Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How can Democrats delude themselves into thinking it’ll be the end of the world if Trump gets elected? That tactic worked in 2016 but it shouldn’t work now. We’ve all seen what a Trump presidency looks like, and beyond the media going after his throat daily and the covid nonsense forced by the end of his term, it’s not that bad.
somehow I don't believe beauty parlor is an unbiased survey, and political polls often have specific groups they surveyTo energize a base of young women and certain boomers presumably. That shit works, if you don’t believe me lurk beauty parlor and see how many said they registered to vote for the first time cause
of roe vs wade. Not even just the terfs but self identified conservatives too. So imagine normie women
As further proof you can look at opinion polls it’s the number one political issue for a good 70% of women
This party has a combined CHA of -5.Preview of speakers for tonight:
View attachment 6335971
We'll see what surprise celebrities might show up, but this so far goes along with the strategy I suspect in which there will be no charismatic figures that'd expose Kamala's lack of charisma by comparison.
Prosecutor wants this to go up the chain. The question is whether it's to try and get a machine gun ban codified in precedent or to do away with it. The case won't effect the election. It's going to be next summer before it hits at least.Expect a mass shooting to occur before November.
View attachment 6336096
View attachment 6336100
View attachment 6336101
View attachment 6336102
tl;dr: A judge actually applied strict scrutiny to the Second Amendment (which is pretty clear, want a gun, yes you can have it, even if it's big black and scary) and the feds didn't even bother trying to make their case, assuming it was just common judicial knowledge they can ban some types of guns. Can you imagine if this gets to SCOTUS and the liberals + female conservatives on the court can't get one of the male conservatives to flip?
I meant more as in party girl/ Ottoman harem girl. She did nude photos, but from how she carries herself I don’t think she’s like the modern Instagram Thot who lets Arab men shit on her for 10K and a Gucci handbag.High end Models are almost always High end escorts. Theres always money to be made being on the arm of some billionaire in Dubai where he can show her off to his friends. And at the same time she gets to shop around for a potential future husband. You think rich and powerful men are going to just have some random girl on their arm? They need security, they need someone willing to sign an NDA. Think of it as hire a girlfriend.![]()
Be honest about it, because Walz isn't. It wasn't "Fertility Treatments," it was the old Turkey Baster approach. Walz has a hard time getting it up for the ladies.View attachment 6335373
Fun fact, did you know it took Walz and his wife 7 rounds of fertility treatments to produce the nebbish monster on the right? Maybe God was telling him not to reproduce for a reason.
Barron, if you're reading this from Japan, make Abe-san's dream come true.Barron 100% reads the farms.
Machine guns are already prohibited by the National Firearms Act and a whole bunch of people are in federal prison right now for having them so there's a ton of precedents.Prosecutor wants this to go up the chain. The question is whether it's to try and get a machine gun ban codified in precedent or to do away with it. The case won't effect the election. It's going to be next summer before it hits at least.
Won't change anything if they do. Like the boy who cried wolf to many times, it only sways those who have already been swayed.Expect a mass shooting to occur before November.
Barrett is a 90s or 80s liberal. She's the speed limit type of "conservative" that conserves nothing. Might as well as call her a liberal, and the rest of that side of the court progressives.Can you imagine if this gets to SCOTUS and the liberals + female conservatives on the court can't get one of the male conservatives to flip?
By the metrics of the US government not having direct control over the various peoples/nations considered as being part of the "US EMPIRE." For example, an empire taxes its holdings. Does the US tax any part of Europe, Africa, or Asia that we supposedly control? Or for another, does the US have direct military control over those areas? Not bases that provide support, but actual control over local militaries? If so, what explains the near decade long push to get NATO members to meet the minimum requirements of 2% GDP defense spending. As they continue to drag their feet on meeting their obligations, even given the "warmongering" of the evil dictator Putin?By what metrics? Define what you consider makes an empire.
Everytime you start to look at things it leads back to the Jews. The Jewish western marxists that fled Germany after Hitler took power. Briefly stopping in Geneva, the birthplace of the WEF before heading to New York. They are everywhere. Even the people you think are the "rebels" are involved.
View attachment 6335281
Nah, I think it's because they're on the ropes legally and with the administration in a rut- I believe they doubt they get much support or even an ear unless there is another totally real giga shooting. Chevron Deference was smacked down just earlier this year - it allowed alphabet agencies to make their own interpretations of laws that they could then enforce at will. Not the case anymore - legally that is.the feds didn't even bother trying to make their case, assuming it was just common judicial knowledge they can ban some types of guns.
Yes. Yes I can. I can imagine as well if this happens after Sotomayor has a catastrophic stroke. It could be amazingCan you imagine if this gets to SCOTUS and the liberals + female conservatives on the court can't get one of the male conservatives to flip?
Machine guns are already prohibited by the National Firearms Act and a whole bunch of people are in federal prison right now for having them so there's a ton of precedents.
Instead of diving head-first into the alluring pile of bullshit you just laid in front of me, a better question came to mind.By the metrics of the US government not having direct control over the various peoples/nations considered as being part of the "US EMPIRE." For example, an empire taxes its holdings. Does the US tax any part of Europe, Africa, or Asia that we supposedly control? Or for another, does the US have direct military control over those areas? Not bases that provide support, but actual control over local militaries? If so, what explains the near decade long push to get NATO members to meet the minimum requirements of 2% GDP defense spending. As they continue to drag their feet on meeting their obligations, even given the "warmongering" of the evil dictator Putin?
When the Britain declared war on Germany, what did India do? Its started raising military units to send to Europe, for the Empire. And not did India do this once, they did it twice, because India was part of the British Empire. Can the Non-US part of NATO even field 3 or 4 divisions right now? Seems strange that when the "imperial capitol" of Washington tells the Europeans to jump, they bicker instead of asking how high.
You dont speak for the peanut gallery.The second sentence in and you're already glazing the eyes of 99% of the population
You know what, you're right. It wasnt 1/10th of 1%. Let's have a look at the numbers and see what it was exactly. In Arizona:Well, wrong, the margin in no battleground was 1/10th of 1% of the votes cast, either in total or specifically for Donald Trump. You're being an angry lazybones child.
A total " this movie isn't made for you" move.So I'm reading that a Harris Campaign spokesperson just sperged out at RFK Jr. amid the rumors of him dropping out to endorse Trump.
The spokesperson said something to the effect of "It's fine if he endorses Trump ... Our campaign is not FOR him. It's for the voters who resonate with our message."
Total amateur hour at the Harris HQ right now. They're openly admitting that the Democrat party isn't for everyone. Good luck swaying some of those independent voters, Kamala ... ? Oof.
Also, I can't wait to hear more bullshit about how Trump is the divisive one here. Gimme a break.
SC precedent in light of Bruen? This is a direct Bruen challenge case and is meant to get the Supreme Court to clarify that part. They deliberately avoided it in the initial ruling.Machine guns are already prohibited by the National Firearms Act and a whole bunch of people are in federal prison right now for having them so there's a ton of precedents.
You realize most nations lose their fucking bananas when the US goes to remove a base? Remember when we thought about reducing in japan and they cried that korea would bomb them?I have one image as answer of this
View attachment 6336072
This is not an empire riiight
You have the biggest military spending for å reason.
That's not tradition. The NFA is FDR era bullshit inspired by gangster movies.Machine guns are already prohibited by the National Firearms Act and a whole bunch of people are in federal prison right now for having them so there's a ton of precedents.