Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
The real point of the Denny’s joke is that some people are so dumb/bored that they will even try to make sense out of a cokehead’s drunk ramblings.
Sure the Denny's joke was dumb and pointless, but the "Mexicans can only spell 'repair'" joke contains deep, esoteric wisdom that finally explains how wearing the balldo isn't gay and how Nick actually didn't poison his child with cocaine.
 
Nick's problem with women is likely from a couple of angles from his childhood, but likely not from the money dynamic.
Good post, I'd add that time when Nick was super retarded and talked about how he'd really want his parents to talk to him more about their sex life and that they finally did for the first time recently. And he said something along the lines "oh cool, and now I know that you guys still like each other". I can't look for that clip now, but there are so obviously some issues there, he sounded like it was a big thing that actually bothered him. I wonder what's the relationship between his parents and how that fucked him up, but I think there's a lot there.
 
The real point of the Denny’s joke is that some people are so dumb/bored that they will even try to make sense out of a cokehead’s drunk ramblings.
there was someone here who had a real good breakdown of what was running through racket's minds for various jokes and lines during the cokestream. I think its interesting since unlike the local junkie schizo at your local train station we have hours of rekieta fucked up trying to piece together wtf he was trying to convey if he wasn't fucked up on both alcohol and coke.

The alcohol makes him nasty and incoherent, the coke makes him flip from thought to thought on a dime. Some stuff is entirely incomprehensible but there's other things where it is possible to stop and try to divine what he's trying to convey or what joke he was trying to make and how the blend of alc/coke blurs whats in his mind in what he says.
 
I think that Nick is pulling his "technically correct" bullshit when he's saying he hasn't changed since he started streaming.

What we see as a gradual decline, I think was Nick slowly introducing us to the real him as more money allowed him and Kayla more freedom.

I was just thinking how much he's changed but then it occurred to me that going to a blacked swinging club with your wife is not something that you do on a whim.

Ralphs comments about Kayla seem more accurate than we first thought. Also Camelots slip ups about Nicks interactons with whores and drugs add up too.

I think one reason why Nick is flipping his shit is because he's now fully lost control of his image. Which is the worst thing for a narcissist. I doubt we'll ever see him leave the internet as he needs to be on top again.

I guarantee these things that will make Nick even worse and will all be the othersides fault entirely according to him.

1. Lose his case.
2. Lose his kids.
3. Kayla or April leave.
 
to be fair, its a 4D chess move from Manning. he did it and Nick gave us that fucking beautiful Dear John stream
To be perfectly fair, I used to believe he was John but with hindsight, I think it's another unrelated user that also suicide baited to Rekieta..

I think his bible studies thing+ his e-daddy-ism made his most frail fans want to John to him.
 
Sounds like he's trying to get the officer in a lie since he saw a restream/copy rather than the original, hoping that'll get the warrant thrown out.

What he's doing is misinterpreting this line from the warrant:

> "Your affiant was able to review the video that was taken off of Nicholas' Youtube and Rumble social media sites...." https://imgur.com/a/rekieta-search-warrant-i98Vydo

Nick is pretending that line means "I watched the video ON Nick's social media sites." He contends that the cop misrepresented that he viewed the original video on Nick's channel, and that the cop did so intentionally to add veracity to the video. That is, he claims the cop thought: "if I admit I watched this on a different channel the judge will never sign my warrant because we can't be sure the video hasn't been altered, so I'm going to lie and say I saw it directly on Nick's channel." Nick claims that's a material misrepresentation, and that the warrant is therefore invalid.

Of course, that's not at all what that line means. The "taken off of" language is an admission by the cop that he viewed the video on a channel that wasn't Nick's, and this interpretation is bolstered by his citing both Youtube and Rumble.

With the argument Nick is trying to make, it doesn't matter whether the clipped portion is accurate or not, as it's the lie that invalidates the warrant. It's a silly argument, but it's all he's got.
 
I don't want to sound like a Nick defender but literally fuck that because Kayla is just as copable if not moreso than Nick. She was posting lewd videos and shit, I don't recall Nick putting a gun to her head for that. She was allowing all this to happen to her kids too. Nick is a wimp and literally everyone knows it so there's no excuse to pretend he was the mastermind here behind everything and Kayla is just some innocent victim.
I'm just speaking from the perspective of her parents. She's a piece of crap who will get hers but healing doesn't start until you cut the dead weight.
 
Not sure if anyone has made the comparison yet but Nick crying about how the video isn't the true and honest version reminds me of one part of the Rittenhouse case centered around a video recording, where the defense challenged as the video was captured on an iPhone which apparently filling in the blanks to make a sharper image only for the judge to rule that it was acceptable. So it feels safe to bet another Minnesotan judge might rule that while the video isn't the original the recording isn't some AI generated deepfake to make Nick look bad.

You know? The state should use that argument and cite the instance in the Rittenhouse case. Just as a final “Fuck You” to Rekeita’s career. Because I think we all watched that exact moment on Dick Lickeita’s streams. It’d be a poetic send off to this entire story.
 
I'll never understand the appeal of that 'raceplay' shit. Like yeah have sex with someone of a different race if you think they're hot or whatever, but making it all about the race aspect is weird. I've never gotten hard thinking about demographic information or haplogroups.
Aha, you just activated Nick's trap card.
It's WEIRD that you think it's about BLACK bulls fucking Kayla (it is, white people in the north have this weird obsession about non-White men fucking their women as a form of embarassment).
 
x123.png

Given that Nick chose to focus primarily on the Franks argument in his motion, it suggests to me that he was likely the one who wrote it.
He seems to take disagreements over the validity of the Franks argument by his fellow lawyers—though practicing ones—quite personally.

I wonder if even White thought this argument was weak, considering how offended Nick appears to be by anyone disagreeing with it. 🤔

Xeets / Archives: (X1 , A1 | X2 , A2 | X3 , A3)
 
What are the odds of Rekieta deciding to reward Ethan’s loyalty with some pussy? And picks sweet Kayla for the job, since April is his newest toy and he doesn’t want anyone else to play with it.

Ralph’s super potent swine semen then gets Kayla pregnant, and Nick ends up legally tied with the Ralphamale for the next 18 years?

Truly a horrific fate that Nick would deserve.
Kayla going from Blacked to Oinked, how the Qover has fallen.
 
Given that Nick chose to focus primarily on the Franks argument in his motion, it suggests to me that he was likely the one who wrote it.
He seems to take disagreements over the validity of the Franks argument by his fellow lawyers—though practicing ones—quite personally.
Sean (Potentially Criminal) talked about this on stream during his review, Nick's argument in his brief barely mentioned Franks (listed once, never directly cited). They (/Nick/White) spend most of the time whining about Miranda stuff for April.
 
I as a prosecutor have an ethical obligation NOT to lie, I have an ethical obligation NOT to prosecute cases I don't think I should be prosecution in good faith. He's about as obnoxious as a sovcit at this point.
Nick is a faggot but let’s not pretend the system or prosecutors actually work like that. The Rittenhouse trial, which I assume most here are familiar with, proves ‘ethical obligation’ is a nonsense term.
 
Nick's argument in his brief barely mentioned Franks (listed once, never directly cited). They (/Nick/White) spend most of the time whining about Miranda stuff for April.
Yes, and that's why I think Nick wrote the Franks part, and White included it due to his client's insistence.
You’d think the argument you spend the most time on would be the one you believe is the strongest.
Why is there so little focus on Franks in the motion, but so much attention given to it on his social media?
I think Nick wrote it and is angry that people find the argument stupid. Narcissistic ego and all that.

Nick is a faggot but let’s not pretend the system or prosecutors actually work like that. The Rittenhouse trial, which I assume most here are familiar with, proves ‘ethical obligation’ is a nonsense term.
You work hard and ethically because you take your profession seriously. Then some people, who you don’t even think meet the minimum criteria for your profession, do something stupid, and suddenly everyone is seen as rotten. When it comes to a group of individuals, one rotten apple shouldn’t spoil the whole barrel. But that’s often how the public perceives it. Such is life.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6338914

Given that Nick chose to focus primarily on the Franks argument in his motion, it suggests to me that he was likely the one who wrote it.
He seems to take disagreements over the validity of the Franks argument by his fellow lawyers—though practicing ones—quite personally.

I wonder if even White thought this argument was weak, considering how offended Nick appears to be by anyone disagreeing with it. 🤔

Xeets / Archives: (X1 , A1 | X2 , A2 | X3 , A3)
I agree with Nick. His attorney is absolutely shit for writing this. They must be siding with the government with this utterly retarded play. It's borderline malpractice.

Poor Nick, having to defend this absolutely sloppy work. :^)
 
The last time Rekieta smelled a woman (April) so did everyone else in a radius of 20m.
Who the fuck talks in public about "smelling women"?! WTAF. How does Nick have five kids and two lovers while sounding like a fourteen year old virgin?

(I'm not insulting @Midnight Energy Drink here, he's just making fun of Rekieta's "smelling women" comment too.)

Captain Manning said:
Well, at the risk of being accused of "simping," I'll simply say she looks like a very nice young lady. I particularly like the confidence she exudes while smiling and waving to the felted ragepig. I don't think it's out of line or cringe to say all that. I think that's entirely reasonable. May @Lidl Drip or any other wahman respector smack me if I'm wrong.

Also, she doesn't look like a horse (Ralph's type). so of course Ralph is gonna talk mad shit about her. She might even be taller than him.
To be honest, I don't see how Manning's post was that embarassing. It's simping for her but it's ultimately just an insulting contrast between her and the sweating, quadruple maleboobed ragepig filming her hoping for xitter engagement. Dick just made up a quote there, and correctly assumed that no one who reads his tweets has the attention span to read that screenshot.
Somewhat agree.

Nick tags in Ralph to try to counter the Farms. Instead of cowering in fear, a young lady confidently smiles and waves to Ralph even when he's taking a picture of her to try and dox her. @Captain Manning didn't say something to hit on her, he just pointed out how she smacked down the ragepig. That's not embarrassing or simping.

"I like the confidence in her boobies." Wow Dax, that's the best middle school insult I've heard from you yet. I'll take feedback from the guy who enjoys getting pegged in the ass while dressed as a cow.
 
Nick's problem with women is likely from a couple of angles from his childhood, but likely not from the money dynamic.
Excellent post! One important detail is missing: Celeste worked outside the home for most, if not all, of Nick's childhood. I’d love to provide specific sources for this information, but I’d prefer not to sift through countless hours of streams to find it. Nevertheless, I know this to be true because Nick has mentioned it several times. He has talked about the extensive time he spent gaming and later watching porn on his computer in his bedroom with minimal supervision.

Why does this matter? Research indicates that boys with working mothers may experience less favorable outcomes compared to girls with working mothers
Why is that relevant? It appears that research generally indicates that girls with working mothers tend to fare better compared to those with stay-at-home moms, with outcomes measured in terms of education, employment, and income. Diving into this topic can be quite complex. From a feminist perspective, the data usually highlights the benefits for daughters and downplays any negative effects on boys, and there are some. On the flip side, some qualitative studies, often with conservative or religious biases, suggest that boys might be negatively impacted when both parents are employed. These perspectives are particularly noted within some conservative Black communities.
The key point regarding Nick is that he appears to have overcompensated in several significant ways. He made a family with not just one, but two stay-at-home parents, a heightened focus on religion, and a move to a rural town. Additionally, he married a conservative woman who wanted eight children.

How's that workin' out for you, buddy?
 
What he's doing is misinterpreting this line from the warrant:

> "Your affiant was able to review the video that was taken off of Nicholas' Youtube and Rumble social media sites...." https://imgur.com/a/rekieta-search-warrant-i98Vydo

Nick is pretending that line means "I watched the video ON Nick's social media sites." He contends that the cop misrepresented that he viewed the original video on Nick's channel, and that the cop did so intentionally to add veracity to the video. That is, he claims the cop thought: "if I admit I watched this on a different channel the judge will never sign my warrant because we can't be sure the video hasn't been altered, so I'm going to lie and say I saw it directly on Nick's channel." Nick claims that's a material misrepresentation, and that the warrant is therefore invalid.

Of course, that's not at all what that line means. The "taken off of" language is an admission by the cop that he viewed the video on a channel that wasn't Nick's, and this interpretation is bolstered by his citing both Youtube and Rumble.

With the argument Nick is trying to make, it doesn't matter whether the clipped portion is accurate or not, as it's the lie that invalidates the warrant. It's a silly argument, but it's all he's got.
Yeah this is completely the right take on Rackets' argument. There's no way in hell the phrase 'taken off of' implies the cop is saying he viewed it on those channels, it's much more strongly implying the opposite. Nick must have misremembered the wording of the warrant to pursue this argument this far because it's just.. self refuting in context.
 
Back