that VPs are useless but, historically, they are actively involved in executing the president's policies. There are a few exceptions like LBJ, but that had more to do with the fact that JFK and his confidantes despised LBJ and did not want him around.
 
The major "whoospy daisy" was the introduction of birth control. That is, I argue, what lead to absurd abortion policies and the widespread proliferation of wealthy childless wine aunts who substitute meaningful life decisions with politics. I don't have an issue with women choosing not to be mothers and/or choosing to pursue a career, but Marxists co-opted and propagandized this lifestyle into nothing more than being a paypiggy for community organizers.
I slightly disagree. Birth control is a symptom of larger cultural decline. I want to say it’s fundamentally rooted in relativism, the notion of everyone living their own truth and no universal moral or natural law. But I’m not yet willing to fully commit to that assertion as the fundamental cause.
But I will commit to that being the root cause of Marxism and liberalism’s ills.
 
How can Democrats delude themselves into thinking it’ll be the end of the world if Trump gets elected? That tactic worked in 2016 but it shouldn’t work now. We’ve all seen what a Trump presidency looks like, and beyond the media going after his throat daily and the covid nonsense forced by the end of his term, it’s not that bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back