Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[redacted_name]

EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive.

Surely this is another example of Rekieta starting rumours to impugn the reputation of the local police that is relevant to the release of the body cam, and is relevant to @Null 's motion.

 

[LiquidKid]

Is there a reason why the judge wouldn't just say, 'OK Mr Rekieta. You claim the video this man watched misrepresents your behaviour online somehow? Let's see the original and we'll decide whether there is a material difference between the content he viewed and the content you claim to have streamed live?'

His argument is that Because the cop couldn’t have had the exact original video, he couldn’t possibly have justifiable probably cause to ask for a warrant because he couldn’t possibly know if it was edited or not, and that the existence of Cog’s watermark implies digital manipulation.

It’s quite honestly the dumbest argument made only dumber by him thinking the police were using Aaron as the “concerned citizen.”

Honestly I think the funniest outcome at this point is for the state’s response to leave the judge saying “I change my mind, April’s comments can be used in the body cam.”

 

[SlavSquater]

Someone should ask balldo in a superchat what criticisms he has of ralph or if ralph has done anything wrong in the past so the pig rages at him and drops more details about their DMs.

Anyone who gives money to a wet-brained cuck like Balldo is a legit retard. This isn't DSP or Wings. Cuckieta coked up his daughter. The only thing he deserves to get is TBD.

 

[Sretan Božo]

Really shows that he learned his gay "I never said that, I just explicitly implied it" bullshit from law school.

Not surprising at all. My dad was a lawyer. He always said that lawyers were the lowest form of life on earth. The scummiest of scumbags. Ended up in a govt. Job prosecuting Medicaid fraud cause he just couldn't bring himself to do slimy enough shit to be a big time normal lawyer. Used to also say that judges were just the top tier egregious douche bags, happier with themselves than a faggot in a dick tree.

 

[Mouse Cop]

Police rubbed cocaine into his daughter's hair

That doesn't work though because that particular test shows evidence of cocaine ingestion, not simply exposure. Rubbing it into your hair would not produce a positive result. He really has no leg to stand on for that particular claim, and he nose it. I think his current cope is that the person who read the test results was not qualified to do so.

 

[AnOminous]

I love that point in the motion. "He could have subpoenaed Alphabet!" yeah ok how long does that take? Weeks?

They're not going to do that before getting a warrant, and there's absolutely no reason they would. They might (and probably should) before trial, when the strict rules of evidence actually matter. Also why subpoena Alphabet when they can subpoena Nick?

If he says "suckers I destroyed the original" then just add on charges for obstruction of justice/destruction of evidence.

I am fairly sure the ruling was that the suspect said, 'Well, I should probably get a lawyer then, dawg', and the ruling was that the 'probably' was not a forceful enough assertion of right to representation.

Nope.

I know that I didn’t do it, so why don’t you just give me a lawyer dog ‘cause this is not what’s up.

That's not ambiguous unless you're playing Nick level word games.

 

[just Reading a post]

That doesn't work though because that particular test shows evidence of cocaine ingestion, not simply exposure. Rubbing it into your hair would not produce a positive result. He really has no leg to stand on for that particular claim, and he nose it. I think his current cope is that the person who read the test results was not qualified to do so.

You know reading his really big brain legal arguments as to why he is not a coked up drug addict who was not feeding his kids. Makes me think how the prestige of passing a legal bar exam to become a licenced lawyer has gone down to the same level of a ranting crackhead on the street.
I really do hope he is just gayfabing on twitter about this, and not instructing his real legal case on this.

 

[Fapcop]

what matters is that pomplum "lied" about watching nick's own video rather than cog's (or whomever's) potentially inaccurate re-upload. it's about which video he watched vs. which video he claimed he watched, not whether the videos are actually different.

Hard disagree.

Nick’s entire argument rests on a very specific interpretation of what was written, that doesn’t really stand up to reality.

He’s trying to film flam the judge in the same way he gaslights his audience.

And if it won’t work, as is my guess, it leaves Nick free to say: “The police lied AND THE JUDGE DIDNT CARE AND LET THEM!”

 

[Lidl Drip]

what matters is that pomplum "lied" about watching nick's own video rather than cog's (or whomever's) potentially inaccurate re-upload. it's about which video he watched vs. which video he claimed he watched, not whether the videos are actually different.

Not saying where he watched the video isn't a lie. Nick is trying to argue that just because his video was uploaded somewhere else it's not "THE" video anymore, which is dumb because it's the exact same video with the exact same content. It is THE video. Someone made the comparison earlier to "I watched the new spiderman movie in theatre" isn't a lie because "uhhh akshually that is just a copy of the actual original film roll the movie theatre received, why would you lie and say you watched Spiderman when you actually just watched a copy?!". He didn't say "I watched the original video on Nick's channel" he just says "I was able to watch the video after it was removed from Nick's channel". Arguing the semantics of this sentence is absolute desperation and retarded.

he also ""lied""" that nick took the videos off the Internet, when he really just privated them.

Who cares? It would only be a lie if he knew that the video was actually privated instead of taken down which he has no way of knowing. You can't lie about something you don't know.

did he knowingly watch a potentially dubious copy of the video and base the search warrant application on that when he could have just watched the original but, in a reckless disregard for the truth, chose not to?

No.

 

[Pelican Bones]

Cuckieta coked up his daughter.

Tbh I believe Nick when he says he didn't intentionally/unintentionally poison his kid with coke.

It's infinitely more likely that the 8 yo was up until 3 am in the living room every night listening to "Eminence Front" by The Who full blast on the HiFi while ripping lines off the coffee table.

Maybe Pomplun grabbed a handful of cocaine metabolites out of his "Frame Nick Rekieta" evidence bag and threw it at the kid when no one was looking.

Maybe Kayla drugged her to frame Nick for child neglect so she could collect his trust and run off with Aaron.

It's too bad you kiwifags don't know the full story. It's not your fault that you don't, though. Nick wishes he could tell you.

 

[datura_binge]

Lieing cops, corrupt judges, this whole country is starting to scream injustice. The public needs to know if our government officials are ruining the lived of citizens, just because they don't like them.

This right here is why I feel like his arguments are non-starters. The first thing he did was start claiming it was all a government set up by a bunch of liars faking evidence.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

what matters is that pomplum "lied" about watching nick's own video rather than cog's (or whomever's) potentially inaccurate re-upload. it's about which video he watched vs. which video he claimed he watched, not whether the videos are actually different.

Where the fuck are you getting any of this (other than Nick's fantasies)? The warrant does not say "I watched the suspect's video on the suspect's YouTube channel," it says:

"On 5/22/2024, lmholte did a video blog where he talked about Nicholas and insinuated controlled substance use and also referenced a video blog the Nicholas put online on 5/21/2024 that had since been taken off the internet. lmholte indicates in this blog that Nicholas needs help and and needs to get help for his kids because of his substance abuse. lmholte points out a time in the video where Nicholas has a white powdery substance on his nose. On 5/22/2024, Your Affiant was able to review the video that was taken off of Nicholas' YouTube and Rumble social media sites. The video is from 5/21/2024 and is of Nicholas in his basement studio talking about a court appeals ruling he lost."

Are you being purposefully retarded when you write "pomplum 'lied' about watching nick's own video"? Where does Pomplum say any of that? He said he saw a video of Aaron talking about Nick abusing drugs and referencing a video of Nick's from the day before. He says he was able to review the video. He says the video was taken off of Nick's YouTube and Rumble pages. All of those are true, unless you're retardedly fellating Nick by torturously reading "taken off" as denoting where the officer viewed the video.

Where the fuck does he lie about the video being a reupload or original upload? You and Nick are blowing up about the "video he claimed he watched" when he never claimed to have done the things that you're saying is a lie.

he also ""lied""" that nick took the videos off the Internet, when he really just privated them.

Again, are you purposefully being retarded? Let's put aside the absolute retardation that Nick privating the videos is totally different from deleting them to a third party observer. Pomplum writes the video "was taken off of Nicholas' YouTube and Rumble social media sites." Was the video not taken off them? Can you go to his YouTube or Rumble and find it? No, you can't, because it was taken off, whether by deletion or privating; it's not publicly accessible.

Where's the fucking lie? Nowhere.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

"I don't control April"
>She follows Balldo around like a dog on a leash

- follows Balldo around like a dog on a leash
- lives in Balldo bunker
- wears Kayla's clothes
- gets dicked balldod by Nick
- snorts Nick's coke
- is employed by Nick according to Nick
(insert Nick's comment if she's his puppet)

At this point you could ask if he controls her socials - but I don't think it's necessary, she probably makes everything to make him happy anyway

The fact nick set his stream to private is a testament as to how bad it really is.

View attachment 6343217

Lucky for nick the internet is forever I grabbed a version on 21st of may, I'm certain many others grabbed a local copy.

I downloaded it directly into my shared folder so I have it on all my devices.

Someone should ask balldo in a superchat what criticisms he has of ralph or if ralph has done anything wrong in the past so the pig rages at him and drops more details about their DMs.

'You should ask him. [pause] [stupid laugh] [pause] [snarky comment] [big gulp of 'tea']' - here. Don't give him money.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

It's a drop dead argument because it lacks any of the other elements that would justify invalidating a search warrant. Let's just assume for the sake of argument that the cop did indeed deliberately lie.

Nick's shitty filing is bereft of any argument whatsoever that he lied
a) about a material fact
b) necessary to probable cause

Nevermind that even the argument that he "lied" at all, or even acted with a "reckless disregard for the truth" is piss-weak.

He's trying to argue for invalidating the search warrant without meeting a single element of the standard for doing so.

Yes, exactly. Which is why I went off yesterday about his bad faith.

will the judge buy either argument and toss the warrant? i dunno. nobody does, actually.

Is this whole comment (I just clipped the end in order to reply) tongue-in-cheek? Because these "arguments" are stupid af - they're insufficient in themselves to invalidate the warrant. They are just, as I've said, a mechanism to get to another discussion/ hearing/ pointless exercise. Because, as @Anomimous made clearer than I did, even if the cop "lied" (he didn't), the asserted gap between reality and what was stated (and I don't concede there is one) is immaterial. Distinction without a difference.

 

[Total Annihilation]

That's a rough ass 29 years old, definitely on worldoftshirt level.

I would’ve guessed mid 40s.
Which isn’t too surprising, given all the booze and debauchery going on with Rackets.

 

[The Tall Man]

New Instagram post.
View attachment 6341638
I think Nick’s arc of moving to LA to be with his Internet Daddy Juju the Cow is becoming more likely by the day.

A lot of American culture and history is infused into this structure.

This is true and it should make you sad if you are an American.

 

[Mister Friendly Dude]

So wait... It's just Nick and April at the event? Is Kayla getting Gunt'd?

 

[Bepis]

Tbh I believe Nick when he says he didn't intentionally/unintentionally poison his kid with coke.

It's infinitely more likely that the 8 yo was up until 3 am in the living room every night listening to "Eminence Front" by The Who full blast on the HiFi while ripping lines off the coffee table.

Maybe Pomplun grabbed a handful of cocaine metabolites out of his "Frame Nick Rekieta" evidence bag and threw it at the kid when no one was looking.

Maybe Kayla drugged her to frame Nick for child neglect so she could collect his trust and run off with Aaron.

It's too bad you kiwifags don't know the full story. It's not your fault that you don't, though. Nick wishes he could tell you.

But have you considered that it wasn't even Nick who was on the cokestream? Aaron paid off the kids with spaghettios to let him in after Nick passed out so he could put on a masterful disguise and do a stream in Nick's place.

 

[Total Annihilation]

So wait... It's just Nick and April at the event? Is Kayla getting Gunt'd?

This is just a wild guess, but I do wonder if Null's evil thought is that Rackets will eventually throw his wife under the bus in order to get off scot free and continue his degeneracy with April. Or it's possible he'll throw both of them under eventually once he finds another younger gal to get with (in my headcannon he'll run off with JuJu to form a polycube with Vito).

 

[Journoscum]

Huh? You don’t bring your live-in nanny to art events while someone else takes care of your children? That’s weird.
What are you, some kind of Scandinavian prude?

I have my live-in nanny sit in a corner and we stare at each other for hours at a time while I stream.